« Heads Won't Roll | Main | The Big Show »

August 11, 2011



Please bitch-slap Bob Beckel. He reminds me of Jay.


Goldman Sachs is pumping up the market. Is that a good thing? Just wonderin. Banks traditionally act as enablers but not chosers, but can market forces that are weak to nonexistent be made stronger by bank pumping? It is similar to stimulus spending. They are ignoring basic political and economic facts.

They might attract speculators and day traders.


Banks will always try to save themselves first. They will hoard assets and they will NOT make loans at low interest rates except to the people who really don't need them.
People who can, are buying Gold. That says it all.


Cara Mia, Cara Mia---here's an idea for the show. A highly professional guy who says he forged Obama BC for Obama and will answer all your questions.

This is not a killer idea for 5 o'clock? BTW, the author of following article, Jerome R. Corsi, is like Obama also a Harvard grad. The main difference? Unlike Obama, Corsi, a Ph.D/, is not hiding his "Affirmative Action" school records.

Interested? Got Corsi on your rolodex?...Oh, wait...The Republicans don't do stories like this? Gee, I almost forgot. They tremble that SLIME and its media hacks will call them "birthers"? OK, got it.Sorry 'bout that, girl.

And you still wouldn't call it what I call it....
GOP Complicity?

Pray tell, Princess. Crickets be damned.

///////'I created Obama's certification of birth'
White House links to deliberate forgery from Snopes.com, thinking it was real

Posted: August 09, 2011
8:36 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND

When the White House posted online an image of President Obama's purported long-form birth certificate, it also linked to the previously circulated "Certification of Live Birth," the short-form version that had been presented as the only birth documentation available.

However, the short-form certificate to which the White House linked April 27 was a forgery, claims research expert Ron Polland, Ph.D., who says he made the image himself.

"I made the birth certificate image that was given to the media at the White House press conference held on April 27, 2011," Polland told WND.

Jerome Corsi's book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?" is available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

"The White House said the black-and-white image is a copy of Obama's 2007 [Certification of Live Birth], but it's not. It is the forgery I created, and I can prove that is the case," he declared.

Polland said he created the image to bolster his contention that the short-form Certification of Live Birth circulated by the Obama presidential campaign was a forgery.

(Story continues below)

Read more: 'I created Obama's certification of birth' http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=331525#ixzz1UkNoD0bs




The socialist don't get it and never will. Look what socialism is doing to Europe and the UK.
A UK punk on TV was asked who are they attacking? "The Rich", he says. When asked who are the rich, he replies: "Those people who own these stores." All the stores were little; small business.

TELL THE TRUTH JAY. With you Communists and Leftists, it's not "Da Rich" because you don't even know what that means. What you mean are the Haves versus the Have Nots, just like Lenin and Alinsky said.

Posted by: LongRifle | August 11, 2011 at 04:57 AM

In fact, the typical Marxobooby doesn't even understand what spawned it. Even while truthy booby puffs itself up with factoids and selected stats to "support" its vicious (and phony) moralizing about the "racists" and the "green teabaggers" and the "rich" etc, it doesn't even comprehend one of its holy scriptures, THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.

Marx and Engels set themselves up as champions of the "proletariat" (people who actually worked for a living) and scorned the lumpenproletariat (the rabble, the mob, the shiftless, scammers, hustlers, criminals, the quota queens etc). They never exclaimed, "Hustlers of the World, Unite!"

But how can the poor Marxobooby see this, even if he wanted to, now that today's Democrats and socialists (with some G.O.P. help) depend on millions of the lumpen to advance their power and the socialist jihad?

As for a Marxobooby trying to fess up, and get honest enough to tell how he differs in outlook from the Socialists of America, the Communist Party USA, the Proud Fidelistas etc etc......



Helmuth Nyborg on the Genetic Decline of Western Civilization: Denmark as a Case Study

"The Danish psychologist Helmuth Nyborg has an academic paper soon to be published in Personality and Individual Differences (“The decay of Western Civilization: Double Relaxed Natural Selection“). Nyborg is well-known for his work showing a sex difference in IQ favoring males, a paper which resulted in an investigation of his work and a reprimand from his university. (Nyborg describes the “witch hunt” he endured here.)

