Please join us this weekend for another freewheeling edition of "The McLaughlin Group." Check your local listings for time and channel, or visit www.McLaughlin.com for more information.
« And The Dog That DID Bark | Main | Reality Bites »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Be sure to tell them about he three pillars of Liberalism: theft, hypocrisy and dishonesty.
Posted by: mjfell | January 29, 2010 at 09:01 PM
Has TMG ever looked hard at the mental faculties of our President? It was considered fair game and open season on the previous WH occupant. Is this considered off limits for the current one? If so, why? It only took BHO months and major Democratic election defeats to realize that trying a murderous jihadi in Manhattan instead of a military tribunal was stupid even by standards of a progressive Harvard professor (assuming he does realize it by now, and is not simply caving to massive pressure which he deeply and silently resents).
Can TMG arrive at some kind of consensus on whether POTUS O is (1)the really bright dude that many media hacks assure us he is (2)a well-spoken neocom Nutty Professor or (3) Dumbama, the likeable liar who isn't even very good at progressive deception and double talk?
Here is a financial analyst, giving his opinion, based on another one of BHO's latest initiatives.....
THE MOGAMBO GURU////01/27/10 Tampa Bay, Florida – Last week’s winner of the Mogambo Most Stupid Quote Of The Week (MMSQOTW) goes to that arch-idiot, Barack Obama –The most recent staggering stupidity (our contest winner!) is from the White House, where “President Barack Obama said Thursday he wants to tax banks to recoup the public bailout of foundering firms at the height of the financial crisis.”! Hahaha!
I am sure that you, being the astute Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR) that you are, are laughing merrily along with me – Hahahahahaha! – because this is so, so, so Theater-of-the-Absurd funny on so many, many, many levels, once you get beyond the horrifying, un-funny realization that it is abysmally, shockingly, alarmingly stupid on just the one level: it is a known fact that a tax on a business is just another expense to the business, like labor and raw materials, that is added to the prices that they must charge their customers in order to make a profit, which makes prices go up as the businesses raise prices to maintain their profit margins by recouping the tax they had to pay by, in case you haven’t been paying attention, raising prices, which is inflation, which is the one thing a country does NOT want, making a tax on business the most stupid thing you can do.
In this case, the banks will charge higher fees for their “banking” services and charge higher interest rates to their customers, neither of which is a good thing for the people who have to pay the higher prices! Hahahaha!
And now that idiot Obama wants to raise banking prices and interest rates (which affects all other prices, as interest rates are also an expense that must be recouped through the prices they charge) so that the government can have more money to spend on itself and its greedy, grasping little friends?
www.gringoman.com
Escaping Politically Correct
Posted by: gringoman | January 29, 2010 at 10:04 PM
We must avoid playing to the end : "There can be one" mentality. When Obama wants to alter college Bowl system, what he probably is doing or wants to do, is to end the playoffs. What have just one winner? The point of the game is to exhibit athletic talent, not to have a pantomime of war, which we all know leads to it, and then there is the big Portobella, right? A sport, ought to be really something else, maybe just an exhibition. Each team has its separate but equal allotment, one just as good as the other. It is Peace Sport. For the guy with the Peace Prize.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 30, 2010 at 06:49 AM
It would have sounded better if I had written "Why have just one winner", instead of "What have one winner". If you know what I mean.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 30, 2010 at 06:54 AM
Fast forward to January 5, 2011
Source - The New York Times
Headline - Congress Votes to Outsource Presidency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24395829/outsourced
.
Posted by: DJ | January 30, 2010 at 09:25 AM
Source - The New York Times
Headline - Congress Votes to Outsource Presidency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24395829/outsourced
.
