« Pelosi Officially Goes Nuts (Again) | Main | Me, Myself, and I »

January 22, 2010

Comments

mjfell

Revolutionary Holocaust

A groundbreaking hour long special where Glenn Beck takes us back in time to examine the roots of socialism and communism and the evil that followed. We all know about the horrors of the holocaust where the pure evil Hitler inspired claimed the lives of millions of innocent people. But most do not know about the millions upon millions of lives lost in a different genocide of the Ukrainian people under the Stalin regime. This special also takes a look behind the iconic fashion symbol of Che Guevara showing that the myth doesn't tell the story of the man who was a blood thirsty killer. We meet a family who saw first hand what a monster the man was. They know the cost of communism and you will too when you hear their story, and who can forget about Mao Zedong? A leader responsible for 70-million deaths during his reign. All communist. All killers. We will show you things you've never seen but need to.

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/34922/

M/M

Instead of fighting with the far-left, we should be laughing at them. Why did Jon Stewart beat us to this?
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/22/video-stewart-slams-olby/

M/M

The LIEberals can have all the television stations. I have discovered Polish television. THIS looks really good, how do we get it over here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAQy6RrmoEc

M/M

Inspired by Pat Robertson and the Christians who defended him on Talk Radio, I just gave a donation to this organization. They are open 24/7, if you would like to give:
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate/

gringoman




Goldman Sachs Had Bomb-Sniffing Dogs, Police Barricades At Its Headquarters Before Earnings Announcement

First Posted: 01-22-10 08:59 AM | Updated: 01-22-10 10:10 AM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/22/goldman-sachs-had-bomb-sn_n_432750.html

gringoNOTE: It's not known if the dogs were sniffing for anyone in particular. It is known that a certain left-wing professor (his school transcripts still secret)received big bucks from GS. Before becoming President, and after, this Professor had mutually beneficial dealings with GS, and is now telling the cameras that people want their money back from the banks that he bailed out.

The dogs are a curiosity, perhaps an over-reaction. The Professor, a laid-back type when not working the teleprompter, is not expected to propose the Chinese treatment for any Wall Street associates or miscreants. It's also known that he and his Attorney-General are against water-boarding, even for Goldman-Sachs.

gringoman

Wall Street 2010, a Foto

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/135043/thumbs/s-GOLDMAN-SACHS-BONUSES-SECURITY-large.jpg

Ummahgummah

.

Just give 'em Israel and we won't need German Sherperds, even at Goldman-Sachs.

The X-43 is a Genius!

.

DJ

Vote on Sarah campaigning for Juan:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/22/michelle-urges-palin-dont-campaign-for-mccain/

Posted by: M/M | January 22, 2010 at 08:48 PM

1)Sarah, no!

2)Eh, she benefits from it. What's the harm?

3)Yes. More Maverick, please!

Of course #1 is the correct choice, but she's obligated to support the creep if he asks her too.
McCain should know better than to ask Sarah to campaign for him. The only person that could possibly benefit would be McCain himself. What's in it for Sarah? Answer: NOTHING! Well, nothing except damage to her reputation that is. One refreshing quality that makes Sarah Palin stand above the crowd of sleazy politicians is that she is not seen as one of them. She will lose that distinction if she campaigns for RINO McCain. McCain should know better than put her in that position. My advice to Sarah is: 'call in sick' to McCain campaign headquarters.


M/M

Glenn Beck apologizes to Scott Brown but feels we have the right to laugh at politicians at both sides. I think that Jon Stewart said it best - sure, we can laugh at jokes IF THEY'RE FUNNY, not if they're insults.

Glenn Beck wants the right to laugh at politicians on both sides of the aisle than I want the right to be offended by radio talk show hosts on both sides of the aisle.
http://www.therightscoop.com/

New York has lost two congressional districts to the Democrats and has NO REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE running against a Senate candidate that could be defeated by Travis the Chimp. To add insult to injury, New York is the carpetbagger state and the person who is challenging the Senate Candidate is the back-stabbing weasel from TN. What does Glenn Beck do, but take the wind out of our victory celebration.

