« The McLaughlin Group | Main | The O'Reilly Factor---TONIGHT! »

October 25, 2010

Comments

Rob

Thank you for saving the articles, Monica. The Liberal/Socialist agenda has flown completely apart and none of them can run on the record.

As I was reading your post, I was listening to a news report in which Senator (and Orthopedic Surgeon) John Barrasso said that the latest estimates are that not only did Obamacare FAIL to produce 400,000 jobs immediately, as promised by the outgoing Speaker, Obamacare will cause the LOSS of over 800,000 jobs. Just so no one thinks that's a typo, or I got over-zealous with my 0's: we stand to lose eight hundred thousand more jobs.

So this was a good time to revisit the Plouffe article: Healthcare is NOT a jobs creator, and as he indicated, Democrats ".....own the bill and the health care votes." They sure do.

One week to go.

Truther

Thus global warming was born. Its purpose : Under the guise of a peace effort, to derange US science as a response to the intentional destruction of Soviet crops. This stupid Communist movement spread through networks to many science departments (1985-86) across the US, as they began to make up scientific results favorable to the Soviets, or deliberately made up results for their own personal political benefit instead. Over time it would corrupt all Science, as nepotists and their associates displaced competent researchers. New graduates in the US were being corrupted and hence this process would also hurt our economy. Earlier they took SDI funds to simply burn them off so no one else would actually do the research. Some started training the Chinese to replace WASPY people.

In case you think US/USSR tension was not very great, or that the intentions of people in the US, were not actually that serious, consider the following.

Chernobyl also happened in 1986 in the Ukraine, at about the same time, spewing radioactive waste westward toward Europe. One must wonder if this was intentional act of frustration, eventually leading to the Moscow coup in ‘91. Clearly it demonstrated that airborne substances could travel and be harmful. In the Ukraine, the wind pattern is usually west to east, while at the time of the powerplant explosion it was east to west. Sagan was indeed arrogant, for he was exposed to radiation at Chernobyl and probably died from it - because he did not know how to use a Geiger counter. The Ukrainians probably wanted the Soviets to fight, but they nyet-ted the Ukrainians who then wanted out of the USSR.

Another noteworthy incident occurred in Jan 1986 - the so-called Challenger accident. It was called an O-ring problem at the 305 degree position of the aft field joint of the right SRB(solid rocket booster), but why did they launch that day, and why exactly, did the joint fail? Was the motive to stop Reagan's propaganda "space teacher" flight, that attempted to wrap the flag around the NASA program, militarize space, and stop the circular but joint US-USSR program? In 1982, Reagan's NSDD-42 designated the space shuttle as the primary launch system for the US national security space program. It directed DOD and NASA to develop the shuttle into a fully operational, cost-effective system. The Challenger accident seemed to show that pushing the schedule would result in failure – a demonstration that the Space Shuttle was not fated to be an operationally worthy system, this ridding NASA of the DOD. Someone mentioned all it would actually take to destroy Challenger is someone leaving a wrench out on the pad, that could puncture a hole in the skin of the liquid propellant tank. Since the Challenger breech was obviously present at or near ignition, and this SRB breech was pointed right at the bulbous end of the liquid propellant tank, many causes might exist besides the cold itself.

Did Richard Feynman deliberately misrepresent this to the public, a man who worked on the Manhattan Project, and claimed to pick locks and open safes at Los Alamos, almost saying outright he may have helped to pass nuclear secrets to the Soviets? Feynman railed against NASA, saying it played down the risks of space flight to Christa McAuliffe, and that space flight was not for civilians. Why? Was it because Reagan placed her on the flight to ensure the success of the mission to launch a new communications relay satellite, one that might be used for Star Wars and Landsat Spy satellites? There were also murmurs created that Reagan caused the crash by pushing NASA to launch.

Was it the ugly head of Soviet-sympathizing Luddites that rose up against Challenger and the new technology in space? In this period(84-86) near all launch competency for heavy payloads disappeared. Usually the workhorse of the launch fleet, the Delta missile was not launched at all in 82-83, and 85. In 1986 2 launches were made and 1 a failure. For the Titan system, 2 Vandenburg launches failed in 85-86 with only one successful launch. One, launched two months after the shuttle, blew up right on the pad from a SRB failure almost identical to the shuttle. The result was the stoppage of Star Wars and military missions aboard NASA shuttle flights. And so, Reagan fell off his horse. It took 2 years until the US could launch eyes in the sky, this outside of NASA in hardened programs intended to keep out saboteurs. Today, the UN Space Station, the mission of which is to exhibit international "goodwill", is winding down, or is it?

gringoman

Our Princess is generally right on target when scoping out the Obots, the Soros socialists and their neocom tactics for controlling, confusing and ultimately crippling this Republic.

Now if only she would ask some questions that will cut right through G.O.P. kabuki. Two quick examples.

1. Why do these Goopers never raise the question of Obama's hidden school records?

2. Why did they never make an issue of Congress outrageously exempting itself from the Obamanationcare it legislated for everybody else?

Cara Mia....crickets?

==========================================================

MARK LEVIN Repeal it, Republicans, or be repealed.

GRINGOBRO Do you understand?
You better listen to that man.
Obamanationcare.
Wash it right out of America's hair.
Hey, Goopers! Hear, hear!


jay

"Well, it's how you've governed that's been precisely the problem, David Plouffe.""
that was the problem the Republicans had, too.They didn't lose badly because they did everything right!

gringoman

Obama-Nation, November 2010


60 Minutes Shock Report: National Unemployed and Underemployed 17.5%; California 22%
by Larry O’Connor

In a report sure to cause consternation at the White House and in the offices of the Democratic Leadership in Congress, “60 Minutes” provided an in-depth report on the realities of the unemployment situation in America today.