Nyborg’s latest paper charts past trends and projects IQ changes in Denmark as a result of two trends: relaxation of natural selection among the traditional Danes, and an influx of low-IQ immigrants. These two trends together amount to what he terms a “double relaxation of natural selection” (DRNS).

Relying on Richard Lynn’s work Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations, the relaxation of internal selection is thought to have begun around 1850 as the fertility of the lower classes exceeded the upper classes because of improvements in hygiene and reduction in diseases. He cites Lynn’s estimate that England lost 6.9 IQ points over 90 years (1920-2010) and estimates that Denmark’s average IQ dropped around 10 points since 1850 due to internal relaxation of natural selection."

Read more>>



Note: Fundamentally, Nyborg's main thesis is in accordance with that which Murray an Herrnstein put forth in The Bell Curve.


Totally rockin' the curls today! Love the look. And love your direct unrelentless fact-filled input. I enjoy contributors when I learn from them.


The Gringo Advisory Board is not for or against Rick Perry at this point. Assessment continues. DJ will find him wanting on Illegalismo; as for Right to Life, I find his position perfectly rational, which means it will offend both Left and Right.

This is a States' Rights Issue, under the US Constitution. The people of any State can legalize abortion and they can ban abortion. It's their right. The Right and the Left do not like this. The Right and the Left want Big Nanny in DC to make the decision.

/////Some look at your endorsement of Rudy Giuliani in 2008 and positions you’ve taken on immigration and conclude that you’re not as conservative as you say. How do you reply to those people?

I stand on my record. I thought Mayor Giuliani did a wonderful job of managing a city. He was very strong militarily. He was as strong on crime as any big-city mayor has ever been. He and I were 180 degrees [apart] on social issues, but he would put strict constructionists on the Supreme Court, which dealt with those social issues. I happen to be comfortable that I was making the right decision and that as President, when it comes to those social issues, it’s very important to have that strict constructionist view from whom you put on the Supreme Court. Because they’d look at the Constitution and say, You know what? That issue dealing with abortion is not in the Constitution. We will put it back to the states. Now, if the states want to pass an amendment, and three-quarters of the states want to pass an amendment, to make this a change to our United States Constitution, then just follow that process. And I’m a big believer that that’s how our country should work.

Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2011/08/11/qa-rick-perry-is-ready-to-run/#ixzz1Ul1APUSb


"The Gringo Advisory Board is not for or against Rick Perry at this point. Assessment continues. DJ will find him wanting on Illegalismo"


That's right, Gringoman. He's pro-amnesty amongst other troubling things. He's very Dubya and McCainesque, IMO. Hence, Numbers USA gives him a D- rating. Incidentally, VDARE has a very good article about Perry and his stance on the issues surrounding immigration.



Please bitch-slap Bob Beckel. He reminds me of Jay.

Posted by: LongRifle | August 11, 2011 at 11:10 AM

Stateing facts that some are trying to hide is painful, isn't it?

All the right has to cling to. Are their opinions!

You people would have been happier if you could have stayed in McCarthyism days.

Rick Perry,

His army of God.

"Their beliefs can tend toward the bizarre. Some consider Freemasonry a “demonic stronghold” tantamount to witchcraft. The Democratic Party, one prominent member believes, is controlled by Jezebel and three lesser demons. Some prophets even claim to have seen demons at public meetings. They’ve taken biblical literalism to an extreme. In Texas, they engage in elaborate ceremonies involving branding irons, plumb lines and stakes inscribed with biblical passages driven into the earth of every Texas county."

Believes that the statue of Liberty is a demon worship .

This could be why I have seen such strange comments on the memo. And, from the regulars.



