« And Bush Was Supposed To Be The Idiot? | Main | Memorial Day, 2011 »

May 26, 2011

Comments

LongRifle

AZ is considering additional extended UI benefits. Here is a notable comment from the AZ Republic. Rather long, but says it all--There are no jobs and there isn't going to be:


IgnoreAZCards82:
I have to comment on a few things in this comment section.

GOP lackeys: Which is it? Either (inappropriate term) is creating all these jobs or he isn't, you can't have it both ways. If the article were all about The great deceiver bringing all these jobs to the U.S. you would be on here (correctly) calling it a lie. Yet here you are when it comes to unemployment benefits talking about all these jobs that are available, so which is it?

Obama sycophants: The same goes to you. If some bogus article popped up in the media about nonexistent jobs being created by our Messiah, as they regularly do, half of you would be hailing it just as your hail how the nonrecovery of the economy is actually a recovery.

FWIW I am a Conservative(NOT Republican, there IS a difference) and normally would agree, 18 months is too long. But the reality of the situation is there aren't a mass of jobs being created or available. The economy ISN'T better. The unemployment numbers are a joke. You should know better. The fact is unemployment numbers are dropping because people are running out of benefits. Meanwhile both corrupt parties use the Government approved numbers for their agendas.

Btw no, I am no longer on unemployment. I WAS, but exhausted me tiers and benefits in 9 months.... Seven months ago. About that, I have been working since I was 13 years old(that was the age in the state I lived in), sometimes three jobs at once. See I had this crazy dream of owning my own business which I accomplished in 2003 up until when the depression started in 2008. Pretty successful, too. So much so I was having to turn work down because I couldn't handle it all and as any business owner not in bed with Congress will tell you, unable to fund the rapid growth it would have taken.

Thankfully when work started slowing I got myself a fulltime job thanks to a friend of mine in addition to running said business. Because that's how I am, I enjoy working. Sadly that business closed down their Phoenix operation. Also sadly I was forced to temporarily close down my business. That's where those benefits came in. Sure, they weren't much and paled in comparison to the six figures in tax revenue I generated for the state as a business owner, but it was something.

Now? I work, sometimes. I restarted said business and once every few months I am able to land a contract. Pretty tough to do regularly when there are over two hundred businesses competing for a handful of contracts every month. I work, too. Sometimes I can land a pool cleaning gig, or landscaping gig, or general laborer gig off Craigslist from everyday people. Sometimes someone will need an oil change and be willing to pay $5 or $10 for someone to do it for them. On good weeks when everything clicks that week I can bring in $200-$300. Others nothing. On average $100 per week.

Apply for jobs? Been there, do that. From February 2010 until currently I have had a resume expert go over my resume and have applied to over 25,000 jobs in the last 15 months. Here, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, California. Everything from landscaping laborer jobs at $8/hr to McDonalds(6 different locations!) for part time openings, $7.35 per hour. Jobs i've been qualified for, overqualified and underqualified.

Point being the work isn't there like people convince themselves it is. Anyone saying there are readily available jobs in this depression(let's be real and call it what it is, the recession didn't rebound, it quickly turned into a depression in 2008 that hasn't rebounded) is delusional.


Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2011/05/26/20110526arizona-unemployment-benefits-extension.html#ixzz1NZZnt8hD

gringoman

Monica said she thinks Sarah is going to run.

Posted by: DJ | May 26, 2011 at 01:50 PM

Oh, no. Did Monica beat out the crystal GringoBall, which on May 25 predicted that Sarah will run? Is there a time stamp?

Posted by: gringoman | May 26, 2011 at 10:04 PM

---------------

Let the record reflect that Monica (during a guest appearance on the Hannity Show) opined Sarah Palin was going to run for president.

That very notable event occurred at least 9 hours AFTER the crystal GringoBall revelation was made public. ;-)

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 07:25 AM


DJ,

thanks for the "time stamp." However, I am willing to concede that Monica opined without having seen what the Crystal GringoBall revealed at Monicamemo earlier. Gallantry demands nothing less, and Monica can still incite mine.

BTW Rush Limbaugh on Fox is indicating that he too is seeing what I'm seeing. Palin is not now intimidated by Libworld's massive Obamasuck media onslaught. She not only fully understands that it's part of the process, meant to depress Americans by ridiculing her, but she's learned even to relish it. They keep telling us what they fear. Nobody spends that much energy and venom mocking the insignificant. Besides, Palin can slap back at the hacks like no Republican "man" can or will. I.e. She's got their number. They probably don't know it yet, but they are going to find out, as the "process" proceeds.

