« A Fountain in The Sahara | Main | Count Barack Dracula »

March 27, 2009




No comments yet?

Nice to be #1!



GLENN: Senator, what is the, what is the one thing, I mean because people are really I think my audience is worn out. I think Rush's audience is worn out and Sean's is. I mean, they are invigorated because they believe it but, you know, I think they are worn out a little bit on, I've called, I've called, I've called, I've called. What is the one thing that people should do?

SENATOR DeMINT: It's to look back to themselves and the people sitting next to them at work or church. I still want people to call and e mail because it has helped us back people down on some pretty bad votes but don't look to Washington. America is not Washington. It's not Republican or Democrat. It's a very unique people that believe in freedom…


I’m worn out, but we have to keep fighting……Here is a list of tea parties in your state.


GLENN: Michele, I am concerned that we are on the verge of transformation that we may never get back.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: Yes, I am, too. I share that concern. Glenn, it's that serious. It's almost like radio shows like yours are the committees of correspondence that the Revolutionary War had where we're trying to get the word out to people who still love the fundamental freedoms that our country was founded upon.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: It is that serious that we're about to lose it.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Congressman, here's the problem. The Democrats and the Republicans have done so much damage and played so many games with the American people saying they are for term limits and then never doing them, saying that they are for smaller spending and then not doing it, saying that they are for protecting us in every way possible but then not doing it, saying that they are for border security but then not doing it, saying they are going to enforce our laws but they are not doing it. I mean, the list goes on and on and on and on. We are playing now with nitroglycerin and it is about to explode and there are people like me that believe we are truly in this area, it is we are truly ready to lose our country if we don't do anything and it's not a partisan issue. It is, there are a lot of Republicans that are lining up and doing the give act and everything else. They are right along with them on many cases. So
Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: It's terrible and I'm glad you brought it up. It's going to come to the house next week. I urge your listeners, make calls today to tell your member of congress, do not vote for that thing. But let me tell you, there's something that's happening this week in congress that could be the eventual unraveling for our freedom and it was this. I have also asked the treasury secretary and Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chair, if they would categorically denounce taking the United States off of the dollar and putting us on an international global currency because as you know, Russia, China, Brazil, India, South Africa, many nations have wind up now and have called for an international global currency, a one world currency and they want to get off of the dollar as the reserve currency.


CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: No, that's why we have to reel back in every commitment that we've made. It hasn't all been spent yet, Glenn.

GLENN: How will you do that? How are you going to Congressman, you are not going to do that unless the people I mean, two million, five million people go to Washington and I don't know I mean, look. You know, I just said

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: I agree, but they need to. The people at this point, they need to be armed with knowledge. People need to be armed with knowledge, which you are giving them and then what they have to do is use that knowledge. They need to use it, band together just like these tea parties people are doing. This is very effective. And come to Washington and let the establishment know, "Look, we love this country. We love it based on freedom. We don't want to go with an international currency and we don't want to yield our freedom and be bankrupt." And unfortunately the current administration really does believe in a social welfare state and they really do believe in economic equivalency which is not America.


Monica's favorite Congressman was just interviewed on GMA. He's not Bernard McGuirk, but I can understand why some women might find him attractive. Hey, Meghan McCain, he's single - repent!



This is how they indoctrinate their islam youth:


Notice the hate speech against Jews and Christians.




If you do go watch please take a moment to give them a BAD rating and FLAG for racism and bigotry. It does make a difference.

These are people living in OUR countries indoctrinating against US.




Funny we didn't get to hear about this BEFORE the election:


Can we say DECEPTION?!

Not that many of us didn't have an idea that this is what they'd be doing AFTER the election, of course.

Oh, but we were all a bunch of "paranoid racists", right?



Ladies, go out and show your support for Jim Tedisco for Congress. Unlike the Democrats (and a certain FORMER female N.Y. U.S. Senator), Jim Tedisco FOUGHT FOR the Bellevue Women’s Hospital, one of the few women’s hospitals in the country.



