« The O'Reilly Factor---TONIGHT! | Main | (No) Drama Obama »

April 26, 2011

Comments

xbjllb

Obama should have pulled everyone out of the Mideast, first. That was his first broken promise, and biggest mistake.

The money saved from KEEPING THAT CAMPAIGN PROMISE would have PAID for all the debacles that happened since. The bailouts, health care, a public option, all of it.

In fact, there can be no more greater textbook illustration of DOING EVERYTHING A*SS-BACKWARDS than the Obama Presidency.

TRUMP-BUSH 2012

xbjllb

TRUMP. TRUMP. TRUMP.

I hope Trump can buy off Ron Paul. Crazy little PITA. He never gets the memo:

Wacky Peter O'Toole's DON'T GET TO BE US PRESIDENT. No matter how much sense they make, because NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE IN AMERICA WILL EVER BELIEVE THEM.

They just spoil it for every else and the worst person wins.

Trump can't even pick Paul for veep. He's too whacky, and his completely insane son made that abundantly clear.

I mean, who wears a Gerber baby hairstyle? I mean, c'mon. Really?

gringoman

That's what Ronald Reagan did in 1980. That's what we need now. We need the message, and we need the messenger. Who will step up, and FIGHT? Who will say a resounding NO to "leading from behind" and have the United States, once again, lead from the front?

April 26, 2011 at 12:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Oh, Princess! You don't know who that is? Really?

And you don't know how your G.O.P. and liberal Corporate Charley's Hackstream media will do anything to keep him from the nomination? You don't see the slimebots coming, with "Donald's babes," and his dinner with George Soros, and how he threw an old lady out of her home to make way for a new parking lot servicing limos? And you don't see how the Goopers plan to anoint one of their chosesn girly-menschen instead, and will blather about how he "served a purpose," teaching them to grow a pair and confront the corporate-Marxist Macdaddy?

Princess, really!

gringoman

Does Monica fully understand the crisis of her Gooper castrati? We know they make her restless, but we also know that she will not jump ship. She'll just chortle on about "the need for real leadership," yada-yada. Does she realize how serious it really is? Does she think her G.O.P. chortlings are convincing? To whom? Does she know what it means when her Rinosaurs may be losing even the son of Billy Graham? Does she get the significance? And guess who they could be losing the Reverend Graham to......?


///////Newsmax/////REVEREND FRANKLIN GRAHAM (son of Billy Graham)

Donald Trump, when I first saw that he was getting in, I thought ‘Well this has got to be a joke,'" Graham said. "But the more you listen to him, the more you say to yourself, ‘You know maybe the guy’s right.’"

When Amanpour asked whether he might support Trump, Graham said, "Sure, yeah. Sure."

thebuckstopshere

Gman, the captain always goes with the ship mentality from the head gopper cheerleader...........

NO MORE RINOS 2012

gringoman

gringoNOTE: As the Demopublican paper mills print the trillions of dollars for their Great Society Entitlement Republic, weaning ever more Americans into Serfs of Socialism, and Monica's Goopers prepare to cave on raising yet again the astounding debt ceiling, without at least demanding the repeal/defunding of Obamacare in return, and the once almighty dollar continues in its death spiral.....

“There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning
the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.”
— John Maynard Keynes

gringoman

gringoNOTE: Karl Rove is a long-time associate of Monica's beloved Georgie Bush. Rove has even been called "Bush's brain." Maybe it's no wonder that Monica won't jump ship and sign on with the Battleship Trump, after what Trump says about her Georgie's Karl Rove?

//////Trump: Rove Needs to Retire
Friday, 22 Apr 2011 06:10 PM

Donald Trump, fresh from a Gallup poll showing him tied with former Gov. Mike Huckabee for the lead in the Republican race for the White House, is firing back at GOP strategist Karl Rove for calling Trump a "joke candidate."

////gringoNOTE: Trump seems to think the chubby Bushnik, Karl Rove, belongs in a retirement home////


Trump, who says that Rove has proven himself to be out of touch with Americans, released the following statement to Newsmax:

"Karl Rove is a loser. He is doing the Republican Party a great disservice by trying to stop the discussion about the president not being able to present his birth certificate to the American people – or to assure the American people as to his place of birth. This is a great issue for Republicans, and I can tell you that the president is spending millions of dollars fighting this issue and he doesn't like it at all.

"I also have great respect for the states considering legislation that would require a birth certificate, not a certificate of live birth, be mandatory in order for a candidate to appear on a presidential ballot in their state.