I have my issues with Juan, but I have to admit that I like 50 percent of him. He DID pick Gov. Palin, he was behind Scott Brown, he defended Bernard and he got me to vote for him by introducing.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,394724,00.html

M/M

"Long Island Republican congressman Peter King — who once said he was "very likely" to run for U.S. Senate against Kirsten Gillibrand, then decided not to, then briefly considered it again — has, shockingly, decided against a Senate candidacy, again, for real now, probably, unless he gets the urge, or someone suggests it to him. [CQ Politics]"

Read more: Peter King Absolutely Not Running Against Kirsten Gillibrand, He’s Pretty Sure -- Daily Intel http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/peter_king_absolutely_not_runn.html#ixzz0dRS4p8oD
_________________________

Hey, John McCain, do you have any friends in New York?

M/M

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/01/21/national-enquirer-submits-for-pulitzer-prize-after-john-edwards/

DJ

"Long Island Republican congressman Peter King — who once said he was "very likely" to run for U.S. Senate against Kirsten Gillibrand, then decided not to, then briefly considered it again — has, shockingly, decided against a Senate candidacy, again, for real now, probably, unless he gets the urge, or someone suggests it to him. [CQ Politics]"

----

Hmmmm..............Peter King is known to be a sharp decisive guy, that type of indecision is out of character for him. I wonder if it's because he's considering running for pres. in 2012? Why settle for senator if you think you can win the grand prize?

M/M

Glenn Beck shows us there is something worse than a reformed smoker. Sometimes, when "Hem" goes on his frequent visits to the hospital, I wonder if it isn't a cover up for something else. Wonder what we will find in his closet?

Dedicated the "Hem"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYS732zyYfU

M/M

Hmmmm..............Peter King is known to be a sharp decisive guy, that type of indecision is out of character for him. I wonder if it's because he's considering running for pres. in 2012? Why settle for senator if you think you can win the grand prize?

Posted by: DJ | January 23, 2010 at 09:01 AM
_________________________

Good luck with that! Fool me once...

I specifically remember he voted for TARP 1 when we were all against it. Although I can't find the quote, I remember him saying that he hoped Gillibrand would run so he could defeat her. That article from "New York" says that he is also the "King of earmarks" .

No way am I looking at Mr. All Talk No Action again.

gringoman

What might the neo-coms and/or PC Gestapo have on Newt Gingrich? Youthful indiscretions in the bath-house?
He's never been a Scott Brown hunk posing for PlayGirl at age 19, has he? Surely he never left a girl to drown in his car? That would be a no-no for a Republican.

Posted by: gringoman | January 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM
______________________________

How about this? Here's the dirt:

Family Values? Pressing Wife for Divorce in the Hospital:

"He walked out in the spring of 1980.... By September, I went into the hospital for my third surgery. The two girls came to see me, and said, "Daddy is downstairs. Could he come up?" When he got there, he wanted to discuss the terms of the divorce while I was recovering from my surgery." - Jackie, his first

wife.http://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm#adultery

Posted by: M/M | January 22, 2010 at 08:05 PM

There's just one problem with this revelation about Newt ready to divorce cancer-stricken wife: it was revealed a long time ago. It's so well-known that even a certain percentage of 'American Idol' fans probably know about it.

To explain Newt's strange readiness to tango with Pelosi on Obama/Pelosicare, just when the monster seems virtually dead, one would need a really fresh dollop of dirt, if dirt is the answer. Newt does seem unusually active and energetic for a white-haired professor---grinding out books, speechifying, word-processing, globe-trotting, keeping his hand in for 2012 etc. Has he been drug-tested? Has he gone to Rush Limbaugh for counseling on it? Did Beijing get interesting fotos in his hotel room during last China trip, or a video with sound, while his current wife was traipsing around the Forbidden City, leaving Newtie to rest up on the queen bed? We don't know.

gringoman

And with that post, and a recent "Supreme" court decision insuring absolute US Fascist Nazism and endless war until Armageddon, I retire north to watch the revolution from a very safe place.


Posted by: xbjllb | January 22, 2010 at 07:29 PM

Can we have this certified by a Notary Public?

gringoman

Vote on Sarah campaigning for Juan:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/22/michelle-urges-palin-dont-campaign-for-mccain/


Posted by: M/M | January 22, 2010 at 08:48 PM

Anyone who wonders why Sarah Palin would campaign for John McCain, the man who brought her into the world, whatever his failings may be, has little understanding of human nature, even less of gratitude, and none at all of politics.

gringoman

Posted by: M/M | January 22, 2010 at 08:48 PM

1)Sarah, no!