Posted by: DJ | January 30, 2010 at 09:25 AM
DJ,
Admittedly, out=sourcing the Presidency to a Hindu tele-technician might be an improvement over the Obamanation. Still there's a problem. True, this Govindar was born in US since his parents were vacationing at Niagra Falls. However, neither of his parents were US-born. That means he would be eligible to replace hacks like Harry Reid in Senate or a mad queen like Pelosi in the House, but NOT the highest office in the land. At least not according to the 'natural born' requirement of the US Constitution.
Meaning that before out-sourcing POTUS, you must first out-source the US Constitution.
Oh, wait. Yes. The Eliteniks have done that already. Obama owns up to a Kenyan father. Meaning, in effect he is the UN's first POTUS. Meaning, in effect, that the US Constitution has been out-sourced (while the citizenry was watching American Idol.) Obviously the media hacks, not to mention the "opposition" Republicans, accept this. (It beats being labeled a 'birther' by the Alinskybots.)
Now I get it. The Republic of Jefferson, Washington and Lincoln, after Barack Hussein Obama, is now ripe for President Govindar Singh.
Gotcha.
Posted by: gringoman | January 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM
okay, now, some citiies have unemployment rates in high-teens and 20's; recently had an Islamist infiltrator gun down or wound dozens of Americans; on Christmas Day the horrible death of hundreds at the hands of another Islamist infiltrator is narrowly avoided and WHAT'S ON THE MIND OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA------COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYOFFS?! PLAYOFFS, ARE YOU KIDDIN' ME?! PLAYOFFS?!
Posted by: rickswrite | January 30, 2010 at 11:06 AM
The Saigon Post
August 30, 1971
ETCETERA
Defiance at O'Reilly
by
Daniel Cameron
Part I
Fire Support Base O'Reilly, Central Highlands, South Vietnam
[He was the youngest Colonel in Vietnam, in or out of combat.]
In Fire Support Base O'Reilly's neighborhood is Fire Support Base Ripcord, evacuated recently by US troops after taking heavy shelling and heavy casualties. That episode only makes Lt. Colonel Le-Huan try harder. He has never been to the US for training, but his English is rapid.
"After the Americans withdraw from Ripcord," he said. "the enemy plan to take 'O'Reilly between August 5 and August 19. They think they finish us off easy, no sweat.
They choose...."
Coming. At monicamemo and www.gringoman.com
Posted by: gringoman | January 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM
The banks have found a device for creating a global liquidity pool, independent of any government, through the creation of an international resolution fund. This fund would be generated by a bank levy on assets over a certain amount, or a tax on bank transactions.
This appears to be a way over the too-big-to-fail problem, and bailouts. On the other hand, it could also be used to create a defacto oligarchy independent of any country. Now that carbon credits just soot the faces of internationalists, the question arises : "Why is it so important to connect all banks internationally?" It has already been established that this is too big to control, and now they have a mechanism to place it beyond any control.
This attempts to solve the too-big-to-fail problem by making banking gargantuan and totalitarian.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 30, 2010 at 03:14 PM
Would you want to give these guys your retirement money? Would you trust them with your home loan?
Posted by: Dgscol | January 30, 2010 at 05:54 PM
the ansser is to have a national bank, that is separate.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 30, 2010 at 05:55 PM
Doesn't the Scretching Newsweek Liberal Hag who calls herself "a journalist" and who constantly intrerupts the other panalists EVER take a vacation ?????? It tries one's patience having to listen to her tik off he liberal propaganda points every week!
Posted by: Checkers | January 30, 2010 at 08:54 PM
Clift adds authenticity to the dialog. She does fairly well holding her own doesn't she, interjecting her "Excuse me" ?
The Supreme Court decision to allow unlimited corporate political advertising, never addressed the
multinational nature of some corporations. Should they be allowed to speak freely about US elections when there are mixed and possibly conflicted allegiances? According to the court, it apparently makes no difference.
