« The Empire State Joins the Tea Party | Main | Have You Paid the Taxes On That Yacht Yet, John? »

September 23, 2010

Comments

DJ

The only way Sarah will be elected president is if she proclaims the American people must accept the fact that our country MUST become majority non-white and there MUST eventually be more mosks than churches. If she does that, then the MSM and the ruling class will allow her to be elected president. There is no other way.

DJ

Merkel: Mosques to become bigger part of German life

Chancellor Angela Merkel

Chancellor Angela Merkel has said Germans have for too long failed to grasp how immigration was changing their country and would have to get used to the sight of more mosques in their cities, according to a newspaper






Germany, home to at least 4 million Muslims, has been divided in recent weeks by a debate over integration sparked by disparaging remarks about Muslim immigrants by an outspoken member of the country's central bank.

“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the immigrants,” Merkel said, in remarks published on Saturday by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily. “For years we've been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before,” she added.

The uproar sparked by the Bundesbank's Thilo Sarrazin, who argued Turkish and Arab immigrants were failing to integrate and swamping Germany with a higher birth rate, is one of several recent prominent disputes touching on religion and integration. Sarrazin formally stepped down Friday from his job on the board of the country's central bank.

German President Christian Wulff relieved him of his responsibility, Sarrazin told the German Press Agency (dpa) in Berlin. Only Wulff has the power to appoint or remove people from the board of the Bundesbank, which is independent of the government.

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=222148

Ummahgummah

.

Gringoman, i couldn't believce my ears when I heard Lou Dobbs respond to a caller asking his opinion on a possible Palin/Brewer ticket for 2012.

He had a few things to say but what really pissed me off is that he said it wasn't a good idea to run Palin because the LIEberal media have it in for her.

I think that's the BEST possible reason for me, anyway!

Dobbs seems to think the MSM still matter. To me they are dying a slow death and are becoming ever more transparent about being partisan LIEberals as their desperation increases with each and every canceled subscription, with each and every subscription not renewed..

It is with great joy that I observe what I call "media shrinkage".

I'd trust anything I see on Free Republic 100x more than anything in the NYDN or the NYT.

Anyone who still watches the Alphabet channels for news has to have their head examined.

I stopped watching Letterman & co. in the late 80s once Letterman stopped doing his outdoor and on location shticks.

Who needs to see a never-ending parade of bubbly arrogant know-it-all celebrities hawking their latest movies and books?

In short, what is Lou talking about??!!

The fact that they hate her is a Badge of Authenticity in the eyes of many.

I think she'd beat the Bama head-on if elections were held today.

What more does Lou Dobbs want?

What is it with these so-called 'conservative' hosts tearing down anyone who doesn't fit the mold?

I was shocked when I heard Rush defend the 'pledge' earlier today.

Like I suggested before, what we need is not a top-down 'pledge' but rather a section on the RNC home page dedicated to user input where WE THE PEOPLE CAN LET THEM KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE WANT AND EXPECT.

Then they can respond with their opinions, whether they support or oppose philosophically or ethically, how feasible each of these suggestions are and their relative merits and demerits.

That would be a virtual town hall but I think the GOP already know what WE THE PEOPLE really want and they dare not have it posted on their website by WE THE PEOPLE!

They are really flirting with a Third Party... Short of inviting True Democracy to break out with input on their website, Sarah Palin may just be their best bet if they wish to prevent that.

.

Ummahgummah

.

A couple of days ago i saw a post by M/M referring to John Batchelor as a 'conservative' radio host.

I have to assume that she hasn't listened to him very much.

The other night he had a reporter on describing all that supposedly 'evil hatred of immigrants' in Germany and France.

Not a single word wasted on why Germans and French alike might feel uncomfortable about ever-increasing numbers of 'immigrants' in their countries!

NOT A WORD!

Nor did Batchelor bother to ask!

Then he said that this 'reporter' was the NYTIMES correspondent in Berlin AND ALL OF A SUDDEN IT ALL MADE SENSE.

Any Western country is always BAD. All Western countries are under some moral obligation to allow unfettered entry to 'immigrants', as if this were some immutable right owed to them.

Sorry, Mr. Batchelor and mr. Gray Lady, but Europe is under absolutely NO obligation to accomodate hordes of 'immigrants' who behave more like invaders and occupiers .