"Reagan," Vice President Dick Cheney famously declared in 2002, "proved deficits don't matter." Unless, that is, a Democrat is in the White House. After all, while Ronald Reagan TRIPLED the national debt and George W. Bush DOUBLED it again, each Republican was rewarded with a second term in office. But as the Gallup polling data show, concern over the federal deficit hasn't been this high since Democratic budget balancer Bill Clinton was in office. All of which suggest the Republicans' born-again disdain for deficits ranks among the greatest - and most successful - political double-standards in recent memory."

"As predicted at the time, Reagan's massive $749 billion supply-side tax cuts in 1981 quickly produced even more massive annual budget deficits. Combined with his rapid increase in defense spending, Reagan delivered not the balanced budgets he promised, but record-settings deficits. Ultimately, Reagan was forced to repeatedly raised taxes to avert financial catastrophe, including the last major bipartisan tax code overhaul in 1986. By the time he left office in 1989, Ronald Reagan nonetheless more than EQUALED the entire debt burden produced by the previous 200 years of American history. It's no wonder the Gipper cited the skyrocketing deficits he bequeathed to America as perhaps HIS GREATEST REGRET."


I don't want the world to know
Don't want my heart to show
Two Faces have I

Posting one fact about Conservatives. One, at a time.

Another fact about Conservatives.
Their cutting taxes has resulted in MORE TAXES, ELSEWHERE!

It's a wonder why anyone would vote Conservative.


Re RICK PERRY////"He's a cowboy," said Michael Goldfarb, former senior staffer on John McCain's presidential campaign. "You have to assume he'd shoot first and ask questions later -- which would be nice after four years of a leading from behind, too little too late foreign policy."

gringoNOTE: GAB (The Gringo Advisory Board) doesn't mind a cowboy per se, provided that he's a canny cowboy.
The kind of cowboy who invades an Arab country, is tongue-tied with vicious critics, has no idea how to finish the war he started, gets tangled up in near-impossible nation-building with a resentful population, while his toppling of a dictator opens the door to mad mullahs with apocalyptic dreams, nuke-enhanced---this type does not fit GAB's definition of 'canny cowboy.'

Perry has an extensive record of international experience, covering everywhere from Israel to China and points in between. This sophistication, combined with being a Bible man, a job creaing Governor and a don't= tread- on- me Texan, suggests that the socialists, crypto-commies, progs and Chicago gangbangers will fear him more than they ever would a Mitt Romneycare and his Mormon underwear. They'll also think twice before trying to slime him as a "Crazy Eyes," like they do with a woman, Michele Bachmann, on their "sophisticated" agitprop outlets, like Newsweak.


Anybody notice how a typical Marxobooby seems to be "shocked" by Ann Coulter's outrageous jokes, but when the Communist Party USA endorses Obama 2012, and not as a joke, but deadly serious, the Marxobooby suddenly seems to come down with lockjaw?


Ever noticed that the right doesn't seem anything wrong with Ann attacking the 9/11 widows.
And, tries to deny that several 1000 tea partiers endorse David Duke?


Rick Perry, associates with very radical Religious groups. Who think that The statue of Liberty is worshipping a demon god. And, God punishes people with floods and the like.

Look up Rick Perry's The Army of God.



I don't doubt that Perry can be criticized, and on Immigration, or Illegalismo, too. That said, I see some of his so-called "controversial" positions worthy of legitimate, reasoned debate, including

1. The Fence
2. A guest-worker program (with NO granting of citizenship.) I say there has been a need for guest-workers, especially in light of the work ethic in the uS today, especially among the welfare class. Wages are just part of it. Nobody wants to hire lousy attitude, even home-owners needing a wallbanger. And anybody who's been around the world knows how different attitudes are outside the uS. Maybe they're too humble, or too polite, or too mannerly or whatever. But the attitude does tend to be different (exceptions to all rules.) Americans have gotten too fat. That's where the US happens to be in this historical moment. Things might change before too long. Possibly change radically. Perry's been around enough to notice all these things. This is not to say that the present system is not a shambles. It is. It's a great big hideous mess. Business needs an orderly system but isn't strong enough or wise enough to get it, and the devious Dems want nothing but votes and their Marxist Class War, jacked up with some race war to get the socialism they want.

