« The Jokes Write Themselves | Main | Laughing All The Way »

April 12, 2011



Please don't go on and tell us how the GOP will solve all our problems....


Please don't go on and tell us how the GOP will solve all our problems....

Posted by: LongRifle | April 12, 2011 at 08:41 AM


But our Princess keeps telling us how she misses Georgie Bush. Don't you?



I hope he'll spend lots of time on the golf course with the Bama once we are able to rid ourselves of the usurper.



What about the CT SSN that Obama has on his draft records? Why isn't anyone asking about this matter?


Just watch Monica on Bill's show, what she should remind Bill O is the so called Birth certificate that Obama has posted as his true one, is a document that Hawaii admits is issued to children born out of the US. This document only states that they saw a BC they don't say from where. How can we assume its from Hawaii. Obama only submitted one page from a Dr. saying he was physically fit. John McCain gave 1700 pages. If McCain only gave one page the DNC would have gone ballistic. Obama was vetted by the DNC not the FBI, and yet Barry insisted everyone of his cabinet or nominees be vetted by the FBI. She should also have asked why Obama is spending so much money to lawyers to keep his records sealed, he has even gone as far a to issue an executive order. Really now all this money and then say nothing is being kept hidden.


Warning Special Alert !!!

The Obamanation Bypasses Congress and Does a Major Deal With Calderon for the USA Invasion of Mexican Trucks

Obamas Treason !!!

Barack Obama's deal with the president of Mexico to allow Mexican trucks to carry their loads onto U.S. highways and roads is new evidence of his high-handed solo behavior that has become Standard Operating Procedure in the administration.

Here are 10 reasons why Obama's plan is dangerous and must be stopped by Congress and public protest.

1. Obama's deal with President Felipe Calderon, announced on March 3, bypasses Congress, defies the wishes of the American people, and looks like the action of a Third World dictator who thinks representative government is a nuisance and can be ignored.

Congress made its wishes emphatically clear in 2007 when it voted to continue our ban on Mexican trucks. The House roll-call vote was 411 to 3, and the Senate's was 75 to 23.

2. Obama's deal is a direct attack on the jobs available to U.S. truck drivers because it helps big-business interests cut their costs by hiring cheaper Mexican drivers. Obama's deal is also an attack on small business (i.e., the owner-operated and independent truck drivers) who constitute the big majority of U.S. trucks.

3. The claim that Obama's deal is reciprocal (i.e., U.S. trucks will be allowed to drive into Mexico) is so cynical that we can hardly believe anyone says it with a straight face.

"South of the border down Mexico way" (in the words of the old popular song) is the most dangerous war zone in the world (more dangerous than Afghanistan or Libya), where U.S. truck drivers would become the targets of hijackings, theft, murder, kidnappings and even beheadings committed by the drug cartels.

4. Built into the Obama deal is the sneaky imposition of costs on both U.S. truck drivers and U.S. taxpayers. Each truck will be required to install an EOBR (electronic on-board recorder) costing S-3,000 plus maintenance fees:

U.S. drivers at their own expense and Mexican trucks as a gift from U.S. taxpayers paid out of the Highway Trust Fund. U.S. taxpayers are already paying S-1,600 each for many Mexican trucks to replace their old mufflers with catalytic converters.

5. Obama's deal will make it easy for Mexican trucks to bring in loads of illegal aliens and illegal drugs. Border inspection will be a farce, maybe only one in 10 trucks inspected, perhaps merely one in 20.

6. Opening our southern border to Mexican trucks will be a giant step toward the goal of creating a North American Union with open borders between Mexico, the U.S. and Canada -- a proposal launched by President George W. Bush using a website called Security and Prosperity Partnership (since deactivated).

Obama is advancing the plan under less threatening names -- the March 23, 2010, State Department fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision," a Nov. 30, 2010,

"Trusted Traveler" agreement with Mexico signed by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and a Feb. 4, 2011, declaration signed by Obama with Canada called "Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security."

7. When Mexican truck drivers have their layovers and turn-arounds in the U.S., what's to prevent them from enjoying a frolic and diversion?

