ObamaCare Sinks Like A Stone

From the moment the Democrats began nailing together their Frankenstein socialized medicine bill, the vast majority of Americans rebelled against it. From the Tea Party revolt to the raucous town hall meetings to the 2009 and 2010 Republican victories in Congress and governorships and state houses around the nation, Americans held up their collective hand and said, "Enough!"

President Obama and the Democrats didn't care what the people they're supposed to represent wanted. They steamed ahead, ramming through ObamaCare on a strictly party-line vote and patting themselves on the back for seizing more freedom from the American people.

From the start, ObamaCare has polled badly. Many more people opposed it than supported it. And a big majority always supported its full repeal.

Today, the Washington Post and ABC News released a new poll showing opposition to ObamaCare at a record high (at least for their polling) 53%. Support for it is at a record low of 39%.

The reason for this is two-fold: contrary to the Democrats' hope that the more we saw of this monstrosity, the more we'd like it, the more we see of it (its massive new taxes and regulations, its rationing, its unaccountable government control, its costs, its restrictions on access, its overall destruction of health care), the more we hate it.

And the second reason is that we heard the arguments before the Supreme Court. Even the administration's own lawyers had no real defense for it. The very fact that it's before the Supreme Court is reason enough for most thinking people to realize that ObamaCare is a giant, freedom-sucking, unconstitutional, socialist stinkbomb.

If the Supreme Court doesn't kill it, then we must drive a stake through its heart by electing a Republican president and Congress to strangle this anti-American piece of legislative garbage once and for all.

Comments

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Floppy has ALWAYS been a Conservative propagandist.

he's the REAL 24/7 on the memo.

Don't have to speak the truth. Just say SOMETING. Say it long enough and people will believe it.

Remember, his idol, Goebbels said,"We MADE the Reich on Propaganda."

[DJ]

G-man said: "Deal with it, DJ. And I ask you again, please. Never confuse Donald with Willard."

DJ says: I never did. I simply pointed out that Trump was hounded our of his presidential bid before it got started. And the reason for that is he attacked Obama on the birth certificate issue. Moreover, the last thing Romney needs to do is repeat Trump's mistake(s).

Again let me remind you how the MSM hyenas attacked Trump. Here, I even googled it for you: Obama birth certificate Trump racist: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS454US454&q=obama+birth+cirtificate+trump+rasist

Deal with it, Gringoman.

G-man wrote: "True, he now supports Willard. He knows which way the wind is blowing."

DJ says: Trump being the smart man he is, realized Willard is the best the G.O.P has to offer this time around -- just like most everyone else sans Todd Palin and Gringoman.

G-man said: "But maybe I'm the only one who recalls how he previously described Willard contemptuously as "a small businessman"?"

DJ says: Big deal! Twas nothing more than typical Trump bragadosio - not meant to be contemptuous. Besides, Trump made that remark during the time when he was considering jumping into the race. So, of course, he wouldn't say anything to build up his potential opponent, now would he? Of course not; on the contrary, he'd want to diminish his opponent. But of course you should already know that, right?

[ElGringoman]

DJ says: Trump being the smart man he is, realized Willard is the best the G.O.P has to offer this time around -- just like most everyone else sans Todd Palin and Gringoman.
-----------

DJ can say but that doesn't make it true.

Willard squeaked by in the primaries because that is what Wall St wanted.
He outspend all his challengers 100-1 in negative ads AND more importantly Wall St paid Gingrich to be a stalking horse dividing the right wing populist vote.
So much so that Willard really won nothing if you add the divided right wing conservative votes together.

DJ, you and your esteemed friends from the trailer park have just been snookered by Wall St yet again. Willard is not the "best thing the GOP has to offer this time around". He is the product of the loaded dice and represents only one substantive between himself and the President: skin color.

No need to pontificate on the issues that don't exist and the ones you don't believe in anyway.
You are down with RINO Romney because he's white. All the Marxist jibjab about Obama I read here flies in the face of the cool Billion bucks collected by the President from the Wall St Banks. Romney will rake in that amount from the banks too.
Your rationalizations here don't even fool a fool like you.
---------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans: We're old, we're white, and we want out country back.

[DJ]

"He is the product of the loaded dice and represents only one substantive between himself and the President: skin color."

----------

Not so mofo!

But I come to expect that type of shallow thinking from a crazed black-ghetto dweller like yourself.