Re Trump. If Palin ignites America like Libworld fears she might, Trump will not try to get back in next year. He's not an idiot. The only way he might get back in is if the combined forces of Libworld/Sorosbots/Corporate Charley/ Socialist Sammy/Club Gooper and their Obamasuck Media can successfully depress voters and keep her from igniting America.

gringoman

HARK!

HARK!

HARK!

My panel of experts just handed me a preliminary report on whether or not Sarah Palin intends on running for president. It reads: she does NOT intend to run for president. She has other plans for elective office. Specifics to be provided later.....

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 08:33 AM

Yes, DJ, it's about Senator from Arizona. Got it. Yet another option. The wise keep options open. They also know the difference between an option and a final decision. The Gringo Advisory Board goes with Princess on this: Sarah will run---for POTUS. US Senator for AZ is a contingency.

Ummahgummah

The tax payers have the ability--- to pay for the socialist leeches; the socialist eliteniks have the need--- for Living Large in order to save us from the "greedy capitalists."

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MAY 27, 2011 AT 12:36 PM

--

Libs keeps screeching about those evil rich WHO MADE THEIR OWN FORTUNES, but the LURVE themselves an arrogant Socialista living large off the peon masses.

Which goes to show that libs are really closet Monarchists. Libs also created this whole culture of celebrity worship.

Libs hate the self-made maverick [in the true sense of the word, not the bastardized McLame sense the libs have made it into].

Notice the difference in Bill Gates, for example, before and after the near-breakup of Microsoft. He used to hold politicians and journalists in well-deserved contempt. Now he is a piece of fluff married to a Commie and supports every liberal cause in the book.

.

gringoman

MamaGrizzly Watch/////

WAPO is doing good Alinskybooby against Sarah Palin today. How does "ace" reporter Harold Hack mention her plan to ride into DC this weekend with Rolling Thunder Motorcycles for their annual Memorial Day celebration?

Without a shred of evidence, Harold Hack writes that she "may" ride in on a hog. Clever. no? Won't that convince soft-headed Americanos that their liberal betters and intellectual superiors see Palin as a no=no? And won't Club Gooper be quiet as the Harold Hacks do its work for them---the work of getting Gooper Man nominated for 2012? Everybody knows how malleable the Americano is, right?

Meanwhile.....'THE UNDEFEATED' will open in Iowa and other "battleground" States, while the Hackery stick to the "She dumb" meme....

////Palin’s team initiated the film. Bannon said in a phone interview on Thursday that he made the movie at his own expense, that he did not interview Palin for it, and that the former governor and her team had no editorial control over it.

He predicted that audiences will come away with a new impression of the former governor. “People may say a lot of things about Governor Palin and Sarah Palin, but I guarantee when they come out they will not say she’s not smart, she’s not tough and she’s not dedicated,” he said.

gringoman

The tax payers have the ability--- to pay for the socialist leeches; the socialist eliteniks have the need--- for Living Large in order to save us from the "greedy capitalists."

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MAY 27, 2011 AT 12:36 PM

--

Libs keeps screeching about those evil rich WHO MADE THEIR OWN FORTUNES, but the LURVE themselves an arrogant Socialista living large off the peon masses.

Which goes to show that libs are really closet Monarchists. Libs also created this whole culture of celebrity worship.

Libs hate the self-made maverick [in the true sense of the word, not the bastardized McLame sense the libs have made it into].

Notice the difference in Bill Gates, for example, before and after the near-breakup of Microsoft. He used to hold politicians and journalists in well-deserved contempt. Now he is a piece of fluff married to a Commie and supports every liberal cause in the book.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 27, 2011 at 01:50 PM

Re the Libworld/Marxista hatred (and envy) of the self-made: One of the great and most obvious examples of this is their hatred of Sarah Palin. She defies everything the neo-com Women's Lib want---a woman who succeeds by following their "pwogwessive" talking points. They overwhelmingly prefer an Ivy League Princess like Hillary Clinton, who is still subtly choking from eating and drinking out of Bubba's bedpan for 30 years, while riding his coat-tails to fame and fortune. Sad woman? Happy woman? Look at Hillary and look at Sarah. Can't tell which is the "sad" and which the "happy"? Honest people can see it, and easily.

