My first active memory of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi was in 1986, when I remember seeing images of the flamboyant terrorist on television. Why was he on TV? Our intelligence services intercepted messages from Libya's East Berlin embassy suggesting Qaddafi had ordered the terrorist strike on a West Berlin disco frequented by U.S. servicemen that left hundreds dead. In response, President Reagan ordered a massive strike against Libya ten days later. U.S military jets bombed Tripoli and Benghazi in an operation that by all accounts stunned Qaddafi. Reagan didn't play.
Qaddafi's long list of horrors includes the bombing of Pan Am flight 103, support for all manner of Islamic and other terrorist groups, including the PLO, Carlos the Jackal, and FARC, funding the "Black September movement" that carried out the Munich massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Summer Olympics, and giving safe harbor to the convicted terrorist of Pan Am 103, al-Megrahi.
After the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, Qaddafi thought he was next, so he preemptively caved, giving up his nuclear weapons program. In return, Washington restored full diplomatic relations with Libya in 2006, but no one was under the illusion that Qaddafi was now our friend.
He is one of the world's most despicable despots and a terrorist in belief and in action. Over the past few days, he has extended that terror to his own people, ordering military jets to fire upon the thousands of protesters who have gathered to demand regime change. Qaddafi has hired mercenaries from Chad and Sudan to murder his people in the streets using hollow-point bullets. In a bizarre (is there any other way for him?) mini-speech, he said opponents "deserved to die." Yup, that's the old Colonel: what a sweetheart.
In all of the upheaval in the Middle East over the past two years, two examples in particular cry out for American presidential leadership: the revolt in Iran nearly two years ago, and the revolt today in Libya. In both cases, the regimes are enemies of the United States and state sponsors and exporters of terror; and they have revealed once again their brutality and totalitarianism by their willingness to slaughter their own people. In both cases, the people there have honestly had enough of their ruthless dictatorship and would really benefit from a few words of clear moral support from the President of the United States.
In both cases, instead of clarion calls of support for those aggrieved peoples, Obama has given them the silence of crickets and the remoteness of tumbleweeds.
When the 2009 Iranian revolt began, Obama spoke of an unwillingness to "meddle." But he was more than happy to meddle in Egypt, one of our staunchest and longstanding allies, and throw Hosni Mubarak under the bus. He's also more than willing to meddle in Israel on settlements and in the UK by giving away their nuclear secrets to the Russians, and on and on. He meddles when he wants to.
But he will not "meddle" when it matters most and costs the least: against terrorist regimes like Iran and Libya. Whose side is he on? Seriously.
Reagan once called Qaddafi "the mad dog of the Middle East." It now looks like the mad dog has met the chihuahua of the West.
Reagan didn't play. Bombs dropped. Sanctions were levied.
Obama plays. Half-hearted words are spoken. UN resolutions of mere "condemnation" are endlessly debated.
While the mad dog hangs on to what's left of his regime, he must be astonished by the American president who appears to be rooting for him.
"Whose side is he on? Seriously." ( --Monica)
----------------------
He's on the globalists' side. Naturally. Just like the HoB and all the rest of the Republican and Democrat Party establishment are on the globalists' side. That should be glaringly obvious to all by now, shouldn't it?
Posted by: DJ | February 23, 2011 at 09:46 AM
ye rite ... sure ... y' fuolovit ... o nd......hehehe
Posted by: satan | February 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM
monica your wot 42 yr old (not an insult), however 1986 would put you at about 17 yr old, so, where the hell were you during the early to mid 1980's---the fookin brkfst club?
Posted by: satan | February 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM
A few words of moral encouragement? C'mon! A few words of moral encouragement in Iran or Libya would get a lot of people killed just as a few words of moral encouragement from G H W Bush got a lot of Iraqi Shites killed, something you can bet they haven't forgotten. Besides Obama probably remembers when he proclaimed it was a moral imperative to keep Americans alive even if they couldn't afford medical care, he was quickly told where he could put his moral imperative.
