« The O'Reilly Factor---TONIGHT! | Main | Hot Mess »

March 13, 2012

Comments

gringoman

DJ,

I'm with Mama Grizzly. I'll leave the polls to you (and Libworld, that can't wait to have turkey early this year.)

BTW, the Cain train still runs to Newtville. Herman might get you a seat, DJ, if you promise to chant "OBAMNEYCARE? NO WAY!" But you must show conviction.

Posted by: gringoman | March 14, 2012 at 07:46 AM

------

Gringoman,

I have two words for you to mull over:

Brokered convention.

Posted by: DJ | March 14, 2012 at 08:08

DJ,

If that means that Libworld, the Beltway, the Romneyiacs and Marxelrods might not get their wish after all, I'll forget "brokered." How about The Deliverance Convention?

BTW, re those polls that Sarah Palin and I can get along without: Why don;t they point out the obvious? Willard, despite all his out-spending and out-sliming GOP rivals, can't excite more than 1/3 of the GOP electorate, whereas the two biggest non-Romneys, Newt and Rick, collectively command 2/3 while running much more conservative than Willard? Neither do those pollss show Romney's depressing effect. Example, although he did very well in certain areas like Birmingham in Alabama, the voter TURN-OUT was abominable. People didn't bother to go out and vote. Willard won by default. If you call that "winning."

In my opinion, Santorum is still in there because (1) he's been working his butt off like a white coolie pulling a RICKshaw
and (2) he has never been subjected to the kind of negative ad blitzkrieg that Willard used to take down Newt. That makes sense. The corporate raiders understand that "rookie" Santorum is a lightweight compared to an extremely seasoned old pro like Newt. True, he has surprised them with his staying power,. but that's just more proof of how cool everyone but the establishment is to Romney. He's where he is now because he's almost the last non-Romney standing, after Willard feels he finished off his Big Threat, Newt, by dumping millions of dollars of negativity on him---just as the Billion Dollar Class War Obots will do to synthetic Willard if he gets anointed.

Ummahgummah

Was UGLY even born here?" - Jay

We're not even sure he POSTS from the US.

We KNOW DJ is from Australia.

And Gringoman is from hell. Don'tcha know.

Posted by: xbjllb | March 13, 2012 at 08:52 PM

HOW TO SPOT TROLLING PSYCHOPATHS

They rut together, more inane and stupid than maggots in mating season. Maggots at least have a reason to ooze and crawl.

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MARCH 14, 2012 AT 08:13 AM

--

I recently questioned the IQ CHILD's origins based on its garbled output which gave me cause to suspect a foreign origin.

Either that or IQ CHILD is less than moronic.

I mean that in the clinical sense.

True to form, the IQ CHILD parrots me, questioning my own origins.

Truly a parrot who thinks he is talking to another when it is merely its own image in the mirror it is talking to.

Truly a bizarre cast of characters that swings my here.

There just isn't enough NYT to line the cage when they overstay their one-post welcome.

.

Ummahgummah

He's where he is now because he's almost the last non-Romney standing, after Willard feels he finished off his Big Threat, Newt, by dumping millions of dollars of negativity on him---just as the Billion Dollar Class War Obots will do to synthetic Willard if he gets anointed.

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MARCH 14, 2012 AT 08:41 AM

--

Nonetheless, if Santorum doesn't manage to upset Romney, do you really prefer a brokered Convention, as DJ has warned about?

Cause if they anoint Jebbie, they have really removed what little choice we've had.

The ONLY think I like about W is how much LIEberals hate him.

Not nearly enough to make me want Dubya lite in the White House next.

Which would raise the hideous specter of Hitlery next, since she'd see a Jebbidency as a sign that she is "due" next.

And if there is anything left of America after all that who knows.. CHELSEA or MEGHAN?!

Aaaaaarrrgh!!!!

Time to WAKE UP!!!

Thank God it was only a nightmare.

.

