« The McLaughlin Group | Main | Obama to Fellow Democrats: Drop Dead »

March 15, 2010

Comments

gringoman

My current fave depicting 'Le Malaise Obama': It's a cartoon in LA Times by Ramirez who, I believe, never met a "progressive" or idiotlogue he couldn't see right through. His cartoon is about the Obots, the 'Deemocrats' and their fateful kamikaze drive in Congress to foist their crypto-Marxist Obamacare Monster on Americans.

You want a link? Who needs a link? All you need is a few words on what Ramirez depicted:

A donkey wearing a suicide vest, shrieking "OBAMA AKBAR!"

gringoman

Poll-taker Frank Luntz, on Imus, said a goodie. It explains why progressive, trans-sexual MSNBC wants Obamacare.

For its viewers. It's afraid---if Congress doesn't pass The Bill--- all five will die.

DJ

America

Born - July 4, 1776

Died - January 20,2009

Cause of death - Suicide

gringoman

Gringoman, just found this musician on Rush's site. Wow!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOXYlPpRLmM

Posted by: M/M | March 14, 2010 at 09:19 PM

M/M.

Bei mir das war schoen! Most excellent. He (or they) take liberties with first movement of Mozart's immortal Symphoney #40. I approve. (In fact it would go well even with a return to Indochina where correspondents will commemorate the 35th Anniversary of The Story.) Classicists are generally too uptight to take liberties with Wolfgang and other greats. Unlike Bach, Beethoven and Mozart,who were also great improvisers, these starched academics leave all the improvising fun to jazz types today. I suspect that even Albert Einstein, who reports hearing "eternity" in Mozart's Second Movement of the 40th, would agree with me.(Mozart, Einstein and Rush Limbaugh, correlated by gringoman via M/M. What prog could even imagine this?)

Danke,


www.gringoman.com
Escaping Politically Correct

Miguel de Mexico

'Deemocrats' and their fateful kamikaze drive in Congress to foist their crypto-Marxist Obamacare Monster on Americans-GRINGOMAN
-------------------------------

Crypto-Marxist is a good term for the bill which seems to put private insurance companies in the drivers seat. A corporate takeover of healthcare by the insurance middlemen who have absolutly nothing to do with one's good health.
Crypto-Marxist in that the depiction of big insurance suddenly shill for the prolitariet.
Gringoman best stick to parody of Miss Julie. To know from where speaks is a maxim which cannot apply to his above remarks. Dick and Xuan would be rolling over in their conubial bed.

WowZER

Maybe I'm giving the Obama "administration" too much credit, but I suspect at this moment in time that Obama is deliberately picking a fight with Israel and threatening to withhold weapons they need to defend themselves as a ploy and public display aimed at Iran and the Arab states so as to make it appear that America is not behind any attack on Iran's nuke facilities and thus Iran should not retaliate against America and its overseas interests in the area. And if Iran did attack American interests in retaliation for an Israeli attack on their nuke facilities, then we would say such attack as unprovoked and we would feel justified in retaliating harshly with an American attack on Iran.

Oh, the tangled webs we weave!

However, it alternatively could be that Obama and his "administration" is anti-semitic and was just looking for an excuse to distance itself further from Israel in hopes that Iran will follow through on their stated goal of destroying Israel.

JMHO

DJ

Excellent reasoning by WOWZER,there. That said,I doubt very much Obama is a virulent anti-Semite; hence, the alternative scenario you proffer is highly unlikely.

Ummahgummah

Excellent reasoning by WOWZER,there. That said,I doubt very much Obama is a virulent anti-Semite; hence, the alternative scenario you proffer is highly unlikely.

POSTED BY: DJ | MARCH 15, 2010 AT 01:39 PM

--

WOWZER's reasoning is excellent, but how can you say that the Bama is not an anti-Semite?

.

SteveOk

What Obama doesn't understand and will never understand (just like J. Carter never understood), the world doesn't respect a wienie. He goes around the world apologizing for 8 years of the Bush Administration as if he is on the corn hustings in Iowa campaigning for the Primary, and then thinks that bs is going to give him credibility in the world community. This guy is a major league goofball. Our enemies in Iran and N. Korea must be laughing their a** off at this idiot going around apologizing for America.

gringoman

'Deemocrats' and their fateful kamikaze drive in Congress to foist their crypto-Marxist Obamacare Monster on Americans-GRINGOMAN
-------------------------------

Crypto-Marxist is a good term for the bill which seems to put private insurance companies in the drivers seat. A corporate takeover of healthcare by the insurance middlemen who have absolutly nothing to do with one's good health.
Crypto-Marxist in that the depiction of big insurance suddenly shill for the prolitariet.
Gringoman best stick to parody of Miss Julie. To know from where speaks is a maxim which cannot apply to his above remarks. Dick and Xuan would be rolling over in their conubial bed.

