What the (bleep) just happened? That's the question most Americans have been asking since the Fall of 2008. And it's the question I ask---and answer---in my raucous, high-octane, and hilarious new book.
This book will make you think and laugh, and it will have you on your feet. It will be published on June 19th, but you can pre-order your copy today! Please click on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Books a Million, or Indiebound, or get it on your Kindle, Nook, or iPad.
Follow me on Twitter @MonicaCrowley
Cara Mia Crowley:
Please clarify. Are your Monicamemo troll trash also welcome at your Twitter---in all their 9.11 Truther/Vampire for Jesus/Dyke from Dachau/Satanizing/black wang/white wang stereotype (but not black brain/white brain stereotype---are these scumella scumbots also invited?
Can you clarify? Would you clarify?
Oh, you're too busy analyzing Obot un-accountability, irresponsibility and mis-management?....
Shucks.
Posted by: gringoman | March 23, 2011 at 10:48 PM
Check this out. ABC news humiliates Captain Honors over those old videos, but seems to apologize to Chris Brown after he smashes up his dressing room the day before. Check out 3:09:
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/chris-brown-storms-off-set-good-morning-america/story?id=13193040&page=1
Posted by: M/M | March 23, 2011 at 11:07 PM
Good point about this video, DJ.
http://www.vdare.com/taylor/110322_open_letter.htm
Notice how ABC news falls all over Chris Brown after he smashed up their dressing room.
Posted by: M/M | March 23, 2011 at 11:37 PM
Dr. Evil's Organization doesn't do Tvitter. Tvitter is for brats.
Like my son, Scotty Evil, evil governor of Visconsin.
SCOTT!!!! Get off the FACEBOOK and go eat some middle class folk!
Chef has PREPARED a vonderful dinner!!!
The OTHER OTHER vite meat.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 24, 2011 at 01:03 AM
Camille Paglia on the progressive femizombies///////
Taylor obsessive Camille Paglia speaks to Salon editor-in-chief Kerry Lauerman by telephone under a portico, as the wind howled around her.
I remember reading your essay on Elizabeth Taylor from Penthouse in 1992 (it appeared in the collection "Sex, Art, and American Culture"), where you called her "a pre-feminist woman." You said: "She wields the sexual power that feminism cannot explain and has tried to destroy. Through stars like Taylor, we sense the world-disordering impact of legendary women like Delilah, Salome, and Helen of Troy. Feminism has tried to dismiss the femme fatale as a misogynist libel, a hoary cliche. But the femme fatale expresses women's ancient and eternal control of the sexual realm."
Posted by: gringoman | March 24, 2011 at 11:04 AM
.
I dunno, Gringoman. I always thought of ol' Liz as an overweight lush and a bit of a fag hag.
Definitely not my type.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 24, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Ah, but Shortie-pants man... surely you must have LOVED the vay she vent after gay men like Clift, Hudson, Jackson (a RABID pedophile, von of ours, she only mistook for gay).
Scott, ever vicked Scottie, my dear son, made a crack that had the Lair howling... he said "Liz would have followed Michael Jackson into hell itself for the PUBLICITY. IF hell existed!!!"
And all that money she raised for the gays and AIDS; must have ascended your testicle and shriveled your ardor, yes?
Or perhaps it made you think you actually had that much more of a CHANCE!!!
Didn't Clift vear shorts in von of the movies? Yes, I think he did.
I vouldn't be sure; at the time I vas more of a Marilyn Monroe devotee myself. But then, she had the good sense to never grow OLD!! And chase REAL men. Men of POWER.
Much like myself.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 24, 2011 at 11:26 AM
I dunno, Gringoman. I always thought of ol' Liz as an overweight lush and a bit of a fag hag.
Definitely not my type.
---
Just ven I think no one could possibly outdo my evil viciousness...
Along comes Tonetta.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 24, 2011 at 11:29 AM
PAGLIA, In the Time of the Progressive GenderZombies and Trans-sexual trolls/////// To me, Elizabeth Taylor's importance as an actress was that she represented a kind of womanliness that is now completely impossible to find on the U.S. or U.K. screen. It was rooted in hormonal reality -- the vitality of nature. She was single-handedly a living rebuke to postmodernism and post-structuralism, which maintain that gender is merely a social construct.
