ObamaCare Sinks Like A Stone

From the moment the Democrats began nailing together their Frankenstein socialized medicine bill, the vast majority of Americans rebelled against it. From the Tea Party revolt to the raucous town hall meetings to the 2009 and 2010 Republican victories in Congress and governorships and state houses around the nation, Americans held up their collective hand and said, "Enough!"

President Obama and the Democrats didn't care what the people they're supposed to represent wanted. They steamed ahead, ramming through ObamaCare on a strictly party-line vote and patting themselves on the back for seizing more freedom from the American people.

From the start, ObamaCare has polled badly. Many more people opposed it than supported it. And a big majority always supported its full repeal.

Today, the Washington Post and ABC News released a new poll showing opposition to ObamaCare at a record high (at least for their polling) 53%. Support for it is at a record low of 39%.

The reason for this is two-fold: contrary to the Democrats' hope that the more we saw of this monstrosity, the more we'd like it, the more we see of it (its massive new taxes and regulations, its rationing, its unaccountable government control, its costs, its restrictions on access, its overall destruction of health care), the more we hate it.

And the second reason is that we heard the arguments before the Supreme Court. Even the administration's own lawyers had no real defense for it. The very fact that it's before the Supreme Court is reason enough for most thinking people to realize that ObamaCare is a giant, freedom-sucking, unconstitutional, socialist stinkbomb.

If the Supreme Court doesn't kill it, then we must drive a stake through its heart by electing a Republican president and Congress to strangle this anti-American piece of legislative garbage once and for all.

Comments

[LongRifle]

Electing a Republican Congress will assure us that the top 1% will be protected, while the lower 50% (or more) will be taxed to death to pay for their welfare programs like otherwise uninsurable beach-front homes...
It will also ensure more privacy and rights being lost. More freedom, privacy, and rights were killed under Bush than any other ten Presidents. More unwanted children with less assistance, less unemployment, Social Security raped, etc., etc...

BYW Monica, you can stop selling the anti-Obamacare crap. The SCOTUS will take care of it. No use beating a dead horse.

[Brian]

We just don't understand the Pres. Harvard is taking care of that by offering a new course called "Understanding Obama". Let's understand the President.

[Brian]

Ms Pelosi's comments are certainly ringing true:"...we must pass the bill to find out what is in it..." WOW!

[JohN]

Sorry Longrifle, the lower 50% pay almost zero income taxes...You, sir, are allowed to have your own opinions but not facts.

[Sthomp13]

You put into words the way I feel well! Thank You for the work you do to reveal whats behind the left's agenda.

[ibaconi]

The left and the right both have the same agenda, more government, although they do differ somewhat in what they want this ever expanding monster to do.

[SteveSellsRE4U]

Couldn't agree more! I love your bold remarks in these troubling times. We need more like you and more listening to what we're saying.

[xbjllb]

There you go again. More than half of the disapproval of "ObamaCare" was from the left because there was no public option to compete with Big Insura to force prices down.

Far more Americans disapproved of it BECAUSE IT DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH than went nuts over "Big" "government" "takeover" of "health".

As you will find in November when your little bubble world of lies and misread polls comes crashing down around your heads like softball-sized hail.

[xbjllb]

"Electing a Republican Congress will assure us that the top 1% will be protected, while the lower 50% (or more) will be taxed to death to pay for their welfare programs like otherwise uninsurable beach-front homes..." - longrifle

No worry whatsoever there. NOT happening.

"BYW Monica, you can stop selling the anti-Obamacare crap. The SCOTUS will take care of it. No use beating a dead horse." - longrifle

There are ways around ANYTHING the SCOTUS says or does, ESPECIALLY when it's against the will of the majority of the American People.

And guess what? The majority want health care for all, and it's coming.

Like it or not.

[xbjllb]

"If the Supreme Court doesn't kill it, then we must drive a stake through its heart by electing a Republican president and Congress to strangle this anti-American piece of legislative garbage once and for all." - Monica Crowley

I know. God forbid worthless out of work "niggers" and "spics" get healthcare on OUR backs, the "superior" "white" "race".