The NYT 'reporter' cleverly tried to conflate the somewhat unfortunate remarks of Erica Steinbach, a CDU party functionary (and spokeswoman for Germans exiled from formerly eastern German provinces like Silesia, Pomerania and so on which were given to Poland after the war), with 'growing anti-immigrant sentiments' in Germany.

He was trying to make believe that this sentiment is equally hostile toward non-moslem foreigners as it is toward moslems, which is simply put a bold-faced lie.

The statement in question was that Erica Steinbach said that Poland was instigating for war to provoke Germany to react.

This statement was widely condemned inside Germany.

He tried a similar tack with France, which is repatriating hordes of hostile, thieving gypsies to their native Romania, actually by PAYING them to leave!

These gypsies have also gained some notoriety in Italy, where property crimes and rapes went way up because of their presence until Italian citizens formed their own private patrols.

So YES, Mr. NEW YAWK SLIMES!!! When people like non-moslem gypsies behave like PIGS and CRIMINALS, they get the same treatment as moslems should get but aren't getting yet!!!

As for Erica Steinbach's Poland remarks, they have absolutely NOTHING to do with moslems behaving like absolute SWINE in Germany and therefore becoming increasingly hated and reviled.

German businessmen have told me that the NYT is known inside German business circles for its Germany-hatred and that they didn't believe anything that is written in there.

This is over ten years ago that I heard that.

Anyway, john Batchelor is anything BUT a conservative.

That hatchet job on French and German citizens who like the rest of Europe are besieged by moslem hordes while their politicians stand by doing nothing, attests to that fact.

By the way, the biased Euro-media is even more vicious in their constant attacks on America.

But this post was mainly to inform everyone on that phony John the confirmed Batchelor and to prove that he is anything but a Conservative.

I can detail the many ways in which America and Israel are constantly misrepresented and slandered in the European media if anyone really wants to know.

.

gringoman

That would be a virtual town hall but I think the GOP already know what WE THE PEOPLE really want and they dare not have it posted on their website by WE THE PEOPLE!

They are really flirting with a Third Party... Short of inviting True Democracy to break out with input on their website, Sarah Palin may just be their best bet if they wish to prevent that.

.

Posted by: Ummahgummah | September 24, 2010 at 06:05 PM

Ummah,

Many share Lou Dobbs' view that Palin can't win due to the Big Bad Media. (Savage says Dobbs would make a good bartender.)

DJ and Dobbs are on the same page here. That's the conventional wisdom. (Dobbs idea of running Brewer with Palin is too stupid to waste another word on. (Did he really say that?) General Petraeus as her VP, maybe, a big maybe (despite his kowtowing to Obama on Koran burning.

2012, especially if Palin runs, will tell us whether the Ruling Crap and its Hack Media, OR the American people choose the next President. The Demopublican Rulership and its mediacks clearly put Obama in the White House.

Will they have the same monopoly power in 2012 to stop a Sarah Palin?

Conventional wisdom says yes, they will.

I've always been wary of conventional wisdom. History often shows us that the operative word in that phrase is 'conventional,' not 'wisdom.' The one constant in history is the surprise factor.

gringoman

Ummah,

Yes, John Batchelor has been sounding very RINO of late. News-wise, he's got the most encyclopedic show in radio, easily. He tries to cover everything everywhere, with elite (in the best sense) panache, and he's a bright guy. That said, the recent Election has forced him to reveal a dark underbelly. He's done promos putting down Christine O'Donnell, for example, that sound like they were drafted by Tokyo Rove. I was surprised. What I used to see as a lively, independent mind starts to look like just another conventional elitenik, eager for NY Times approval, as he wades through the New York Review of Books ambiance. His mother is from Iran, but I have no reason to believe she had jihad tendencies.

Batchelor is far from a dummy. Maybe he's been dining our with too many Demopublicans lately.

Ummahgummah

DJ and Dobbs are on the same page here. That's the conventional wisdom. (Dobbs idea of running Brewer with Palin is too stupid to waste another word on. (Did he really say that?) General Petraeus as her VP, maybe, a big maybe (despite his kowtowing to Obama on Koran burning.

-

Gringoman, sorry if I gave the impression that it was Dobbs' idea to run Palin/Brewer. It was a caller to his show who was asking his opinion, causing Dobbs to go into his put-down of Palin as unelectable due to the Big Bad Media.

