« The McLaughlin Group | Main | The O'Reilly Factor---TONIGHT! »

November 02, 2009



Yo Princess, we are glad to see
You're now behind Doug Hoffman in the 'NY 23'
Your support the Tea Rebels can now record.
If I was Sarah Palin I'd say 'Welcome aboard!'
As for that Scozzafava woman, that GOP dummycan,
You know, that card-checking same-sick marriage ACORN Republican,
That "moderate" hack who your friend Newt Gingrich would back,
Who even your friend Peter King would sing,
Who drops out of the race and to her disgrace
Supports the Democrat---you mean that ain't spitting in Hoffman's (and our) face?

That ain't a revelation
That this 'moderation'
Is just a GOP manifestation
Of the same Obamanation?

Yo Warrior Princess, welcome. Welcome aboard.
Could be fun to get a Republic restored.
You won't forget to bring your sword?

GRINGOBRO The Cracker Rapper



(i.e. Pamela Geller (ATLAS SHRUGS) tells libs of all stripes, all phonies, fakes and frauds, whether Republican, Democrat to Troll, to shove their talking points)

And Saturday, the Arctic Fox had the last laugh: Scozzafava dropped out of the race, saying, "In recent days, polls have indicated that my chances of winning this election are not as strong as we would like them to be." Palin responded generously, writing, "I want to personally thank Republican Dede Scozzafava for acting so selflessly today in the NY District 23 race. Now it's time to cross the finish line with Doug Hoffman so that he can get to work for District 23 and the rest of America."

Palin explained what was at stake: "With Congress poised to overhaul one-sixth of our economy with so-called health care 'reform' (which is really a government takeover of health care) and with plans to enact a cap-and-tax bill just as our economy struggles to recover, Doug Hoffman will be a voice for fiscal responsibility and common sense in Washington.

We need candidates like Doug now more than ever."

Scozzafava was not as generous. On Sunday, she showed her true colors: this enemy in our ranks announced that she was backing Democratic candidate Bill Owens, not the conservative Hoffman.

This shows just how bad things have become. The Republican Party has been hijacked. Conservatives have been driven underground by the RINOs and the DIABLOs (Democrats In All But Label Only). This leftish creep was insidious until we got clubbed over the head when the ultra-liberal media picked our presidential candidate -- the Gang of 14 tool John McCain.

We all sucked it up. We went along. We embraced the ticket in the spirit of AROO (Any Republican Over Obama), and we held our noses until Sarah Palin came along. Ah, just a spoonful of Sarah helped the medicine go down.

But now it's time to clean house. Newt and his ilk will be relegated to the dustbin of history, and deservedly so. Enough with the old, in with the true!

Nothing happens for decades, and then decades happen in a day. So it was with 9-11, and so it is with Barack Obama in the White House. This terrible compromise between the RINOs and the conservatives is over. In any compromise between individual rights and collectivism, collectivism profits. It's all on the back of the individual. Basta!

The new Republican partiers -- Palin, Michele Bachmann, Allen West -- these people are our future. The RINOs belong to the past. It is over for them. It's over for the Newts, the Romneys, the Steeles, the David Keenes, the Norquists, the Lindsey Grahams. Scozzafava's failure was just the beginning. You ain't seen nuthin yet. It is time to kick the RINOs to da curb.

The next traitor to go must be Olympia Snowe.

It's time to take back the Republican Party.

But first we must purge the voter rolls of all the Democrat fraud and skullduggery. Americans deserve clean elections.

It's time to take back America.

Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs website and is former associate publisher of the New York Observer.


Escaping Politically Correct


Malawi, has suffered. Its people were dependent on foreign grain charitable contributions to stem starvation. Now, they have John Deere tractors, combines, thrashers, the whole nine yards, and ..
they can now obtain, with loans, money for fertilizers. One man with his new equipment can now plant enough corn to more than feed his own family, he now having 90 extra bags of corn to sell. Of course the main problem in Malawi is drought. Now, if you rich western countries would just share your water, then the people of Malawi would be doing just fine.


I'm really FED UP with this constant drumbeat that us "rich western countries" should share our water or whatever it is!

I don't see any oil countries "sharing" their petrol with us when many WORKING Americans can't afford to heat their homes in the winter!!

Let the freaking SOWdis TRADE their oil for water and they can then give the water to the Malawians.

So far SOWdi hasn't done a thing for the "World community".

America has struck out. No money left. NEXT BATTER UP.



Heard the "nude grinch" joined Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Al Sharkton and Jesse Jackson at the White House with BO. He makes me sick.



MM, are you joking?




islam, the "religion" of peace no less, that keeps on GIVING:


How much MORE are we supposed to TAKE of this CRAP?!