Perry also has come out for Voter I.D., which for the venal neocom Democrats amounts to "dangerous right-wing extremism".)

The fence? 1200 miles or whatever? I'm reminded of "walls" throughout history. Name one that ever worked. Even the great wall of China. Maybe the Berlin Wall? The French Maginot line, to keep out the Germans?


It doesn't bother me who the right picks.

But Perry associating with the religious fanatics. Who are trying to infiltrate the government, the arts, entertainment and all other such (call them forms for lack of a better word)

Rick Perry's Army of God
A little-known movement of radical Christians and self-proclaimed prophets wants to infiltrate government, and Rick Perry might be their man.


I have clicked on many of the links that the regulars post.

Bet, no one will look up my Perry's army of god, though.


These Marxoboobys affect to be "shocked" by a thousand Christian hard-liners while millions of their black serfs get lunatic anti-white hatred spewed at them by Farrakhan and many others in churches and mosques across the country--in fact even in one where their own Community Organizer Obama sat for 20 years.

No wonder the typical Marxobooby gets lockjaw when confronted with Communist Party USA endorsing Obama 2011.

Better to paste the latest quote from one of Obama's $38,000 a plate dinners and how, while they wash down the nouveau beaujolais over the chocolate truffles, some start burping out like, "YOU KNOW WHAT I SAY,GENTLEMEN! TAX DA RICH! THAT'S DA TICKET, SUCKERS! TAX DA RICH!"

Great laughter all around the tables, from Barry too.


FACT: Communist Party USA endorses Obama 2012.


Perry: Army of God

Obama: Army of Marx.

Your choice.


FACT: Communist Party USA endorses Obama 2012.

Posted by: gringoman | August 11, 2011 at 11:54 PM

Perry: Army of God

Obama: Army of Marx.

Your choice.

Posted by: gringoman | August 11, 2011 at 11:55 PM

1000s of tea partiers want ex klansman David Duke

Perry's army of God

Radical religious freaks that want ro take over government and feel that our statue of liberty is demon worshipping.

Remember McCain and John Hagee?

The Army of God isn't God's real followers. Just fanatics that want to take over the government by voting in the right politicians.
Always thought tea partiers were against a stronger and more powerful government. Guess not.



But Paint Creek, where ranches and wooden homes, some now abandoned, are dotted beside cotton and wheat fields, is the place that defines the man who some Republicans believe could unseat President Barack Obama next November.

Governor Rick Perry was part of the fifth generation to work the land at Paint Creek, some 200 miles west of Dallas on the flat expanse of plains known as “the Big Empty”.

It was here that he was imbued with the country values of church, family, neighbourliness, thrift and hard work that now seem part of a bygone America beyond places like West Texas.

“There were three things to do in Paint Creek: school, church, and Boy Scouts,” Mr Perry said last year, looking back on the late 1950s. “That’s it. And it was plenty.” Paint Creek was “one of the most beautiful places or it could be one of the most desolate” depending on the weather. As a child, he ventured, it was the home of “some of the most principled, disciplined people in the world, and faithful”.



"In contrast, Mr Perry, who has championed Israel and called for a muscular foreign policy, has the ability to appeal to all five elements of the party – fiscal, social and national security conservatives plus the Tea Party and the Establishment – without alienating any."

gringoNOTE: I beg to differ. Perry will alienate DJ.


Perry, the puppet for the fanatical religious group?
John Hagee, who said that Hitler did God's wishes!

Another proclaims to see demons. And, Texas is God's chosen prophet land.


Re Perry and the Obamarxists:

Watch their reactions in coming weeks. If relatively mild, it means they see no problemo.

OTOH, if they and SLIME (Socialist Liberal Media) start to get real vicious real quick, it means they are scared, clearly nervous.

If we start to hear that Rick Perry dreams of leading an Army of God to Washington where they plan to surround the US Congress, it means the Dem panic is on.

Another give-away: If they spend more time sliming Rick Perry than Mitt Obamneycare.