"Karl Rove should go into retirement where he belongs. The old machinery is broken, and new and much smarter blood is needed."

Read more on Newsmax.com: Trump: Rove Needs to Retire

Phillydkidder

Somebody has to attach China and The Renimbi/Yuan and get it to true market value.. this is Like Japan 1985ish

DJ

Re Barry long-form birth certificate:

Why don't they reframe the question about Barry's long-form birth certificate from one that asserts it dosen't exist to one that asks something like: IF Barry's long-term birth certificate actually exists, why is he hiding it? What could be written on it that compels him and his handlers to go to great lengths to keep it secret? Something too embarrassing for public consumption, perhaps?

Liberator

Trump in 2012...--two thumbs up from this lib...can't wait to contribute to his campaign fund and to vote for him in the primaries.

Interesting reading the links posted here wherein Trump questions Obama's intelligence by stating that "he has heard" that Obama didn't do well in school and implying that he should not have gotten into Columbia or Harvard. Those same links indicate that Obama graduate from Harvard Law School Summa Cum Laude (top 5%) and that he was President of the Harvard Law Review. Strange that a reporter doesn't ask the simple follow-up question: "Mr. Trump, if you are questioning Obama's academic abilities as a student, how can you explain his stellar academic performance at the top law school in the country?"

DJ

Everyone is worried about Trump not being a "genuine conservative". Well I say the last "genuine conservative" we had sitting in the White House, he bestowed upon us a slew of liberal policies and legacies. I'm specking of Ronald Reagan, of course. The truth is conservatism in American politics is a myth. It dosen't exist and never has; at least not in practice. So I say to hell with those who smugly criticise Trump for not being a "genuine conservative".

TRUMP 2012

thebuckstopshere

what could be so embarrassing? that barry was really a brenda? just wondering here in the land of oz


Trump is very much correct the machine is broken, the ship is sinking & the has beens need to go golfing, maybe he could supply them with lifetime memberships.
everytime that Rove opens his big fat mouth I want to shot my tv.

NO RETREADED RINOS 2012

gringoman

Trump in 2012...--two thumbs up from this lib...can't wait to contribute to his campaign fund and to vote for him in the primaries.

Interesting reading the links posted here wherein Trump questions Obama's intelligence by stating that "he has heard" that Obama didn't do well in school and implying that he should not have gotten into Columbia or Harvard. Those same links indicate that Obama graduate from Harvard Law School Summa Cum Laude (top 5%) and that he was President of the Harvard Law Review. Strange that a reporter doesn't ask the simple follow-up question: "Mr. Trump, if you are questioning Obama's academic abilities as a student, how can you explain his stellar academic performance at the top law school in the country?"

Posted by: Liberator | April 26, 2011 at 02:41 PM

TRUMP to MEDIAC: Good question, but not good enough. I'll be glad to answer it as soon as we can see Obama's school records and transcripts. Do you know why he is still hiding these records, not just a real birth certificate, and why his legal team to help in the hiding has now cost 2 million dollars to keep everything secret?

I'm looking for the answer. Do you have one? If not, do you mind if someone does your job for you and looks for the answer?

DJ

"what could be so embarrassing? that barry was really a brenda? just wondering here in the land of oz"

------------------------

Buck,

We're all wondering.

Liberator

Why don't they reframe the question about Barry's long-form birth certificate from one that asserts it dosen't exist to one that asks something like: IF Barry's long-term birth certificate actually exists, why is he hiding it? What could be written on it that compels him and his handlers to go to great lengths to keep it secret? Something too embarrassing for public consumption, perhaps?
Posted by: DJ | April 26, 2011 at 02:27 PM

--
You pose an obvious and reasonable question asked by many. A few possible answers: (1) He is a not a citizen and cannot prove otherwise; (2) As you suggest, there is something else indicated on the long-form that he would rather not have made public; (3) From a tactics perspective, it makes sense for him to allow his opponents to expend energy on this issue; thereby deflecting, at least some of the media attention and headlines, away from pressing economic issues.

thebuckstopshere

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/588/483/Obama_birth_certificate_and_college_records,_Obama_using_taxpayer_dollars_and_resources_to_hide_records,_This_is_the_question.html

one word: TRANSPARENCY

two words: DONALD TRUMP

Liberator

Everyone is worried about Trump not being a "genuine conservative". Well I say the last "genuine conservative" we had sitting in the White House, he bestowed upon us a slew of liberal policies and legacies. I'm specking of Ronald Reagan, of course. The truth is conservatism in American politics is a myth. It doesn't exist and never has; at least not in practice. So I say to hell with those who smugly criticize Trump for not being a "genuine conservative".
TRUMP 2012
Posted by: DJ | April 26, 2011 at 02:42 PM