When is enough ENOUGH??!!!




September 1929

"There is no cause to worry. The high tide of prosperity will continue." — Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury.

October 14, 1929

"Secretary Lamont and officials of the Commerce Department today denied rumors that a severe depression in business and industrial activity was impending, which had been based on a mistaken interpretation of a review of industrial and credit conditions issued earlier in the day by the Federal Reserve Board." — New York Times

December 5, 1929

"The Government's business is in sound condition." — Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury

December 28, 1929

"Maintenance of a general high level of business in the United States during December was reviewed today by Robert P. Lamont, Secretary of Commerce, as an indication that American industry had reached a point where a break in New York stock prices does not necessarily mean a national depression." — Associated Press dispatch.

January 13, 1930

"Reports to the Department of Commerce indicate that business is in a satisfactory condition, Secretary Lamont said today." - News item.

January 21, 1930

"Definite signs that business and industry have turned the corner from the temporary period of emergency that followed deflation of the speculative market were seen today by President Hoover. The President said the reports to the Cabinet showed the tide of employment had changed in the right direction." - News dispatch from Washington.

January 24, 1930

"Trade recovery now complete President told. Business survey conference reports industry has progressed by own power. No Stimulants Needed! Progress in all lines by the early spring forecast." - New York Herald Tribune.

March 8, 1930

"President Hoover predicted today that the worst effect of the crash upon unemployment will have been passed during the next sixty days." - Washington Dispatch.

May 1, 1930

"While the crash only took place six months ago, I am convinced we have now passed the worst and with continued unity of effort we shall rapidly recover. There is one certainty of the future of a people of the resources, intelligence and character of the people of the United States - that is, prosperity." - President Hoover

June 29, 1930

"The worst is over without a doubt." - James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor.

August 29, 1930

"American labor may now look to the future with confidence." - James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor.

September 12, 1930

"We have hit bottom and are on the upswing." - James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor.

October 16, 1930

"Looking to the future I see in the further acceleration of science continuous jobs for our workers. Science will cure unemployment." - Charles M. Schwab.

October 20, 1930

"President Hoover today designated Robert W. Lamont, Secretary of Commerce, as chairman of the President's special committee on unemployment." - Washington dispatch.

October 21, 1930

"President Hoover has summoned Colonel Arthur Woods to help place 2,500,000 persons back to work this winter." - Washington Dispatch

November 1930

"I see no reason why 1931 should not be an extremely good year." - Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., General Motors Co.

January 20, 1931

"The country is not in good condition." - Calvin Coolidge.

June 9, 1931

"The depression has ended." - Dr. Julius Klein, Assistant Secretary of Commerce.

Quotes compiled by Tim W. Wood - Cyclesman.com
Posted by atheo at 5:51 PM



"How much MORE are we supposed to TAKE of this CRAP?!

When is enough ENOUGH??!!!" - Ummah


When you're long dead and gone and deep in Hell where you obviously belong with the rest of your kind, so you can gleefully rip each other apart.

Valhalla... very close to the truth, only in truth Hell, and not what it's cracked up to be.

Line up Dupes... find out the hard way.


Savage is reading the White House guest list RIGHT NOW and "the nude grinch's" name is on it.

Check this out:

"However, Gingrich’s position as a Fox News regular may be in jeopardy because of his abandonment of the conservative candidate, Doug Hoffman, in a special election race in New York. One of the White House criticisms of Fox News is that it is an arm of the Republican Party. The regular use of Gingrich, a knee-jerk Republican who defers to party bosses, tends to support that thesis.

Since many people tune into Fox News to ascertain the conservative point of view, the regular use of Gingrich will become disconcerting and problematic to many members of its viewing audience. In a major break with some of his on-air colleagues, independent conservative and Fox News host Glenn Beck openly has questioned Gingrich’s embrace of the official Republican candidate, liberal Dede Scozzafava, in the race. Beck noted her ties to ACORN and interviewed her conservative opponent, Hoffman. The interview ran under the headline, “Principles or Party?” and is now featured on Hoffman’s website."



from MENSHEVIK (Bush) to BOLSHEVIK (Obama)

US businesses at risk as lender CIT Group files for bankruptcy
guardian.co.uk, Monday 2 November 2009 10.31 GMT

Thousands of small and medium-sized businesses in the US face financial difficulties and could go out of business after lender CIT Group filed for bankruptcy protection last night.

Although the company will keep operating, it is unlikely to be able to make the same number of loans as before. CIT provides working capital to small firms such as shops, their suppliers and restaurants, many of whom are already struggling in the recession.