This is a frequent problem. Human rights, for example, have no restricted provenance. But some rights are possessed only by citizens. The destruction of a citizen is what bothers me. Citizens vote, corporations do not, citizens care about the country, multinationals may not. Citizens have rights to medical care paid for by Americans, and they have rights to education paid by Americans. Corporate free speech regarding our elections should, at the very least, be restricted to corporations that employ US citizens, and market products to Americans. Their focus and concern should be a national matter, not a foreign commercial or a foreign political nature.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 31, 2010 at 11:00 AM
The Supreme Court decision to allow unlimited corporate political advertising, never addressed the
multinational nature of some corporations. Should they be allowed to speak freely about US elections when there are mixed and possibly conflicted allegiances? According to the court, it apparently makes no difference.
This is a frequent problem. Human rights, for example, have no restricted provenance. But some rights are possessed only by citizens. The destruction of a citizen is what bothers me. Citizens vote, corporations do not, citizens care about the country, multinationals may not. Citizens have rights to medical care paid for by Americans, and they have rights to education paid by Americans. Corporate free speech regarding our elections should, at the very least, be restricted to corporations that employ US citizens, and market products to Americans. Their focus and concern should be a national matter, not a foreign commercial or a foreign political nature.
Posted by: Truther | January 31, 2010 at 11:00 AM
____________________________
I caught that too. There are also different laws governing corporations. Don't individuals incorporate to protect themselves from lawsuits for example? The corporation can be sued, not the individual.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Oh, wait. Yes. The Eliteniks have done that already. Obama owns up to a Kenyan father. Meaning, in effect he is the UN's first POTUS. Meaning, in effect, that the US Constitution has been out-sourced (while the citizenry was watching American Idol.) Obviously the media hacks, not to mention the "opposition" Republicans, accept this. (It beats being labeled a 'birther' by the Alinskybots.)
Now I get it. The Republic of Jefferson, Washington and Lincoln, after Barack Hussein Obama, is now ripe for President Govindar Singh.
Gotcha.
Posted by: gringoman | January 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM
---------
Haha! Brilliant analysis as usual, Gringoman.
Here is Reverend Dr. Manning discussing how important it is to keep hammering away on the issue of Obama's phony birth certificate:
Tea Party Please Go Birth Certificate Viral ATLAH Media Network
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZSmZkY4UTM&feature=related
But be careful, Dr. Manning was paid a visit by Homeland Security for saying what he said. See here:
Homeland Security Launches Investigation of Dr Manning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0PduVjd3Co
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 11:10 AM
I thought the conversation on digital addiction was interesting as I am addicted. However, my addiction also serves a need. My real friends have no interest in politics and are bored to death when I attempt to discuss it. It isn't that easy finding real friends with common interests.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 11:11 AM
This universality of values and concerns, is possibly influenced by the Catholicism of the justices. When these justices took their oath, however, they accepted a different standard. No doubt, the Catholics have been very successful at getting theirs, onto the court.
How about more Protestants or even a Jewish justice? This court is stacked, and not representative of the country, and its mood, as it has been in the past.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 31, 2010 at 11:12 AM
How about more Protestants or even a Jewish justice? This court is stacked, and not representative of the country, and its mood, as it has been in the past.
Posted by: Truther | January 31, 2010 at 11:12 AM
----
Truther,
FYI, both Ruth (Buzzie) Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are Jewish.
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Listening to Nazi-radio WABC right NOW and the current Goebbels on air just blamed the panty-bomber's ACLU defense on JANET RENO!!!
YEAH, YOU don't SEE B&W, especially BLACK when it comes to "OUR" resident Nigroe in the WHITE house...but for niggas like ME, WE are highly cognizant of THE haus-nigger @ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...Y'ALL are obviously still stuck up about Bill Clinton?
Posted by: EminemsRevenge | January 31, 2010 at 04:22 PM
Buzzie is not much of a buzz anymore, and actually espouses the use of foreign laws in making decisions. Why would she even say that?