If we start to hear that Rick Perry dreams of leading an Army of God to Washington where they plan to surround the US Congress, it means the Dem panic is on.

Another give-away: If they spend more time sliming Rick Perry than Mitt Obamneycare.

Posted by: gringoman | August 12, 2011 at 12:59 AM

It really doesn't matter to me who people vote for. Just feel people should know as much as possible before they do vote.
If, the right wants to vote for someone who has followers that think the statue of Liberty is a demon worship. Fine. The right might discover that people like John Hagee and others. could be Perry's Jerimiah Wright!


Should be Perry's Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

Know how much he's loved on the memo.

John Hagee was once called McCain's Reverend Wright.

And, the "army of God" is full of them!

So, Perry would get a whole movement of Reverend Wrights!


gringoNOTE: I beg to differ. Perry will alienate DJ.

Posted by: gringoman | August 12, 2011 at 12:36 AM


I haven't formed a definitive opinion about Perry yet. He could very well be my pick. However, what I do know about him is he is dismal on the immigration issue.

BTW, I think a fence across the entire Southern border is a waste of money. All we need to do is enforce the existing immigration laws -- that'd be enough to solve the problem of illegals. Everyone knows that. Which begs the question: Why is it that the ruling elites in both parties refuse to crack down in earnest on the invasion? Could it have something to do with the forthcoming North American Union? Is Rick Perry in favor of the NAU? All indications are he is.


"And anybody who's been around the world knows how different attitudes are outside the uS. Maybe they're too humble, or too polite, or too mannerly or whatever. But the attitude does tend to be different (exceptions to all rules.)" ( --Gringoman)


Yes, the first generation Mexicans are extremely hard workers. But are their kids? The data reflects the offspring of these hard working immigrants, in large part, wind up as net tax consumers rather than wealth producers*. Even Princess, on TMG, acknowledged the fact that Mexicans have a worse high school graduation rate than blacks. And to think these are the new influx of immigrants the government is counting on to fund thus save the entitlement programs? Does Gringoman really think third world immigration will save the Republic?

* http://www.amazon.com/Mexifornia-Becoming-Victor-Davis-Hanson/dp/1893554732


DJ note: The problem with mainstream conservatives is they are, at best, ignorant of the truth about race and racial differences. At worse, they engage in feigned ignorance - which in reality equates to cowardice. In that respect Eric Holder is right: We are a nation of cowards."


Negroes Rising
by David Yeagley · August 11, 2011 · ·

"Unfortunately, the Negro in the White House has had a dire and deleterious effect on the world. It’s all about race, not economy. The Communist theory of equally distributed wealth only brings out the fact that class war, in every place where there are non-white people cohabiting white societies, the poor are in fact the darkies, the Negroes, the non-whites. Class struggle is race struggle.

Conservative talkers, ever fearful of talking about race, faithfully avoid its mention in connection with the riots across the globe. It seems that all riots are about socio-economic issues, not about race, even when racial groups riot against other races.

Yesterday Sean Hannity spoke the entire day, by radio and TV, about the riots in London, and carefully, passionately identified the riots as the result of liberalism. The expectation of government aid, the deep-seated dependency, the right to hand-outs–when denied, result in socially immature behavior, like, violence. “We’re getting our taxes back,” shouted a rioting looter. BadEagle.com brought out the fact that the rioters in Tottenham (London) were African, or, Negro. This fact, however, was discovered by research, not from media reports.

And now, today, Laura Ingraham is lamenting the complete abandonment of morality, but without any reference to Negroes making white people strip in the streets. It is a behavioral issue, not a racial issue, so say these careful conservatives. Even the BBC hid the faces of riotors, trusting that their beloved British accent would give the illusion that the knaves were white, not black.

All this, in spite of the fact that, in America, Negroes attacked white people at the Wisconsin State Fair, and in fact, the infamous Memorial Day beach closings in Chicago were caused by blacks attacking whites on the beach, and not because of heat or temperatures. The media completely lied about that, covering up the dramatic attacks and the fact that they were explicitly racial, blacks against innocent whites. Even the few news reports of “flash gangs” were careful not to make an issue of the fact that the gangs were black. That part of the story was all on personal cell phones and twitter accounts. Few professional news agencies are willing to call it what it is: black teens looking for trouble.