In one of the biggest corporate failures in US history, CIT made its filing in the New York bankruptcy court yesterday, after a debt-exchange offer to bondholders failed. CIT said most of its bondholders have agreed a prepackaged reorganisation plan which will reduce total debt by $10bn (£6.1bn) while allowing the company to continue to do business.




That is so shocking to hear that I thought you might have been joking, MM!

Did he actually invite the nude grinch at the same time as these four terrorists of the Apocalypse were at the white House?!

How come this is not mentioned on the news??!!

Well, most of US here on the Memo KNEW what the Bama was all about.. he threw Ayers and Wright under the bus just long enough to trick the vote cattle.

I'm sure Bambi is busy dusting them off now..



Limbaugh is making excuses for the RINO nude grinch! "Nude is just trying to be a good soldier for the party"

Oh GREAT, Rush! How about someone being a good soldier for the PEOPLE??!!!!!!

No matter where I look I see the Party always comes before the People!

I am disgusted.

Posted by: Ummah Gummah | November 02, 2009 at 01:30 PM
Screw Rush. That RINO chick makes Obama look conservative.


RUSH: How about Dede Scozzafava? You know what? Dede Scozzafava has just screwed every RINO in the country by showing everybody who they are. It's what I say about radio, people say, "Rush, does it matter AM, FM?" No, no. Content, content, content, content. Content determines what people will listen to, and in politics, principle, principle, principle. Moderates by definition have no principles. They're wishy washy. A typical moderate is Lindsey Grahamnesty. A typical moderate. They're all over the place. They go with the flow. They think of themselves first. They are not guided by principle at all, and Dede Scozzafava has just delivered a teachable moment for those who lack a keen sense of the obvious. RINOs cannot be trusted. Republicans-in-name-only cannot be trusted. They aren't principled. You vote 'em into office and you're going to get cap and tax, you're going to get some version of Obamacare, you're going to get tax increases, you're going to get TARP bailouts, you're gonna get amnesty.

To betray her party, Dede Scozzafava at this point in time when conservatives have been sounding the alarm about the dangers of RINOs, is a gift. For Dede Scozzafava to endorse the Democrat in NY-23, I know a lot of people got mad about it and so forth, no, folks, it's great! Dede Scozzafava is showing everybody who Republicans-in-name-only are. Dede Scozzafava is illustrating precisely what moderate Republicans will do and who moderate Republicans are. She has just put an exclamation point on the problem with RINOs. They eventually end up exactly where most liberals do. They're just a little slower in getting there. But they end up where liberals are. Scozzafava has screwed every RINO in the country. We could say she's guilty of widespread bestiality. She has screwed every RINO in the country. Everyone can see just how phony and dangerous they are.

You know, 2010 might be a nightmare for PETA, two animals may become extinct, RINOs and Blue Dog Democrats. Pelosi's going to kill off the Blue Dogs, and conservatives are gonna finally get rid of RINOs. The American people have had enough. They want government out of their lives. They want disposable income, they want a burgeoning, growing economy with opportunity; they want their own doctors; they want cars not made by bureaucrats and public servants.



The banks are giving the Chinese loans, the Chinese are buying government bonds, the government is giving the banks free money, and the banks are now also buying government bonds. What is wrong with this picture?

Nobody is giving the US consumer zero interest loans.


That is so shocking to hear that I thought you might have been joking, MM!

Did he actually invite the nude grinch at the same time as these four terrorists of the Apocalypse were at the white House?!

How come this is not mentioned on the news??!!

I actally found the list on an MSNBC story. Don't know if the nude grinch was there at the same time as Wright and Ayers but he certainly was there the same time as Sharkton.

Guess Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers are not the same ones. Wow, how many Jeremiah Wrights and Bill Ayers do you know? I had no idea they were such common names. Wonder who the other Jeremiah Wright and the other Bill Ayers are and why were they invited to the White House.

Account Deleted

A clunker of a recovery:


Thank you for reading,


MM, are you joking?


Posted by: Ummah Gummah | November 02, 2009 at 08:26 PM

M/M does not kid around. If anyone is joking, it would have to be Michael Savage. Savage pointed out that Gingrich, along with said Obama worthies, was among those on the (partially disclosed) list of White House invitees.

I've heard no denials from Gingrich, his friend Monica, or anyone else.


You know, 2010 might be a nightmare for PETA, two animals may become extinct, RINOs and Blue Dog Democrats. Pelosi's going to kill off the Blue Dogs, and conservatives are gonna finally get rid of RINOs. The American people have had enough. They want government out of their lives. They want disposable income, they want a burgeoning, growing economy with opportunity; they want their own doctors; they want cars not made by bureaucrats and public servants.


