« The Chicago Way | Main | Storm Clouds »

May 25, 2011

Comments

DJ

Yes, Monica, Obama is often a doofus but ... the latest Gallup tracking poll shows Obama has a 51% approval rating as opposed to a 42% disapproval.

I think it's a safe bet that out of those 42% who disapprove of him, 1 in 4 are liberals.

Ergo, when faced with the choice come election day whether to vote for the Gooper candidate or the long-legged mack daddy, said libs will do doubt pull the lever for the latter.

Hence, as of now, Obama is clearly the prohibitive favorite. What this means for the future of America is all too obvious.

But don't blame the long-legged mack daddy for America's demise; the die was set for America's decline long before Obama entered the political arena.

EyeOnFreedom

Well Said!

LongRifle

To under-estimate Obama is a serious tactical error; just ask Trump.
With the Soros' funded 800 pound Gorilla-media in his corner, nothing will be spared to see America PC'd into Soros' vision of the "open society".
The GOP has no one to beat him. Perry is their best bet, ONLY because the Texas election machinery has been in place since 1968 and WORKS, electing Three Presidents from different parties.
REAL Conservatives (whatever that is now) won't like it but hate the idea of another four years of Obama even more...

xbjllb

Obama can come out into the Rose Garden in front of all the press in the world, take off every stitch of clothing, squat down and leave a steaming pile of fresh excrement in front of the podium, pass out on the lawn while presenting a piss fountain, and there STILL will be no GOP in a mere decade and no GOP President ever again.

The GOP lost the 26th in New York against all odds, in a GOP majority district, despite MILLIONS in fascist biz biz money. The right have utterly and completely lost their SUICIDAL fascist battle against Medicare and Unions. Congressional GOP cared more about their cushy upcoming lobbying HIGHER PAYING jobs with their johns than getting re-elected. Screw the constituents and electorate, who needs to be in Congress anymore? Who wants that headache, with all its hassles and limitations? Better to be a whore by name also so there are no "misunderstandings": lobbyist.

It's nice to see a Nazi Party like the GOP completely obliterate itself on the altar of their johns.

Want to keep it from happening ever again? OUTLAW LOBBYING. Publicly fund all elections and block forever from politics people who break the rules.

That'll be the day.

xbjllb

If Obama had been smart enough to hire me, he never would have toasted the Queen THROUGHOUT THEIR NATIONAL ANTHEM.

Possibly the greatest diplomatic gaffe in the history of the world.

Even when GHW Bush threw up on the Japanese ambassador, it thankfully didn't go on as long or was anywhere near as painful. And was unavoidable.

Actually, it was hysterically funny as well as painful; several hundred of Britain's highest class assembled in one room suppressing the dreadful urge to "SHOOSH"!!!! the President of the United States the way almost every last one of them had done their children during "God Save The Queen" in the past.

Did you see some of those baleful glares? If looks could kill.

But he's still President until 2016. More fun and shenanigans to come I am sure.

xbjllb

England won't declare war.

But they will want to.

For at least several decades.

Christo Strom

Maybe he was at a Bob Dylan concert in 2008
and was remembering,
Won't you come see me Queen Jane.
Wait a minute it's Queen Elizabeth.
Oh well, the times they are a changing....

National Debt Training

Respectfully in TRUTH

Christo Strom
Orange Race Card Angels

P.S. Hi Monica from D.C. in 2011

Ummahgummah

The GOP lost the 26th in New York against all odds, in a GOP majority district, despite MILLIONS in fascist biz biz money. The right have utterly and completely lost their SUICIDAL fascist battle against Medicare and Unions. Congressional GOP cared more about their cushy upcoming lobbying HIGHER PAYING jobs with their johns than getting re-elected. Screw the constituents and electorate, who needs to be in Congress anymore? Who wants that headache, with all its hassles and limitations? Better to be a whore by name also so there are no "misunderstandings": lobbyist.

--

Gotta love it. When the X-lax predicts your demise the exact opposite takes place.

As for the 26th, the spineless but self-financing RINO was pushed at the expense of the TEA PARTY candidate. The RATS put up a fake "third party" candidate to siphon off Tea Party votes.

Typical RAT bullhockey and it was talked about on local radio shows BEFORE that election.

JUST thought I'd take the RAT SPITTLE aka SPIN off.