2)Eh, she benefits from it. What's the harm?

3)Yes. More Maverick, please!

Of course #1 is the correct choice, but she's obligated to support the creep if he asks her too.
McCain should know better than to ask Sarah to campaign for him. The only person that could possibly benefit would be McCain himself. What's in it for Sarah? Answer: NOTHING! Well, nothing except damage to her reputation that is. One refreshing quality that makes Sarah Palin stand above the crowd of sleazy politicians is that she is not seen as one of them. She will lose that distinction if she campaigns for RINO McCain. McCain should know better than put her in that position. My advice to Sarah is: 'call in sick' to McCain campaign headquarters.


Posted by: DJ | January 23, 2010 at 07:18 AM

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

gringoman

"Long Island Republican congressman Peter King — who once said he was "very likely" to run for U.S. Senate against Kirsten Gillibrand, then decided not to, then briefly considered it again — has, shockingly, decided against a Senate candidacy, again, for real now, probably, unless he gets the urge, or someone suggests it to him. [CQ Politics]"

Read more: Peter King Absolutely Not Running Against Kirsten Gillibrand, He’s Pretty Sure -- Daily Intel http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/peter_king_absolutely_not_runn.html#ixzz0dRS4p8oD
_________________________

Hey, John McCain, do you have any friends in New York?

Posted by: M/M | January 23, 2010 at 08:31 AM

Sounds like Peter King doesn't think he's got the equivalent of a George Soros, oil sheikhs and mysterious internet contributions from all over the world that can raise the $40 million he'd need for Senate run. He probably also knows that the Republican Machine will not get solidly behind anyone who is not afraid to say words like "Islamic terrorist."

Ummahgummah

.

The prophet of Islam boasted, “I HAVE BEEN MADE VICTORIOUS WITH TERROR”.

http://newstime.co.nz/2010/ideology-akin-to-nazism-camouflaged-as-a-religion.html

That was the founder of the cult.

.

rickswrite

uh-oh, ol XB seems to have gone missing again. I'm always worried he'll immolate himself or go off into the desert to eat bees and wild honey and get irretrievably lost or jumped by a cougar (if X starts talkin, 10-1 the cougar lets him go).

M/M

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM
______________________

I'll trust the people of AZ to vote for who they think can best represent them.

Ummahgummah

.

A vote for McCain is a vote for business as usual. The Tea Party moves on without McCain and the rest of the RINOs.

We're not throwing anyone under the bus, we're simply not letting them aboard.

.

M/M

Sounds like Peter King doesn't think he's got the equivalent of a George Soros, oil sheikhs and mysterious internet contributions from all over the world that can raise the $40 million he'd need for Senate run. He probably also knows that the Republican Machine will not get solidly behind anyone who is not afraid to say words like "Islamic terrorist."

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:19 PM
________________________

So how did an unknown state senator from the bluest of blue states win Ted Kennedy's seat?

Ummahgummah

.

I do think that the mysterious internet and other contributions to the Bama's Presidential campaign are more than troubling.

They are a direct manipulation of the country's Sovereignty by the worst of our enemies since it's an open secret that most of these contributions came from moslems.

And we can see how the Bama is paying them back already while trampling all over the rights of Americans.

Legislation outlawing this kind of manipulation of the electoral process MUST be introduced and ENFORCED. This means also effective means of supervision of all campaign finances, regardless of who is running.

.

Ummahgummah

.

Memo to Monica: "I'm frustrated too" = "I feel your pain".

.

DJ

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM

----

Gringoman,

I get your point and it's a good one. I just hope the Tea Baggers understand and wont hold it against her.

The ideal situation would for McAmnesty to retire. He and his deviant wife could spend their time doing what RINOids do...like advocating for gay marrige or such such thing.

Ummahgummah

.

DJ, the McLAME wife just appeared in a print ad supporting gay marriage. Same idiots who want more islam in this country also want more gay marriage!

It's ONE or the OTHER, stupids!

The fact that they don't even understand that opposing principles of the two is beyond troubling.

This willful lack of knowledge, the lack of logical thinking, the utter lack of even a modicum of common sense is the definition of LIEberalism!

Of course, the vast majority would rather live without either of the two. Meaning, free of islam and free of liberalism.

I am researching 'best places to live', and this means areas with no infestations of LIEBERALISM!