And all the animal rights and PETA people who want a strong animal rights advocate in Washington should RUN to the polls on Tuesday. Take a look at Jim’s animal rights record:

“He was the lead author of "Buster's Bill" which was signed into law in 1999, enacting felony-level penalties for aggravated cruelty to animals. Buster's Bill was named after an 18-month-old tabby cat who was doused with kerosene and burned to death by a Schenectady teenager in 1997. Previous to Buster's Bill becoming law, animal cruelty resulted in misdemeanor charges if any charges were brought at all. “

Here is more information about Jim’s track record FOR animals:


Are you looking for a Republican with cojones? RUN, don’t walk to the polls to vote for Jim Tedisco on Tuesday.

When “the sheriff of Wall Street”, former Governor Eliot Spitzer, referred to himself as a “f’ing” steamroller” in a heated discussion with Assembly Minority Leader Tedisco, Jim Tedisco DID NOT hide under the bed. He STOOD UP to Spitzer.

When Spitzer tried to steam roll over the 77% of voters who were opposed to giving illegals driver’s licenses, Tedisco REPRESENTED NY voters and fought Spitzer against the legislation that Spitzer attempted to cram down their throats.

THIS is exactly the type of Congressman we NEED in Washington. Send Jim Tedisco to Washington IMMEDIATELY. If you can’t vote for him, make a donation.

Good luck, Jim!

Ron Mwangaguhunga

Monica: The reference in that hastily put-together song on your show today linking President Obama and "Old English Malt Liquor" by your staff was more than a little disrespectful, it was racist. You might want to rein in your staff a bit with the hate-humor. The President of the United States looks more like a microbrew man to me:



Unlike the Democrats (and a certain FORMER female N.Y. U.S. Senator), Jim Tedisco FOUGHT FOR the Bellevue Women’s Hospital, one of the few women’s hospitals in the country.


Would that be the carpet bagger Hitlery who "fondly remembers her childhood watching the Cubs playing the Yankees"?


That lying sack of sh*t.



Monica: The reference in that hastily put-together song on your show today linking President Obama and "Old English Malt Liquor" by your staff was more than a little disrespectful, it was racist. You might want to rein in your staff a bit with the hate-humor. The President of the United States looks more like a microbrew man to me:


LIEberals promoted far more "racist" material when it came to George Bush and Dick Cheney.

Let's stop with the double standards already!



Before Al Gore Invented Global Warming or Global Warming Baloney.



Would that be the carpet bagger Hitlery who "fondly remembers her childhood watching the Cubs playing the Yankees"?
That lying sack of sh*t..
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | March 28, 2009 at 04:02 PM
Yes, and women remember that Hillary DID NOTHING to save one of the two women’s hospitals in the country, which was founded by a women.

Bellevue Woman’s Hospital was one of the most beloved hospitals in the community. Many people were born there they and hoped that their children would be born there.

Here is why:
“Bellevue’s superiority shouldn’t be overlooked
Schenectady, NY

Several weeks ago Bellevue Woman’s Hospital published its neonatal mortality statistics, which are nine times less than the national average and 10 times less than Schenectady County’s published figures.

On May 1 at Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital a meeting of the medical community was convened to discuss the impact of the Berger Commission’s recommendations. All were aware of Ellis Hospital’s outstanding ranking in cardiovascular surgery. An obstetrician posed a hypothetical question to the Ellis staff. “Suppose a government agency told you that you had to move your surgeries to an institution with 10 times your operative mortality.” There was no response, only looks of incredulity. No one in that room thought there was a remote possibility that that could happen, and I agree it would not.

Therefore, if, in spite of observations such as these, Bellevue is closed, it would mean that our society and our government place a higher priority on hearts damaged by age, smoking, obesity and unhealthy life styles than on innocent, pristine hearts of healthy newborns destined to beat for 80 years.“ http://www.miracleontroyroad.com/pressRelease.htm


I FAV Senator James Webb (D) of Virginia is bringing up American Prison Reform he wants an over haul he wants to kick nonviolent offenders out and put the violent offenders behind bars. He believes the current system isn’t serving anyone especially the American Taxpayer who is footing the bill to something like 68 Billion Dollars a Year. Maybe Monica can get him to come on her show? I Read it is going to be best of Imus next week. I would love to see Sen James Webb come on Imus in the Morning again.