Posted by: Miguel de Mexico | March 15, 2010 at 01:08 PM

Do the eternal Marxlings ever grow up, even mentally? It's a hundred years after Benito Mussolini showed even the densest among them how a good socialist makes deals with the Corpos. It's even longer since their leading idiots "revealed" that the ends justify the means, and even "Big Insura" will hang itself if you give it enough rope.

Does anyone even bother talking anymore to the "educated" who can't even understand why the neo-coms and many corpos, like "Big Insura," will join forces and oppose opening up the uS to cross-state competition?

Should these professors be allowed off campus? Quarantine? Was El Maximo in Havana on to something when he quarantined AIDS "imperialists"? Does anything in Bammy's 2000-page monstrosity recognize the tenured hazard to the nation's mental health?

How did Congress get that way, pretending that Corporate Charley and Mickey Marxling are not both centralized statist Big Brothers under the skin? How? Look at what scrubbed their (sic) brains on campus, wearing the Che undershirt beneath suit and tie (bought from the chica at the sensuous parque up from the Malecon in Havana.

WowZER

Barack Hussein Obama said, in his Cairo speech: "I know too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story."

AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE:

Dear Mr. Obama, Imposer-in-Chief:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the
Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution?

Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights? Didn't think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England? No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own 'half brother', a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves". Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage" doesn't it, Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present.

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they?

Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East. No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses
you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America.

Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslim.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 ~ the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who was a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That, Mr. Obama, is the "Muslim heritage" in America.

DJ

WOWZER's reasoning is excellent, but how can you say that the Bama is not an anti-Semite?

.

Posted by: Ummah Gummah | March 15, 2010 at 02:21 PM

---

Well, Ummah, on second thought President Hussein could very well harbor an anti-Semitic agenda. If memory serves me correctly, his Muslim father wasn't too fond of Jews? Too, he's fairly close buds with Calypso Louie. Then there's the fact Hussein sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Ol' Jeremiah has been known to let loose a few choice anti-Semite remarks in and amongst his frequent racist rants directed towards whites in general. Ohyeah, I almost forgot about his good freid Rashid Khalidi....and the list goes on..... Hmmmm... the more I think about it, the more I catch your drift.
--

Correction: I meant to say 'offer' not 'proffer' in my previous comment at 01:39 PM

M/M

Glad you liked Gringoman, so did I.

Sent this song to Bernard today because I thought it really described him. Don't think he liked it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGnVGd1Sst0

Here is the modern version, which do you prefer?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-vPamPCiLs

gringoman

Barack Hussein Obama said, in his Cairo speech: "I know too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story."

AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE:

Dear Mr. Obama, Imposer-in-Chief:

Posted by: WowZER | March 15, 2010 at 03:17 PM

Wowzwer's survey of American history suggests that the former Barry Soetoro has no idea what he's talking about. This could be. For a macadaddy, the all-important is style, not substance. But what if this one really does know what he's talking about, only it's not what you think he's saying? Regard....

"Percy Sutton, long-time Borough President of Manhattan passed away this week at 89. Sutton is famous for being Malcolm X’s lawyer and a powerful New York politician but he was also a member of the famed Tuskegee Airmen, a radio pioneer, and a civil rights activist. There is one more little thing that Sutton is known for and that is for revealing that Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, a member of the Black Panthers and a well-known Islamist, was the benefactor that paid for Barack Obama’s Harvard education."

http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/12/28/man-who-told-of-obamas-islamic-benefactor-passes-away/

gringoNOTE: In other words, BHO, today the world's most celebrated narcissist, is showing the solipsism that goes with it. American history? The American story? Of course he means his history, his story. He's telling everyone, loud and clear, who has ears to hear. From Indonesia to step-father Soetoro to Dr. Khalid al-Mansour to the Saudi-endowed Harvard, Islam indeed has always been part of "American" history, i.e. his story---the story of Barack Hussein Obama.

Barry has a way of telling the truth even when he's lying.

gringoman

BULLETIN FROM THE DARK SIDE: Michael Savage warns of a possibility: War with Mexico."You heard it here first."