.

gringoman

////Obama is often a doofus, but according to the Left-wing media, President Bush, Governor Palin and other conservatives are the only doofi out there. We know better.//////

Yes, yes, Sweetie, but where were you when....?(see below)


Although Palin is not interviewed directly, the film features on-camera interviews and commentaries from 10 Alaskans who played different roles in her political rise, as well as six Lower 48 denizens who defend her in more visceral terms, including prominent conservative firebrands Mark Levin, Andrew Breitbart and Tammy Bruce.

Hey, what about Warrior Princess! Where was she, as Breitbart tore into the Republican "eunuchs" for not defending Palin against the Hackstream's massive Marxoid muck makers?

ps Will Palin run? Longrifle says no. The Crystal GringoBall on May 25 now indicates yes. One thing is certain. Even if nobody knows, everybody is going to find out. Trust me.

And it will be the best show in town, as the Hackstream, Club Gooper and the Soros socialist slimies shriek the same old mantra they tried on "stupid" Ronald Reagan decades ago: UNELECTABLE, and Americans responded, "Yeah, but why not elect him anyway?"

ps The new film coming out, THE UNDEFEATED, showing Palin's accomplishments as Governor in an Alaska stinking with Republican and Democrat corruption, will give even Oprah watchers a way of evaluating Slimy's 'stupid' meme. That's just for the untutored, who don't know that a Palin supporter like Mark Levin has more brains in his bowels than a media hack pack and Sorosbots have in their collective skulls.


gringoman

While the media hacks of Corporate Charley and Socialist Sammy continue to shriek "UNELECTABLE" as they once tried with Ronald Reagan.........

May 25, 2011
Palin's Secret Weapon: New Film to Premiere in June
By Scott Conroy

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/25/palins_secret_weapon_new_film_to_premiere_in_june_109949.html

gringoman

Not For Gooper Eyes Only.........


WND Exclusive A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Trump pumps Corsi for latest on Obama
Requests information from author of 'Where's the Birth Certificate?'
Posted: May 24, 2011

Read more: Trump pumps Corsi for latest on Obama http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=303049#ixzz1NNjTlnVS

Ummahgummah

.

Just when I finished UNSPINNING the SPIN re. the 26th in NY, Limbaugh is explaining the exact same thing to his audience!

The RATS are apparently using this to herald the demise of the Tea Party.

ROLMFAO!!

They installed a RAT-OP to "run to the right" of the RINO and when their candidate wins they trumpet the end of Conservatism!

Luck Fiberals!

.

Ummahgummah

.

Which proves by the way that the X-lax is feeding from the same talking point trough as jay for instance.

All they can do is regurgitate the talking points put out by their ¡último líders!

.

gringoman

Just when I finished UNSPINNING the SPIN re. the 26th in NY, Limbaugh is explaining the exact same thing to his audience!

The RATS are apparently using this to herald the demise of the Tea Party.

ROLMFAO!!

They installed a RAT-OP to "run to the right" of the RINO and when their candidate wins they trumpet the end of Conservatism!

Luck Fiberals!

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 12:28 PM

Claro que si. This also bears out the gist of many gringoNOTES:

Does Savage do things that Limbaugh does not do? Yes. Of course. That's true.

OTOH, it's equally true that Limbaugh does things that Savage does not do.

DJ

"DJ, the Mac Daddy is merely the most visible symptom of our ongoing decline. But he is also responsible for hastening said decline.

Which might be what is needed to make the frog realize that that proverbial water is pretty dang HOT." ( --Ummah)

-----------

Yes, better we get this over with quick rather than elect a relative moderate Republican such as Palin et al.

Palin will only serve to allow the liberalism that ails us to metastasize beyond the point of a viable treatment. On the other hand, Obama MIGHT (but not for certain) cause the American patriots to wake up to the fact we are going down thus perform RADICAL surgery. The type of radical surgery that some here at the Memo KNOW is indicated.

Ummahgummah

.

After I explained a few things.. Notice the SILENCE OF THE LIBS.

.

Ummahgummah

.

Dj, I am not sure that we agree on Sarah Palin at this time. I respect your views but I am inclined to want to see how she does before I judge her.

As for those whom I see as RINOS.. sure.. bring on the Bama and get it over with instead of dragging it out.

.

gringoman

Here's a foto of Mama Grizzly you won't see in the Progressive Koran that ABC Radio's Mark Levin calls "The New York Slimes."

http://gawker.com/5805451

gringoman

MikeSilver commented:

Remember who told Bibi to stop apologizing for Israel…….. Sarah.

DJ

Sarah Palin is pro-amnesty for illegal aliens exactly the same way McAnus is.