Posted by: M/M | November 02, 2009 at 09:33 PM


Good teachable post. This is another example of why Limbaugh still matters, despite being Savaged as "the golfer." Savage can come up with penetrating insights and historic analogies, but nobody does nuts-and-bolts political analysis like Limbaugh. Hannity, immediately following him on air, is smart enough and humble enough to recognize this. That's why he, Limbaugh and Mark Levin have become the Three Musketeers who rip the clothes off the Lib-Left Emperor in non-Obamasuckling media.


Laura's E-Blast
November 1, 2009

(gringoNOTE: Laura, too, interviewed Newt Gingrich recently. Here's how she handled it.)

Of course "Republican" Dede Scozzafava endorsed the Democrat in the New York-23 congressional race! When I first got word of her dropping out three days before Tuesday's special election, I knew it was only a matter of time.

Ten days earlier, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was a guest on my radio show. He was booked to discuss his new historical novel, but I sensed history was unfolding in upstate New York and wanted to hear his justification for endorsing the liberal Scozzafava over her Conservative Party challenger, Doug Hoffman. The Republican National Committee, in typical tin-ear fashion, also supported Scozzafava. During a rather spirited back and forth, Gingrich's main contention was that the people of NY-23 had rejected Hoffman in the primary, and thus his "conservative friends" should support that decision. Yet the "primary" Scozzafava won was determined not by "the people," but by a gaggle of party pooh-bahs who obviously have their heads up their posteriors. Had these people not seen, felt, and heard the spirit of this summer's townhall events? Where were Republican primary voters rallying for a politician like Scozzafava, who is pro-union, pro-abortion, and -- as we've since learned -- pro-Democratic Party? The Republican Party needs warriors ready to fight for conservative principles; and yet Scozzafava couldn't even muster the courage to discuss taxes with a reporter from the Weekly Standard.

Listeners' reaction to Gingrich was overwhelming. No less than 95 percent of callers and emailers were outraged. For them, the country is already way beyond party affiliation; why fight for the RNC if it no longer represents core conservative values -- like fiscal restraint, individual liberty, and a pro-growth agenda? "If he doesn't want to be part of the solution, he needs to get out of the way," wrote one listener in Kansas . And from a mom of five in Syracuse: "He may be a brilliant thinker and writer, but he's soooo '90s." Ouch.

President Obama has done something no GOP pol has managed since Ronald Reagan -- he's spurring a reinvigorated conservative movement that transcends party, geography, and its own internal factions. It's now obvious the country didn't move left alongside Obama's ascendancy. The pundits and intellectuals who delivered election night eulogies to conservatism owe the public, and their own credibility, one big mea culpa. Conservatism is the most influential political philosophy of the past 100 years because it's built upon essential truths. Here's to more triumphs of orthodoxy over oscillation.



M/M definitely did well in digging this up. I remember now hearing that they invited people with the names Jeremiah wright and Bill Ayers in a deliberate attempt to draw fire from US so they could then say how ridiculous it all is.

Fact is they are nervous as hell and we are having an effect.

They wouldn't have sent all their agent provocateurs even to this little blog with the missive to disrupt things and muddy the waters if they weren't afraid of US.

Our "species" is hardly "extinct".

And if it ever were to become extinct, who would pay the taxes for all the little social experiments and who would pay for the upkeep of the U.nited N.azis?





Maybe Dick Cheney should run in 2012. I would definitely vote for him.



Maybe Dick Cheney should run in 2012. I would definitely vote for him.


Posted by: Ummah Gummah | November 03, 2009 at 10:57 AM

So would I, especially if he agreed to serve as Palin's VP and (when needed) mentor.

But that said, I still don't know if Cheney can go scot free in responsibility for the muck that Iraq became after the initial success of Shock-and-Awe. And since he was practially joined to Bush at the hip, virtually co-President in the war, who can ever make a case that he is in fact blameless?



That is true Gringo but I'd bet you a dollar to a donut that Cheney is way tougher than Bush.

He was only the Veep last time.

I'd vote for him if only to stick it to the libs and the MoFoes.



NY 23" and Sarah Palin

Originally Posted by gringoman
How significant is "NY 23" in Teusday's Congressional Election?

'Very', many will agree.

Here is another reason, I submit, for its importance.

It's a referendum on Sarah Palin.

We know the RINO and Democrat Talking Point. Palin is not taken seriously by enough voters. Their polls say only about 25% are really pro-Palin (these, of course, are conveniently labeled as "extremists" who do not represent "mainstream.") Their tired talking point usually concludes: 'Go ahead. Go with Palin, hah-hah. See where it gets you. We're begging you. Go Palin, so we can crush you. Hee-hee.) Then they put down the Saul Alinsky playbook and go back to bed.