Posted by: gringoman | March 24, 2011 at 11:31 AM
Plus she had a squeekier higher more annoying voice than even ME!!!
Even after it descended into that Lucille Ball/Frau Farbissina alcoholic cackle.
But hey, I can relate. "Vho's Afraid of Virginia Vollfe" is a lot like vhat goes on behind the scenes at the boudoir at the Lair between Herr Doctor and myself!!
Only vid dead henchmen!! Pile 'em up, HERR DOCTOR!!!
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 24, 2011 at 11:42 AM
For my money, IF I vas still expressing the love that dares not speak its name, Nicole Kidman has that something. Plus she likes the gay MEN like Liz did too!!
The CRAZIER the better!! (But don't forget the auto-tune, yes?)
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 24, 2011 at 11:46 AM
I dunno, Gringoman. I always thought of ol' Liz as an overweight lush and a bit of a fag hag.
Definitely not my type.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 24, 2011 at 11:11 AM
__________________________
Gringoman, she was hot when she was young, but UG describes what she became and he didn't even mention how she stole other women's husbands and couldn't stay married. Hey, didn't she became a cougar years before her time by marrying some way too young guy? He wasn't even hot.
And they criticize us for admiring Charlie Sheen. Can you say dysfunctional?
Posted by: M/M | March 24, 2011 at 10:13 PM
Gringoman, here is a 60s sex kitten that is still alive and fighting for her country.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai2As4XFZDY
Posted by: M/M | March 24, 2011 at 10:30 PM
Catherine Zeta-Jones had Elizabeth Taylor's sensuality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uczLtpWF_cY
Posted by: M/M | March 24, 2011 at 10:42 PM
If troops are placed on the ground in Libya - wouldn't that be similar to intervening in the war between Iraq and Iran?
Posted by: Dgscol | March 26, 2011 at 04:53 PM
If troops are placed on the ground in Libya - wouldn't that be similar to intervening in the war between Iraq and Iran?
Posted by: Truther | March 26, 2011 at 04:53 PM
Not really, since we backed Iraq and the Soviets backed Iran.
Posted by: Naijaman | March 26, 2011 at 06:17 PM
THERE ARE MANY PARTY STRANGENESSES. When can we get rid of the IRS?
I got to thinking - this guy I know about is a Soviet agent, and has been all his life - and a US citizen living off the taxpayer running his research as a front for his policy initiatives, influencing our government's actions. He has two illegitimate children, and he has rigged jobs and grants at universities for both of them. He had been in the government since the 60's and his parents were members of the Soviet secret police, going back to the forties (they knew the Rosenbergs). His associates are all members of his parent's network - so he is well connected. He had his own little fiefdom, the whole thing subsisting off the US taxpayer.
How do we get rid of people like these? How many parents have rigged their children up, into government jobs, at which they were just deplorable, or just plain irresponsible. It is like Bush, except his terms ran out.
Posted by: Marine Globetrotter | March 26, 2011 at 07:09 PM
Fortunately, this Age of Stupidity cannot last very long. Already, most people know that if you want a good TV or VCR, you buy Japanese; for a good car, Japanese or German, etc. Eventually, in order to compete, the Elite will have to allow a bit
more education for American youth, before we sink fully to the level of a Third World nation.
-- Prometheus Rising(1983)
Posted by: Dgscol | March 27, 2011 at 02:41 AM
The idea here, was that the status quo created an atmosphere of stupor for our youth, to keep their exuberance from altering society .... leading eventually to confused, fat, tv-watching, depressed kids playing video games, wearing T's advertizing products that they paid for.
Posted by: Dgscol | March 27, 2011 at 02:49 AM
wearing T's that they had to pay for, that advertized products. They are the "Sign" generation.
Posted by: Dgscol | March 27, 2011 at 02:51 AM
From an artcle about the GOP wanting to make huge cuts with social security:
"In southeast Florida last week, first-term GOP Rep. Allen West, a tea party favorite, called for changes that some might consider radical: abolish the Internal Revenue Service and federal income tax; retain tax cuts for billionaires so they won't shut down their charities"
First, getting rid of the IRS? As, in no more taxes? The government neds some money coming in. Or, it couldn't function. Or, it would shut down. Boy, that is radical!