Palin turned her back on the Tea Party candidate and supported McAnus in the last election.

Palin turned her back on the Tea Party candidate in Texas (Debra Medina) and supported the estabishment candidate - "RINO RICK" Perry.

The list goes on.....

I really like Sarah but we can't ignore the inconvenient truth which clearly informs us that Palin = McAnus.

gringoman

In response to a standard troll technique, i.e. Sarah is a "fine American" but she is a rich famous celeb, you see, and not a "real conservative." Don't fall for all that staged fluff. Got it, my fellow "conservatives"? Vote for the Davy Crockett Party. Now they're real Americans, not media image. Got it?/////

#24 May 25, 2011 at 11:00 am
Militant Conservative commented:

Old fan, you must be senile and beleiving the MSM byline. Think for yourself and quit slurping up the MSM lies. I’ll take anyone that LOVES America AND is a LIFE MEMBER of the NRA.

Powder is dry and Sarah is smokin hot.

Ummahgummah

.

hahaha! The progressive Koran.

Priceless!

.

gringoman

"DJ, the Mac Daddy is merely the most visible symptom of our ongoing decline. But he is also responsible for hastening said decline.

Which might be what is needed to make the frog realize that that proverbial water is pretty dang HOT." ( --Ummah)

-----------

Yes, better we get this over with quick rather than elect a relative moderate Republican such as Palin et al.

Palin will only serve to allow the liberalism that ails us to metastasize beyond the point of a viable treatment. On the other hand, Obama MIGHT (but not for certain) cause the American patriots to wake up to the fact we are going down thus perform RADICAL surgery. The type of radical surgery that some here at the Memo KNOW is indicated.

Posted by: DJ | May 25, 2011 at 12:40 PM

DJ,

Let's assume you're right. I don't think you are, but let's assume it for a moment. You make a great argument for running Sarah Palin. Libworld, Goopers, Sorosbots and I believe yourself, maintain that Palin is UNELECTABLE. Most of you want Obama re-elected (you want this for reasons you stated)

Ergo, how can you not be enthusiastic for RUN, SARAH, RUN?

According to everyone cited above, it guarantees what everyone cited above wants---the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama.

jay


Which proves by the way that the X-lax is feeding from the same talking point trough as jay for instance.

All they can do is regurgitate the talking points put out by their ¡último líders!

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 12:30 PM
Talking points? As in facts from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. IRS? others?
Maybe conservatives just hate the truth!. They fed us the lies so long. They believe them. Look how long people thought the world was flat. Conservatism is a mental disorder!
Maybe conservatives paid lobbyists for decades to get people to not believe the truth!

The silence of the libs? Not everyone can sit at their computer all day.

gringoman

hahaha! The progressive Koran.

Priceless!

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 01:07 PM

Ummah, how did I strongly suspect you would dig it?

ps I'll bet Mark Levin would love it, but probably hesitate to use it because of certain religious "sensitivities."

DJ

Gringoman,

If Sarah gets elected the best she can do is mask the symptoms of the disease that has been eating away at America since the 1960s.

Cases in point:

Did Reagan, the great Republican go, cure America of the liberal disease or nurture it?

Did Bush the Elder or Bush the Younger help eradicate liberalism or serve to compound its destructive nature?

Sarah is a loyal Republican. What makes you think she'll be any different than Regan or the HoB once elected pres?

Bottom line, they are all Republicans. Therefore once in office they will behave like Republicans.

Do you like the way Republicans behave, Gringoman?

DJ

Correction:

Reagan, the great Republican god,

Ummahgummah

.

Where the real KKKoranmpf is filled with gibberish the Slimes is filled with Libberish!

.

jay

Thought I'd throw in a "talking point"
A term conservaives use for "facts"

Since the United States began giving larger and larger tax breaks to the top 2% of wealthy Americans, the federal deficit has gotten worse.
trickle-down economics, statistics show that the less wealthy Americans pay in taxes, the worse things get for the middle class and the poor. Trickle down economics has also raised the federal deficit. According to the Economic Policy Institute, family income among the top 1% grew a whopping 73.9% from 1980 to 1990, while the lowest earners saw a negative 4.4% drop in their income. The Bush tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 that are due to expire at the end of this year, expanded the Regan tax cuts to the most wealthy Americans.
"

OsPatriot

The reason for the higher approval rating for @BarackObama is SIMPLE. The Main Stream Media BIAS is in FULL FORCE.