Ergo, let's see what happens in "NY 23" Teusday Nov 03. Palin has come out four-square for the conservative Doug Hoffman. She in effect led the Republican dissidents who later supported Doug Hoffman AFTER she cleared the trail. Scozzafava, who the RINOS and libs call a "moderate," and who I call an "ACORN Republican," after dropping out of the contest as a Republican now dares to endorse the Dem candidate Owens AGAINST the conservative Hoffman. (Does this ACORN Republican even realize that her crass endorsement of the Democrat in effect gives away the RINO and liberal game? She's showing everyone what she and her kind really are. Rush Limbaugh got that right.)

So it's very clear. It's unusually clear. With Obama VP Biden up there plumping for the Dem Owens against the Palin Hoffman, it's even clearer.

Sarah Palin with Doug Hoffman: Will Sarah be the kiss of death (as RINOS and libs imply) or will she be the breath of life?

Let's see. November 03, 2009. 23rd Congressional District, NY.




gringoNOTE: Whether I agree or disagree with The Church on anything is beside the point. The point, for gringoVision, is about Libdom's cowardly double standard re Christians and other religions---especially Islam.

Archbishop's blog slams Gray Lady's
Hits 'anti-church' op-ed


Last Updated: 11:59 AM, November 3, 2009

Posted: 2:56 AM, November 3, 2009
New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan has condemned The New York Times -- blasting the Gray Lady and its columnist Maureen Dowd for what he says are examples of unfair, prejudicial and just downright mean anti-Catholicism.



REDSTATE//// NeoConScum writes: Tuesday, November, 03, 2009 11:00 AM
Charlie Crist Is So Smoooooth,Oil,Which
he won't allow to be drilled and pumped off our Florida Shore--while the ChiComs happily drill for the Cubans and Themselves--rolls off his perfectly coiffed gray hair and his flawless tanning club tan is the Pluperfect Politician Poster Boy.

Lady Sarah is rugged, independent, says it like it is, insensitive to RINOS & Lib-Lefties, shoots moose & wolves and flim-flam artists. The absolute opposite of Smooth Charlie. Go, Sarah! Go, Hoffman!


I actually found the list on an MSNBC story. Don't know if the nude grinch was there at the same time as Wright and Ayers but he certainly was there the same time as Sharkton.

Guess Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers are not the same ones. Wow, how many Jeremiah Wrights and Bill Ayers do you know? I had no idea they were such common names. Wonder who the other Jeremiah Wright and the other Bill Ayers are and why were they invited to the White House.

Posted by: M/M | November 03, 2009 at 06:21 AM
They were not invited.

William Ayers Visited White House – No, Not That One

The Obama administration has released a preliminary list of White House visitors as part of its promise to release to the public a record of people who came to the White House as well as "when they came, how long they were here, and who they met with."

The list, which is here, includes the names "William Ayers" and "Jeremiah Wright." But the White House says they aren't the Ayers and Wright that are known to the public.

"A lot of people visit the White House, up to 100,000 each month, with many of those folks coming to tour the buildings," White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said in a statement. "Given this large amount of data, the records we are publishing today include a few 'false positives' – names that make you think of a well-known person, but are actually someone else."

"In September, requests were submitted for the names of some famous or controversial figures (for example Michael Jordan, William Ayers, Michael Moore, Jeremiah Wright, Robert Kelly ("R. Kelly"), and Malik Shabazz)," he continued. "The well-known individuals with those names never actually came to the White House. Nevertheless, we were asked for those names and so we have included records for those individuals who were here and share the same names."

Among the names on the list that appear to not be "false positives" are Bill Gates and George Clooney.

The White House told CBS News that it has social security number records that show that the Ayers who visited and the controversial William Ayers whose connections to Mr. Obama were brought up several times during the campaign last year are not one in the same.

It's unclear why the White House is including the names of people who went on White House tours with their listing of those who have come to the White House on official business. It may be news to those who have gone on the tours that a record of their visit will be released to the public.

The White House announced in September that it would release the records of visitors from the previous 90-120 days every month, "aside from a small group of appointments that cannot be disclosed because of national security imperatives or their necessarily confidential nature (such as a visit by a possible Supreme Court nominee)."

Those releases begin in December. The White House had also said it would release information about visitors prior to the beginning of the disclosure program in response to specific requests. This release is in response to such requests, 110 of which the White House says it has processed. It covers specific requests about visitors between January 20, 2009 to July 31, 2009.

The comments to this entry are closed.