DJ

In my opinion, Santorum is still in there because (1) he's been working his butt off like a white coolie pulling a RICKshaw
and (2) he has never been subjected to the kind of negative ad blitzkrieg that Willard used to take down Newt. That makes sense. The corporate raiders understand that "rookie" Santorum is a lightweight compared to an extremely seasoned old pro like Newt. True, he has surprised them with his staying power,. but that's just more proof of how cool everyone but the establishment is to Romney. He's where he is now because he's almost the last non-Romney standing, after Willard feels he finished off his Big Threat, Newt, by dumping millions of dollars of negativity on him---just as the Billion Dollar Class War Obots will do to synthetic Willard if he gets anointed.

Posted by: gringoman | March 14, 2012 at 08:41 AM

--------

That makes perfect sence, Gringoman. I beleive you are 100% correct.

But just let me add one thing: If the Obots can destroy the squeaky clean Willard, surely they can easily do the same to the baggage laden Newt, no?

DJ

Which would raise the hideous specter of Hitlery next, since she'd see a Jebbidency as a sign that she is "due" next.

And if there is anything left of America after all that who knows.. CHELSEA or MEGHAN?!

Aaaaaarrrgh!!!!

Time to WAKE UP!!!

Thank God it was only a nightmare.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 14, 2012 at 08:53 AM

---

LOL! That's funny, Ummah. But is your nightmare any scarier than the reality we are facing wrt the skinny racist socialist we now have in the WH?

Ummahgummah

Gringoman,

My first impression of Steve Morgan was one of a guy a cut above the psychopathic bathhouse boys, IQ Boy and X-Lax. But, it didn't take him very long to reveal himself to be just as intellectually bankrupt as IQ Boy, or just as morally bankrupt as X-Lax, did it.

Miscreant Steve's comments are getting SO degenerate and slimey, one must wear a Hazmat suit in order to read them.

POSTED BY: DJ | MARCH 14, 2012 AT 08:03 AM

--

See I never had a doubt as to the former identity of "steve morgan".

The recurring personnel rotating in and out of the Memo makes one wonder if they are being used on other assignments when they don't stink up the Memo.

A MLM wannabee like GW is a natural for site spamming.

X-lax and GAY BOY IQ CHILD are equally bottom of the barrel and have all the time in the world to make sure they lower the level of discourse on whatever site they parasite on.

DNC tactics are beyond disgusting.

They already own Hollywood and the media and here they are trying to destroy our little neck of the woods.

.

gringoman

BTW, the Cain train still runs to Newtville. Herman might get you a seat, DJ, if you promise to chant "OBAMNEYCARE? NO WAY!" But you must show conviction.

Posted by: gringoman | March 14, 2012 at 07:46 AM

---

G-man,

You just don't get it. Romney has never been my first choice. He hasn't even been my second, third or fourth choice.

But given the four still standing, I think Romney has the best chance of beating Obama in the general. Newt has a snowball's chance.

That said, my backing of Romney is NOT motivated by principle. No, it's based on pragmatic reasons.

So, if Romney's campaign results in failure, then a brokerd convention is likely.

If a brokerd convention becomes a reality, then Jebbie could very well end up as our nominiee.

Is that what you want?!?

Is it a not fact that Gringoman has been a closet Jebbieite all along? :-)

Posted by: DJ | March 14, 2012 at 08:31 AM

DJ,

What I'm getting is that you;re not getting what I've been posting. Have the troll trash been getting to you that much? Now you're calling me a Jeebite? OMG! What blogosphere have you been pn while I've posted all those Monica and the House of Bush and "Monica's Georgie}\" etc comments Or did you think my 'Monica's Jebbie Joy' was filler for a new dishwashing detergent

As for your "unprincipled" attachment to Willard, I won't argue. When it comes to phony free, I'll take half the pie with Newt, rather than nothing at all with Willard (and that's just assuming for sake of argument that Newt is half phoney, i.e. a politician.)