--

Agreed. Strategically he faces a possible challenge in convincing the religious right that he is a "social" conservative. However, both Reagan and Bush seemed to have navigated that space well and Gringo has already noted that Trump may already have an evangelistic endorsement from Franklin Graham.

soggy

Everyone is worried about Trump not being a "genuine conservative". Well I say the last "genuine conservative" we had sitting in the White House, he bestowed upon us a slew of liberal policies and legacies. I'm specking of Ronald Reagan, of course. The truth is conservatism in American politics is a myth. It dosen't exist and never has; at least not in practice. So I say to hell with those who smugly criticise Trump for not being a "genuine conservative".

TRUMP 2012

Posted by: DJ | April 26, 2011 at 02:42 PM

He is what many on this site have called a RINO. Why the sudden change? He is about as conservative as Rove, Bush I or II, or Newt for that matter. Just wondering why he gets a pass on his brand of rino-ism?

xbjllb

Food for thought re: The Birther Issue

Do they ever register botched survived abortions on birth certificates?

Obama has some awful scarring on his head. Huge skull wide scars.

What if Lolo Soetoro is listed on his birth certificate as his father? And Obama is Indonesian-American and not even half-black at all?

xbjllb

It seems as if Monica's post is leaving room for a Trump candidacy and endorsement.

DJ

He is what many on this site have called a RINO. Why the sudden change? He is about as conservative as Rove, Bush I or II, or Newt for that matter. Just wondering why he gets a pass on his brand of rino-ism?

Posted by: soggy | April 26, 2011 at 03:24 PM
-------------------

Soggy,

I like Trump because he is a leader and acts like one. He may not have the best track record on social issues but so what? The Republicans talk a good talk on social issues but when it comes time to actually delivering on their promises, they're now where to be found.. or they make excuses. For example: The Republicans have been running on the issue of overturning Roe v Wade since it was enacted into law (1973!). Has anything changed since then? No? See what I mean?

Given the current line-up of potential Republican candidates, Trump, proverbially, stands head and shoulders above them all.

One pundit put it something like this: The American people are sick and tired of the pols in both parties. They want to roll a grenade into the tent called Washington DC. Trump represents that grenade.

xbjllb

More birth certificate speculation. Say a late term (very late) abortion is performed, and the baby survives (with scalp tears but otherwise okay and healthy.) Would the attending physician to the abortion sign the birth certificate? Maybe because of this, one could not be obtained.

What if the abortion occurred in a back alley, or was self-performed, and the baby survived with only a bleeding scalp, and then was brought into the hospital for treatment. This would not warrant a hospital birth certificate either, as the baby wouldn't have been born in the hospital.

What if the abortion was performed in Kenya, and mother rushed the child to Hawaii for medical treatment? Once again, the same no certificate condition.

What if the birth was performed in Kenya, resulting in forceps damage in a head-first birth arrangement (as was claimed in Frank Sinatra's case)? Would the hospital in Kenya have a birth certificate in such a case? Might the baby have been considered dead and smuggled out of the hospital?

One can come up with all sorts of speculation and questions, because Obama will not release the definitive truth about his birth. There is a chance that he doesn't know it himself, but it is hard to believe that his grandmother would withhold it from him on her deathbed, given he was already the President of the United States.

All we know is this. Stanley Ann Dunham was ambivalent about being pregnant (what white girl pregnant with a possibly black baby in 1961 wouldn't be?) and even ambivalent about being a mother, although there are plenty of occasional happy photos with Obama. We know she was ambivalent because she eventually dumped Obama on her mother. CIA and single parenting apparently don't mix.

DJ

Agreed. Strategically he faces a possible challenge in convincing the religious right that he is a "social" conservative. However, both Reagan and Bush seemed to have navigated that space well and Gringo has already noted that Trump may already have an evangelistic endorsement from Franklin Graham.

Posted by: Liberator | April 26, 2011 at 03:12 PM

------------

Yes, If Trump can keep garnering the support of evangelical heavyweights such as Franklin Graham, he will find it much easier to win in the primaries.