It would be nice to have a conservative Jewish justice.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 31, 2010 at 04:44 PM
If a corporate body is found guilty of a crime the entire corpus can be held responsible, and imprisoned. Say Goldman Sacks. Right?
Posted by: Dgscol | January 31, 2010 at 04:51 PM
It would be nice to have a conservative Jewish justice.
Posted by: Truther | January 31, 2010 at 04:44 PM
----
Mark Levin is Jewish and conservative, wouldn't it be a riot if HE somehow became one of the Supremes? LOL
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 05:08 PM
Listening to Nazi-radio WABC right NOW and the current Goebbels on air just blamed the panty-bomber's ACLU defense on JANET RENO!!!
YEAH, YOU don't SEE B&W, especially BLACK when it comes to "OUR" resident Nigroe in the WHITE house...but for niggas like ME, WE are highly cognizant of THE haus-nigger @ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...Y'ALL are obviously still stuck up about Bill Clinton?
POSTED BY: EMINEMSREVENGE | JANUARY 31, 2010 AT 04:22 PM
--
M/M, I hope this latest diatribe of Al-Fartson-lite will remove any doubt that we are dealing with a ne[gr]ofascist of the highest order.
If ABC is nazi-radio what does that make Al Fartson over on WWRL? The fat one is responsible for MURDER here in New York and I for one won't allow that fact to be forgotten..
I guess Radio Stalin would be an appropriate name for that station which features not only fascist types like Ed Schmutz but any number of hate-filled turd-worldists spewing their view of why and how they are entitled to OUR money.
Unlike the idiot hater I am vomiting on I back up what I say with FACTS:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/22/the-shut-up-white-boy-woman-is-the-slum-dweller-with-a-60-inch-tv/
Sharon Jasper sits in the living room of her voucher-backed private residence. “I might be poor but I don’t like to live poor. I thank God for a place to live but it’s pitiful what people give you.”
Well you hateblacks have FUN with your islamist proteges. Remember the slave trade and how it got started. Remember Darfur. Remember they they call you ABD.
But hey, FACTS get in the way of HATE, don't they?
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 05:25 PM
UG, if it isn't ER, my favorite, black, blogging buddy. ER, here is a new Haiti charity for you to post on your blog. Hope you liked the Polish television show I sent to you. Tell your sister I say hello. How are book sales?
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2010/01/trail-mixers-for-haiti.html
UG, brings up a good point. In terms of Haiti, it has come to my attention that we have sent billions of dollars of foreign aid to Haiti and, as you can see from how well the buildings sustained the earthquake, the money was not put to good use by the corrupt government. What can we do to make certain foreign aid and charity money get to the people who need it?
Also, the black community really should try to get it together and try to end slavery that exists today. What is the black community doing to end this?
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/buy-child-10-hours/story?id=5326508&page=1
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 05:49 PM
.
More facts for the not-so-colorblind on the neo-STALINIST thide of sings:
http://tnjn.com/2009/nov/01/jury-says-death-by-lethal-inje/
I am pretty d*mn sure, no in fact I am CONVINCED, that if the perps in the case had been white and the vics black, this would have been disseminated by MSM world-wide.
Just last night I had to listen to all this hateful anti-Americanism on BBC with is PAID for by "n"pr, ergo by US, the taxed!
And all they could harp on is that Americans weren't doing enough for Haiti. Why don't THEY do something for Haiti, since they are so concerned about it, instead of running their mouths instead?!
FACT is they don't give a sh*t about Haiti. It's all about HATING AMERICA.
Why didn't they mention the FACT that SOWdi Barbaria gave NOTHING, not even a bit of money, to the effort, both in Indonesia and now in Haiti.
Rescue missions are strictly for the "infidel" to carry out and pay for.
In fact in other islamic countries they referred to the Haitians as "devil worshippers and alcoholics" undeserving of aid.
Interesting how much airtime was devoted to similar, but much milder, comments by the old Pat Robertson.
LIEberalism CONTINUES to EXPOSE itself!!!!!