The reason GOP lost in NY is SIMPLE. The Left brought in a PHONY TEA PARTY candidate, argot: Votes that should have gone to GOP went to a Pathetic Loser.

The Obama Family has NO CLASS but have Mafia Style Tactics. Do we really want a DICTATOR in OFFICE?

jay

Conservative talking point:

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/conservative-talking-points-about-health-care-deathdeathdeath/

jay

"The reason for the higher approval rating for @BarackObama is SIMPLE. The Main Stream Media BIAS is in FULL FORCE."
Where is this so called Bias? Probably the number 1 news source in the country is Foxnews. And, who is a regular? At least until recently. MONICA!

jay

Also, other regulars on FOX are Hucklebee, O'Reily, Beck. Talk about BIASED!

Liberator

Just when I finished UNSPINNING the SPIN re. the 26th in NY, Limbaugh is explaining the exact same thing to his audience!
The RATS are apparently using this to herald the demise of the Tea Party.
ROLMFAO!!
They installed a RAT-OP to "run to the right" of the RINO and when their candidate wins they trumpet the end of Conservatism!
Luck Fiberals
Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 12:28 PM
==
Really? Rush claims that the tea-party spoiler in NY was an Dem-OP? Regardless if Rush agrees, I love that kooky here is trying to spin a conspiracy theory to explain away the stupidity of 2012 wingnut strategies. First tear down every establishment candidate as a RINO, and then, if a TP candidate doesn't win the Repug. primary, hoist one up as third-party candidate who then drains votes away from the Rino in the general. Perfect.

TRUMP in 2012!

=====================================================

After I explained a few things.. Notice the SILENCE OF THE LIBS.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM
==

LMAO. Feckin' narcissist thinks it's compelling conspiracy theories overwhelms others into silence. Nope, you had it right earlier conservatives are not as dumb as libs. They lower the bar considerably

Ummahgummah

.

DJ, I think that Ronald Reagan did turn things around until his Gooper successor took over.

When he came into office PC was still being cooked up in the poisonous labs of academia.

Reagan gave hope and his legacy continues to give hope to millions of US. I am not at all sure that Sarah Palin will be beholden the the insiderists of the GOP.

I think they fear her because she could herald the end of their reign.

Which is why the RoverGrovers prefer RINOS bereft of convictions, even if they lose like we just saw in the 26th in NYC. Easier to manipulate.

The Silent Majority anger which has finally found expression in the Tea Party Movement was not nearly so openly present during the Reagan days.

Sarah Palin is directly buoyed by just that movement and will no doubt be running things from her newly purchased ranch in Arizona as often as she can, in order to stay close to the people and far from the corruptions of the Beltway in Washington.

.

LongRifle

After I explained a few things.. Notice the SILENCE OF THE LIBS.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM

You gotta love that... However, like turds that won't flush, they will be back.

Ummahgummah

.

jay is once again bringing up a non-topic, betraying a state of irreversible LIEberal brainwashing. I and some of the others have given a lot of time and patience and effort to try and explain things to him.

I am no longer prepared to allow him to keep wearing me out with his rote idiocy.

.

jay

"Reagan gave hope and his legacy continues to give hope to millions of US"

He also started the "debt to the moon".
His watch lied about trikle down and supply side economics. Just to get the people to agree to the huge tax cuts for the rich. In the process, took a debt that was at a 50 year low. Next year, the debt- BLAST OFF!

LongRifle

Broken record Jay is back already with his "tax the rich" lib-droning.

Hey Jay,
If we say we agree with taxing the top 2%, will you go back to the Huffblo?

jay

Hey Jay,
If we say we agree with taxing the top 2%, will you go back to the Huffblo?

Posted by: LongRifle | May 25, 2011 at 02:06 PM

So, one of the top 2%?
You people have the biggest broken record of all.

I and some of the others have given a lot of time and patience and effort to try and explain things to him.

I am no longer prepared to allow him to keep wearing me out with his rote idiocy.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 02:03 PM

Have tried for a long time to explain facts, er "talking points" goota be PC ya know to you guys.

LongRifle

GRINGO,
I want to be clear about Palin. While I don't think she will run, I think she would make a great President.

Ummahgummah

Broken record Jay is back already with his "tax the rich" lib-droning.

Hey Jay,
If we say we agree with taxing the top 2%, will you go back to the Huffblo?

POSTED BY: LONGRIFLE | MAY 25, 2011 AT 02:06 PM

--

HAHAHA!!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

.

jay

I want to be clear about Palin. While I don't think she will run, I think she would make a great President.