According to Rush Limbaugh, even some "conservative" women resent Palin. I suspect these women would tend to be (1) Ivy Leaguers and the like who resent an "upstart" who did not tread the Elite Treadmill like they did (1) the envious who can't forgive her for doing what they never did and probably never could.

gringoman

GOOPER DREAMS

By: Byron York 05/26/11 8:05 PM
Chief Political Correspondent Ed Andrieski/AP

"The bottom line is Sarah Palin is not going to run for president," says a Republican adviser close to front-runner Mitt Romney. "She's making money, she's moved on, she's kind of an entertainer rather than a politician. She still has some sway with the grass roots, but she is not going to run."

"I don't think she's going to run," says a Republican close to Tim Pawlenty. "She has faded a lot in the last few months. I look at what she's doing now and say that she's found a way to get back in the story."

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/05/palin-creates-buzz-gives-no-sign-running#ixzz1NZvKzUZY

gringoNOTE: Nighty=night, fellas. Sweet dreams....

gringoman

nevadabob said...

Sarah Palin is a lot smarter than Mitt Romney because she's never been for an individual mandate.

Romney is Obama, only slightly lighter skinned. If you want a white Barack Obama, Mitt is your guy. Ask anyone from Massachusetts who had to live through his reign as governor.

He and Obama have essentially no difference of opinion on the important issues of the day.

I don't think people want a professional politician from the secret society like Romney back in office. We're tired of the way the secret societies of Harvard, and Yale and the Mormons (Harry Reid) run the country.

We want change.

If that means we have to destroy the Republican Party to get it, oh well then so be it. That would be unfortunate and will be a sad day. But it will happen.

Sarah Palin is going to run. It's just that she may not run as a Republican. So, doesn't really matter what Mitt Romney thinks since he's going the way of the Whigs.
5/27/11 10:31 AM

gringoNOTE: I doubt that Palin would run as an Independent. The results of a 3-way race would be something like: PALIN 23% GOP 33% OBAMA 39%. The Marxobots could capture the White House with not much more than 1/3 of the vote, like their Billary did, thanks to Perot in '92. Palin would understand that.

gringoman

IS SHE IS, OR IS SHE AIN'T?

nevadabob said...

Does this look like someone NOT RUNNING?

http://nation.foxnews.com/sites/nation.foxnews.com/files/imagecache/dv1/636_052611_fx_palin_bus.jpg

She's not going to run a conventional campaign BECAUSE OF THE FEC. The Federal Election Commission has rules for candidates that require candidates to disclose information to their political enemies - entrenched in Washington - so that those enemies can destroy candidates who threaten their structure.

We're routing around that spy network.

So, no, by the SEC's definition, Sarah's not running for anything yet.
5/27/11 10:34 AM

gringoNOTE: GAB remains with Princess on this: Mama Grizzly will run. (Yes, a run for US Senate AZ not impossible, but neither is a run for higher ground. Don't have a compass? Then watch those bear tracks.)

Ummahgummah

.

No. The only thing Perot did wrong was quit. And who cares is Bush Sr. had won instead of Bubba? What difference would that have made, frankly?

.

DJ

My panel of experts just handed me a preliminary report on whether or not Sarah Palin intends on running for president. It reads: she does NOT intend to run for president. She has other plans for elective office. Specifics to be provided later.....

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 08:33 AM

Yes, DJ, it's about Senator from Arizona. Got it. Yet another option. The wise keep options open. They also know the difference between an option and a final decision. The Gringo Advisory Board goes with Princess on this: Sarah will run---for POTUS. US Senator for AZ is a contingency.

Posted by: gringoman | May 27, 2011 at 01:17 PM

---------------

Well, Gringoman, my panel of experts has determined Sarah has made up her mind and is running for Senator of AZ. After winning, she will use her Senate position as a springboard to launch her 2016 presidential campaign; which, in that event, will almost certainly land her in the Oval Office.

Yes, Sarah IS going to run for POTUS, but not this time around.

thebuckstopshere

cracks in the foundation.........?

http://www.breitbart.tv/pelosi-to-obama-we-want-a-timetable-to-bring-the-troops-home/


NO RINOS 2012

thebuckstopshere

DJ, if the pubes can manage to keep the house, gain control of the senate (palin seat, good start....) what who that make the One if re-elected?


all of the above would only matter, if seats taken, were taken by CONSERVATIVES, NOT RINOS....

personally, I think 2012 is going to be sh!t hitting the proverbial fan.......