Letting the billionaires keep their tax cuts. Sounds like the rich protecting themselves, don't ya think?
Posted by: jay | March 27, 2011 at 01:32 PM
Jay,
If the Tax Code is simplified, i.e., a Flat Tax, then the IRS could be downsized by at least 90% thus reducing the size of government thus lowering our taxes thus stimulating the economy thus creating more jobs....
Secondly, charity always works more efficiently and with better results for the recipient when it's administered within the private domain. On the otherhans, Government bureaucracies muck up the works and actually increase dependency and its attendent poverty. That's the nature of the beast.
.
Posted by: DJ | March 27, 2011 at 01:59 PM
DJ, Think the flat Tax is a good ideal, yes. Seems that the GOP and maybe the tea party feels that the Rich are entitled to tax cuts more than the average guy. Since, at least the rich earned it. I feel that the average guy earned his, just as much. That guy wants to get rid of the IRS, comepletely.
Getting rid of federal income tax? Any federal government needs some income comeing in. To pay for the services, employees, etc.
Always wondered if the tea party believes in 50 United states or 50 individual ones on a piece of land.
Posted by: jay | March 27, 2011 at 02:25 PM
Jay,
With all due respect, I think you're confusing the Tea Party Protesters interests with those of the Republican country clubber blue-blood establishment. I've always been under the impression the TTPs are trying to wrestle away the power from the Republican establishment AND those on the Left whom want to grow government to the point of socialism - mainly for the benefit of minorities.
The fact is: we in the middle are being played by both sides. This is why I advocate a third party. One which protects and promotes the interests of the working middle classes; even WHITES in the middle classes, if I may be so bold.
Posted by: DJ | March 27, 2011 at 03:05 PM
DJ, just see comments about the programs that helps the working people, Social security for one. that several people want to abolish it completely. But,the rich? we don't do enough. better to give the rich tax cuts that the average guy. weeks ago, i posted a link on what Buffet and some others of the super rich feel about the ineqaulity of tax rates for them and the working people.
Posted by: jay | March 27, 2011 at 03:32 PM
On the news today about Libya. They said that the presiden't goals there are to create a no-fly zone. And, to get rid of gadafi. But, they said that Obama can't say that .
Posted by: jay | March 27, 2011 at 06:48 PM
Monica, you were excellent as always on McLaughlin today. Word to the wise, however. You occasionally glance over at Eleanor with an eyebrow-half-arched look of barely controlled contempt that looks frighteningly like Michelle Obama. It kinda freaked me out.
Posted by: TexasPride | March 27, 2011 at 08:40 PM
"Monica, you were excellent as always on McLaughlin today"
------------------
Agree.
Monica, as usual, gave Eleanor "EXCUSE ME" Clift a real smack-down this week. Monica is so cool -- a great debater too -- whilst Eleanor is such a screeching libtard.
Posted by: DJ | March 28, 2011 at 10:58 AM
all i could think of is zhit, pizz, kunt, fuk, kockzukker. muthierfukker, titz.....what's wrong with titz?................................absurd li a'ab v us..................
Posted by: andrew joseph leonard | March 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM
monica...how qud u al lao dadt lasht state ment?.........dkish gusting
Posted by: monica | March 28, 2011 at 11:54 AM
fount (daling's) G spa'at
Posted by: and | March 28, 2011 at 01:18 PM
The problem with shows like The Mclaughlin Group or any other show that pits rightie pundits against leftie pundits is that nothing new is ever said, and I never learn anything. The responses are predictable - Monica and Uncle Pat bash President Obama and Eleanor Clift and whoever her colleague defend President Obama. So boring and clichéd. When Bush was the President, the roles were reversed....same result - nothing new said, and I never learned anything.
I'd rather spend my time learning and growing - hence I watch CNN International, BBC World, Al Jazeera English, C-SPAN's Washington Journal, Sky News, EuroNews, ITN and so on. You'd be hard pressed to find pundits offering their opinions on these networks (thankfully).