Posted by: LongRifle | May 25, 2011 at 02:11 PM

But, the biggest question is will she quit half way through her term?

jay

"Broken record Jay is back already with his "tax the rich" lib-droning.

Hey Jay,
If we say we agree with taxing the top 2%, will you go back to the Huffblo?

POSTED BY: LONGRIFLE | MAY 25, 2011 AT 02:06 PM

--

HAHAHA!!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 02:16 PM

Maybe another top 2 percenter? LOOOOOOOOOL!

Ummahgummah

.

Longrifle, you know what it is with them? They have this tax raising desire to loot other people's stuff in their DNA, this burning need to control what others do.

Since most people don't want others in their business they figured out that if they take stuff from some and give to others, that those whom they give to will follow and support them.

This is the first step in the cycle of dependency they seek to establish and increase.

So why do they still seek to "convince" US of the positives of taking from some so they can give to others?

I call if COVER. They do it for cover.

Just look at jay who keeps throwing this one Conservative guy who apparently was into raising taxes in our faces.

In other words, jay is using the guy for cover.

According to the likes of jay if one of US PEOPLE does something liberal we all should do the same thing. WE simply don't consider a Conservative who does liberal stuff Conservative any longer.

Seems a lot more logical to me.

But then, I am not a liberal.

.

DJ

Sarah would make a good "Republican" president.

Liberator

Broken record Jay is back already with his "tax the rich" lib-droning.

Hey Jay,
If we say we agree with taxing the top 2%, will you go back to the Huffblo?

Posted by: LongRifle | May 25, 2011 at 02:06 PM

Broken record? Actually Jay continually and patiently states an "accurate" record that correctly reveals the disastrous impact of long-standing supply side/trickle down economic policy. Nobody here ever convincingly counters Jay's facts or assertions, except with the usual gaggle of right-wing pablum and one-liners.

Ummahgummah

Maybe another top 2 percenter? LOOOOOOOOOL!

POSTED BY: JAY | MAY 25, 2011 AT 02:19 PM

--

Typical LIEberal. My own income and wealth play absolutely no part in my philosophy.

They just don't get it.

They think that unless you are in the 2% they want to rob, you should agree with them to rob those 2%.

My philosophy is far more fundamental and less selfish and envious than that: God Bless the Child.

.

jay

Longrifle, you know what it is with them? They have this tax raising desire to loot other people's stuff in their DNA, this burning need to control what others do.

Since most people don't want others in their business they figured out that if they take stuff from some and give to others, that those whom they give to will follow and support them.

This is the first step in the cycle of dependency they seek to establish and increase.

So why do they still seek to "convince" US of the positives of taking from some so they can give to others?

I call if COVER. They do it for cover.

Just look at jay who keeps throwing this one Conservative guy who apparently was into raising taxes in our faces.

In other words, jay is using the guy for cover.

According to the likes of jay if one of US PEOPLE does something liberal we all should do the same thing. WE simply don't consider a Conservative who does liberal stuff Conservative any longer.

Seems a lot more logical to me.

But then, I am not a liberal.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | May 25, 2011 at 02:22 PM

Know what it is with you people. Want the average guy to pay the taxes. But, want the rich to get all the cuts. Didn't post that link where the GOP defeated a bill to extend tax cuts for the middle class. But voted for cuts for the rich.
TYPICAL RIGHT WINGER!

The one conservative guy? Try many! Because they know that the rates as of now are NOT WORKING!
Clinton knew it and raised the taxes. Got a 4 year surplus for his efforts. Bush didn't know it lowered them and got a recession for his.
It's such simple basic science. that only a right winger could never undersatnd it.
TSK! TSK!

jay

Question for the tea partiers. What was the main reason for the original Boston tea party revolt. Being taxed too much?
No, the being taxed by those who were NOT their elected representaives. Nothing about too many taxes.
The NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!
But, have seen several tea partier comments on other sites that say that our founding fathers didn't have to pay the gasoline tax! LOOOOOOOOL!

My stance has been to cut spending and bring the tax rates back to Clinton era levels. Which is still lower than the norm.
Not the right wingers attitude.
Cut spending, lower taxes back to pre depression era rates. which means we have to cut even more spending.

Nobody here ever convincingly counters Jay's facts or assertions, except with the usual gaggle of right-wing pablum and one-liners.

Posted by: Liberator | May 25, 2011 at 02:26 PM

You notice that, too?

The comments to this entry are closed.