I'd rather have a few skeeters and ticks than LIEBERALS all around me! Taxes also seem to be far lower the less liberals there are.. :-)

.

M/M

The ideal situation would for McAmnesty to retire. He and his deviant wife could spend their time doing what RINOids do...like advocating for gay marrige or such such thing.

Posted by: DJ | January 23, 2010 at 02:57 PM
______________________________

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/23/jd-hayworth-ill-run-john-mccain/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fpolitics+%2528Text+-+Politics%2529

M/M


http://michellemalkin.com/2010/01/23/mccain-backed-gop-senate-candidate-carly-fiorina-hearts-jesse-jackson/

Good luck J.D. Hayworth.

Ummahgummah

.

M/M, Good luck, J.D. Hayworth indeed!

.

Dgscol


Just as Bernanke is Greenspan Jr, the appointment hinges on who replaces Bernanke, hopefully not Bernanke Jr. Or you can have this man over here who looks like Bernanke, but is not related to him as far as we know.

Republicans would do well to nominate someone that continues the Brown revolution.

Dgscol

The Brown Populist revolution is, beyond a doubt, tapping into the nation's anger over Congressional spending, and continuance of the old globalist policies invented during the late Greenspan years. This is over.

By grabbing the reins, the Tea Paries and Republican Party, is cutting the Democratic Party off its traditional base - one the Democrats have not supported.

Dgscol

From our Chinese economic partners, we need to pull back somewhat, to shore up our own economy from its current overextension. That is critical to US job growth, and the stabilization of housing, tax receipts by the government, and for our own security.

Part of the new regulations, should be a throttle to prevent over-indulgence in foreign economies by our own banks. This whole effort was risky, misguided, over-extended, and unfocused.

Dgscol

They are calling Bernanke "Big Ben". Yeah ... right. More like a ticking time bomb.

Dgscol

Speaking of which - have you ever used Burma shave?

No, actually bomb sniffing dogs were outside Goldman Sachs as they reported their earnings. Despite their condition, they reported a rise in earnings and their stock fell.

I guess someone didn't like that they tightened credit on the Chinese, and in turn the Chinese tightened credit on the US government. Like watching air coming up from within your oatmeal on the stove.

Dgscol

The initial foray of Bush I into China, may have been the waking of Chinese giant. What is astonishing to most Americans, is the nonresponse of the US government to the theft of US technology. While we were being told the Chinese were making T-shirts in fact the Chinese were stealing military secrets, and had inundated our universities, found a friend working within our government, and lately, within our national laboratories. They also inundated our banks.

Their cyber-attacks have stolen Pentagon secrets including Pershing II technology, compact nuclear warhead technology by Wen Ho Lee at Sandia lab, and also our GPS technology. The Chinese just launched their first navigation satellite, as part of a planned Beidou constellation that will allow cruise missles, and navigation for ICBMs, and submarine launched ICBMs.

After each attack, there has been no response. In fact we have opened our labs and universities to employ them.

There is a stock called Baidu that sounds alot like Beidou. I started wondering if the Chinese could open an equity on a stock exchange, and if we are in fact investing in China's military buildup. WE are also directly funding a company that directly competes with Google, the US company we hoped, would open up China. BY what would keep the Chinese from using funds invested in Baidu to fund their Beidou navigation system? By using our technology and money, they could be up and running in short order.

No response? NO pull back? NO public criticism? Who is exploiting what?

Sorry. I am a person with little faith in my government. I am sure the Pentagon has secret systems that supercede these apparently outdated systems. No sweat. Hopefuly Obama will not spend all the money we may need to deploy these systems.

Dgscol

Do losses in the U.S. housing market trigger losses in huge stock portfolios that had nothing to do with housing? This wasn't supposed to happen!

Equity houses did not consider in their models that real estate downturns would influence equities. Yet, it doesn't take a genius to see that people would cover losses in real estate by selling equities, right? This is something that is plaguing the markets, and will worsen. With enough borrowed money, do the banks care?

DJ

DJ, the McLAME wife just appeared in a print ad supporting gay marriage. Same idiots who want more islam in this country also want more gay marriage!

It's ONE or the OTHER, stupids!

The fact that they don't even understand that opposing principles of the two is beyond troubling.