They could use that time to father a baby who would then be proclaimed a U.S. citizen and get generous financial benefits and handouts provided by U.S. taxpayers.

8. We can assume that Mexican truck drivers will not be required to speak and read English, as U.S. law requires.

The previous secretary of transportation, Mary Peters, stated at a Senate hearing that if drivers respond to test questions in Spanish, the test-taker nevertheless checks the box that they are "English proficient."

9. While U.S. truck drivers are strictly limited to the number of hours per day they can be on the road, there is no way to figure out how many hours a Mexican truck driver has been on the road when he clocks in at the border. Has he been driving the typical Mexican 20-hour day?

10. Mexican trucks will make highway safety for Americans a major problem. We have no way to know a Mexican driver's record of accidents, alcohol or drugs, or a Mexican truck's record of brakes or emissions.

Mexico doesn't bother with records or regulations.

Don't let anybody get by with saying that NAFTA requires us to admit Mexican trucks because it's a treaty.

It isn't -- NAFTA never complied with the treaty provision in the U.S. Constitution and is merely a law passed by Congress that can be changed or overturned.

Tell your member of Congress to take action to cancel Obama's truck deal with the Mexican president. Solo deals like this one cannot be tolerated under constitutional government.


Trump would be way better than any of these Supreme RINO's:

GB-2, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, Pawlenty, Daniels, Christie, Barbour, Gingrich, etc.

Because he would not want to ruin his name, record, or reputation for the sake of a fortune paid to him after he leaves office or for liberal-moderate-RINO reach across the ailse type principals.

He doesn't need to do what the NWO-EU-UN types want him to do, he has and or will find his own pro-American power groups to be allied with.

If Obama is proven by Trump to have a valid US BC, so lets give Trump the credit for being the only one willing to take the trouble of finally getting to the bottom of it once and for all.

At the same time surely something will be revealed that Obama is trying to hide, that's a given. And then lets move on from there.

If we frame it that way Trump wins either way on the BC issue, and then he can move on to his next Conservative political platform issue to defeat the liberal Obamanation version on that issue !!!

Trump will not hurt this country the way that; Clinton, GB-2, and Obama have, because he doesn't want to go from being an admired man of high-profile business and media-public-friend, to the way that we all talk about, Clinton, GB-2, and Obamanation.

Ask yourself would Truump take on uch an important and high profile job such as POTUS and want-take any chances that the people wouldn't be very thankful to have chosen him, that's the style and legacy that he has evolved into.

And there's no reason to believe that he's about to change that kind of popular style and legacy.

Clinton, GB-2, and Obama all had-have very covered up secret hidden agendas. We've all heard about there ties to NWO, Bilderberg, EU, UN, etc.

Hopefully Trump does not or if no President can avoid having dealings with those anti-American groups that at least he can't be controlled by them the way that the above 3 anti-American Presidents obviously were-are.

He does have his own circle of friends and alliances and he'll be alligning himself more and more with the pro-American groups and leaders amongst them.

He also has a much larger circle of diplomacy amongst people from all kinds of; business, financial, economic, political, government, and national backgrounds.

He has made it his trademark to succeed. In his earlier business dealings he had difficulties like everyone else usually does and he has recovered from all of that and is now a very productive and successful businessman because of having gone through all of those earlier business challenge.

Another good thing about Trump is that he's very much against illegal immigration and illegal-aliens getting Social Services payments !!!

Donald Trump on Immigration

Control the borders; even legal immigration should be difficult.
America is experiencing serious social and economic difficulty with illegal immigrants who are flooding across our borders. We simply can’t absorb them.

It is a scandal when America cannot control its own borders. A liberal policy of immigration may seem to reflect confidence and generosity. But our current laxness toward illegal immigration shows a recklessness and disregard for those who live here legally.

The majority of legal immigrants can often make significant contributions to our society because they have special skills and because they add to our nation’s cultural diversity. They come with the best of intentions.

But legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It’s a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design. I say to legal immigrants: Welcome and good luck.