Libya is no Egypt which retained a vestige of nationalism and where the people retained ties with a well-disciplined military. Libya is effectively a colony of oil corporations and Qadafi will stay or go depending on what oil executives decide. It's doubtful any nation would dare even air strikes against Qadafi today and certainly not sending ground troops. If they got their butts kicked by corporate armies, it would pull back the curtain and reveal the era of nationalism and republican government is over.
We see here corporations have ordered states to destroy unions so workers have no direct representation. Citizens United wiped out any theoretical obstacle keeping corporations from buying the politicians they want in power. It's not 1986. There won't be another honest union leader elected President.
Posted by: borderbriar | February 23, 2011 at 11:54 AM
kiss my tukas...there was no "MASSIVE" strike on libya in 1986 (i know i was stationed in jacksonville fl.). what did happen was that the U.S. Navy "brass" ( James D. Webb--quote-" the screw ups and shitheads of the navy R rout of the navy....also coach Ron when i was on the Stingray Americans football team--J.V. level pop warner in buffalo ny--coach ron had prevoiusly coached in lackawanna ny in the bills jr. league little league football--i played for hamburg---our colrs were exactly like cheeseheads but with an H---both cheated and both are soviet/nazi... coach ron had said in 1980{during eranian revolution-pol pot killing fields} the screw ups and shits of south buffalo play on the stingrays not the other south buffalo little league team{west side of buffalo had one team west seneca had two teams like in south buffalo-not enuff kids to field a strong team, usually} exactly like india/pakistan 1947 north korea/south korea 1953... north vietnam/ south vietnam 1957 to 1975...iraq/iran 1980 to 1989(soviets in afghanistan---anyone)...iraq/iraq no fly zones 1990's...balkans 1990's... ... ... ...WITH us/AGAINST us leave no child behind... ... ... ...red state/blue state... ... ...lieberal/cunservative.........repubics/demi more gimmemore... ... ... ...superma ums/ stay at ho um ma ums ... ... ... ... ... ...Monica Crowley you worked for Richard Milhouse(BART< WALLACE
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:11 PM
i got all fired up telling the Truth i forgot to tell you about Libyan missile strikes in 1986... ... ... ...VA-46 and , i think, it's sister squadron ( A-7 CRUSADERS light attack bombers {the maneater was actually the A-3, however, walk in front oh=f an A-7 and ya will get sucked in to engine) were the first squadrons to use the new HARM missile---Heat Anti Radar Missile---the squadron personnel were awarded ribons for that---the single libyan radr site was back and fully usable in approximately 36 hours...NO harm NO foul... ... ...the rest of us sailors pointed out that with 5 minutes of shelling from one of our Battleships the soviet/nazi's would have had to build a whole new radar site... so why did the secnav and raygun (just {pizza/pasta} say, ur, NO) not destroy Libya then.... .... ...another time i'll tell you about when I pissed inside of three miles along libyan coast---february 1987 that was---terry anderson/terry waite...i need a smoke so i'll cut this "post" short...(john waite-the babies...no child left behind...anyone/noone)
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:22 PM
SecNav in 1986 was... ... ...ta ta (motors?)... ... ... ...James D. Webb with the famous quote " all the screw ups and shitheads of the seven T'z..R rout of the Navy "... ... ... Adolph Hitler, Himmler, goerbbels,etc. referred to Germanyn famously as " R DHUR MENE " pronounced "r germany" sore T ov...these are facts and WHO is A ONE TERM SENATOR (or is that ONE TERM PRESIDENT OF THE NAZI {T} PARTY) nazi is pronunced na t z ... ... ...Xe services pronounced Z... ... ...on and on and on and on...and still they complain
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:29 PM
Yes, I know, Dearest. We should go right in with troops, take over, uh, I mean LIBERATE the good people of Libya after killing a fourth of the rest, and install a dictator and US-style fake Democracy more to our liking. Like we do almost everywhere else. With the requisite blood sacrifices of babies and children already born to America's god Lucifer.
And then, of course, for Lucifer's own Israel, Iran. Onward and upward. The sun never sets on the American Empire.
Until it does.
The adults are running the asylum now, Sweetums. There are more modern ways to do things. Yes, your offense contractor stock won't be doing as well as it did in the past, Toodles, but there always a little thing called DIVESTMENT.