Posted by: Naijaman | March 28, 2011 at 05:53 PM
Does Twittter Monica also welcome Monicamemo Monica's scummellicons and Sorosbots who is so "clever" it knows how to spam by using "private citizen" ISP numbers? Surely Monica knows how entertaining and what a laugh riot a nutbag 9.11 Truther is to its vast audience of one---Scumella itself.
========================================================
FLASH. BULLETIN. BREAKING SCUMBOT NEWS!
For everyone aware of how the scumellicons stink up Monicamemo. Here is relevant Breaking News of what they are and what enables them.....
////////The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of “guerrilla warfare and sabotage” aimed at the Fox News Channel.
The group, launched as a more traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its monitoring of newspapers and other television networks and is narrowing its focus to Fox and a HANDFUL OF CONSERVATIVE WEBSITES, which its leaders view as political organizations and the “nerve center” of the conservative movement. The shift reflects the centrality of the cable channel to the contemporary conservative movement, as well as the loathing it inspires among liberals — not least among the donors who fund Media Matters’ staff of about 90, who are arrayed in neat rows in a giant war room above Massachusetts Avenue.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html#ixzz1HxYw0JlG
gringoNOTE: One question remaining would be: Why does a (sic) Conservative Warrior Princess enable Sorosbots at her website? She and her webmaster could easily ban them. All it takes is a fingertip. But Conservative Warrior Princess will not, even though she's known to have quick fingers when needed. And why not, when no self-respecting site allows disruptive scum in the name of "free speech."....You mean you still haven't figured it out?
Posted by: gringoman | March 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM
Posted by: gringoman | March 28, 2011 at 11:23 PM
The Japanese are exporting cheap fish, and also .. a new line of autos called Geigers, and a new watch that glows in the daytime, as well as at night, and powers itself for 50 years somehow.
Posted by: Marine Globetrotter | March 28, 2011 at 11:24 PM
I'd rather spend my time learning and growing - hence I watch CNN International, BBC World, Al Jazeera English, C-SPAN's Washington Journal, Sky News, EuroNews, ITN and so on. You'd be hard pressed to find pundits offering their opinions on these networks (thankfully).
Posted by: Naijaman | March 28, 2011 at 05:53 PM
Of course the "I'll do Lefty and you do Righty" charade is a deadly bore by now. CNN International might be marginally better, but anyone saying it's "opinion free" might not have an ear for nuance and subtle selectivity. I could give dozens of examples if someone wanted to make it worth my time.
CHANNEL NEWS ASIA (Singapore based) is so far above CNN International (I've been watching them both) especially in covering Asia, it's embarrassing. CNN obviously has the boots on the ground in ME, and arguably Japan, but that's about it. CNA manages to cover the whole texture of life as it is lived, in addition to the usual Hot Headlines. Ideologists hate real life, as it always tends to sabotage their ideology. Dominant ideology might have been Right at one time. Today it is overwhelmingly Lefty, which is why almost all eliteniks hide behind it, (as they once hid behind Right ideology) from Soros to Bush to Mr and Mrs Bubba, hoping to snooker the dimbos they patronize.
Posted by: gringoman | March 28, 2011 at 11:39 PM
Now let the Sorosbots and Alinskybots take a break from their Sliming of Sarah and start mocking the "birther" Donald Trump. Go for it, botniks!
=========================================================
Exclusive to Newsmax: Donald Trump's Birth Certificate
Monday, 28 Mar 2011 01:55 PM
Donald Trump, who has been making television appearances calling for President Barack Obama to release his official birth documents, released his birth certificate exclusively to Newsmax on Monday.
“It took me one hour to get my birth certificate. It’s inconceivable that, after four years of questioning, the president still hasn’t produced his birth certificate. I’m just asking President Obama to show the public his birth certificate. Why’s he making an issue out of this?"
Trump was skeptical that so few people have stepped forward to verify Obama's birth.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Exclusive to Newsmax: Donald Trump's Birth Certificate
Posted by: gringoman | March 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM
It is racism, pure and simple, to not let a Black man say whatever he likes about the names on his birth certificate. C'mon guys.
----------
One reason "globalism" has failed is extremely large companies received tax breaks, incentives, special considerations, and finally bailouts. These large, initially bloated and unchallenged companies like GE were a bad place from which to launch a global venture - but they have clout, and so .... the results were easily corruptable, weak, and unremarkable.