Well, Bush got elected twice and regardless of whom the GOP put up in 2012, the MSM will be murder on anyone opposing their Afro-Dreamboat.

I'd rather have a feisty Palin, who speaks candidly instead of the feckless McANUS [here's to YOU, rick] who fired a staffer for using the Bama's middle name.

I think that everyone is on to the MSM by now and the more they pile on Sarah the more people will vote for her to spite these bast@rds.

A male candidate like Rudy would have a harder time being seen as unfairly treated by them but they will savage anyone threatening to remove their Brown God from his throne.

They can attack SP and many of us will see them for the uncouth scumb@gs they are.

Plus I think she learned a few things since 2008 and no McANUS holding her back and no McANUS staff to undermine her.

[Here's to YOU, rick]

.

Ummahgummah

.

Gringoman, I don't think Batchelor is even a RINO Republican. I think he's a flat-out dhim.

Period.

.

M/M

Ummah is right again. M/M is forgiven because she's too busy with Facebook to know some things here. I premiered STATUS QUOmo here. Of course I didn't premiere it everywhere, as with my own DNC (Demopublican National Corruption (or Collusion).
_______________________________

I'm busy fighting with the LIEberals on Facebook. Like Gringman, who cares who thought up Status Cuomo, everyone is using it because that phrase says it all.

UG, I learned my lesson with the WTC. I was planning on visiting a friend who worked in the WTC the weekend it was bombed in '93. Flew from Boston to LA the week of 9/11. Got it.

I keep post the testimony of the Time Square bomber, about how he considered himself a muslim soldier and would have no problem killing children. The libs call me a fearmonger.

Don't listen to Batchelor. I was listening to him because he had a guest on who was exposing the radical, anti-american Imam.


M/M

Bernard is having some beers and hard drugs. I told him his weekend just got better:

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/cnbc-zucker-wont-make-comcast-merger/

M/M

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/24/criticizing-islam-harvard-professor-pc-war/

Ummahgummah

Bernard is having some beers and hard drugs. I told him his weekend just got better:

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/cnbc-zucker-wont-make-comcast-merger/

POSTED BY: M/M | SEPTEMBER 25, 2010 AT 12:11 AM

--

Oh my. Do we have to send in rick to do an intervention?

.

Ummahgummah

.

Re. Lou The Bartender:

Posted by: Oiao at September 24, 2010 5:44 PM

This is has been my personal experience. Many of my family have been centrist Democrats. Their values weren't progressive, but they tended to trust the media as a rational, trustworthy voice and believe that Democrats represented the little guy. These days, *all* of them, including more than a few who voted for Obama, are fed up and strongly sympathetic to the Tea Party. I don't think dyed-in-the-wool libs can fathom the political realignment that is going on right now.

Posted by: Penny at September 24, 2010 6:11 PM

--

Like I said...

.

M/M

He's done promos putting down Christine O'Donnell, for example, that sound like they were drafted by Tokyo Rove.
__________________________

Heard that. If the Dims think Christine O'Donnell is crazy for dating a witch in high school, does that mean Hillary should be committed for holding seances and "channel Eleanor Roosevelt in the White House?

DJ

"Many share Lou Dobbs' view that Palin can't win due to the Big Bad Media. (Savage says Dobbs would make a good bartender.)

DJ and Dobbs are on the same page here.

[...]

I've always been wary of conventional wisdom. History often shows us that the operative word in that phrase is 'conventional,' not 'wisdom.' The one constant in history is the surprise factor."


-----------------------------------------


Gringoman, If Sarah Palin actually runs for pres in 2012 (highly unlikely IMHO), the ONLY way she has a snowball's chance of winning is IF she receives prior approval from the "Ruling Crap." In that case she will turn out to be no different from the House of Bush.

IF by chance she runs without the approval of the "Ruling Crap" and somehow, despite an all-out media blitzkrieg on her, her poll numbers still indicate she will win, then look for a third party candidate to enter the fray, i.e., a spoiler. The third party candidate (funded by the "Ruling Crap" of course) will be to the RIGHT of Sarah on the issues thus splitting the conservative vote. That, my friend, is the "surprise factor" we're likely to experience. It won't be too surprising, will it? In fact it's easily predictable. Remember Perot?

Now, what'll ya have mate? Drinks are on the house. :-)

Ummahgummah

.

So DJ, what do you suggest we do? Who should run? If they somehow run someone to the right then we all just vote for than candidate instead.