I know now why John McLaughlin picked you; even though you present a much more attractive presentation than fat, sassy, and happy Herman Goering, underneath it all you're just another Tony Blankley.
I KNOW it's you guys putting out the violence is coming schtick, but be careful what you wish for. It IS coming, and not from the folks you control.
And the folks you control won't be controlled for long.
I don't know. Switzerland is looking better and better all the time. Never had any class riots or french revolutions THERE.
But a whole different world is coming, and fast. That light at the end of the tunnel has always been an oncoming runaway train.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM
...In the form of a mushroom cloud.
Ah, priceless. I always wanted to use that bloodstained epitaph from Amerika's tombstone.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM
back in 1975 way before i allowed them to think i didn't know about the receiver /transmitter they put in when i had reconstructive plastic surgery for an injury to my cheek bone that i incurred during battle in 1990....but, i digress... in 1975 to make sure that Mutually Assured Destructuion would happen if they touched my family or ateemted some Big attack anywhere and , at the same Time, ending the Cold War and turning the Cold War fully HOT... i dialed zero on the telephone (still AT&T at the time) and sisd to the operator..."operator, operator; EMERGENCY on SunnyDale Bridge" (it was from a commercial)...well about 4-5 minutes later...i picked up the phone again and the operator was still on the line and asked me if i thought i was funny..(the operaotr probably had no clue that i had just turned the Cold War HOT and the soviets/nazis could not get around it)... ... ...these are facts.
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:44 PM
did you see juniors grades... ... diamond dave lee roth was referring to me...funny... i love that line (song lyrics wise that is)
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:46 PM
That is Not What I Said.
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM
.
Memo to all the "multiple online personalities" Bama-bloggers:
Time for you guys to UNIONIZE.
You're being exploited by demonRATS!!
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 01:04 PM
But he will not "meddle" when it matters most and costs the least: against terrorist regimes like Iran and Libya. Whose side is he on? Seriously.
--
I assume this is a rhetorical question.
He's always on the side of whoever is not on the side of America.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 01:06 PM
tanksulotteasnotderbusnest
Posted by: satan | February 23, 2011 at 01:06 PM
But he will not "meddle" when it matters most and costs the least: against terrorist regimes like Iran and Libya. Whose side is he on? Seriously.
--
I assume this is a rhetorical question.
He's always on the side of whoever is not on the side of America.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 01:11 PM
.
How do we know the ONE won't order troops to fire on Americans when he is ousted in November next year?
I hope that whoever carries the football is a fast agile runner in case it hits the fan.
Target #1: Phoenix, AZ and the North Dakota oil fields. Oh, and Sarah Palin's house.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 01:13 PM
"Reagan didn't play." - MC
Reagan PLAYED at being President every day of his tenure in the White House, while G.H.W. Bush ran the entire country and its wars and biowars under his senile nose, while Mommie ran the White House for him.
It's long been time enough to drop all illusions about the poor senile old fool, who was the most useful and lethal fascist tool since Paul von Hindenburg.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:17 PM
"He's always on the side of whoever is not on the side of America." - UG
Oh, au contraire, mon frere, not true!! Obama is NOT, nor has he ever been, on the side of GOD.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:19 PM
"How do we know the ONE won't order troops to fire on Americans when he is ousted in November next year?" - UG
Oooh, how SCARY!! Better pack the kids and dog up and make for Israel, A.S.A.P.
I'll spring for the tickets. One way.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:21 PM
"He's on the globalists' side." - DJ JR
Can you please tell me where to contact these globalists? I need to sign up.
I'm really sick and tired of offense contractors and endless war.
Even more so of their minions.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:26 PM
"All we are saying, is give peace a chance."
Or else, you stooooooooopid MF's.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:27 PM
Monica Crowley what does Hamn (with a backwards n) mean in soviet russia/ukraine...also i know you know rod spelled backward is Dor (it is spelled with an uppitycase in th by bel...how much for your....a valid legitimate question.