This willful lack of knowledge, the lack of logical

-----

Ummah,

It seems the LIEberals are so committed to multiculturalism and diversity they are willing to ignore the looming existential threat Islam is posing. I think their logic -- twisted as it is -- is founded in protecting the coalition of disparate groups that comprise the Left. To criticize any group within their coalition -- even moooslimes -- would be to weaken the whole. Hence: we witness the cognative dissonance of gay and feminist groups supporting CAIR. Also, admitting the fact that moooslimes are a malignant bunch, would lend credibility to the idea of curtailing immigration. Immigration is the keystone of their wicked strategy.

Overthrowing capitalism and replacing it with a socialist economy enforced by a quasi-Marxist government is their goal, I suspect.

Transforming majority white America into majority non-white America via massive third world immigration is the means. The scary thing is they're succeeding in spades.

The following link features an interview of Peter Brimelow, V-Dare's founder. It may take a minute or so for the video to download, but it well worth watching it in its entirety.

.

Corbett Interview With Peter Brimelow
By James Fulford

___"Our Editor Peter Brimelow is interviewed here on a Waterbury, Connecticut station by local attorney F. David Corbett [Email him] about VDARE.COM. Instead of putting up a transcript, we're going to make you watch it.

What makes this interview different is Dave Corbett, unlike most of the interviewers out there in the MSM, has actually read what's on the site, and is familiar with its writers, like Brenda Walker and Joe Guzzardi.

He actually quotes Brenda Walker's Dead Culture Walking: Muslim Colonization Of Europe Should Frighten America:

"Now the triumphs of Tours and Vienna are being trampled by immigrants, entering mostly legally. It's a wonder the Muslims bother with terrorism at all when demography is working so well for them."

http://vdare.com/fulford/100112_corbett_interview.htm

Here is the article by Michelle Malkin that was referred to at the end of the interview:

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/11/hollywood-howard-zinn%E2%80%99s-marxist-education-project/

gringoman

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM
______________________

I'll trust the people of AZ to vote for who they think can best represent them.

Posted by: M/M | January 23, 2010 at 01:25 PM

Sarah Palin will too, I suspect---while she honestly pays off her debt to the controversial guy who put her in orbit.

gringoman

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM
______________________

I'll trust the people of AZ to vote for who they think can best represent them.

Posted by: M/M | January 23, 2010 at 01:25 PM

Sarah Palin will too, I suspect---while she honestly pays off her debt to the controversial guy who put her in orbit.

Posted by: gringoman | January 24, 2010 at 01:10 PM

Actually, on an immediate political level, this is no-win for Sarah Palin. If McCain is re-elected, she gets tarred with a RINO victory. If he loses, after she campaigns for him, her so-called "clout with the folks" will be questioned, diminishing her authority.

She obviously can see this. Will she therefore back out of it? I don't think so. McCain is the only one who can keep her out of it. If Johnny Boy calls, Sarah will come.

As a hunter, not a wimp, she knows something about the way of wolves.

gringoman

Sounds like Peter King doesn't think he's got the equivalent of a George Soros, oil sheikhs and mysterious internet contributions from all over the world that can raise the $40 million he'd need for Senate run. He probably also knows that the Republican Machine will not get solidly behind anyone who is not afraid to say words like "Islamic terrorist."

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:19 PM
________________________

So how did an unknown state senator from the bluest of blue states win Ted Kennedy's seat?

Posted by: M/M | January 23, 2010 at 01:30 PM

The Obots and the Dem hacks got caught with their pants down. Nobody, not even the Republicans, thought that anyone, especially an unknown, could challenge their "Kennedy" seat. (Exactly how Bubba Clinton got the Dem nomination for POTUS, when no Dem thought any Dem had a chance after Bush's 90% poll numbers from Gulf War I.) All the polls indicated their cliches and truisms were right. Until the last week or two, Coakley had a 30-point lead over Mr Nobody.

The Dems and their DaddyWarbucks (maybe even their Abdullah Warbucks) obviously will not make that mistake in New York for next November. They will pour in everything that's not nailed down. Peter King as a realist understands that. He might still gamble, but is he willing to lose his seat in Congress for the gamble?

And who knows? Maybe they have something on him. Even ex-Marines have been known to misbehave. Their Dirtbaggers would have big incentive to find something, since they know that Peter King would be a formidable Republican candidate, unlike the typical wuss the Republicans like to run.

gringoman

What many will refuse to see, and Sarah will go forward anyway, knowing that she'll lose points with them: She will campaign not for the RINO McCain, but the man McCain who gave birth to her on the national stage.