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 05:50 PM
.
And WHO might THEY be:
(John 8:39-47) They answered and said to him, “Our father is Abraham.” Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works of Abraham. But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from GOD; Abraham did not do this. You are doing the works of you father!” They said to him, “We are not illegitimate. We have one Father, GOD.” Jesus said to them, “If GOD were your Father, you would love me, for I came from GOD and am here; I did not come on my own, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I am saying? Because you cannot bear to hear my word. You belong to your father the devil and you willingly carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer form the beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and the father of lies. But because I speak the truth, you do not believe me. Can any of you charge me with sin? If I am telling the truth, why do you not believe me? Whoever belongs to GOD hears the words of GOD; for this reason you do not listen, because you do not belong to GOD.”
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 05:58 PM
Roger Ailes was great on "This Week".
http://www.therightscoop.com/roger-ailes-defends-glenn-beck-sarah-palin-and-smacks-down-arianna-huffington/
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 06:12 PM
.
M/M, I hope you did read what the racist ER wrote in here today. Please take it to heart. Then draw your own conclusions.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 06:23 PM
Ummah, It's obvious ER is no fan of Obama. His words aren't exactly meant to convey his racial loyalty to the "haus-nigger", not in the least bit.
Anyway, I think you will find this interesting:
.
The WSJ calls on the Netherlands to stop the trial of Geert Wilders--but guess why?
"My brain is running out of the neurotransmitters that transmit amazement. The Wall Street Journal has an article this week that calls on the Netherlands to cancel the trial of Geert Wilders--but not because it is wrong to put a man on trial for stating opinions; and not because it is totalitarian to send a man to prison for criticizing Islam. In fact, the author, Leon de Winter, does not actually find fault with the Netherlands' "hate-speech" laws under which Wilders is being tried, and his strongest criticism of the effort by Dutch prosecutors to put Wilders in prison for his opinions that it is "preposterous." He does not call it tyrannical
Why, then, does de Winter want the trial to be stopped? Because the trial will expose the violent, hate-filled teachings of Islam, and that must be prevented at all costs. As he writes: "On trial is not so much Geert Wilders, but the Holy Book of Islam."
There's a secondary harm de Winter sees resulting from the trial: Wilders might be convicted. But, as de Winter makes clear, the reason he wants to prevent that outcome is not that Wilders would be fined or go to jail and that the people of the West would be scared into silence on the subject of the encroaching power of Islam. No, de Winter want to prevent the conviction of Wilders because it will make Wilders more popular and help advance his cause.
From de Winter's reasoning it is clear that if Geert Wilders had not declared at the openiing of the trial on January 20 his intention to make the truth of his statements about Islam the basis of his defense, de Winter would not have called for the cancellation of the trial. He is doing so, not in order to protect Wilders and other besieged Islam critics from tyrannical leftist governments, but in order to protect Islam from the truth."
More...
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015553.html
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 06:45 PM
YEAH, YOU don't SEE B&W, especially BLACK when it comes to "OUR" resident Nigroe in the WHITE house...but for niggas like ME, WE are highly cognizant of THE haus-nigger @ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...Y'ALL are obviously still stuck up about Bill Clinton?
Posted by: EminemsRevenge | January 31, 2010 at 04:22 PM
_________________
I'm used to him and I don't think he is as annoying as Ovari and Xcretement. He is edgy and can be funny. Even though he calls WABC Nazis, he did call Obama "THE haus-nigger @ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue". He's an "equal opportunity offender".
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 06:50 PM
.
DJ, all that means is that for ER the O isn't openly anti-"whitey" enough. It's like the jihadists excoriating the so-called "moderate" moslems who are advancing the "ummah" by "immigration".
I forgot the word they have for it but I know they have one. It's straight from the Koran.