Not only this, but their tax breaks are unfair to other corporate entities in the country. While GE pays no tax, some patriotic companies pay 21%. Offshored wealth, also, does not help the US of A. If the wealth generated never comes back to America, it actually is a disentegration of our economy. Our politicians launched this with our money, neither protected us on the back side of the deal, nor pulled the stopper when it began to go badly.
A person remarked that if a company pays off a politician, they can practically plot and commit murder and no one cares. you have to be inventive, just to get them to pay attention.
Posted by: Dgscol | March 29, 2011 at 12:10 AM
Republican Party vs Democrat Party = different rhetoric but same overarching "progressive" agenda, thus an inevitable progressive outcome.
As long as the Tea Party work within the framework of the "two party system", their efforts to reform government will be in vain.
The next 6 months will either prove my contention absolutely correct, or only marginally correct. The key to this is what House Republicans do with the funding for ObamaCare. Will they strip it out of the budget, or just tinker around the edges like Boner and Cantor want to?
Soon we shall know the answer....
Posted by: DJ | March 29, 2011 at 08:33 AM
The next 6 months will either prove my contention absolutely correct, or only marginally correct. The key to this is what House Republicans do with the funding for ObamaCare. Will they strip it out of the budget, or just tinker around the edges like Boner and Cantor want to?
Soon we shall know the answer....
Posted by: DJ | March 29, 2011 at 08:33 AM
This points to a question more urgent than just another tired chorus of "Bam-Bam, he boopy-boopy!"
Yo, Monica, even your Monicamemo scumbot trolls and Sorosbots know he boopy-boopy.
What we want to know is whether your Goopers will shape up or STFU.
There, honeybunch, we said it.
Posted by: gringoman | March 29, 2011 at 09:17 AM
The current White House occupant is knowingly operating a no fly zone on behalf of Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and Taliban operatives in Libya. There's talk from the State Department that the USA may soon supply weapons to the Libyan rebels. This is lending aid and comfort to the enemy which, by Constitutional definition, is treason.
Posted by: mjfell | March 29, 2011 at 05:34 PM
Meltdown.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 30, 2011 at 02:39 AM
The current White House occupant, aka the two faced pathological liar in thief, is only concerned with winning the next election. If that means the destruction of America...or even all mankind, so what?
Posted by: mjfell | March 30, 2011 at 01:35 PM
Trump: 'The Bush era gave us Obama'
By Michael O'Brien - 03/30/11 10:09 AM ET
Real estate mogul Donald Trump broke Republicans' famous "11th Commandment" on Wednesday and went on the attack against former President George W. Bush, accusing his administration of leading to Barack Obama's presidency.
gringoNOTE: How will Monica ever Twitter Trump? Mogul non grata? Heretic from Hell? Gooper scooper?
Posted by: gringoman | March 30, 2011 at 02:22 PM
We saw the emergence of an islamist regimes in iraq and afghanistan - just check their "constitutions" which are full of sharia - after we spent a fortune in blood and gold there.
It stands to reason that the Bama could figure out that the exact same thing would happen in Egypt and the rest of these hellholes.
Ergo he did this ON PURPOSE.
Which fits squarely into the definition of treason, regardless of the visible excitement expressed by his panting media lapdogs reporting back from the "moozeleembe street".
It's sickening.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 30, 2011 at 04:35 PM
Ummah,
Convicting Obama of treason would have to prove intent. Good luck with that. Proving intent in a court of law is not the same as in a court of website.
But let's assume, for a moment, it could be done. The Iraq sharia you mention can easily be associated with Bush policy too, Bush who got the sharia ball rolling.
Ergo, how is Bush not as guilty of "treason" as BHO? With Bush it was just stupidity, not intent?
Any wonder that Conservative Warrior Princess will not raise the "treason" issue any more than she will examine how Big Dems (Bubba, Barack etc) have benefitted directly and personally from Wahabbi oil sheiks?
Monica is clever, but is she clever enough to indict Dems for receiving muslim largesse without reminding everyone about the House of Bush windfalls? Does she have the sheikh to pull that off? What's a maid for Georgie and Jebbie to do?