My, isn't Princess in a Zimmie mood today.

[xbjllb]

Healthcare for all!! How unAmerican!!!

Not "let them eat cake", but "let them die in the street".

Nice. Christian. Good Samaritan. Love thy Neighbor.

We can't even get from "Love they neighbor" to "Love thy enemy."

Nope. Out of the question.

[xbjllb]

I tell you creeps three things:

1. You will lose the House in November, and the Senate will gain Dem seats.

2. There WILL be healthcare for all, and finally:

3. Eventually 1950 tax rates on the 1% will pay both for healthcare for all nicely AND the CIA's need to get black op money from Congress in lieu of the end of the Afghaninam drug poppy trade.

Prepare ye the Way of the Lord.

[xbjllb]

OH, and I was remiss. OF COURSE Obama's already won.

[xbjllb]

"Sorry Longrifle, the lower 50% pay almost zero income taxes...You, sir, are allowed to have your own opinions but not facts." - John

Sorry, John, but that's one hell of a MASSIVE tax burden between 51% and 99%.

But no matter what you say. It will be fixed. The PEOPLE demand it.

And what the People demand, they get. One way or the other.

One way for the 1% is paying 1950 tax levels sooner rather than later.

The other is the 1% paying everything they have at the guillotine.

Their call. Not like it hasn't happened before, either, when the aristocracy got just a little too greedy while being just a little too stupid.

[xbjllb]

And when they guillotined the nobles, the one thing you never hear about is what they did to their whores.

[gringoman]

DJ,

Do you think GOP Willard will really go after Obama?

Or let's put this GOP query a bit differently: Do you really think GOP Mz Crowley will Insta-flush her asylum=grade troll trash--- Monica's mutants?

[gringoman]

Couldn't agree more! I love your bold remarks in these troubling times. We need more like you and more listening to what we're saying.

Posted by: SteveSellsRE4U | April 11, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Do you also like the vicious liberal troll trash who are allowed to spam and disrupt this (sic) 'conservative' site night and day?

Feel free to express yourself. We'd like to know if you're authentic, or just another drive-by who hasn't a clue to what's going on. Your silence will be informative.

[ElGringoman]

Barry McGuire will sing "Eve of Destruction" at your party or event.

http://www.barrymcguire.com/

Who can forget his famous lyrics: "The eastern world- it is exploding.."

[gringoman]

WND///Barack Obama, George Soros, “La Raza” and the entire liberal political establishment has launched a multi-million dollar campaign to destroy “America’s Toughest Sheriff.”

They are spending millions of your tax dollars in an effort to place federal bureaucrats as “monitors” in his Maricopa County office -- to stop him from doing the job voters elected him to do!

Crazed supporters of amnesty for illegal aliens just held a protest demanding that the federal government step in and strip Joe of his powers.

And left-wing billionaire George Soros has pledged to spend $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection!

gringoNOTE: Does anybody think Mitt Romney can say "Sheriff Joe Arpaio" and take this to Obama?

Does anybody think the RINOs and Marxelrods don't know it?

[gringoman]

RIGHTWING NEWS/////At this late date, at a minimum, I’d still prefer Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Tim Pawlenty, Rick Santorum, Jon Huntsman, and anybody who came out of a brokered convention over Mitt Romney. That’s because Mitt’s not a conservative, he was a mediocre governor, I don’t really know where he stands on any issue, and I think he is below average in electability. There’s not much of a point to continuing to hammer that message home after today since Mitt has it all but locked up, but it’s worth noting there were a lot of more conservative, more electable candidates in the race whom the GOP establishment helped to methodically beat down in order to clear a path for Romney.

Still, as Donald Rumsfeld might say, you go to war with the politician you have, not the politician you might wish to have — and I have always said, from day one, that if it came down to Mitt and Barack Obama, I’d prefer to have Romney in the White House.

http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-co-founder-of-notmittromney-coms-reaction-to-mitt-sewing-up-the-nomination/

[ElGringoman]

Republicans: We're old, we're white, and we want our country back.