TRUMP 2012

xbjllb

More Obama speculation:

As far as just plain facial features, (and this has been pointed out many times before by many other people) Obama's eyes and upper face resemble his mothers', while his nose and mouth and coloring resemble, strangely enough, Lolo Soetoro, and look completely Indonesian. The only thing Obama shares with his supposed father is kinky hair.

Kinky hair, while rare, is not unusual in indonesia, micronesia, and polynesia.

Could Obama's birth certificate state his real father is NOT black but Lolo Soetoro?

That would explain the reticence.

xbjllb

I speculate only because the American People deserve the truth.

Not some fantasy story concocted up to win an election, which precious few of the facts available support.

xbjllb

Franklin Graham had an interesting skewering on Last Word. He basically backtracked that he hadn't endorsed Trump yet, but thought he would be an interesting and viable candidate. He implied that a religious test would not be an issue for him whether or not he voted for someone or not.

Which is where the majority of America is right now. He pointed out that right now economic considerations just might be more important to America than religious ones. He also said he believed that only God can know any mans' heart, and we can only judge someone by their works.

I've always believed Obama to be an atheist like his parents, and merely claims Christianity as a necessary job qualification. He's no Moslem either.

However, I'd rather have an atheist who was not beholden to Wall Street or offense contractors or the Fed or anyone else in the Oval Office than any social issues totalitarian warrior anyday.

Why something that Jimmy Carter first started ("I'm 'born again'") turned out to be such a useful divisive tool for the GOP is due to Karl Rove. And it's been a case of diminishing returns since George W. Bush, a sworn Luciferian, perverted and damaged American Christianity almost irreparably by cementing it with the far rightwing.

Franklin Graham may well endorse Trump, but not 100% just yet.

gringoman

Agreed. Strategically he faces a possible challenge in convincing the religious right that he is a "social" conservative. However, both Reagan and Bush seemed to have navigated that space well and Gringo has already noted that Trump may already have an evangelistic endorsement from Franklin Graham.

Posted by: Liberator | April 26, 2011 at 03:12 PM

------------

Yes, If Trump can keep garnering the support of evangelical heavyweights such as Franklin Graham, he will find it much easier to win in the primaries.

TRUMP 2012

Posted by: DJ | April 26, 2011 at 04:21 PM

FYI Both my ears, despite their vintage, are in working order. They heard Trump say recently, on Hannity's 500 or so affiliates: "I oppose gay marriage. I'm also pro-life."

I suspect that Reverend Graham's ears are in working order too.

Was Trump once pro=choice? Yes, years ago. This is now. As for change in world view, no less than Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat New Dealer, and possibly even a Commie fellow traveler.

Soggy, if you know a RINO who gets in Obama's face, relentlessly and fearlessly, like Trump does, could you give us this RINO's name? I think we'd all love to
know who it is.

soggy

What we need is a true conservative, in EVERY sense of the word. What we are going to get will be another liberal dressed up like a republican. Another opportunist filling a gap. Sorry, I just can't get excited by any of it.

Ummahgummah

.

Why is the X-lax posting more than all the rest put together?!

X-lax, we do NOT require your "input". We do NOT need libs discussing OUR candidate for us.

Thanks guys but you didn't do such a great job choosing our candidate for us in 2008 and this time we intend to choose for ourselves.

Let noone forget the racist views spewed by the X-lax. It wrote that white skin is the QUOTE: "mark of Cain".

Spoken like a true anti-Bama Pro-Trump person, wouldn't you say?

.

xbjllb

Quit being such an idiotic brat, Anthony.

xbjllb

I'm here, currently, for one reason and one reason alone:

To keep YOU FROM HANDING THE ELECTION TO OBAMA.

jay

The declining United States?
When other countries do what is needed to advance themselves. Their kids are dedicated in school.
We, are more of a spoiled society. Kids drop out. In the future. All the good high paying jobs will go to females and those from overseas. The american Male will have the lower paying manual labor jobs.
So, what do you expect?
In the effort to cut spending. We will throw the baby out with the bath water.

xbjllb

"Let noone forget the racist views spewed by the X-lax. It wrote that white skin is the QUOTE: "mark of Cain"."


1. One cannot be racist against their own race. It NEGATES the DEFINITION. You CANNOT MAKE UP YOUR OWN DEFINITIONS.


2. GET OVER THE TRUTH.

xbjllb

If ANYONE here is acting like a chip off the old Cain block that would be you, Anthony.

So I'm descended from Cain. So you're descended from Cain. (well, except for the black blood in southern Italians, but let's not go there, shall we?)