Chicago news likes to call it “flash mob” activity, or ‘wilding’ incidents. In the old days, in the South, it used to be called “pack niggers,” who, like wild dogs, went out to attack, to loot, to do violence–for the glory of it. (True it is, that kind of glory, itself, isn’t related to race at all.) But now days, educated liberals feel sophisticated to call is social frustration, or the pursuit of economic justice, or some other justified explanation that exonerates the packs from responsibility for their actions."

read more>>



Standard and Poors punctures Michele Bachmann’s blissful fantasy
By Greg Sargent

Wow, what colossally bad timing. Here’s Michele Bachmann at the debate last night, insisting that the Standard and Poors downgrade proved that she was right to oppose raising the debt ceiling:

“I think we just heard from Standard & Poor’s. When they dropped — when they dropped our credit rating, what they said is, we don’t have an ability to repay our debt. That’s what the final word was from them.

“I was proved right in my position: We should not have raised the debt ceiling. And instead, we should have cut government spending, which was not done. And then we needed to get — get our spending priorities in order.”

Unfortunately for Bachmann, Standard and Poors has now clarified that it’s actually people like her, who oppose raising the debt ceiling and aren’t mindful of the consequences of default, that were a primary reason for the downgrade:

A Standard & Poor’s director said for the first time Thursday that one reason the United States lost its triple-A credit rating was that several lawmakers expressed skepticism about the serious consequences of a credit default — a position put forth by some Republicans.

Without specifically mentioning Republicans, S&P senior director Joydeep Mukherji said the stability and effectiveness of American political institutions were undermined by the fact that “people in the political arena were even talking about a potential default,” Mukherji said.

“That a country even has such voices, albeit a minority, is something notable,” he added. “This kind of rhetoric is not common amongst AAA sovereigns.”

Let’s try to wrap our heads around this. Bachmann’s opposition to raising the debt ceiling is one of the most important planks in her presidential platform. She has touted it in two ads, presenting it as a sign of her courage. She repeated it again last night at the debate, asserting that opposing the hike is “the right thing to do,” and even cited Standard and Poors’s downgrade as proof of her superior grasp of our fiscal dilemma.

Less than 24 hours later, the news emerges that S & P has confirmed that it was precisely this opposition to raising the debt ceiling, and the cavalier attitude towards default exhibited by the likes of Bachmann, that led to our downgrade.

The question of what led S & P to downgrade our credit rating is a matter of verifiable fact. And S & P has now confirmed that one of the central rationales of her candidacy is a key reason for their downgrade. What will she say when confronted with this fact? How will she explain it away? Will anyone even ask her to try to explain it?

In a rational universe, this would be devastating to her candidacy. Of course, the world of GOP primary politics is anything but a rational universe.


All this, in spite of the fact that, in America, Negroes attacked white people at the Wisconsin State Fair, and in fact, the infamous Memorial Day beach closings in Chicago were caused by blacks attacking whites on the beach, and not because of heat or temperatures. The media completely lied about that, covering up the dramatic attacks and the fact that they were explicitly racial, blacks against innocent whites. Even the few news reports of “flash gangs” were careful not to make an issue of the fact that the gangs were black. That part of the story was all on personal cell phones and twitter accounts. Few professional news agencies are willing to call it what it is: black teens looking for trouble.

J. WHITE SOCIALIST You always have to bring race into it. These are underprivileged youth. We socialists understand that. But you look at their color. That's because you're a racist. We socialists are on to you. You discriminate against black. Suppose these were white punks.....We socialists may be be white but we are friends of the oppressed black. Can't you tell? Ask the blacks what they think of us. Go ahead. They know how we struggle for them. We are their friends. We get them stuff. Nobody gives food stamps like we do. Even the poor white can tell you that.

The comments to this entry are closed.