STOP THE STENCH 2012

LongRifle

Well, Gringoman, my panel of experts has determined Sarah has made up her mind and is running for Senator of AZ. After winning, she will use her Senate position as a springboard to launch her 2016 presidential campaign; which, in that event, will almost certainly land her in the Oval Office.

Yes, Sarah IS going to run for POTUS, but not this time around.

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 03:38 PM

I told you...

LongRifle

Sarah will NOT run. She is a REPUBLICAN; not an Independent. She moved to Scottsdale to take Kyl's Senate seat from the non-threat of a now-handicapped Gifford run.
She will make her bones and run in 2016 (if Obama hasn't become Iman of the world) and win.
In 2012, no GOOPER can beat Obama out of the current crop at any rate. With luck, they will take the Senate. However, if they don't get the Medicare re-do explained properly, they will lose the House and the Senate. Most people get their info from one minute of histrionics in the local news at 10 PM; which LIBERALs own.

DJ

"DJ, if the pubes can manage to keep the house, gain control of the senate (palin seat, good start....) what who that make the One if re-elected?"

--------------

Null and void.

This is wishful thinking, but if we could win all the Senatorial seats up for grabs in 2012, then that would give the Republicans a veto/filibuster proof majority (67). In that event, Obummer would be sunk.

thebuckstopshere

kinda like a la Peking Lame Duck.........

I gotta believe Dems up for re-election, on the outside may disregard "racist" teapartiers but on the inside.....

One thing for sho, neither one of the "two" want to lose that lucrative place at the public's trough....

NO RINOS 2012

thebuckstopshere

NOPE NO SURPRISES HERE....how do you spin this to the 1 mil who lost their job thru stimulus spending....

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=77517

NO RINOS 2012

gringoman

Well, Gringoman, my panel of experts has determined Sarah has made up her mind and is running for Senator of AZ. After winning, she will use her Senate position as a springboard to launch her 2016 presidential campaign; which, in that event, will almost certainly land her in the Oval Office.

Yes, Sarah IS going to run for POTUS, but not this time around.

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 03:38 PM

DJ,

Warrior Princess and me say otherwise. That's two against one. If you want to add your panel as one, I will be forced to add GAB. That would still make it 3 to 2.

Also, you have called for Obama's re-election. Doesn't your panel understand the kind of Aramageddon Light this strategy entails, which would make 2016 hypothetical in more ways than one? Don't they listen to you? If so, how can they seriously consider a run by Palin or anybody else in 2016? What will be left of the Republic as we know it in 2016, gutted by the sick Sorosbots and their spawn of Satan? Doesn't your panel understand your view that the US needs to re-elect Obama in order to go through a terrible trial by fire, or in Gringolese, the Bamacalyptic?

gringoman

ROLLING THUNDER SUNDAY


For now, pretty much all that’s certain about Palin is that she’ll ride with Rolling Thunder through the streets of Washington Sunday and ride in a bus up the northeast coast after that.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/05/rolling-thunder-riders-praise-sarah-palins-participation-in-rally.html

gringoNOTE: Gentlemen, a suggestion.......Start your engines.

DJ


DJ,
Warrior Princess and me say otherwise. That's two against one. If you want to add your panel as one, I will be forced to add GAB. That would still make it 3 to 2.
Also, you have called for Obama's re-election. Doesn't your panel understand the kind of Aramageddon Light this strategy entails, which would make 2016 hypothetical in more ways than one? Don't they listen to you? If so, how can they seriously consider a run by Palin or anybody else in 2016? What will be left of the Republic as we know it in 2016, gutted by the sick Sorosbots and their spawn of Satan? Doesn't your panel understand your view that the US needs to re-elect Obama in order to go through a terrible trial by fire, or in Gringolese, the Bamacalyptic?

Posted by: gringoman | May 27, 2011 at 08:26 PM

-------------------------

G-Man wrote: “Warrior Princess and me say otherwise. That's two against one.”

DJ: Yes, and two wrongs don’t make a right, do they?

G-Man wrote: “Also, you have called for Obama's re-election.”

DJ: No quite. I said I’d vote for Obama out of protest if the G.O.P. dares give us another RINO such as McAnus.

G-Man asks: “Don't they listen to you?”

DJ: No, I listen to them.