It comes down to this: we must take care of our own people first. Our policy to people born elsewhere should be clear: Enter by the law, or leave.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.143-45 Jul 2, 2000

Limit new immigration; focus on people already here. Trump was firm concerning restrictions in immigration. “I’m opposed to new people coming in,” he said. “We have to take care of the people who are here.”

Source: nytimes.com/library/politics Dec 10, 1999

It's also about time to lower the yearly legal quota down from 1,000,000 3rd worlders being given US Citizenship per year to about 10,000 per year,

to make up for the approximately 15,000,000 or more illegal-aliens including their relatives that they were able to sponsor, who have been given amnesty-US-Citizenship from 1986-2011

Along with the 20,000,000 or more who were also given US Citizenship by the legal quota system from 1986-2011 !!!

What are we stupid or something ???

Trump says that he'll balance the US-China trade deficit.

In 1985 the US-China trade deficit was only 600 million dollars !!!

2011 US-China trade deficit is projected to be 300 billion SSS

2010 US-China trade deficit: 273-billion-65-million

2009 US-China trade deficit: 226-billion-877-million

2008 US-China trade deficit: 268-billion-39-million

2007 US-China trade deficit: 258-billion-506-million

Trump says that he'll balance the US-China trade deficit in a short amount of time.

And he'll stop the imbalanced trade deals as is needed with other big free traders and especially OPEC, which he says will have to start paying THE usa back, for all of our war efforts to protect them in the middle east going back to 1991 !!!

It doesn't have to be Trump, but they've got to be doing those same things that he says that he'll do, or they'll end up being just as bad as Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, RINO-Neocon 10 years in Afghanistan, 8 years in Iraq GB-2, McCain, Obama, or Hillary Clinton,

Because our economy and whole countries overall situation-status is 1000's of times worse than it was in 1990-2001-2008, and going; down, down, down, even further, etc.

So we can't survive anymore liberals, RINO's, or half measures from so-called fiscal Conservatives who won't shut the annual 300 billion SSS illegal-alien scheme-scam-con-job down !!!


To all Trump supporters,

O'reilly asked the guests on his show tonite;

If Obama does end up having a Hawaii BC will Trump look bad ?

The correct answer is:

NO !!!

Trump should-will be getting credit either way !!!

Because he was-is the only one who was willing to step into the politically risky controversey and go about doing what was needed to finally getting it solved once and for all !!!

Also even if the Obamanation was from Hawaii Trump will most probably be uncovering alot of what the Obamanation was actually trying to hide all along.

There's got to be some or alot of things that the Obamanation is trying to hide and-or cover up !!!

How about that angle ???

Clov Wrote:

"Obama's worst nighmare."

"Trump harping on the birth certificate is a strategy straight out of Mans Country bath house member manly ballerina Rahm's wish list."


Trump is going to reveal that:

Obama clearly listed himself as Indonesian on his college applications, to avoid Selective Service Registration.

And used someone else's SS# for reasons that might also be revealed.

Are you so sure that Mans Country bath house members Obamanation and the manly ballerina Rahm would have that too on their wish list


vibram five fingers

Congress made its wishes emphatically clear in 2007 when it voted to continue our ban on Mexican trucks.


Jay said:

"This birther movement should have been stopped long ago. Some people just can't give up. Reminds me of the hanging chads."


Why should we just drop it without the freakin POTUS of our USA who works for us providing proof of hisidentification just as we all have to do to carry out any kind of official task that involves the Government.

The Clinton campaign brought it up and we want answers, it's our White House and the POTUS is emolyed by us, he works for us, we are is his boss !!!

Show us your BC, Obamanation, prove to us who you really are, you freakin abominable anti-American traitor !!!

Obamanation leftist-liberal-Democrat, sworn enemy and obstructor of;

The US Constitution, States Rights, AZ SB 1070, US oil drilling energy independence, secure US borders, an English based US culture and population.

Without foreigners and illegal aliens overcrowding and vringing crime to our $$$ strapped, overrun, and bankrupted;

States, cities, towns, neigborhoods, streets, schools, hospitals, Public Housing, Parks, malls, shopping areas, Social Services, highways, roads, etc.

and the overall best interests of the USA's people and country !!!