[gringoman]

Marxelrods from Progistan: We're so "with it" we still recycle the Class War cliches of The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels, from 150 years ago.

But youse da reactionary. We da progressive.

Heeya, heeya.

[gringoman]

Republicans: We're old, we're white, and we want our country back.

Posted by: ElGringoman | April 11, 2012 at 02:26 PM

DemocrObots: We're old as Soros, we're socialist supremacists, and we want what you got.

George Soros: "Und vee vant to take Amerka back."

[gringoman]

Gingrich to Newsmax: I'm Going to Tampa, Blasts Romney's Negative Ads, 'Etch A Sketch' Conservatism
Tuesday, 10 Apr 2012 09:55 PM

By Paul Scicchitano and John Bachman

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-romney-santorum-spending/2012/04/10/id/435459?s=al&promo_code=EA0B-1

[LongRifle]

Sorry Longrifle, the lower 50% pay almost zero income taxes...You, sir, are allowed to have your own opinions but not facts.

Posted by: JohN | April 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM

...and you, Sir, if yoy would care to read the
so-called Ryan/Romney Budget plan, would see THE FACTS proving exactly what I am stating. In addition, their plan LOWERS the tax rate for "THE RICH", including Fund managers who create ZERO jobs.

[gringoman]

NEWT GINGRICH/////While acknowledging that Romney will “be the nominee” if he is successful in attaining 1,144 undisputed delegates, Gingrich said he would still go to Tampa to help shape the Republican platform on behalf of the 180,000 donors who have made mostly small contributions of $250 and less to his campaign.

“I think we need a party platform that is conservative and not Etch A Sketch. There are solid conservatives that want a conservative platform and I want to represent them,” he insisted.

Asked to elaborate on the platform issues he would take to Tampa, Gingrich cited the importance of a plan for America to gain energy independence so that “no future president will ever bow to a Saudi King,” a running theme in his campaign as well as the need for a balanced budget and paying down the national debt.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Gingrich to Newsmax: I'm Going to Tampa, Blasts Romney's Negative Ads, 'Etch A Sketch' Conservatism

[LongRifle]

While it is true that the those making less then $50,000 pay less income tax than the GOP would like, they can thank previous GOOPER administrations for that; not Obama.
BTW: They still pay PLENTY of taxes...

The current tax system is unfair both ways. A Flat tax is an idiotic idea; benefitting the wealthy the most. The only Fair tax is a National Sales tax.

The guy that can afford a Ferrari pays more than the guy who buys a used VW...

[Rafe]

Zimmerman is now a wanted man. :)

[Ummahgummah]

As you will find in November when your little bubble world of lies and misread polls comes crashing down around your heads like softball-sized hail.

POSTED BY: XBJLLB | APRIL 11, 2012 AT 12:38 PM

--

Note to the uninitiated visiting the Memo: This person above is NON-GRATA ici and is aka LESLIE BELL, a certifiable weirdo whose "predictions" have a very curious way of not happening.

We call him/her the X-lax around here.

Cause it literally stinks up this site with its BS.

A to-the-core LIEberal who wants Israel wiped off the map while bringing an eve larger flood of moHAMedans to our sacred shores.

This character predicted a demonRAT landslide for Congress in 2010, just to give you an idea. Another one was China nuking the Canary Islands, which would supposedly trigger a tsunami wiping out the entire East Coast.

LOL

Last but not least, this eager beaver keeps ranting that Boooosh was behind the islamic attacks on 9/11.

Just putting his/her latest predictions in context for you.

:-)

.

[Ummahgummah]

Zimmerman is now a wanted man. :)

POSTED BY: RAFE | APRIL 11, 2012 AT 03:36 PM

--

The glee with which LIEberals cheer on utter lawlessness is both amazing and frightening.

I keep saying that the time may have come where we will have to divide up the country.