REPENT. CHANGE. DUMP THE RACISM. DUMP THE RELIGIONISM.

LOVE YOUR ENEMIES. OR ELSE.

jay


People also complain about Congressmen constantly making more than the year before. PLUS them being EXEMPT from ObamaCare.

Seems like ObamaCare isn't good enough for our Congresscritters.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 26, 2011 at 02:01 AM
Ditto on Congressmen being over paid. They never take away from themselves which they have taken away from others.
They voted themselves the best Healthcare in the country.

xbjllb

" They voted themselves the best Healthcare in the country." - Jay


And half voted for that same healthcare for all of Americans via a public option.

While the other half kicked THAT half in the nuts, over and over and over and over again, until they puked.

And gave up.

But not forever.

DJ

"Let noone forget the racist views spewed by the X-lax. It wrote that white skin is the QUOTE: "mark of Cain"." (--UG)

-------------------

Not only did X-lax proclaim white skin is the mark of Cain, he went on to say that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it.

xbjllb

"Not only did X-lax proclaim white skin is the mark of Cain, he went on to say that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it."

I said NO such thing. Quit lying, racist scumbag.

xbjllb

No man should be subjugated by any other man. And I've never ever said or even remotely intimated or insinuated otherwise.

But I'll tell you for the last time: One hell of a lot of human souls are sure going to be subjugated by demons for all of eternity.

xbjllb

Let me rephrase that:

Please quit lying, racist fellow Trump supporter.

DJ

Correction:

Not only did X-lax proclaim white skin is the mark of Cain, IT went on to say that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it.

xbjllb

"IT went on to say that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it."


Could you please quote what ever I said that gave you that insane idea?

I mean, just for your own verifiability, so it doesn't look like you're just lying out of your as*s?

Ummahgummah

Notice the X-lax spamming even more than before. It made a big mistake with its "mark of Cain" comment and now the truth is out for all to see.

There is no way to backtrack from something like this.

The X-lax OWNS the "mark of Cain".

Liberation theology at its best.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 26, 2011 at 01:04 PM

--------------------

Ummah, LOL!

I'll always remind of that lest he should forget.


The X-lax OWNS the "mark of Cain".
POSTED BY: DJ | APRIL 26, 2011 AT 03:06 PM


--

The RACIST X-lax will NOT be allowed to have the last word on this issue.

.

xbjllb

For your own credibility as well.

Ummahgummah

.

Gringoman, MJFELL, M/M and maybe a couple others will no doubt remember the McCain-supporting "black Republican" Gilbert washington aka PACO and a few other handles..

Does the Trump-"supporting" X-lax/SatanFrau remind you of anything?

I happen to think that they send ops over here and to other Conservative blogs with the missive to disrupt and disinform.

.

DJ


Correction:

Not only did X-lax proclaim white skin is the mark of Cain, IT went on to INFER that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it.

xbjllb

"The RACIST X-lax will NOT be allowed to have the last word on this issue." - UG


ONE CANNOT BE RACIST AGAINST THEIR OWN RACE. YOU CANNOT MAKE UP YOUR OWN DEFINITIONS, NOR CHANGE DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS.

Racism is bigotry, hatred, and fear against A DIFFERENT RACE THAN ONESELF.

Furthermore, there is only one race, the human race.

RACISM ONLY EXISTS IN THE MINDS OF RACISTS AND THEIR VICTIMS.

xbjllb

" IT went on to INFER that ALL whites should be subjugated by non-whites because of it." - DJ


GOT IT, thanks very much, you can't find any quote REMOTELY asserting your claim, you pulled it out of your as*s.

And your own paranoia.

Apology accepted.

xbjllb

CORRECTION: RACISM ONLY EXISTS IN THE MINDS OF RACISTS AND IN THE REALITY OF WHAT THEY DO TO THEIR VICTIMS.

Ummahgummah

.

Notice the X-lax spamming even more than before. It made a big mistake with its "mark of Cain" comment and now the truth is out for all to see.

There is no way to backtrack from something like this.

The X-lax OWNS the "mark of Cain".

Liberation theology at its best.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | April 26, 2011 at 01:04 PM

--------------------

Ummah, LOL!

I'll always remind of that lest he should forget.


The X-lax OWNS the "mark of Cain".
POSTED BY: DJ | APRIL 26, 2011 AT 03:06 PM


--

The RACIST X-lax will NOT be allowed to have the last word on this issue.

.

The comments to this entry are closed.