Gordon Ray Kissinger

Dear Monica Crowley,

Please see letter below:

As a Citizen of the United States of America, I have the deepest concern for the safety of our country. Where Mr. Obama was born should be a mute point. He is constitutionally ineligible due to his father being born in Kenya and a British subject at the time of his birth.

The fact is that there is a need for this nation to hear and resolve the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility for office. I base this statement on the Constitutional requirement (Section 1, Article 2 of the US Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States) calling for the President to retain a special status of Natural Born Citizen in order to qualify for eligibility to that office. I have reviewed the definition of Natural Born Citizen as written in the Federal Papers by Justice John Jay. This definition of citizenship goes back centuries! Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President! It is a fact that Obama was born a subject of the British Crown. He openly admits his father was a British Subject at the time of his birth.

Here are several references to the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. I implore you, URGENTLY, to investigate on your own.

-1758 Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” –The Framers relied on many of the principles to write the Constitution.

-1787-1788 The Federalist Papers, including Justice John Jay’s letter to George Washington.

-Article II, Section I, United States Constitution.

-The Naturalization Act of 1790-repeal of “Natural Born” from the 1790 Act in 1795.

-The Framers of the 14th Amendment-(citizenship granted, not Natural Born Citizenship); Rep. John Bingham and Sen. Lyman Trumball define Natural Born Citizen.

-Congressional Hearing on Dual Citizenship, 2005, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” discussion .

Our Nation is at grave risk. This issue MUST be addressed. Citizens across this nation are asking this question: Is Obama qualified to be our President and Commander in Chief? The public protests are beginning. There is a significant movement and it is spreading like an impassioned grassfire. To assume it will go away is foolhardy. Furthermore, the usurpation of our Constitution threatens the very survival of our Union!

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one soldier today, another tomorrow, and now our loyal service men and woman are in personal jeopardy!

The survival of our nation is at stake. This issue will not go away.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the United States. As a Natural Born Citizen myself, I implore you to PLEASE….. Issue a Quo Warranto to provide The USA citizenry an answer to this constitutionally vital question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto.

· The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person.

· Two individuals have authority to bring quo warranto action: Attorney General Eric Holder, and US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Channing D Phillips.

· Only one of these officials need bring the action in quo warranto.

· The federal quo warranto statute provides the only Constitutional means by which a sitting President may be removed by the Judicial branch.

· Congress has provided for the removal of a sitting President found to be ineligible by enacting the federal quo warranto statute.

· Nowhere in the Constitution does it give the Judicial Branch the power to remove a sitting President. The Constitution has provided congress with the authority to remove the president from office in cases other than impeachment.

~ Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 6. “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge…”. Note the word “or”.

~ Congress is authorized to exercise removal power by the 25th Amendment – and such power must be derived directly from Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6.

· SCOTUS is not a trier of fact and so quo warranto MUST be brought before the District Court for the District of Columbia EXACTLY as the statute requires.

· Quo warranto action is proper to settle title to the office of President for the good of the nation.

· Even if both officials are convinced Obama is eligible, it’s still proper for them to institute a quo warranto proceeding because the evidence emerging now is that, by leaving the controversy as is, a floodgate of litigation will ensue.

· The best possible candidates who should request the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to bring an action in quo warranto on their own motion are Retired Military officers who understand the absolute need for the President’s title to office not to be encumbered by doubt.

· CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

I seek your immediate response to my grave concern.

Kansas State alum in California

Monica, you did a great job of putting O'Really in his place after he took it upon himself to decide what is true or false about Obama's background, as well as restoring some hope that Fox News will do some justice to the so-called "birther" issue. I didn't think any journalist in the mainstream media would do the kind of tough questioning or investigating that I learned while earning bachelor's and master's degrees in journalism.

A veteran also is quite please with your work as you can see at this link: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/13/will-monica-crowley-continue-to-ask-questions-about-obamas-past/

The comments to this entry are closed.