[DJ]

Let's take a look at how the remaining candidates compare on immigration issues:

2012 Presidential Hopefuls' Immigration Stances

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/2012-presidential-hopefuls-immigration-stances.html

--

Yes, it's evident that the "liberal" Willard is MUCH better than the "conservative" Newt on that score. Not even close!

Are you a closet liberal, Gringoman?

If not, how can you justify your continued support for a treason lobbyist like Newt?

[TheDauntlessC]

IRREGULARS: The rich pay the most because they make most of the income!

Not disputing that; we know that, but good job, Sherlock. You proved part of my point. Can you pronounce "progressive tax"?

IRREGULARS: The top 1% have gone from pre-depression of making 23% of the income, then from about 1950-1979 they made 8-10%. Now, they make 24%.

And...your point? Why does that matter? The last time I checked, it is not illegal to be a millionaire or billionaire, now is it? They earned their keep. They learned how to invest, hedge otherwise manage their money in a smart way. They have their money in all kinds of investments. Can you say "capital investments"? Learn what it means. High taxes affects economic behavior. We have wealthy people with offshore tax shelter accounts? Why? because of class envy types like you and obama whose soul mantra is "soak the rich". All that capital the YOU and YOUR ILK is forced off shore where it could be here in the USA as capital investments. You fail ECON 101. Grade F

IRREGULARS blabbed: While many of those who pay 0 taxes, is because of deductions that the government allows them.

That is an exception than the rule. The numbers are small for the wealthy that have zero tax on their 1040. However, their are far, far more of low income who pay nothing. From the IRS (the pdf I posted):

The top 1 percent of taxpayers, with an approximate average AGI of $960,000 counted for 16.9 percent of AGI.
- The top 10 percent of taxpayers, with an approximate average AGI of $245,000, accounted for 43.2 percent of AGI.
- The bottom 50 percent of taxpayers, with an approximate average AGI of $15,000, accounted for 13.5 percent of AGI.
- For returns reporting positive adjusted gross income, the top 1 percent of taxpayers had an average tax rate of 24 percent; the top 10 percent of taxpayers had an average tax rate of 18.1 percent; and the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers had an average tax rate of 1.9 percent.

Nothing has divided us like the 16th amendment back in the racist/progressive W. Wilson days. I never understand why liberal goons whine and cry over discrimination of race, creed,color,sex yet....they don't hesitate to discriminate against someone base on their income bracket by a progressive income tax and demonizing them with slogans like "soak the rich!!' That was FDR's mantra and he CAUSED the Great Depression.

http://www.mackinac.org/4013.

obamarx is most faithful to FDR.

[Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com]

test

[ElGringoman]

I'm on record that I will probably vote for Willard, even if I have to wear a gas mask-GRINGOMAN
------------

Could you photograph yourself wearing the gas mask..maybe with doughboys helmet or the Kaiser's variation of it, the one with the spike sticking atop the helmet crown and then post it as your avatar? "Trench Warriors for Romney".

It would show just how reluctant you are to support Willard when in fact you are gleefully voting against the President.
So to drive home your disgust with the RINO the gas mask photo is a nice touch especially if you get get some smoke in the picture too. Maybe some dry ice in a bucket of water... then you, the gas mask, and SNAP the photo

BTW: Of course you'll vote for Willard. He's the white corporate candidate.
It really makes zero difference if you do or you don't unless you live in a swing state. In that case you'd be a real swinger. Hey, how about a chorus or two of "Over There" when you don the gasmask.

The Yanks are coming. Yes, the Yanks are coming.
And we won't go home 'til we finish over there!

--------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans: We're old, we're white, and we want our country back.

[Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com]

test

[Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com]

TEST

[WowZER]

Will America re-elect an IGNORAMOUS?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45996

[xbjllb]

Cannot WAIT until tax rates on the rich are back to 1950 levels.

That should cut down the crap around here significantly.

[xbjllb]

"Will America re-elect an IGNORAMOUS?[SIC'" - wowzer

Why not? They "elected" Bush "twice", didn't they?

And hey, Genius.... it's spelled IGNORAMUS.

[xbjllb]

"Test" - The DauntlessConservativeSpammer

Testes.

[xbjllb]

"TEST" - TheDauntlessConservativeSpammer

TESTICLES

[xbjllb]

I love how the truly lost and brainless argue AS IF Obama had any chance of losing.