There are no longer values that unite us.

This cannot continue for too long.

.

[BobRI]

Hey Longrifle,
The lowest 50% pays zero federal income tax (although they do pay FICA if the are working).

[Rafe]

The glee with which LIEberals cheer on utter lawlessness is both amazing and frightening.

I keep saying that the time may have come where we will have to divide up the country.

There are no longer values that unite us.

This cannot continue for too long.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 11, 2012 at 03:49 PM

Agreed. Let's get that started, shall we?

[Rafe]

He is now in custody which should had happened a long time ago.

[borderbriar]

There is a way to get the lower 50% paying more income tax. Make sure they have jobs that pay enough they owe it. Might take a bit of application of the Pancho Villa adobe wall solution to get the point across to those who have so well mastered the technique Stalin taught of keeping all the real money for high party officials.

[LongRifle]

The lowest 50% pays zero federal income tax (although they do pay FICA if the are working).

Posted by: BobRI | April 11, 2012 at 04:46 PM

I KNOW THAT...

IF --IF--You would read what I posted, you would see that the RYAN/ROMNEY TAX AND BUDGET PLAN WANT TO CHANGE THAT...SHEEESH. At the same time, they want to LOWER taxes for the wealthy...Sheeesh.

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Sorry Longrifle, the lower 50% pay almost zero income taxes...You, sir, are allowed to have your own opinions but not facts.

Posted by: JohN | April 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Sorry John . Much of the top 2% also doesn't pay any income tax. But, people pay some taxes. Sales, Gas, property.

Which is why a state like Texas with no income tax. Has some of the highest taxes like property in the nation.
Reagan cut income taxes and raised other taxes 7 times!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

IF --IF--You would read what I posted, you would see that the RYAN/ROMNEY TAX AND BUDGET PLAN WANT TO CHANGE THAT...SHEEESH. At the same time, they want to LOWER taxes for the wealthy...Sheeesh.

Posted by: LongRifle | April 11, 2012 at 07:28 PM

Conservatives make up facts as they go along.They don't really know the % of those who pay 0 income taxes. Why. They just believe what Fox tells them.

Romney's plan, the more you make, the more your taxes drop. While those at the bottom of the scale, pay more taxes.

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Socialist supremacists find a Big Government analysis more credible than a GOP economist!

Who knew?

Could anything be more surprising? Yes. The self-styled 'Liberator' troll, with his fresh bed pan of Statist Stats, could tell us what it is he liberates.

Posted by: gringoman | April 11, 2012 at 03:32 AM

conservatives hate government data because it shows how much they have screwed up the country. While they know that a GOP economist will LIE FOR THEM!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Basically the country accepted the won at face value and got severely tricked. Now that the cat is out of the bag, looking more like a Black Panther in a fancy suit than anything else, the cards are on the table.

The media can try to obfuscate by spinning the wonderchild's record, but the economic pain caused by this disastrous administration has touched far too many to be of no consequence in November.

I for one, CAN'T WAIT.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 11, 2012 at 03:42 AM

For the newbies. This is a mind of a madman!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

4. Even hispanics are becoming alienated by the socialist supremacist race baiters. (See the Trayvon case, where Zimmerman, who could pass for an Azteca gang member, is being portrayed by the socialist supremacists as a "white bigot."

5. Conclusion: The Marxelrod socialist supremacist race baiters may want to reconsider plans for going after Mormon "white supremacists."

Posted by: gringoman | April 11, 2012 at 03:52 AM

The OTHER MADMAN!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

So given that fact, why is the MSM constantly and INSISTANTLY reffering to Zimmerman as white? Perhaps a bit of blatant in-your-face demonization of whites?

To ask the question is to know the answer.

Posted by: DJ | April 11, 2012 at 07:03 AM

The memo racist!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Obama Surpasses Carter on Rising Gas Prices

http://moonbattery.com/?p=10382

Bush beat both of them.

$147.00 a barrel for oil with NO Keystone pipeline!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Sitting back, waiting for the talking points to come pouring in..