.

Ummahgummah

.

I wonder what the carbon footprint would be when you burn a KKKoran..

.

DJ

UG, what I'm saying is the Ruling Class will not allow any outsider to gain control of the power structure. As we all know, the Ruling Class -- those whom control the two party system -- has a progressive agenda and it is global in its scope. Thus no outsider need apply unless they meet or conform to their ideological requirements. If Sarah Palin is not unequivocally in sync with the Republican establishment's nation wreaking agenda, she will never ever grasp onto the reins of power. The powers that be will make sure of it.

Until a real revolution happens, we peasants are pretty much trapped; we are stuck with the candidates the monster with two heads offer us.

Ummahgummah

.

NBPP racist IN THE WHITE HOUSE:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/09/which_malik_shabazz_visited_th.html

Will Conservative radio hosts check this out?

.

Ummahgummah

.

“Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit”
Barack Hussein Obama

“We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many centuries to shape the world for the better, including my own country.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“The contribution of Muslims to the United States are too long to catalog because Muslims are so interwoven into the fabric of our communities and our country”
Barack Hussein Obama

“I have lived in a Muslim-majority country… I know, because I am one of them.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state of our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That is why the U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.”
Barack Hussein Obama

“We are not nor have we even been at war with Islam”
Barack Hussein Obama

“Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation”
Barack Hussein Obama

“We Do Not Consider Ourselves a Christian Nation”
Barack Hussein Obama

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
Barack Hussein Obama


.

Ummahgummah

.

So DJ, how much do you think one Monica Crowley knows about all of this?

.

Ummahgummah

Alarmed Pig Farmer | September 25, 2010 7:00 AM | Reply
That this lawsuit even got as far as it did indicates the dire situation we're in.

*** Bukhari Vol 4 Bk 52 Nbr 220 ***

Mohammed said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror cast in the hearts of the enemy, and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: "Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures. Mohammed did not benefit by them."

I saw the director of the ACLU interviewed on TV just the other night. While he seemed quite pleased with himself and his organization, and while John Daly was only too happy to toss up low velocity marshmallows, a thought entered my mind, "This dude is decoupled from reality, and that makes him dangerous."

*** 18:31 ***

For them will be Gardens of Eternity (heaven, Jannah); beneath them rivers will flow; they will be adorned therein with bracelets of gold, and they will wear green garments of fine silk and heavy brocade: They will recline therein on raised thrones. How good the recompense! How beautiful a couch to recline on!

The treasures the lawyers over at the ACLU seek are socialism, globalism, secularism, and righteous racism, the new racism, le nouveau racisme, the hip and cool racism that feels so correct on the TV and in the classroom.

The treasures sought by the Moslem Activists -- and there tacit allies the "moderate Moslems" -- are quite different, and somewhat more sinister.

DJ

"So DJ, how much do you think one Monica Crowley knows about all of this?"

--------------------------------------

UG,

I think she knows all of that, and more. After all, she graduated from an Ivy League College That means she knows allot about allot of things, right? But I adore Monica so I will refrain from implying she is part of anything foul.

For one thing, the Ivy League schools (acually our nation's entire school system) teach the difference between hate and art.

For instance: Immersing a statue of Jesus in urine is art and we are told to appreciate it as art. So too is smearing cow dung on the Virgin Mary considered art. To the pervs, it is avant garde to see it as such. Or how about a naked lesbian getting up on stage and smearing poo all over herself then shriek at the audience how unfair our Christian society is? That's called performance art by our elites. Art like that must be celebrated, or so we are told by the "elites." But don't you find it a bit peculiar how these same people tell us that burning a Koran is hateful and not performance art? Or drawing cartoons of Mohammad is tantamount to yelling fire in a crowded theater and should NOT be protected by the first amendment?

Okay, we get it. Anything that denigrates Christianity is to be celebrated. Anything that can be construed as being offensive to Islam or other religions is hateful and bigoted.

In Libworld, Dems iz da rools.

Ummahgummah

.

Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Obama's Aunt: "If I Come As An [Uninvited, Illegal] Immigrant, You Have An Obligation To Make Me A Citizen"

Obama’s aunt says ‘system’ was at fault:

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/29779.

“I didn’t take advantage of the system,’’ she said in an interview with WBZ-TV last night. “The system took advantage of me.’’