Posted by: Andrew Joseph Leonard | February 23, 2011 at 01:37 PM
Just when you're CONVINCED that Mankind consistently PROVES there's no God, and there's nothing left to live for, then something happens like this:
http://www.rense.com/general93/hippo.htm
Hope springs eternal.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 01:46 PM
xbjllb---you are an infantiled child,regardless of your fllesh bodies physical age...and you and all the faceshitz are psychosexually the same from about 2 1/2 years old (leave no child behind) , if you can get ahold (royal?) of them early... ... ...not one of you commie/faceshitz is even a juvenile in your own psychological development... that is a scientific fact...ya kindasortawannatedyewisyaweighedmoorsewsuwoodentblowawaysosleeZee ... ... ... ... Dare to support Officer Z.... .... .... turn in dashit/fetuses/childs/andennyUNsecUREA du thing ya can rapeandtorturefourCENTSHOEWAILLITE e... ... ... ... ... ... ... A QUESTion... .... ... ...yt what does SHIIT taste like?
Posted by: satan | February 23, 2011 at 02:08 PM
Yes, I really like hippos. Hippos don't take any s*hit either. They know better than Americanos how to keep their neighborhoods clean:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3266/2867896705_6457094aa0.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnbullas/2867896705/&h=297&w=468&sz=65&tbnid=ZAgGSvZkmkcPYM:&tbnh=81&tbnw=128&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhippo%2Bchasing%2Bman&zoom=1&q=hippo+chasing+man&usg=__z7sCY0rSsZ6ReadI34wMU60bo6Q=&sa=X&ei=gVllTe30MIG3twf8joCHBg&ved=0CCAQ9QEwAQ
Posted by: DJ | February 23, 2011 at 02:12 PM
Dear Monica
Please excuse the bluntness of this message, but I want to be both objective and clear. I have looked at the posts for the past few days, and your blog officially SUCKS.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy your commentary and the posts of several others who make thoughtful, opinionated comments. I don't agree with everything posted here, but if it is posted with sincerity and intelligence, I respect the opinion, even if I disagree. But I have to be honest - experiencing your blog is now similar to a stroll through a completely untended dog run. There are droppings from "Satan" and X-Lax everywhere, and the more intelligent posts are overwhelmed by the volume and stench of the excrement. "Squint 'n Scroll" has become the only way to navigate through the dung piles (and I'll expand that to "Squint, Scroll, and Hold your nose"). These tactics may make a visit to your blog bearable, but it doesn't mean a stroll through the excrement is enjoyable.
Your nest has been fouled, badly, and sadly there is no indication of any desire to clean up the mess.
So, without the metaphors, here's the point: It is clear that you have been infected by those who post here for the express purpose of disrupting, distracting, and diverting all intelligent discussion. Like good Alinsky-ites, they are attempting to use ridicule, fear, idiotic threats, sarcasm, and other Alinsky tools right out of the "Rulebook" to put people on the defensive and disrupt the conversation and exchange of ideas. They FEAR a reasonble, un-disrupted, intelligent exchange of Conservative ideas, so they do all possible to disrupt it. Your commentary and any sensible related dialogue have clearly become casualties of the infestation. If so, why have a blog at all? You really should have enough pride in your work to defend it and protect it. After all, it does have your name on it.
Again, forgive the bluntness, but if you don't care enough about your blog to clean up an infestation of provocateurs and disruptive posters, why should anyone else?
Fortunately (or unfortunately depending on your point of view), there are alternatives. There are lots of other blogs which allow the exchange of a diverse set of ideas and opinions, but manage their sites more aggressively when an intentionally disruptive agenda is revealed. If you care at all about your blog, you really should do the same. I am a huge proponent of free speech, but that does not mean we sit back and do nothing when radicals act to disrupt the conversation.
I will visit from time to time, because I do enjoy reading your commentary, but if you do not care enough about your blog to clear the infestation, then I will not waste a lot of my time on it. There are other places to go.
Posted by: Rob | February 23, 2011 at 02:37 PM
Qaddafi is a dog, but the Muslim Brothers, who are suspected of orchestrating and organizing these demonstrations, are the present concern. A country on its toes, would be out there, attempting to fragment them, to prevent a united Arab front. These double jihaddi states will favor the Red commies, against the great satan of the West.
Posted by: Dgscol | February 23, 2011 at 04:17 PM
.