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 11, 2012 at 07:19 AM

Insanity desn't deserve an answer!

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

oil and gas prices are global, stupid nutjobs.

Under Obama, the mideast has been going under a huge up heaval.

Funny how Conservatives ignore the lack of a Keystone pipeline under Bush. When oil went to 147.00 a barrel. Obama, it's stayed under 120.00.

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

Another fact that Conservatives can't understand.

Now, global demand for oil is much higher than under Bush.

Conservatives,"don't care! Gotta blame Obama. Obama Democrat. Democrats are our scapegoat."

Maybe the president can do something about gasoline prices after all.

After months of rapidly rising gasoline prices—despite any real justification for the dramatic increase."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/04/11/did-obama-bluff-on-opening-strategic-oil-reserves-bring-down-gas-prices/?commentId=comment_blogAndPostId/blog/comment/1068-6466-12377

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

The oil speculators that falsely drove up the price of oil over the past few months —by as much as $20 a barrel—may have gotten the message that the Administration wasn’t going to sit idly by and let them mess up our recovery just so they could make more money.
Last month, I wrote a two part series attempting to explain what was happening with gasoline prices and who might be to blame for the precipitous rise. In Part II of the series, I noted the profound impact the money managers were having on our pocketbooks through their speculative behavior—behavior that had resulted in non-industry traders buying the equivalent of 372 million barrels of oil through a variety of futures contracts. In making the point that these folks were the true villains behind the unnecessary rise in gasoline prices, I noted what Bloomberg had to say on the topic –

(Also from that Forbes article.)

Conservatives," Don't care. Won't blame speculators. Who also drove up oil when Egypt started having their uprising.

Me blame Obama. Obama bad. Dems bad. Conservatives good!"

[Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com]

XBJLLB said "Healthcare for all!! How unAmerican!!!
Not "let them eat cake", but "let them die in the street".
Nice. Christian. Good Samaritan. Love thy Neighbor.
We can't even get from "Love they neighbor" to "Love thy enemy."
Nope. Out of the question"

How nice for you to ignore your side's own words "Separation of church and state" If you can't pray in classrooms, then you can't use the Bible to codify/justify your gubmint healthcare. Charity is NOT a function of gubmint, it is a function of the PEOPLE, that means YOU XBJLLB and the CHURCH. Christ did not ordain YOUR gubmint to be a substitute for charity. Charity comes from the heart, not a gubmint agency.

[M/M]

Don Imus is a PINK, PHONEY, RACIST PIG.

Posted by: M/M | April 11, 2012 at 07:46 AM

Imus calld Al Sharpton a "fat phony."

I heard it with my own ears recently and was shocked. Is Imus trying to get that testicle back from Sharpton's lock box?

Posted by: gringoman | April 11, 2012 at 10:18 AM
____________________________________

Don Imus, the PINK, PHONEY, RACIST PIG, dancing to the tune of his mastah.

[Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com]

IRREGULARS said: "conservatives hate government data because it shows how much they have screwed up the country. While they know that a GOP economist will LIE FOR THEM!" I have plenty of govt data to prove you are wrong. For starters, The rich DO pay the most FEDERAL taxes from the IRS: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/09inratesnap.pdf
Want more?

[The irregulars on the memo, love their bath houses!]

IRREGULARS said: "conservatives hate government data because it shows how much they have screwed up the country. While they know that a GOP economist will LIE FOR THEM!" I have plenty of govt data to prove you are wrong. For starters, The rich DO pay the most FEDERAL taxes from the IRS: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/09inratesnap.pdf
Want more?

Posted by: Thedauntlessconservative.wordpress.com | April 11, 2012 at 09:03 PM

The rich pay the most because they make most of the income!

The top 1% have gone from pre-depression of making 23% of the income, then from about 1950-1979 they made 8-10%. Now, they make 24%.

While many of those who pay 0 taxes, is because of deductions that the government allows them.

Check Factcheck.org