Unlike some other Americans today, she believes in paying her debts.

Posted by: gringoman | January 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM

----

Gringoman,

I get your point and it's a good one. I just hope the Tea Baggers understand and wont hold it against her.

The ideal situation would for McAmnesty to retire. He and his deviant wife could spend their time doing what RINOids do...like advocating for gay marrige or such such thing.

Posted by: DJ | January 23, 2010 at 02:57 PM

DJ,

'Twould be nice if Sarah could just focus on candidates like Michele Bachmann in Minnesota.

Would Johnny Boy rather retire and spend most of his time at home with wife and family who know his every peccadilo (ego-deflating even for a POW icon), or would he still prefer the corridors of power and media limelight in Washington, where people still actually care what you think and will even listen to you?

I have my suspicions.

I'll bet Sarah does too. And she'll answer the call from him. She couldn't look at herself in the mirror if she didn't---no matter what anybody thinks of Johnny Boy, or even what she herself thinks of his politics.

Ummahgummah

.

Gringoman, so what if they "have something" on Peter King? Are the DemonRATS so clean and free of sin?

Let's have all sides' dirt on the table and get the scales out!

I'd vote for him anyway, assuming the demonRAT running against him hates America and is a LIEberal sellout to terrorists, which is worse than any "dirt".

.

Ummahgummah

.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/42/96187683_9c9bc50d43.jpg

.

gringoman

Gringoman, so what if they "have something" on Peter King? Are the DemonRATS so clean and free of sin?

Let's have all sides' dirt on the table and get the scales out!

I'd vote for him anyway, assuming the demonRAT running against him hates America and is a LIEberal sellout to terrorists, which is worse than any "dirt".

.

Posted by: Ummah Gummah | January 24, 2010 at 02:13 PM

Ummah,

Of course we'd still vote for Peter King. That doesn't mean the dirtbaggers won't try. Also, as a non-Kennedy type Catholic, PK might feel it more excruciating to have his private life on front pages.

But this is nothing but idle speculation. I have no grounds to think they have anything like this on him, although you can be absolutely certain their slime technicians are looking.

In order of priorities, I'd say the money problem is a more important factor. Does he want to stay on the phone for a whole year trying to raise $40 million and lose his House seat?

Now, if that changes....if suddenly he gets some very interesting news on the Money Front....all bets could be off....despite the fact that Beltway Republicans, who are just as tied up with Sheikh deals as the Beltway Dems are, don't really want to back anyone who can pronounce "Islamic terrorist"....

But until then....

Ummahgummah

.

I think that's the problem, more than any potential "dirt".

The RINOs like Jim BaKKKer III and Grover Norquist who make millions from the SOWdis, will work behind the scenes to make sure the apple cart won't be upset.

And those two are just the tip of the iceberg. Sowdi and other islamic slush funds all over Washington.. a veritable cesspool of Anti-Americanism.

.

Ummahgummah

.

J-E-T-S JETS! JETS! JETS!

.

rickswrite

I see that Gibbs and other WH insiders and prominent dems still insist on mirandizing soldiers of the Islamic Jihad. Please keep doing this Obie and Holder, oh god, please. Fact Check: Barack Hussein Obama DID attend Madrassas in his youth did he not? Next question, folks: is the fox in the henhouse? And i mean that as a serious question!

DJ

A commenter on Larry Auster’s website put it best:

>>>"I couldn’t help thinking that this string of improbable election results—Christie in New Jersey, the Virginia clean sweep, Brown—in addition to the widespread Tea Party protests, have been powerful confirmation of what you said more than a year ago, and what I was thinking when I refused to vote for John McCain. Obama has galvanized and revived American conservatives in a way that no liberal Republican president ever could. I think it’s pretty well beyond serious dispute that if John McCain were president, we’d already have amnesty and none of those federal and local seats would have gone to a Republican. Moreover, people have coalesced around fierce opposition to a President whose leftist agenda and sheer, brazen contempt for the American people has awakened real panic and outrage."<<<

This is the guy Sarah Palin is going to campaign for? True, McCain gave political birth to her on the national stage, but he most assuredly is writing her political obituary if he compels her to campaign for him.

The comments to this entry are closed.