I can't go with $200 million dollars worth of plastic in any case. The conventional wisdom, pushed frantically by Obamasuck media, if you'll notice, is that Willard is the most "electible."

I;m with Rudy Giuliani on this, and most likely Sarah Palin. Newt Gingrich is more electible than Mitt Romney.

There, I said it, and if Club Gooper wakes up, it might not be too late. I also see Gingrich as more electible than Santorum. Old pro vs raw rookie. Gingrich, despite his "old baggage," is also more articulate than Romney, Santorum and Obama piled on top of each other. And that will count as much as money in the Fall---maybe more than money.

I warn Club Gooper again: Anoint Wall Street Willard at your peril. His depressing affect on turn-out could even cost a number of seats in the House and Senate. Sure, lots of Congress critters resent Newt because he knows them too well, and lets them know it, but don't worry, they would ALL rally 'round if its the Fat Old Pro leading their careerist butts. (You heard it here first, DJ)

gringoman

Aaaaaarrrgh!!!!

Time to WAKE UP!!!

Thank God it was only a nightmare.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 14, 2012 at 08:53 AM

I'm for a brokered convention if it;s needed to stop Gooper Central from anointing Romneycare. I;m not for\
a brokered convention in order to coronate a RINOsaur, whether Jebbie Joy or any other. If it's a choice between what the Obamasuck media will tout as the "electible" Jebbie vs the "non-electible", say, Sarah Palin, give me (and the USA) the "non-electible" Sarah Palin, and watch a campaign they'll be talking about for a hundred years, after Sarah gets the RINOs off her back. (And I don't think she's as qualified as Newt, but I;ll still take her over any RINOsaur. And let their troll trash start using the
C--- word again and see where it gets the vicious jerks. Millions would rise up behind her, imcluding fathers of daughters.

gringoman

-------

That makes perfect sence, Gringoman. I beleive you are 100% correct.

But just let me add one thing: If the Obots can destroy the squeaky clean Willard, surely they can easily do the same to the baggage laden Newt, no?

Posted by: DJ | March 14, 2012 at 08:57 AM

No, DJ. They can't do to Newt what they will do to the Mormon corporate raider.

Newt knows how to hit them back. And he doesn't need a teleprompter or million dollar consultants holding his hand night and day when he's off camera.

Baggage? Newt's "baggage" is so old it's almost elegible for Medicare.

Willard might look "squeaky clean" to you, but when the Marxelrods get done going through his history as a corporate Raider, his complicity with Obamacare and even his magic underwear (keeping home droves of evangelicals on Election Day), it will look like a replay of what willard did to Newt---only Newt is on record as warning about the Fannie Freddy fraud while being paid as a consultant. It's a little different from actively advising Obama on how to nationalize Obamacare, which Romney or his agents did. The "electible" Romney gets neutered on one of the red hot issues of the campaign, further depressing GOP turn-out, while his team tries to write convincing double talk for him.

Romney's "electibility"? What a joke GOP Central and the Obamasuck Media are running.

xbjllb

"The kind of parasite that feeds on a host, and hallucinates the blood-sucking as romantic." - Satan

Never underestimate the lure of the vampire to a woman.

Ummahgummah

Never underestimate the lure of the vampire to a woman.
POSTED BY: XBJLLB | MARCH 14, 2012 AT 12:43 PM

--

Never underestimate the lure of a woman to the vampire.

There fixed it for ya. Once again.

Say Thank You, Ummah!

:-D

.

xbjllb

"Never underestimate the lure of a woman to the vampire.

There fixed it for ya. Once again.

Say Thank You, Ummah!" - UGSatan


So you're saying our attraction is mutual.

Excellent.

What's next? Arranging our dates?

Joe Humphries

I notice that Monica, in slamming all the people who have been attacking the NYPD, left out Chris Christie.

Odd.

The comments to this entry are closed.