Onyango, 58, first came to the United States in 2000 with the intention of returning to her home country of Kenya, but she said she became ill and was unable to afford the return trip home. Onyango suffers from Guillain-Barre syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. [What is the cost to Massachusetts taxpayers of treating that illegal immigrant's medical condition each year?]

She said she has been receiving disability checks of up to $700 a month while living in public housing.

.

gringoman

UG, what I'm saying is the Ruling Class will not allow any outsider to gain control of the power structure. As we all know, the Ruling Class -- those whom control the two party system -- has a progressive agenda and it is global in its scope. Thus no outsider need apply unless they meet or conform to their ideological requirements. If Sarah Palin is not unequivocally in sync with the Republican establishment's nation wreaking agenda, she will never ever grasp onto the reins of power. The powers that be will make sure of it.

Until a real revolution happens, we peasants are pretty much trapped; we are stuck with the candidates the monster with two heads offer us.

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM

A problem with DJ's Eliteniks vs Peasants thesis.

How can he possibly maintain this thesis without defining Ronald Reagan as someone who was "allowed" to win, since he was a puppet of the Demopublican Rulership?

ps

Re The Big Bad Hackstream Media. It all but crucified Ronald Reagan. He was not anointed by the Ruling Crap. He was constantly depicted as a grade-B Hollowood idiot. Ivy League savants lost sleep, spending all waking hours in denouncing this "know nothing" who "might trigger nuclear war with Moscow." Maybe you never saw the "Bedtime for Bonzo" ads, showing Ronnie with chimp?

Yet, despite the Alinsky-type wermacht launched on the "grade B actor," he was nominated and ran against the "intelligent" pre-Obama: JImmuh Carter, who even commanded a nuclear sub while Ronnie was playing with animals in Hollywood.

I think we all know what happened in that "impossible" Election, with the Dunce vs The Democrat. The Hackstream did everything it had to do. Ir just couldn't do the voting too.

Ummahgummah

.

DJ I have to agree. If this agenda is indeed afoot, then Monica and Rush & Co. are "in the know".

The question remains though, how do these people first get suckered in? Are money and insider perks and privs enough to make people turn on their country against better knowledge?

Though it all looks like a grand conspiracy, both national and international, why has not a single "insider" spoken out and pulled back the curtain if doing so will aid in saving Western Civilization?

I am asking questions I have been asking myself, and am in no way suggesting that I have the answers.

It is clear that the GOP is to the left of their best voter potential. Can this be fully explained with the social atmosphere in DC, SOWdi millions lavished about, as well as other PAC influence?

.

pinhead

I took the time to pay attention to that video and was impressed by how "fabulous" Palin looked. She had a bit of a queenly aura this time, I thought. Americans won't mind that because it's so balanced by a tremendous common touch.

Posted by: gringoman | September 24, 2010 at 05:12 PM
==

Well, she obviously has the gay vote.

Ummahgummah

.

Now Monica has Bill O'Dhimmey on.. hawking his latest "book". Maybe it is all just about the money.. a truly depressing thought, by the way..

.

Chief Joe

Government services are definitely screwed up, and likely to worsen. As incumbents are voted out because they went crazy, people who have to deal with government have to re-establish whole new relations with a new group of people. It would be better if the second group were related to the first group.

Of course, they're all looking for something.

Chief Joe

Like me, I believe Warren Buffett files only a personal income tax report, so he would take a hit if only corporate bodies got a tax break. Poor Warren!

DJ

"How can he possibly maintain this thesis without defining Ronald Reagan as someone who was "allowed" to win, since he was a puppet of the Demopublican Rulership?"


-----------------------------------

Ronald Reagan fit the image America needed; he was the right man at the right time. He exemplified American patriotism at a time when it was at a very low ebb. Factor America's 1980 and 1984 racial demographics into the equation and we can see why Reagan won landslide victories. And let's not forget the "eliteniks" practically forced Reagan to accept the blue-blooded GHW Bush as his VP. If I recall correctly, Reagan wasn't very fond of old man Bush, right? Also, it was reported time and time again that GHW Bush, from behind the scenes, for the most part, ran the show the last six years of the Reagan Administration. Is there any truth to those unverified reports?

DJ

"Though it all looks like a grand conspiracy, both national and international, why has not a single "insider" spoken out and pulled back the curtain if doing so will aid in saving Western Civilization?"