The so-called "moderates" meanwhile believe that the jihadists are unduly taking risks that the "infidels" might wake up in sufficient numbers to realize what is being done to them, thus jeopardizing the long-term goal, ie. moHAM-MAD's FINAL SOLUTION forall Mankind.
This undermining by using PC and "immigration"/demographic conquest is called the "slow jihad".
Prime example of this is the strategy paper found post-9/11 in a terrorist safe-house in Switzerland.
So here we have black radical cutting into "house negros" where in fact you can see that even Colin Powell - who took HOW MUCH demonRAT abuse? - supports Obama when it comes down to the nitty-gritty.
The tactic is clear, whether intended or not: They think they can make the Bama into a "good cop" in our eyes by insulting and demeaning him.
It is my belief that the Bama and many others who are called names by their more openly radical brethren, ultimately share the same sinister goals.
See also the non-prosecutions of the armed black panther group at polling places in Philadelphia by the FALN terrorist-freeing Eric Holder.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 06:58 PM
Ummah, It's obvious ER is no fan of Obama. His words aren't exactly meant to convey his racial loyalty to the "haus-nigger", not in the least bit.
_______________________
That's right. ER's no kool-aid drinker and has called out Obama from the beginning. His blog is really interesting and he is funny. I'll never forget when he posted the picture of the homeless guy, sleeping next to a huge pile of cans, using an Americian flag as a blanket, and referred to him as a recipient of Obama's green jobs plan. LOL!
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 07:04 PM
A black panther, white-hating blogger is still more interesting than Ovari and Xcretement.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 07:07 PM
"DJ, all that means is that for ER the O isn't openly anti-"whitey" enough."
----
In the larger context of B/W racial issues you're right about that, Ummah. But I think we can give ER the benefit of the doubt in this instance. Given the context of his post, he is saying that the hosts over at WABC shouldn't still be hung up on the Clinton administration. They should live in the present and lay the blame for the stupid decision to try the terrorists in civilian court where it belongs: the "haus nigger."
.
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 07:24 PM
"Listening to Nazi-radio WABC right NOW and the current Goebbels on air just blamed the panty-bomber's ACLU defense on JANET RENO!!!"
-----
Okay, now I see. ER's remarks are definitely anti-Semitic. Hey, I'm sometimes slow on the up-take.
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 07:50 PM
.
Well, I am glad we all agree that the aforementioned blogger is a racist. I'm not sure he's simply "anti-Semitic" though. I think he hates "whitey", be he Christian Jew or atheist or whatever he might be.
I think the openly anti-Semitic ravings of one Leroy Jones aka amiri baraka, for example, are simply using jews as placeholders for"whitey" in general.
To think that "Gay American" McGreevy made him "poet laureate" of New Jersey only goes to show how cravenly masochistic white liberal pols really are.
I prefer a guy like Rudy who gave Al Fatson the cold shoulder he deserved. After all, he was an unelected private citizen, and still is, by the way.
Rudy also turned down terrorist-tainted cash in the amount of $10m from one of the millions of SOWdi "princes".
The man stands up for what he believes in.
.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 07:58 PM
.
M/M it is debatable if the black racist blogger is preferrable to the self-racist whitey-bloggers you mention, but I have to say the fact that he doesn't show up nearly as often as the white-libs do, speaks in his favor, if nothing else.
Let there be no doubt on this FACT: ER is a racist. No ifs ands or buts.
q.e.d.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
.
DJ, as far as the terrorist thing goes.. I don't know your age, but I for one distinctly remember Clinton passing up several opportunities to get bin Laden while he was in office. And yes, I knew who bin Laden was at the time. He got interviewed plenty enough by Ted Kropzeug and co. and he wasn't bashful about his views and his plans on their implementation either.
So there is a precedent and there are far too many of these very same terrorist-loving Clinton administration retreads in the Obama administration now.
If you haven't done so already, you might want to check out "The Path to 9/11". Hard to find and well worth the watch. The Clintons got footage removed and the DVD suppressed.