In addition, Dr. Marola writes about Bellevue’s culture:

“Perhaps it is because of Bellevue’s founding by a courageous young nurse or perhaps it is because Dr. Marola has a life-long respect for the nursing profession; nurses are a particularly important theme of The Miracle on Troy Road. In his dedication, Dr. Marola writes, “…thank you to all the wonderful nurses with whom I have enjoyed working and who helped me deliver so many wonderful babies at Bellevue, Ellis and St. Clare’s Hospitals.”

Marola notes that Bellevue has always been known for its warm ambience, but he credits the professional example of Mary Grace Norlund Jorgensen, RN with setting a standard for excellence that to this day permeates the culture at Bellevue Woman’s Hospital. “It has been a constant over the years; as strong today as in nurse Jorgensen’s day,” says Dr. Marola. “Every effort of the institution from the CEO to the housekeeping staff is dedicated to the woman and her child.”


Again, here is an example of Assembly Minority Leader James Tedisco fighting for Bellevue Woman’s Hospital:

And while Assembly Minority Leader Tedisco was BUSY fighting to save the Bellevue Woman’s Hospital, Hillary somehow found the time to visit Rutgers right after the Don Imus controversy to discuss “the role of women in society.” Rutgers, by the way, is in New Jersey.


Monica was interviewing Assembly Minority Leader Tedisco today and wants to help him with the special election on Tuesday. Here is an organization that she might want to contact:


Just so PETA doesn’t miss the Humane’s Society endorsement of Assembly Minority Leader Tedisco:

The animal protection issues that Tedisco has supported include the following:

• He was the lead author of "Buster's Bill" which was signed into law in 1999, enacting felony-level penalties for aggravated cruelty to animals. Buster's Bill was named after an 18-month-old tabby cat who was doused with kerosene and burned to death by a Schenectady teenager in 1997. Previous to Buster's Bill becoming law, animal cruelty resulted in misdemeanor charges if any charges were brought at all.
• Since the passage of Buster's Law, he has introduced measures to upgrade the anti-cruelty statute, by requiring psychiatric evaluations before convicted animal abusers could ever own pets again, and by making it a felony offense to harm an animal in the commission of another crime.
• He has supported a wide range of animal protection bills, such as strengthening the penalties for spectators at dogfights and cockfights, cracking down on abusive puppy mills, requiring the use of alternatives to animals in cosmetics testing when available, establishing a task force on the slaughter of sick and crippled cattle for human consumption, banning the electrocution of animals for their fur pelts, prohibiting live animal markets near public dwellings where they pose a public health risk, requiring the accurate labeling of fur-trimmed apparel, and making it a crime to keep pets locked in cars during extreme temperatures.

HSLF is a nonpartisan organization that evaluates candidates based on their positions on animal welfare policies. HSLF does not judge candidates based on party affiliation or any other issue.


Monica: The reference in that hastily put-together song on your show today linking President Obama and "Old English Malt Liquor" by your staff was more than a little disrespectful, it was racist. You might want to rein in your staff a bit with the hate-humor. The President of the United States looks more like a microbrew man to me:


Posted by: Ron Mwangaguhunga | March 28, 2009 at 02:58 PM
You seem to be interested in lecturing Monica and us on who and who is not a racist, and what and what is not racism, Correct?

Are you ready to stand up like a man in real toe-to-toe debate, give and take etc? Or do you prefer, like a NaIJaman, to drive-by, hit with your little pearl of wisdom, and then run away rather than deal with the counter-argument?

If you're not just another Naijaman phoney of color or, worse yet, a Slimebert Smearington, hang around like you're serious and have a mind to prove it. You want dialogue on race, like they say you do, and not just stupid PC bromides? You can begin by checking out the coming YOU LIBERAL RACIST, YOU, by GRINGOMAN The Cracker Rapper (Rap like you never had it before but are about to get it, and more.)


Uh, oh, here comes Dick Gregory. Time to wash and style my hair.