She can entertain and attract "conservatives" with her good looks and spanking of Democrats and Alan Colmes in their Punch & Judy Show. That's all they ask for. Why complicate things for them with the whole story? Keep it nice and Twitter simple. Alan gets it too.
Posted by: gringoman | March 30, 2011 at 08:34 PM
"CHANNEL NEWS ASIA (Singapore based) is so far above CNN International (I've been watching them both) especially in covering Asia, it's embarrassing. CNN obviously has the boots on the ground in ME, and arguably Japan, but that's about it. CNA manages to cover the whole texture of life as it is lived, in addition to the usual Hot Headlines." - posted by Gringoman.
Thanks for the tip bro...will definitely add CNA to my rotation...I'm really looking forward to it after reading your description. Much obliged!
Posted by: Naijaman | March 30, 2011 at 10:48 PM
"CHANNEL NEWS ASIA (Singapore based) is so far above CNN International (I've been watching them both) especially in covering Asia, it's embarrassing. CNN obviously has the boots on the ground in ME, and arguably Japan, but that's about it. CNA manages to cover the whole texture of life as it is lived, in addition to the usual Hot Headlines." - posted by Gringoman.
Thanks for the tip bro...will definitely add CNA to my rotation...I'm really looking forward to it after reading your description. Much obliged!
Posted by: Naijaman | March 30, 2011 at 10:48 PM
I think you'll find CHANNEL NEWS ASIA an interesting discovery. For technical reasons I won't be watching it again for a while, but I've been impressed by it frequently (although not always.) Since it's a far smaller operation than "giant" CNN International, it doesn't have the "troop strength" and live coverage in hot spots like CNN, yet always seems to convey the gist of what's going on. Still, I saw amazing footage of the Japan tsunami that I didn't see on CNN, although there's plenty of that everywhere. For Asia, which is increasingly significant every day, including interesting artists and thinkers, it leaves CNN far behind. Enjoy, my man. From my perspective, I like how it shows, usually by implication, that Asia--which like it or not is THE booming continent today (and not just China) is not nearly as tied down as the US is today by politically correct and by taxes and Government, and by media hacks who are constantly trying to defame their opponents. Fresh air.
Posted by: gringoman | March 31, 2011 at 02:21 AM
Another of the attractions of CHANNEL NEWS ASIA is the vivid communication of something that is less and less understood or appreciated in the West today, especially the US---the family, the family structure, traditional values even in the Telecom Age. The people seem much less decadent, doped out, porned out and jaded than what they've become in the US of the Culture Wars. They're more like Americans used to be, in that regard. Monica's troll trash would have a much tougher time over there, trust me.
Posted by: gringoman | March 31, 2011 at 02:31 AM
One reason "globalism" has failed is extremely large companies received tax breaks, incentives, special considerations, and finally bailouts. These large, initially bloated and unchallenged companies like GE were a bad place from which to launch a global venture - but they have clout, and so .... the results were easily corruptable, weak, and unremarkable.
Not only this, but their tax breaks are unfair to other corporate entities in the country. While GE pays no tax, some patriotic companies pay 21%. Offshored wealth, also, does not help the US of A. If the wealth generated never comes back to America, it actually is a disentegration of our economy. Our politicians launched this with our money, neither protected us on the back side of the deal, nor pulled the stopper when it began to go badly.
A person remarked that if a company pays off a politician, they can practically plot and commit murder and no one cares. you have to be inventive, just to get them to pay attention. 2945abc45 0402
Posted by: louis vuitton discount | April 01, 2011 at 09:52 PM
BE CAREFUL, MONICA - Better wear a hat!
"Are U.S. government microwave mind-control tests causing TV presenters' brains to melt down?"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1372538/Are-government-microwave-mind-control-tests-causing-TV-presenters-brains-melt-down.html
It looks like the Globalist Commie Tyranny advocates have a new weapon they might choose next to point a conservative talk show hosts and pundits with whom they disagree.
Posted by: WowZER | April 03, 2011 at 07:47 AM
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/HarryReid-QuranBurning-Afghanistan-/2011/04/03/id/391567
Posted by: M/M | April 03, 2011 at 02:16 PM