Thank you for speaking out, ROB. I feel the exact same way. Besides Monica's commentary I would miss the small online community we've been enjoying here with MJFELL, M/M, Gringoman, DJ, ROB and others, in case I left anyone out.
I also visit other boards and they have much better lib/spam controls than here, but there are also more posters and people don't communicate quite as directly as we've ben used to hear.
I'd hate to lose the friendly and informative atmosphere we've been sharing, with the usual kill-joys, who now seem to be increasing in numbers like flies on a freshly deposited pile of dogsh*t.
I, too have been looking for new terrain.
Does Monica really want the leftards and the libracists to infest the Memo, driving off her radio audience who has been posting here, some of us for years?
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 04:54 PM
"There are other places to go." - Rob
And don't the let the door hit you on your brain on the way out either, Robby.
You already know where you're going, and so do we.
Unfortunate. But not our doing.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:06 PM
I will visit from time to time, because I do enjoy reading your commentary, but if you do not care enough about your blog to clear the infestation, then I will not waste a lot of my time on it. There are other places to go.
POSTED BY: ROB | FEBRUARY 23, 2011 AT 02:37 PM
--
Tell us where, I am looking for a more lib-free environment myself.
I think the increased presence of libs on the Memo is part of the recently revealed White House strategy of paying operatives to influence opinion on Conservative boards.
Scorched Earth is definitely part of the Alinsky strategem.
If only Monica would put her money where her mouth is. But then the HoB she keeps praising didn't know how to stand up to LIEberal rhetoric and rage either.
The result of that lack of fight on the part of the GOOPERS now sits in the White House.
.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 05:07 PM
"I'd hate to lose the friendly and informative atmosphere we've been sharing, with the usual kill-joys, who now seem to be increasing in numbers like flies on a freshly deposited pile of dogsh*t." - UG
AS IF you're not one of them posting here as Satan et al.
"Does Monica really want the leftards and the libracists to infest the Memo, driving off her radio audience who has been posting here, some of us for years?"
Monica, unlike those of you who REALIZE you are wrong, is so sure she's right in all judgment, that she is not afraid of the truth, as you are.
You won't be going anywhere. There's no other place you can abuse the freedom you're given like you can, and do, here.
Now, go figure out a way to make peace with those you've made your enemies, or make plans for a very painful eternity.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:13 PM
"These double jihaddi states will favor the Red commies, against the great satan of the West. - Truther
There ARE NO red commies left anymore, Rip Van Winkle. Reagan destroyed the Evil Empire, remember?
Just various tribes of the same old usual fascist suspects fighting it out to be top dog in the world gov. Little Hitlers, Big Hitlers, and Closet Hitlers.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:16 PM
"Scorched Earth is definitely part of the Alinsky strategem." - UG
That might be a strategy of Alinsky, but when it comes to hatemongers making scorched earth an absolute reality, look in the mirror, Double Jihad Boy.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:18 PM
"They know better than Americanos how to keep their neighborhoods clean:" - DJ
I bet you're just LOADS of fun at your KKK meetings.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:19 PM
while i might be considered a "lib" I do try to voice my viewpoints in a civilized manner. But, like some. Do not understand the comments that consists of just gibberish. Mine my consists of typing errors. But, I do try yo make them readable. Agree with Rob and Ummah.
Posted by: jay | February 23, 2011 at 05:23 PM
"A QUESTion... .... ... ...yt what does SHIIT taste like?" - Satan
UG, remember? Me and your sockpuppet Satan are supposed to be on the same side.
Remember?
Good grief, Double Jihad Boy... get it together.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:24 PM
Jay, "Satan" and his other various names are UG, trying to mess up the blog. His twenty pages of repeat spam tantrums didn't achieve his censorship objective, so this is his latest attempt to try to MAKE Monica censor the blog.
Ug-Satan's gibberish is just more of the same inane drunk spam. Which is why I rarely reply to him, because he is unredeemable and unreachable.
What UG fails to realize is this flirtation with insanity can become quickly out of control in his own weak, damaged, and failing mind.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:29 PM
P.S. And if you EVER don't understand one of MY posts, just let me know. I'll be only too happy to explain exactly what I mean to you and anybody else who seriously wants more info.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:30 PM
.