G-Man wrote: “What will be left of the Republic as we know it in 2016, gutted by the sick Sorosbots and their spawn of Satan? Doesn't your panel understand your view that the US needs to re-elect Obama in order to go through a terrible trial by fire, or in Gringolese, the Bamacalyptic?”

DJ: HAHAHAHA! With all due respect, Gringoman, you’re starting to sound like Leslie. :-D

Chief Joe

Obama got the World Banks to give $20B to emerging Arab democracies, with possibly $20B more to come ....

if we gave them nothing, they probably would not fight - but $40B?

gringoman

CLUB GOOPER ON MAMA

Karl Rove To Greta: ‘I Don’t Think [Palin] Thinks The Rules Apply To Her’
video
by Frances Martel | 11:07 pm, May 26th, 2011

gringoman

Club Gooper Measures Mama

Rove didn’t give a yes or no to that, but noted that Palin was captain of her own ship, but added the caveat that, if she believed large crowds on a tour were an indication she would do well in a primary she was wrong, noting that some of the biggest crowds in modern history came out for George McGovern, who lost a landslide defeat against Richard Nixon in 1972. “There’s a difference between crowds and what you need for a campaign,” Rove warned. That said, he argued there was a chance that Palin had hit on something completely new in politics, noting her presence on Facebook and Twitter without “being inside the Beltway.” Overall, he didn’t seem too confident that this campaigning would work out, but definitely left the door open for the possibility that Palin’s new media campaigning would revolutionize the political landscape.

borderbriar

DJ, if you buy into the IQ nonsense, you'll have a very inaccurate view of the world. As someone who was a Mensa member for a few years I can assure you scoring high on an IQ test only means a person has a knack for scoring high on an IQ test. It may have some predictive value on how well one may do in school, but the real world doesn't run on an IQ scale. Like Asians more and more Latinos are staying in school to follow the white pattern of go to college and climb the corporate ladder, but many still follow the cultural tradition of dropping out early to go to work. If you get a chance to travel through the Southwest, especially West Texas and New Mexico, you will notice how entrepreneurial Hispanics are. Lots run small family businesses, but increasingly many run large companies. Like it or not Hispanics represent the future. Many are still influenced by the Pope and don't practice birth control and many are just willing to live on a lower level because they like large families. That will probably change as it has with other cultures, but for a good while they are going to be producing a lot faster than us whites. If you look at the success of Hispanics in business, often high tech ones, and how predominantly Hispanic universities are turning out top level scientific research, there is no reason to worry about Hispanics.

The problem of failure of blacks as a group to advance is a complex and vexing one. Thomas Sowell in his book Black Rednecks and White Liberals gives some interesting views as to why other groups have been able to move ahead.

DJ

"DJ, if you buy into the IQ nonsense, you'll have a very inaccurate view of the world. As someone who was a Mensa member for a few years I can assure you scoring high on an IQ test only means a person has a knack for scoring high on an IQ test. It may have some predictive value on how well one may do in school, but the real world doesn't run on an IQ scale."

--------------------

That's your opinion, Borderbriar, and I respect it but virtually ALL the experts in the field of psychometrics beleive otherwise. All the data indicates IQ is BY FAR the best predictor of how someone will do in life. Moreover IQ is passed on from parents to children via the genes. It's inherited. I wish it weren't so, but it is.

IQ Will Put You In Your Place
By Charles Murray


http://eugenics.net/papers/murray.html


gringoman

DJ: HAHAHAHA! With all due respect, Gringoman, you’re starting to sound like Leslie. :-D

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 09:02 PM

To paraphrase the Romans, nothing human is foreign to me. In certain cases, that includes the inhuman.

G-Man wrote: “Warrior Princess and me say otherwise. That's two against one.”

DJ: Yes, and two wrongs don’t make a right, do they?

GRINGOMAN///You really don't know? I'm surprised, DJ, at your forgetting the mother's milk of Monicamemo, politics. In politics wrongs are the only things that lead to rights. You do remember Obama vs. McCain in 2008---two wrongs that made the Tea Party right?

DJ

GRINGOMAN///You really don't know? I'm surprised, DJ, at your forgetting the mother's milk of Monicamemo, politics. In politics wrongs are the only things that lead to rights. You do remember Obama vs. McCain in 2008---two wrongs that made the Tea Party right?

Posted by: gringoman | May 27, 2011 at 09:53 PM

-------------------

HAHA! That's right. Excellent point, Gringoman!