The file can be found on the internet with a bit of diligence and research though.
Oh and then there's the HilLIARy movie which is HILLARYous! Even though hardly any jihadist stuff in that one, as it focuses more on all of the collective misdeeds of Billary!
Great watching though and will make you laugh in recognition!
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 08:08 PM
ER's not anti-Semitic. I think he was just using the term Nazi to refer to WABC, the way Rush describes annoying, progressive women as feminazis.
ER likes cool music and he is edgy. At least he isn't boring.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 08:17 PM
.
M/M how do you know that the Bama doesn't also like "cool music"? Bill Clinton was "cool" and played the Sax on Letterman. I enjoyed watching that too.
So what?
Still bad for the country all in all.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 08:34 PM
Sharon Jasper might find that missionary work is right for her. Many ladies like herself, through their churches, find working in places like Africa, Haiti, or China rewarding.
Posted by: Dgscol | January 31, 2010 at 08:44 PM
ER likes cool music and he is edgy. At least he isn't boring.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 08:17 PM
-----
Charley Manson was "edgy" and he liked cool music too. He certainly wasn't boring either. Is being "edgy" and "not boring" the standard by which you judge males, M/M? Or is it you are intrigued by ER's blackness that turns you on?
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 08:50 PM
.
LOL, Truther. If this Jasper woman is really in a church it seems to be more of a mosk than any church I've ever been to.
Maybe she visits the Rev. Wrong church every so often.
If she is fit to work in Haiti or anywhere else is doubtful, given the sloth she is. I don't think she'd last a day, never having worked even one full day in her life..
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 08:55 PM
.
Intriguing question: if Charlie Manson were black..
A. Would he still be in jail?
B. IF he were still in jail, what kind of efforts would be underway to get him out and who'd be making those efforts, if any?
PS. Mumia references come to mind..
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 08:58 PM
Charley Manson was "edgy" and he liked cool music too. He certainly wasn't boring either. Is being "edgy" and "not boring" the standard by which you judge males, M/M? Or is it you are intrigued by ER's blackness that turns you on?
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 08:50 PM
___________________________
Charlie Manson was crazy. ER is an author who has written 2 novels. He is edgy and creative like NYC.
Here are reviews from Amazon:
"Vigorously vulgar. Spirited. A passionate throat grabbing read." â€" Lisa Zaran, author of the sometimes girl and You Have A Lonely Heart
A gut-wrenching and DERANGED saga from an author about a post-9/11 NYC whose palette was so vivid that it was BANNED by davechappelle.com!!!
REMEMBER ALL THOSE JAW-DROPPING CLOSE-UPS WHEN HENDRIX TOOK THE STAGE in the Monterey Pop Festival film???!!!!
Today, the pied piper doesn’t pipe. He types. He riles. He pokes and prods as he wings his way across the internet dropping in-your-face, strip-you-down, lay-you-out, question-your-reality hard-hitting missiles on blogs and forums across cyber-land. Who can’t remember the first time the mysterious EminemsRevenge graced their blog or forum with one of his insightful, instigating comments? Anyone lucky enough to entertain a visit from this enigma, knows the feeling well. You log onto your computer, check your blog or your forum and there it is, a bomb of a comment that makes you shake your head and think, “Who the hell is this guy?†You don’t know if you like him, but you can’t help yourself. You have to Google him….and then you’re off, surfing your way through the chronicles of one of the most banned entities on the net.
He’s the quintessential champion of free speech going to battle everyday fighting the censors and pundits who use terms of use and political media as a smokescreen for any kind of intolerance, be it racial, sexist, religious or simple narrow-minded mindlessness. Then, he drags them under the spotlight and shows us their dirty little secrets. In between, he finds those with smaller voices than his, the poets, the philosophers, the disadvantaged, with messages and words that need to be heard. He shows them the way to get their messages out. It will warm the heart of anyone who gushes at the memory of the first time he saw a college professor wearing a t-shirt that said, “Question Authorityâ€. It will piss off those who feel the need to hang onto all the crap they were ever force-fed in the name of propriety. "
http://www.amazon.com/Jew-Girl-EminemsRevenge/dp/1411645510
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 09:21 PM
"ER's not anti-Semitic. I think he was just using the term Nazi to refer to WABC, the way Rush describes annoying, progressive women as feminazis."
