« A Forgotten Terrorist Attack | Main | Major Hasan's Fire Bell in the Night »

November 11, 2009



"My grandaddy carried this flag as an Army dentist, WW I. My Daddy carried it 36 months in the Pacific as a Navy pilot, WW II. I'm the last of the Potter line. Either i bring this flag home or the line ends with me."

---December 25, 1970. A young gunner in Charley Battery, an artillery unit on duty at Special Forces Camp Bu Prang, Central Highlands, South Vietnam. (from 'Saigon Notes' by Daniel Cameron. The Saigon Post)

Escaping Politically Correct


Nice 'shout out' homegirl,

I'm sure that you only want people to 'thank' some of the service men and women. In particular the ones that supports your right-wing, racist agenda.

And I read over your website (which is basically a blog anyone can make), I notice how many things in the past you were completely wrong about. I'm surprised you didn't do to those post what you'll do to mine, delete it.


Now Dagwood, be nice, Warrior Princess is an excellent host. If she hasn't deleted MY posts, I doubt she'd delete anything simply because she disagreed with it.

And you'll find she is right about somewhat more things than the "average" "usual" conservative commentator, and when she is wrong she listens and moves on.

Unlike the rest who do just keep harping on the same tired Jihad to a smaller and smaller and smaller audience.


Did you catch that, warmongers?

Jihad... the new slang term for BS.

Already catching on like wildfire.

Yesterday's baloney is today's BS and tomorrow's Jihad.


"I'm sure that you only want people to 'thank' some of the service men and women. In particular the ones that supports your right-wing, racist agenda."


Why do you assert Dr. Crowley supports a "racist agenda"? Surely you can point to specific examples that support YOUR allegations, right? Please provide, otherwise STF-UP!


"Why do you assert Dr. Crowley supports a "racist agenda"? Surely you can point to specific examples that support YOUR allegations, right? Please provide, otherwise STF-UP!" - DJ

Wow, I feel like I'm back in college. You must be a professor to demand for me to show my work.

Well, lets warm up with her backing of Don Imus. Yes, he is a friend, she hosted some of his shows and whatnot. Unfortunately, Mr. Imus made a racial comment that was inappropriate. Does Dr. Crowley rebuke him? No. She dedicates all of her time to rebuke those who has jumped his ship.

If you read her blogs that refer to Obama getting elected, she is constantly referring to his race as a factor for why he got elected. She brings up his race, and his race against the 'white woman with the mythical black president-husband' out of context to point out that his race was won by his race. BTW, how is someone given the name "mythical black president"? Because more blacks vote for him? Didn't more whites vote for him? Isn't he suppose to be president of the WHOLE USA including whites, blacks, latinos, asian, conservative, liberals?

Going back to Obama and understanding Monica's clear perception of his race, why is he not given the same benefit of the doubt as GWB? Monica has stated over and over in her blogs "President Bush might have of not done _____ perfectly, but at least he's trying to get it done". How come the 'black president' doesn't get that type of support? His plans aren't perfect, but at least he's addressing them and trying to make them right.

Monica seems to be on a rampage against muslims, which for the most part are people of color. If a person committs a crime but prays to Allah then it's terror. If Hasan was a bible touting Christian and did the same shooting, she would have dismissed this as just some crazy guy that let stress get to him. Ft. Hood was a horrible situation, but why not compare it to the VT massacre? 32 people died at the hands of a South Korean who didn't like his environment and had wrote and produced essays, plays and videos that should had been red flagged. Since this South Korean didn't say Allah or has connection to Muslim's then he just goes into our history as a 'crazy guy'.

Do I need to keep going?

Look, Monica isn't a bad person. Other than the occassional rolling her eyes when her 'opponent' is speaking, she seems nice and easy on the eyes. However, she's in the business to shock jock and to create conspiracies. Moderates don't get book deals or radio/tv time. Monica would rather sacrafice her faith, morales and common sense for 10 mins on the Bill O'Reilly show so she can promote this blog and upcoming merchandise that I'm sure you'll purchase.


You flunked the test, Dagwood. Unfortunately for you, there aren't any affirmative action programs here to prop your sorry arse up.

Dagwood wrote: "Mr. Imus made a racial comment that was inappropriate. Does Dr. Crowley rebuke him? No."

DJ replies: Does the comment Imus made acually require a rebuke from Monica Crowley? Remember we're talking about Don Imus. He's an entertainer you know, not an elected official that crafts and implements government policy. Obviously according to you she should.

That said, should the same standards be applied to black entertainers or anyone else for that matter who makes racially insensitive comments? For example: should not Obama himself be labled a racist and rebuked for making a racially insensitive remark about a certain white police officer? How about him calling his OWN grandmother a "typical white person"? Do you understand that that is a racial smear against white people?

I could go on ad infinitum... but you see, Dagwood, the sword cuts both ways. Whites for the longest time have bent over backwards to live in the spirit of a colorblind society, but there's very little if any reciprocity from "people of color" -- especially blacks. Now tell me again: Who are the the racists?


I love how veterans and right-winged non-veterans will rant and rave about "defending our freedom", but when a citizen decides to express their unpopular thoughts, they are attacked as being anti-American or anti-military.

To all the veterans who actually fought for my freedom, THANK YOU. But now leave me alone to exercise it as I see fit.


DJ- You assume too much.. And you know what happens when you assume right? ;)

I'm going to let you slide with the affirmative action comment because that will prove my point of Monica Crowley's racist agenda. Birds of a feather flock together right?

1st, if Monica is going to make a big rant about how badly people are treating Don Imus to a point of creating multiple blog posts, then she should be obligated to explain how severe/bad his comment was. The man made a horrible comment. There would be outrage if Monica had blogged about why she believes Mike Vick should get a 2nd chance in the NFL if she didn't also blog about how bad his actions were. Monica is all about minimizing the weakness in her arguements and exploding her agenda so stupid people can follow her. Yet nobody holds her accountable. Maybe you guys are too busy trying to look up her skirt or awaiting for the Nixon/Crowley sex tape. How did a 22 year old get a job interning for Nixon anyways... Ah, that's another subject for another day.

2nd, you're assuming that I believe Obama isn't racist or that I support the man. The subject isn't about Obama, it's about Monica. So you can call reverse racism, sideways racism, inside-out racism, it doesn't affect the point that Monica Crowley has a racist agenda.. Translation: The Cleveland Browns, St Louis Rams, Kansas City Chiefs are horrible but they do not mute the fact that Oakland Raiders suck.

Like I've written before. I'm moderate and your assumptions of me are 100% incorrect. And that is why, my friend, conservatives and republicans have a hard time getting my vote.


The comments to this entry are closed.