Y O U A R E T H E M A N !!!!

xbjllb

Sarah Palin cannot and will not win Senator of Arizona or any other political office ever again.

She will lose, after the most expensive waste of rightwing money in history, throwing away far more than the combined "campaigns" of Sharron Angle in Nevada and Christine O'Donnel.

And that will be the effective wake of the Tea Party. And you can take that to the bank.

Even the senile people and bigots who voted for Jan Brewer will not put someone who abandoned her governor job mid term for a reality TV series in as their senator.

Sarah Palin has as much chance at winning a senate seat in Arizona as does Levi Johnston.

Because they're both celebrities and not politicians. Palin gave up being a politician forever when she quit Alaska. Which actually gives Levi a better chance.

Which doesn't mean she can't raise money from desperate clueless fascists who see their America growing further and further away from their clutches.

It's just that they'd be better off burning the money for heat.

jay

"The Democrats had several years to get this economy going, and their approach has clearly failed"

Clinton memo to Bush:
"Gave you a 4 year surplus. Whaaaaat happened?"
The dems have had a little over 3 years to fix it . Bush, (no it's another But, Bush. But he was in office at the time.)
Took a huge surplus and created a huge debt in 32 months.
Congressional Budget Office, a ten-year projected surplus of $5.6 trillion to a deficit of $4.4 trillion: a turnaround of $10 trillion in roughly 32 months.

jay

The FDA is a bunch of ex drug company folks.
The attacks on Healthfood stores?
It's a drug industry attack to get rid of them. The drug companies invented diseases. Just to sell their products. GERD is NOT a disease. But, by law, only drugs can "cure" a disease.

jay

"Conventional wisdom in the United States suggests that stock returns are better when a Republican president is in office. This belief is fostered by the Grand Old Party's traditionally pro-business, anti-tax platform. Democrats, on the other hand, are traditionally associated with an anti-business, tax-and-spend platform based on using taxation policies and welfare programs to redistribute wealth from affluent individuals and large corporations to people at the lower end of the socioeconomic scale. Despite these well-established characterizations of each party's position, a 2003 study conducted at the University of California's Anderson School produced numbers that reveal significantly better stock market returns when the nation's highest office is held by a Democrat. "

So, what an increase in your portfolio. Vote Democrat?

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/08/political-party-democrat-republican-stock-returns.asp

"It's tough to say. President Eisenhower (from 1953-1961) was the only Republican to hold office during a statistically significant period of market outperformance"

Chief Joe

In case Obama dies from parasites in Europe, here is a practice death certificate :

http://www.findadeath.com/Deceased/c/John%20Candy/Candy%20DC.JPG

If you zoomed in and translated, you would have noted his eye color is incorrect.

 M/M

You do remember Obama vs. McCain in 2008---two wrongs that made the Tea Party right?

Posted by: gringoman | May 27, 2011 at 09:53 PM

-------------------

HAHA! That's right. Excellent point, Gringoman!

Y O U A R E T H E M A N !!!!

Posted by: DJ | May 27, 2011 at 10:05 PM
___________________________________

Actually, it started with TARP and went back to W.


Ummahgummah

.

OK, we are still in the initial stages of OPC. If you are as tired as the rest of us of the same LIEberal bleat-bleat polluting the Memo then please look up Gringoman's site and contact him.

If we want to read LIEberal talking points we can find them all over the lamestream media.

The Memo is supposed to give refuge to us from these liars and manipulators who just want to sap our productivity on their own behalf.

I think we still need to heard from SteveOK, Truther and Longrifle. Unlike LIEberals, we are actually diverse and individualistic, which often makes it harder to co-ordinate a concerted effort.

.

 M/M

How many Polacks does it take to snub the President? ONE

Lech Walesa/2012

Posted by: LongRifle | May 27, 2011 at 12:31 PM
_________________________________

GOOD FOR HIM! Did anyone notice that Michelle Obama snubbed Poland while Polish troops are fighting and dying in Afghanistan?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0511/POLES_NEGLECTED.html

Meanwhile, the poor Queen of England is expected to tolerate them and Michelle's "There's Something About Mary" hairstyle. But what can you expect from someone who attended Rev Wright's church:

"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye. We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost."

http://vdare.com/buchanan/080317_wright.htm

Guess, Rev. Wright didn't care about these people:
http://www.holocaustforgotten.com/

We had an Underground Railroad too:

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERpilecki.htm

http://www.pbs.org/programs/irena-sendler/

Ummahgummah

.