-------------------------------------

UG,

I don't think the transformation/destruction of the West is structured as an insider/outsider model. Everything they are doing, for the most part, is done right out in the open. The problem is nobody wants to come out and publicly protest lest they be labeled a racist or smeared with some other such career ending label.

Here is good article on what the eliteniks have planned for us:

http://www.vdare.com/lodge/100924_kotkin.htm

DJ

UG,

Here is another strange set of circumstances. Jews in Sweden claiming to be at the forefront of the transformation of Europe's demography at the same time they are being chased out by those [mooslims] they are advocating for. If you can shed light on this type of mentality, it would be much appreciated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_a-25MhRuk

That was part of a longer documentary, here:

http://vimeo.com/14907669

DJ

UG asks: "Though it all looks like a grand conspiracy, both national and international, why has not a single "insider" spoken out and pulled back the curtain if doing so will aid in saving Western Civilization?"

---------

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 6:42PM BST 23 Oct 2009

"The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett"

Read more >>

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

M/M

Freedom of religion?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/ft-bragg-evangelical-event-draws-fire/story?id=11727193

LongRifle

While others piddle around with petty politics, Obama is consolidating and centralizing his power....

Cybersecurity bill would give president emergency powers
23 September 2010

Proposed cybersecurity legislation, a combination of existing bills circulating on Capitol Hill, would give the president power to declare an emergency if there is an imminent cyber threat to the nation’s critical infrastructure.
The draft bill would give the president the power to shut down industries or impose measures to combat the cybersecurity threat, according to Reuters, which obtained a copy of the draft.

The emergency declaration would last 30 days, unless the president renews it, but it could not last more than 90 days without congressional action.

The draft is a combination of cybersecurity bills that were merged at the urging of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.). "It (the draft bill) is something that we hope to be able to pass before the end of the year, if we can", Reid spokeswoman Regan Lachapelle told Reuters.

One of the merged cybersecuity bills was introduced by Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-Ct.) in June. That bill contained the provision about the presidential emergency declaration.

The Lieberman cybersecurity bill would also establish an Office of Cyber Policy within the executive branch while creating a director position responsible for advising the president in establishing national cybersecurity policy. It would also set up a new National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) within the Department of Homeland Security, led by a separate director who would enforce cybersecurity policies throughout the government and the private sector.

Authority for implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) would be transferred to the NCCC from the Office of Management and Budget. The bill would also use the government’s bulk purchasing power to enforce cybersecurity standards for the software purchased from third-party vendors.

This article is featured in:
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery • Internet and Network Security • Public Sector

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.

DeliciousDiggRedditFacebookStumbleUpon2CollabWhat are these? Members' Login
Email Address


Password


Forgotten login?

Not a member?


Chief Joe

For the markets to be truly free of the capital welfare state, to do as the markets wish, we need to get rid of social security and unlink the central banks from the Euro-socialist welfare system; the latter really bogging the banks down, including their social support for fast-breeding Euro-Nazi-Muslims. The debt obligation of Europe is larger than SS in the US. Catholic Europeans: go to Lourdes.

The possible growth in China, could possibly double.


Ummahgummah

I just heard John Bolton say (on Fox Business) that he is NOT RULING OUT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

Now, before any of you start in with "...yeah, but Bolton once was seen drinking, and one time he bought a Playboy magazine, and he placed a bet with a bookie and..." I say to you "SHUT UP!"

I'm not looking for Jesus Christ. As far as I know, He was the only one who was without sin.

I'm looking for a strong, pro-American, pro-capitalist, small government bad-@ss to take the reigns and get us the hell out of progressive püssy-ville.

BOLTON 2012! He kicked @ss in the U.N. Imagine what he could do with his finger on The Button! (Remember...444 hostage days. Reagan says "...so help me Go..." and BINGO! Released hostages.

Iran will cave with a bad-@ss in the White House.

BOLTON 2012!

Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at September 25, 2010 7:56 PM

Ummahgummah

.

India: mohaMEDanS attack and cripple Christian teacher:

http://www.lemonde.fr/asie-pacifique/article/2010/09/23/en-inde-un-professeur-catholique-est-mutile-par-des-islamistes-pour-un-exercice-de-ponctuation_1415067_3216.html

If you don't read French, take my word for it, it's disgusting. This is how they ARE. What's amazing is that le Monde would even publish this incident!

Usually the MSM try to keep the spotlight OFF.