When you take into account the underemployed as well as the unemployed, the national rate hits 17% and California a staggering 22%.

To put a face on the realities of the underemployed in America under Obamanomincs, reporter Scott Pelley spoke with a fiber-optics engineering manager who has been looking for work for over a year. He just took a job working at a Target. 20% of the unemployed in America have college degrees.

According to the report, 1/3 of the unemployed have been out of work for over a year. This hasn’t happenned since the Great Depression.

Airing one week before the mid-term elections, this report explains better than anything, exactly what is at stake for our country on November 2.

xbjllb

Going out on a limb here... first, this is not a prophecy or something I strongly felt coming. But I would be remiss if I didn't pass this on. Something very horrible MAY be happening in November, and it won't be the election results one way or the other. A lot of rumblings about imminent nuclear war in the continuum, but it could be a planet wide national disaster. Or both, possibly related, and a resulting dollar and worldwide financial collapse. A life changing event far above 9-11 and false flag shenanigans. Bunker time.

Make sure you're ready to face God. And make sure He won't immediately toss you to your god Lucifer. A smart policy every day, despite the initial financial drag.

If I didn't care about your fate, I wouldn't be willing to look like an a*ss if this somehow doesn't happen.

Not kidding on this. This goes WAY beyond politics.

And I hope my sources are wrong far more than you do.

And vote anyway. This is not a cheap attempt to suppress any votes, although they will probably be moot.

xbjllb

Kiss Aqua Buddha man good-bye... Rand Paul storm trooper knocks "Move On" woman to ground, stomps on her head.

http://www.salon.com/news/rand_paul_jack_conway_kentucky_senate/?story=/politics/war_room/2010/10/25/paul_supporter_stoms_woman

This is how you lose an election. We are not, nor will we ever be, Nazi Germany.

Not for lack of the right trying.

jay

Perfect example why no matter who wins in Nov. The country's problems won't be any better. There's an article on the internet that shows how BOTH parties are lying.
net jobs under Bush-4.4 million
Private sector-4.6 million
Under Obama
net job losses3.3 million
private sector-3 million.
most mainstream economists believe the stimulus has helped end the recession monthe if not years sooner. Both parties are driving the nation towards insolvency.
On Obamacare. the costs will be by the CBO 1.2 trillion. But will be offset by 1.3 trillion in savings and new revenue. Which will lower the national debt by 170 trillion.
that'sa condensed portion of the article. Know that people being what they are. Will only agree with something when it agrees with them. For everyone is an expert! But, will say that if people think the country will be far better when someone in particular is elected. They don't know history!

Truther

Iran has carried out missile tests for what could be a plan for a nuclear strike on the United States, the head of a national security panel has warned.

In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee and in remarks to a private conference on missile defense over the weekend hosted by the Claremont Institute, Dr. William Graham warned that the U.S. intelligence community “doesn’t have a story” to explain the recent Iranian tests.

One group of tests that troubled Graham, the former White House science adviser under President Ronald Reagan, were successful efforts to launch a Scud missile from a platform in the Caspian Sea.

“They’ve got [test] ranges in Iran which are more than long enough to handle Scud launches and even Shahab-3 launches,” Dr. Graham said. “Why would they be launching from the surface of the Caspian Sea? They obviously have not explained that to us.”

Another troubling group of tests involved Shahab-3 launches where the Iranians “detonated the warhead near apogee, not over the target area where the thing would eventually land, but at altitude,” Graham said. “Why would they do that?”

Graham chairs the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, a blue-ribbon panel established by Congress in 2001.

The commission examined the Iranian tests “and without too much effort connected the dots,” even though the U.S. intelligence community previously had failed to do so, Graham said.

“The only plausible explanation we can find is that the Iranians are figuring out how to launch a missile from a ship and get it up to altitude and then detonate it,” he said. “And that’s exactly what you would do if you had a nuclear weapon on a Scud or a Shahab-3 or other missile, and you wanted to explode it over the United States.”
----------

The same could be done to Israel.

soggy

They don't know history!

Posted by: jay | October 26, 2010 at 03:12 AM

History has ALWAYS shown that CBO and all other financial forecasting by gov. agencies is ALWAYS wrong.

xbjllb

Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld headed for war crimes tribunals after all?

Apparently the Wikileaks Papers are filled with hard evidence of nonstop lying and nonstop coverups of heinous war crimes in Iraq.

About the only thing that could stop their prosecution now is.... you guessed it, thermonuclear war between Iran/Pakistan and Israel, and by extension the US and China.

Of course, such a war stops more than war tribunal trials. Stops just about everything on the planet dead, and quite awhile for Europe/GB and Russia to recover and become the world's only remaining superpowers.

The only question is, does Cheney still have his finger on the button?

And... button, button, where's the button?

Kate

Going just as intended for 2012, I'm sure.
Everyone eventually eats their words.. :)

jay

"History has ALWAYS shown that CBO and all other financial forecasting by gov. agencies is ALWAYS wrong."
Soggy , history has also shown that electing someone else doesn't solve the country's problems, either. Otherwise our problems would have been solved decades ago.

xbjllb

Speaking of China and nuclear war, they just had a successful cyber attack that knocked 50 of our missiles offline.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20020817-503544.html

Of course, the military and gov will never admit to that, while panicking behind closed doors.

jay

Monica, you said that the Kennedys stole the election from Impeached Nixon. As, Bush stole it from Gore? With the help from his Florida governor brother? If, you are going to have hanging chads. Then, have it in your brother's state!

The comments to this entry are closed.