It pays for everyone to know that as the libs are screeching FREEDOM OF SPEECH as they point their fingers at the regulars on the Memo, THIS is what they are doing on the other hand:

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/05/georgetown-deni.html

Just in case some of us had any doubts as to their true agenda.

.

 M/M


Speaking of defending our cherished freedom of speech from "the castrati" and MessNBC, Captain Honors, the decorated Navy officer, who after 27 years of LOYAL service to our country, might be thrown out of the Navy like a bag of trash over... those videos that the state-run media aired in January. Even if you are non military, you can stand up for Captain Honors you by filling out the non military form on Captain Honors' website:http://captowenhonors.com/Here is Captain Honors' IMPRESSIVE background. Please consider supporting him:http://www.militarytimes.com/static/projects/pages/honors-declaration.pdf Thanks for your time and your support.

Ummahgummah

.

Remember than when you actually take your time and effort to reply to the inanities put out by the libtrolls on the Memo.

THEY WANT TO CENSOR WEBSITES THEY DON'T LIKE.

Liberals HATE Free Speech!

Just like moslems who harp on Freedom of religion in western countries but don't practice said Freedom or Religion at home.

Liberalislam!

ONE AND THE SAME!

.

Ummahgummah

.

From Irish to Polish in a day! Only the Bama can do it! We will really have to worry when he claims he's German.

.

gringoman

OK, we are still in the initial stages of OPC. If you are as tired as the rest of us of the same LIEberal bleat-bleat polluting the Memo then please look up Gringoman's site and contact him.

If we want to read LIEberal talking points we can find them all over the lamestream media.

The Memo is supposed to give refuge to us from these liars and manipulators who just want to sap our productivity on their own behalf.

I think we still need to heard from SteveOK, Truther and Longrifle. Unlike LIEberals, we are actually diverse and individualistic, which often makes it harder to co-ordinate a concerted effort.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 28, 2011 at 07:35 AM

Of course, the troll trash, as they regurgitate their mindless Talking Points, do show exactly what the Marxobot game is as they drone on about the "fascists" and "millionaires" while their billionaires fund the "Take Back America" and their commissars in the 20th century broke the murder record even of Adolf Hitler.E.g. They give away a major lie they will use in their desperate attempt to keep an American, like a Sarah Palin, from igniting America as the Land of Liberty it was designed to be. "She a quitter! Hee=Hee! She abandoned her post as Governor of Alaska! You clingers may be stupid, but you not stupid enough to back a quitter, are you? Hee-Hee. Now get out of here and stop being fired up by that. She a quitter! Hee-hee!"

The pogwessive piranha and little Sorosbots, of course, won't point out that Palin made a very astute move by leaving a post which the Leftniki thuggery had made untenable by using their Lawfare tactic. The thugs knew Alaska law. They knew that by filing nuisance law suit after nuisance law suit against Palin she would have been tied up in court for years, and at her own expense, since Alaska law mandates that she would have to pay out of pocket. It was an indecent move for the decent. But for LibThug, perfect! Or so the thugs thought. But Palin foiled them. In fact, after she left, all the cheesy lawsuits were gone. Not a single "corruption" charge stuck. By leaving an office which the LibThugs had effectively destroyed by their vicious use of Alaska law against a Governor who had 80 percent favorability for her crusade against corruption of Dems AND Goopers, she turned their game against them. She made use of her new freedom to go on to fame and fortune.

They tried to stymie her. She reacted by throwing the stymie right back at them. Now.with their billionaire funding, from Soros and Wall Street banksters etc, they hope to keep blowing "Quitter" sand into Americano eyes.

Which means their pwogwessive piranha must bite away more frenzied than ever, as we see even at Monicamemo, as it proceeds with Operation Pest Control.

The LibThugs and troll trash see a Palin as a vampire sees garlic, and Goldman Sachs sees an indictment.

Ummahgummah

.

Well said, Gringoman. And those who aren't coming on board must ask themselves whether they are quitters or collaborateurs.

.

Ummahgummah

.

So.. let's see.. a show of hands please.. who is LISTENING TO MONICA'S RADIO SHOW?

Please raise your voice if you are listening. I think it's important that she knows who among us is actually listening to her programs.

.

Ummahgummah

.