.

gringoman

"How can he possibly maintain this thesis without defining Ronald Reagan as someone who was "allowed" to win, since he was a puppet of the Demopublican Rulership?"


-----------------------------------

Ronald Reagan fit the image America needed; he was the right man at the right time. He exemplified American patriotism at a time when it was at a very low ebb. Factor America's 1980 and 1984 racial demographics into the equation and we can see why Reagan won landslide victories. And let's not forget the "eliteniks" practically forced Reagan to accept the blue-blooded GHW Bush as his VP. If I recall correctly, Reagan wasn't very fond of old man Bush, right? Also, it was reported time and time again that GHW Bush, from behind the scenes, for the most part, ran the show the last six years of the Reagan Administration. Is there any truth to those unverified reports?

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2010 at 02:50 PM

DJ,

Looks like you're saying

1. Sarah Palin is no Ronald "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan.

2. The Ruling Crap would force Palin to pick a Bush-like VP who "teach" her.

Even if 1 and 2 are right, so what?

1. Of course she's not Reagan. Nobody is, unless you believe in reincarnation. She's getting increasingly known as 'Mama Grizzly.' An affectation? Not even Reagan had to take the kind of flame-throwers that Libworld has fired against her and even her family. Yet she's still standing, and looks strong as ever.

2. Sure the Rulership might get her to pick one of them for VP. That's how the game works. You don't get the golden apple handed to you for free. She's not preaching to a five-person choir on Friday nights. Compare an aging Ronald Reagan being played by George Bush, to a prime-of-life "Mama Grizzly" being talked down to by a Bushie if you like. But as even Alaskans know, some of whom even fear her,and claim she's vindictive "Mama Grizzly" knows what Ronnie never quite got: She knows how to lock and load. Let's face it, today's American man has been significantly feminized, and everybody knows it. That's why an anomaly like Palin is really more of a man than most American men today. Americans don't see this or understand it for a reason. They don't want to. In fact, this is another reason why libworld so dreads and hates her and wants their minions to feel the same way. Irony of ironies: A woman who gives men the courage to be men again. That's anathema for Libworld and its Soros workers, which depend on a defeated and demoralized populace, needing the eliteniks and their nanny bailouts.

As for Reagan coming along at the right time, there's something called the Tea Party Tsunami in the air these days. Right now, we see no one who can ride that wave like Palin. (If you do, be sure to let us know who it is.)

As for the "racial demographics" which you are certain have changed everything today, we won't have to wait for 2012 to test out that thesis.

Another anathema to Ruling Class crapola has suddenly burst on the scene. The mogulship and its lib minions are greeting him as "Crazy Carl Paladino." He's running for NY Governor against the Ruling Class Machine's anointed Andrew "Subprime" Cuomo. According to the Machine and urban demographics, not to mention your own thesis, "Subprime" should be a shoo-in against "Crazy Carl" in November.

Stay tuned, DJ. New York is eager to test your thesis.


gringoman

BOLTON 2012! He kicked @ss in the U.N. Imagine what he could do with his finger on The Button! (Remember...444 hostage days. Reagan says "...so help me Go..." and BINGO! Released hostages.

Iran will cave with a bad-@ss in the White House.

BOLTON 2012!

Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at September 25, 2010 7:56 PM

Posted by: Ummahgummah | September 26, 2010 at 11:11 AM

Bolton is respectable. If he were nominated by Republicans, the Dems couldn't believe their good luck. Libworld's hacks would eviscerate him in the way they would try to eviscerate Sarah Palin. The difference is that "Mama Grizzly" is spoiling for a fight, and the smarter libniks know it. This time she wouldn't have John McCain's "brain trust" gagging her. Libworld senses that a woman who has field-dressed a moose might not be afraid of shedding blood.

In addition, she can rouse millions, and not just news junkies listening to John Bolton on John Batchelor.

Bolton would make an excellent SecState and foreign policy adviser for Palin.

DJ

"As for the "racial demographics" which you are certain have changed everything today, we won't have to wait for 2012 to test out that thesis."

-----------------------------------------

Gringoman,

My thesis has already been tested and proven to be correct. The election of President Obama is the irrefutable evidence that proves my case.

Conservatives' chances for winning future elections at the national level -- or in many cases at the state level -- can only worsen as the "browning of America" runs its (inevitable?) course.

The comments to this entry are closed.