M/M, here is what ER said:
"Listening to Nazi-radio WABC right NOW and the current Goebbels on air just blamed the panty-bomber's ACLU defense on JANET RENO!!!"
---
M/M,
Anti-Semites invariably refer to Israel as a Nazi regime. Hence, his reference to Nazis. Anit-Semites assert the media is controlled by Jews and they are using the power of the media to manipulate the masses to support Jewish causes, thus his reference to Gobbles. The reference to "ACLU defense" is code for JEW DEFENCE. Get it?!? Not to mention his homophobic and anti-white racist innuendo. This guy is truly a professional race-baiter.
Posted by: DJ | January 31, 2010 at 09:25 PM
I think Bill Clinton is interesting. ER turned me on to Bob Marley. I just never thought deeply about Bob Marley before ER posted a link on this blog.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8onbDZmAwhE
He posted this link too. I never even knew about this concert.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO_7WlPfdw0
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 09:27 PM
.
M/M I can turn you on to Lee "Scratch" Perry if that will help you see ER for what he is.
Remember the impetuous black woman last spring and I turned her on to the Visioneers.
She was cute as I could see from the pictures on her blog, but she was far too LIEberally brainwashed for my taste. Beauty and brains don't always come in the same package.
Not saying she was stupid, but certainly ignorant of a lot of facts.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 09:39 PM
Listening to Nazi-radio WABC right NOW and the current Goebbels on air just blamed the panty-bomber's ACLU defense on JANET RENO!!!"
_______________________
DJ, I think you are reading too much into it. He refers to WABC as "Nazi-radio" because it is mostly known as conserative radio. Refering to the panty-bomber's defense as an "ACLU defense" means that he disagrees with it because the ACLU defends terrorists, not their victims. He seems to be saying that the radio host is blaming Janet Reno when they should be blaming the ACLU, and to stop living in the 1990s because the Clinton Administration is over.
He is not anti-Semitic:
"We learn, for instance, that 'the book pays homage to the forward thinking teacher who inspired him [the author] to read both Joyce and D.H. Lawrence and look outside the box of conventional thinking. This teacher built on a foundation created from information about Judaism shared with an inquisitive pre-adolescent EminemsRevenge by his next door neighbor, a rabbi cop, in the Rockaway peninsula of NYC.'"
http://grumpyoldbookman.blogspot.com/2006/05/eminemsrevenge-jew-girl.html
and he has a link to Debbie Schlussel's blog too. His first novel was about a post-9/11 world, so I don't think he is too into islamic fascism.
Posted by: M/M | January 31, 2010 at 09:44 PM
.
M/M you can twist and turn it any which way you like. You're free to like the guy, but please don't sell us on "he's not a racist".
Calling WABC nazi radio is beyond the pale. And it was far from his first racist comment here.
Women have strange reasons for liking men sometimes. I've been the beneficiary of that as well. But when liberal women make you the object of their affections you better pretend you're not a Conservative!
First thing you know you'll be in nothing but useless aggravating arguments and forget about nookie.
That said, I have been able to reason with some when it surprised me most. The college ones are much harder to reason with than those who are simply raised in a very liberal environment.
The term "politically correct" was first brought to my attention by a girl I dated from [MA college that shall remain nameless]. She was cursing the "politically correct manhating bulldykes" on campus.. LOL and I had to ask what does "politically correct" mean?
Unfortunately, now the entire world knows what it means.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | January 31, 2010 at 09:55 PM