Since I actually listened to today's show I learned that it's REALLY IMPORTANT to raise taxes on THA EEEEVEEEEL RICH so the Government can spend it on REEEEEAAAAALLY IMPORTANT stuff like.. ta-dah!

http://kramersforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=376124

SHRIMPS ON TREADMILLS!

Oh yeah, TAX THE RICH!!! We need more shrimp exercises since we refuse to exercise our Military under the Bummah!

.

Ummahgummah

.

Maybe jay also listened to Monica's show and now he can explain to us "stupid Tea Party YOU PEOPLE" how spending on Shrimp Exercises is good for America.

I am actually dying to hear this one.. but I doubt we will hear anything but crickets and tumbleweeds.

.

Ummahgummah

.

THE PRICE WE ALL PAY FOR LIEBERALISM:

Oslo: ALL Sexual Assaults ending in Rape commited by Non-Westerners

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_rHFKRwv5Y&feature=player_embedded

LIE-BERALS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE RAPES! NOONE BUT LIE-BERALS WANTS THESE "ASYLUM SEEKERS" AND "REFUGEES" IN WESTERN LANDS!!!!!

NOONE BUT LIEBERALS GIVES THEM LAX SENTENCES AND PREVENTS THEIR DEPORTATION!!!!!

NOONE BUT LIE-BERALS PREVENTS AN OPEN AND HONEST DISCUSSION OF ISLAM, THE ROOT CAUSE OF THESE RAPES AND ALL THE VIOLENCE THESE PEOPLE PERPETRATE!!

L-I-E-B-E-R-A-L-S ARE COMPLICIT IN MOSLEM CRIMES !!!!!!!

.

gringoman

So.. let's see.. a show of hands please.. who is LISTENING TO MONICA'S RADIO SHOW?

Please raise your voice if you are listening. I think it's important that she knows who among us is actually listening to her programs.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 28, 2011 at 01:09 PM

Anyone, even the troll trash, who listened to Radio Monica today would know that....

1, She is far from convinced by the current conventional wisdom about Sarah Palin, i.e. the speculation that Palin is not running for POTUS. Monica still thinks Sarah IS running, or very likely will be soon.

2. Monica's contempt for the MSM continues. She got in "lamestream" repeatedly. I have to think that's a good sign, since I started using 'lamestream" almost five years ago. Glad to see it's been filtering down, or trickling up during the last few years. In fact, if Monica is willing to listen, I will have a suggestion later for a term that, arguably, can sock the hackstream back on its toady haunches, just in time for their 2012 charade. Monica's Goopers won't use it. But will Monica?


(Incidentally, even Larry Kudlow, a hard money guy from CNBC who worked for Ronald Reagan, admits to being very intrigued by the idea of Palin running. He's willing to take flak for this from straightlaced Rerpublicans. He thinks the Alinskybooby meme that she 's 'stupid' is obviously a joke, and that she may be the strongest advocate of American free enterprise on the scene today, far more effective than the Republican so-called "men.")

jay

Maybe jay also listened to Monica's show and now he can explain to us "stupid Tea Party YOU PEOPLE" how spending on Shrimp Exercises is good for America.

I am actually dying to hear this one.. but I doubt we will hear anything but crickets and tumbleweeds.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 28, 2011 at 03:33 PM

Hey, I agree that there has been wasteful spending. But, it has been done by BOTH parties. Not just the "EVIL DEMS"
Also, I would sign a petition to keep conservative websites on the internet.

Never said the tea party was stupid. Another case of saying something I NEVER said.
Also, "you people" is far less derogratory, (actually not derogratory ar all) Than what I've been called since day one. And, I'm not alone.
Monica's radio show? Could only listen to it on the memo. Don't know what channel it's on. But, do listen to her when she is on the Mclaughlin's Group. That's how I got here.

Ummahgummah

.

Gringoman, let's just presume to know that if this were a BLACK-"oriented" forum, GAY would never address the people who post there as "you people".

I think that one's a LOCK, don't you?

.

Ummahgummah

.

And let it be known that WE HAVE STATED MANY TIMES BEFORE that WE are not in favor of massive spending REGARDLESS of party affiliation.

However, we NEVER see the LEFT criticize spending.

I venture to say that it is precisely that very LEFT which BULLIES the be-balled "men" of the Gooper Thide of Sings into reckless spending even when they do know better.

.

The comments to this entry are closed.