Jay, I don't consider you one of the intransigent and destructive elements here, unlike the X-lax and its friends.
At least you're capable of logical conclusion and learning.
I too was A lib when I was a youngin'. Just those nagging voices how none of it was logical or made any sense kept getting louder and louder, until finally all lieberal pretensions were completely lost.
The love affair of liberalism with islam being the firs
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 05:36 PM
And now back to Governor Scottie Walker.
No better illustration of the utter banality of evil was given to in Gov. Walker's interminable speech. In fact, I can hardly think of a worse torture in hell than having to listen to the man recite his fascist spiel like it really meant something.
Could they ever have used a man like him; to run Dachau.
And then afterward, at the Nuremberg War Trials, acting in his own defense.
He would have put everyone to sleep, and then snuck out the front door.
And never breaking a grin. What a cucumber. Thinks he's The Fonze.
I guess one has to talk so long enough to put people asleep to make them forget:
1. He created the deficit out of thin air by giving over a trillion dollars in tax cuts to big business and the rich
2. The Democrats and Union workers have already caved into his monetary demands and have agreed to pay every penny more he asked of them
3. He is extorting the Democratic congress by saying he will take away people's jobs if they don't come back (which only hurts him, just makes him an obvious as*shole to everyone)
4. The people of Wisconsin he keeps talking about support unions 66% against 33% who are the "millions of people" in Wisconsin he keeps talking about who support him
5. He really is the single most boring man on earth, except for that ridiculous hair transplant and the pie plate bald spot it left in the back of his head. THAT at least provides a moment or two of hilarity in an otherwise untenable interminable speech
6. The entire affair is really just about destroying unions' power to bargain
7. He actually thought a Koch Brother would call him to "see how things were going"... and he TOLD HIM!!! Punk'd!!!
8. All he has to do to fix the deficit is RESCIND HIS TAX CUTS TO THE RICH.
But there you go. Mike Meyers was a genius, and a prophet. Forseeing Scottie Walker, a real life
SCOTTIE EVIL.
Only without a personality. Or looks. Or HAIR ON THE BACK OF HIS HEAD.
Or a conscience. Or compassion. Or class. Or even a momentary grasp on reality.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:48 PM
"I too was A lib when I was a youngin'." - UG
Thanks for explaining how you know your spew is SO wrong, that you have to try to force the hostess of this blog to censor your opposition, which we can now consider you obviously realize to be THE TRUTH.
And you really need to reel in your sock puppet Satan. Some of that stuff was creepily beginning to channel Jared Lee Loughner as you intended, and more than a few of us were getting very concerned.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 05:56 PM
.
Jay, I don't consider you one of the intransigent and destructive elements here, unlike the X-lax and its friends.
At least you're capable of logical conclusion and learning.
I too was A lib when I was a youngin'. Just those nagging voices how none of it was logical or made any sense kept getting louder and louder, until finally all lieberal pretensions were completely lost.
The love affair of liberalism with islam being the first and foremost warning sign that something is deeply wrong with LIEberalism from its very roots.
Those roots being naked Marxism, as revealed by closer inspection.
"Progressivism" and liberalism" are merely different skins on the same old program.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 06:13 PM
Fortunately (or unfortunately depending on your point of view), there are alternatives. There are lots of other blogs which allow the exchange of a diverse set of ideas and opinions, but manage their sites more aggressively when an intentionally disruptive agenda is revealed. If you care at all about your blog, you really should do the same. I am a huge proponent of free speech, but that does not mean we sit back and do nothing when radicals act to disrupt the conversation.
I will visit from time to time, because I do enjoy reading your commentary, but if you do not care enough about your blog to clear the infestation, then I will not waste a lot of my time on it. There are other places to go.
Posted by: Rob | February 23, 2011 at 02:37 PM
Rob,
Ditto. You put it very well. Monica, who we thought of as our Warrior Princess, is clearly in dereliction of duty to her own website and her loyalists here.
Here's a little insight. There is a connection between the troll disease at Monicamemo and Monica's attachment to the HoBo (House of Boosh.)