But Michael backs off a bit. He says it would depend on the US acquiring "Patriotic Leadership."

gringoman

FOTO: What is Obama? The folks are getting it, even when not sipping tea.

http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/strongsville-600x450.jpg


gringoman

ROGER L. SIMON///// March 15th, 2010
Is the Jewish love affair with the Democratic Party about to end?

http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2010/03/15/is-the-jewish-love-affair-with-the-democratic-party-about-to-end/

gringoman

CBS NEWS: OBAMACARE’S TWO AMERICAS. “The dirty little secret of this plan-which wouldn’t be a secret if opponents of this legislative package weren’t distracted by a dozen other wrongheaded policies in it-is that it will bring a major and irreversible upheaval to America’s labor markets. In a time of economic tension, this plan will displace millions of workers and push more people into becoming contract employees, resulting in increased instability for working families. “

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/15/opinion/main6300344.shtml

Ummahgummah

.

Words of wisdom:


“Winston Churchill did not lead a war against blitzkrieg, he led a war against the Nazis.”


Lieutenant Colonel Allen West

.

Truther

Being familiar with some of the membership of the CFR, and understanding their goals, I must say, global hegemony by them, the Trilateral commission, and the Bilderberg Group, is not actually very likely. Here's why.

First, they are a disparate group with inchoate initiatives, taken by them presumably to create a new world order, but actually to make themselves wealthy. Their clandestine mode of operation is prone to error, misunderstanding, local initiatives, and disorder. As a structure, they are very weak, and the difference between them and the Jesuits that Rhodes admired, is that people do not believe in the CFR, but they did believe in Jesus.

Impulsive, the political personalities collectively were rather unimaginative. As an example, just take global warming as a method for creating a global tax. Isn't it rather intellectually blighted to claim a tax based on a little weather hiccup? What if the weather changed? Could people believe it? How could you base a plan for global domination on such a ridiculous thing? It is greed that propelled this absurdity, instead of gaining the trust through positive deeds, intelligence, and a deliberate, cautious step by step approach. Now there are some reasons for creating globalized actions, but false claims of climate, and a false need for vaccinations, shows the essential idiocy of these people as a collective. They are almost, shall I say it, at best a laughing stock, and at worst, a public menace. The only things good about them, is that many of them do not take themselves seriously but only academically, or have plans other than being someone else's tool.

There is a need for the West to coordinate its actions across America and the EU politically. I am not sure the CFR is helping, but rather it seems to be interfering. We have future political challenges most notably the Chinese autocracy, and the Soviet Leninist autocracy. These and the West, would make three incompatible centers of global power. The loose financial nature of the CFR and it's associates, makes it fairly simple for these other power centers to disrupt Western activities. In fact, I would guess the Chinese and Russians are doing just that here in the US - attempting to disrupt, derange, and deflect Western initiatives, adding ridicule everywhere their plans depart from common sense..You do not create a world order with a haphazard gold rush mentality, stoked by secretive plutocratic bankers. Not in this world. Not using people from Western countries that have come to desire representative governing, and individual liberty, as a springboard for a plan that is antediluvian - or at least reminiscent of an age of aristocrats in Europe - predating WWI.

One cannot help but recognise the influence of Clinton and his former White House associates. Hillary has claimed that she might be blamed for all this, and certainly that would be as appropriate as blaming Bill. We should have impeached him (could we now?), instead of watching him set up Lewinsky making a fortune on gaudy purses in NYC, a rather inauspicious beginning to the new World Order. There is the illusion of control here, but the better part of this is bribery and the exact same stuff as global warming was made. Fortunately, many bankers foresaw the collapse following quick profit taking and repositioned themselves beforehand. Although this bizare financial situation continues, no doubt many bankers are resisting outside manipulation and want to restore "normalcy" to banking.

Why did anyone go along with the Clintonian manipulation? They were handed excuses : we are alleviating hunger, we are saving lives, we are updating and improving, this is a bonanza etc. Just like global warming seemed to be about saving fuel, saving the environment, etc., when it was really about selling people worthless carbon credits, for funding a global government everyone cannot resist. Wow! The Global government is here. LOL. And the Communists are on the run, but it appears that China might have played the US off the EU. A Manchu-Han surprise?

Ummahgummah

BULLETIN FROM THE DARK SIDE: Michael Savage warns of a possibility: War with Mexico."You heard it here first."

But Michael backs off a bit. He says it would depend on the US acquiring "Patriotic Leadership."

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MARCH 15, 2010 AT 11:19 PM

--

That's backing off a WHOLE LOT. The only patriotic leader was Tom Tancredo and everyone conspired o get rid of him!

Patriotism is career suicide.

.

DJ

What Was Karl Rove Thinking? Some Clues From His Autobiography
By Steve Sailer

excerpt:

^ Edmund Burke described prudence as the “first of all virtues”. To Bush and Rove, though, prudence equals prejudice. They were just as much true believers in multicultural dogmas as their Democratic opponents and the press corps.

Thus, for example, Rove somehow forgets to mention his amazing 1997-2001 crusade alongside Beltway Right activist Grover Norquist to win the (ludicrously small) Arab and Muslim vote by abolishing the Clinton Administration’s use of ethnicity in profiling for airport security and also the use of “secret evidence” against terrorism suspects. According to Norquist, Rove phoned him not once but twice during the October 11, 2000 Presidential debate to point out Bush’s demands for less protection against skyjackers. Rove asked Norquist to “put the word out” among Muslims voters.

But, three days later, Al Gore agreed with Bush at a meeting with Muslim politicians. So, because it lacked partisan salience, Bush’s campaign to make sure Mohammed Atta didn’t get extra scrutiny at the airport has vanished from the American media’s memory.

There is one interesting historical tidbit in Courage and Consequence. I had long heard assertions by Islamist extremists, such as Sami al-Arian, that Bush was actually scheduled to meet with them in the White House on the afternoon of September 11, 2001 to brief them on his war on anti-terrorism. But that was so bitterly ironic that I assumed it must be an urban legend.

Remarkably, however, in his chapter on 9/11, Rove blithely confirms that it’s true (p. 266):

“Coincidentally, the president was to have met at 3:05 p.m. with American Muslim leaders after his planned return from the Florida education event. He had been scheduled to spend forty minutes, first with a small group in the Oval Office and then with a larger one in the Roosevelt Room.”

Rove’s attitude seems to be this: The Democrats didn’t criticize Bush for it, so there’s no reason not to admit it.

To Rove, this anecdote merely illustrates Bush’s “compassionate conservatism”.

Full article:

http://www.vdare.com/index.asp

gringoman

BULLETIN FROM THE DARK SIDE: Michael Savage warns of a possibility: War with Mexico."You heard it here first."

But Michael backs off a bit. He says it would depend on the US acquiring "Patriotic Leadership."

POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MARCH 15, 2010 AT 11:19 PM

--

That's backing off a WHOLE LOT. The only patriotic leader was Tom Tancredo and everyone conspired o get rid of him!

Patriotism is career suicide.

.

Posted by: Ummah Gummah | March 16, 2010 at 08:34 AM

Mickey de Mexico should be relieved to hear that.

Incidentally, it was the narcotraficantes and the breaking news on the killing of Americans in Ciudad Juarez--- and not specifically the immigration tsunami--- that prompted Savage to brandish the sword.

gringoman

WHY PROGS HATE THIS WOMAN


Bachmann: We're Not Going To Obey Health Care Law -- 'We Don't Have To' (VIDEO)
Eric Kleefeld | March 15, 2010, 10:34AM

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is going a step beyond simply pledging to fight efforts to pass the health care bill -- she's openly pronouncing that people should personally declare it unconstitutional and defy it, depending on how it ends up getting passed.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/bachmann-were-not-going-to-obey-health-care-law----we-dont-have-to-video.php

gringoman

BULLETIN
Clyburn says health vote could push past Easter holiday
By Michael O'Brien - 03/16/10 07:48 AM ET

The House's healthcare vote could be delayed until as late as Easter, House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said Tuesday.

gringoNOTE: Redstate's Eric Ericson says that if they don't make it by Easter, they don't make it. He means that when the Dems go home and face the Wrath of the People,it's over. Not even their arms broken by Pelosi and ganglanders from Chicago will keep them on board with the Care Monster.

PS Maybe. But how many times has The Monster been buried so far? At Obama's urging, the Creature keeps crawling out of the crypt. Have you noticed?

Miguel de Mexico

BULLETIN FROM THE DARK SIDE: Michael Savage warns of a possibility: War with Mexico."You heard it here first."

But Michael backs off a bit. He says it would depend on the US acquiring "Patriotic Leadership."

Posted by: gringoman | March 15, 2010 at 11:19 PM

-----------------------------------

Good idea... we get back our land stolen in the War of Invasion and the border will move about 1700 KM up the road. If you declare now there can be a new San Patricio Brigade formed just in time for St Paddy's Day.
Cheer up too. None of you like NAFTA and it will no longer be needed since Mexico will have a land border with British Columbia.

Miguel de Mexico

I'd add that Spanish would be compulsory in the occupied schools; except it is already ..

Miguel de Mexico

Trade in yout three-cornered hats for a sombrero and your hatred of Obama for Lopez-Obrador.

The comments to this entry are closed.