How so?
The Bush Syndrome accepts, maybe even encourages, the dirtbags of the Left. Remember Bush Derangement Syndrome and how mute Georgie Bush remained about it?
Monica, you see, is showing what a good Bushnik she can be by accepting this obnoxious trash at her site, just as Georgie Bush shut up about the vile life forms who lambasted him for years. She and HoBo consider this to be a sign of their "class." Never mind how it disrespects all who voted for or supported them. That doesn't matter to "classy" people. And Monica, unlike a truly feisty Laura Ingraham, is determined to be accepted by these "classy" types. There are other words for this. No need to use them.
Monica's crush on Boosh is a leading indicator of her attitude to the infestation of her site. For her to take out the trash, like a man, would indicate at the very least a modification of her Bush hypnosis. It's almost impossible for a gal from the middle class, who feels the "reflected glory" of the ruling class HoBo.
In other words, as long as Monica remains a committed Bushnik, the sickness at her site will continue. While they remain smug on their sense of "class," the Left chuckles, amazed at these "boozeoisie."
Posted by: gringoman | February 23, 2011 at 10:36 PM
.
The Goopers are enlisting the d-RATS in order to make an end run around the Tea Party:
http://nicd.arizona.edu/node/8
WE KNOW WHAT'S UP HERE!
They're trying to grease the skids for the jebbie. The Goopers have sold out a long time ago. This makes it official.
There's a lot of horse-trading going on here. The Goopers get their golden boy for President in exchange for yet further leftward movement of the GOP.
The Bama hasn't quite worked out the way certain people in establishment circles expected and now it's time for a bi-partisan "course correction".
NOT ON MY WATCH, BIATCHES.
.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 10:37 PM
Grow up, Lucifer's bitches. It's a REAL Christian's JOB to expose war criminality while you fools WORSHIP it.
Monica's lack of fear of the Truth is going to be what gets HER into heaven.
While the rest of you?
We try. God knows how we try.
Posted by: xbjllb | February 23, 2011 at 10:58 PM
.
The Goopers are enlisting the d-RATS in order to make an end run around the Tea Party:
http://nicd.arizona.edu/node/8
WE KNOW WHAT'S UP HERE!
They're trying to grease the skids for the jebbie. The Goopers have sold out a long time ago. This makes it official.
There's a lot of horse-trading going on here. The Goopers get their golden boy for President in exchange for yet further leftward movement of the GOP.
The Bama hasn't quite worked out the way certain people in establishment circles expected and now it's time for a bi-partisan "course correction"
NOT ON MY WATCH, BIATCHES.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | February 23, 2011 at 11:41 PM
The House voted to remove US funding from the IPCC. Yeah!
The IPCC is a non-trustworthy institution, have solely a political agenda, like all of climatology. The scientists would have us believe that every dried up stream , very calving glacier, every dead bird, and each hurricane is caused by cataclysmic climatic warming.
Obama wanted to increase funding to $20M, from $2M. The actual horror continues, however, until the billion in support for both bogus and bloated climate science, is revoked.
Thank you, Marc Marano
Posted by: Dgscol | February 23, 2011 at 11:43 PM
Wht people fail to understand about Anthropogenic Global Warmists, is that there exists a political faction, possibly connected to countries like China, that are seriously attempting to wage war against credible people who are willing to make public statements calling AGW into question. This includes depicting these people as pedophiles. People have lost a substantial amount of income, in some cases.
People begin to wonder how Congress can just keep funding groups like these "climatologists", year after year, even increasing their funding, when they are broke and they know their work is basically a fraud. The Warmists are laughing - no penalty for this conduct. In fact they are surprised the Right has been bright enough to figure them out. They have no sense of responsibility to the US public, whatever.
Posted by: Dgscol | February 24, 2011 at 12:59 AM
"Memo to all the "multiple online personalities" Bama-bloggers:
Time for you guys to UNIONIZE."--Ummah
HAHAHAHAHA---PRICELESS.
First it's x-bj, Then the illiterate satan, now the blithering aj. Probably all the same woman.
Posted by: LongRifle | February 24, 2011 at 01:29 AM