POSTED BY: M/M | MARCH 27, 2009 AT 08:09 AM




Posted by: Ummah Gummah | March 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM

M/M set this up for a mischievous gringomanic reference to a ditty from Rodgers & Hammerstein's SOUTH PACIFIC, but I will resist the temptation. I will, I will, I will---even though M/M's Bernardo, I'm sure, would have said it on Imus and gotten a big laugh. (Yes, it's pretty raunchy. Did I say 'pretty'? Make that 'very'.)

Hint: It's got to do with men and a woman washing her hair.

Posted by: gringoman |

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.



For those who are interested in where Hussein was born they might want to research where - if - he was baptized.


Posted by: Ummah Gummah | March 26, 2009 at 03:29 AM

Yes, but gringoVision puts it this way. Why are the Republicans (the so-called ' Opposition') not looking into the Birth of an Obamanation?

We know what would happen to our Monica if she went out on the ledge by her lonesome. We understand that. We forgive her.

But what is the excuse of the Republican Party, a so-called band of so-called men, at a time when the Obots and their fools are threatening to turn the USA irrevocably into the USSA (United Socialist States of America)?

ps Where Bammy was born is only part of the issue. He was born with dual citizenship. Even his own toadies admit that much, as they continue to stonewall all his vital records---while the Republican monkeys see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil.

Monica may forgive her Republican castrati. Will history?


New York Post



March 28, 2009 --

DIRT doesn't matter. You don't defeat a trans-national terrorist organization by occupying medieval villages.

Yesterday, President Obama presented his "comprehensive new strategy" for Afghanistan and Pakistan. It was neither new, nor a strategy. Behind all the rhetoric, he just said, I'm sending more troops and more money.

Barack Obama? I heard Lyndon Johnson. The only LBJ touch that BHO lacked was the word "escalation."

The rhetoric was masterly. The content was drivel. He said, "The situation is increasingly perilous." Which situation? Why? For whom? Certainly, it's becoming more perilous for our troops as we escalate in support of the wrong policy.

Obama rightly identified the main threat to us as al Qaeda, which he wants to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat." Then why are his efforts overwhelmingly directed toward the Taliban?

I don't like the Talibs, but they didn't attack us on 9/11. Dirt poor, they just made the mistake of renting some fleabag motel rooms to al Qaeda. And they paid heavily for it.

The Taliban strategy is to make Afghanistan ungovernable for us. What if, instead of trying to claim worthless territory in the name of a corruption-poisoned Afghan government, we flipped the rules and just kept Afghanistan ungovernable for the Taliban?

We'd need far fewer troops. And the investment's return would be higher.

Or how about Obama's ringing claim that the Taliban have "nothing to offer the Afghan people but terror and oppression?" Many Afghans -- at least among the Pashtun plurality -- don't agree.

The tribals deep in those valleys and the Pashtuns in Pakistan feel a lot closer to the Taliban's values than to ours. They might not mind a new road, but they'll skip the bikinis and Budweiser, thanks. The Talibs are home-boys. We're the foreign element. Why is that so hard to grasp?

All of this circles back to the core of the problem -- and it's not Afghanistan. Afghanistan's not worth a mullah's hemorrhoid. Putting the bulk of our effort into Afghanistan amounts to attacking a crisis in California by rescuing Nevada. It's Pakistan that lies (and lies and lies) at the heart of this problem.

To his credit, Obama noted Pakistan's importance. Then he got all the solutions wrong.

Start with his inane -- but touchingly American -- statement that "the people of Pakistan want the same things we want." Oh, really?

How many Post readers think Sharia law would be a good idea? How about beating the crap out of women just for yuks? Or stoning them to death because they smiled at the wrong time? And let's ban alcohol, bare arms, dating and jobs for women. And grow those beards, fellas!

Yeah, we're tight. We're such good buds that, while the Pakistanis protect the worst elements within the Taliban, manipulate our key supply line and pander to terrorists, Obama wants to guarantee Pakistan's stunningly corrupt politicians $1.5 billion in aid every year. Plus military aid.

Why on earth should the Pakistanis help us when we reward them lavishly for screwing us?

And since it's still our policy to punish those who aid terrorists, we need to punish ourselves. We bear a portion of the responsibility for every Pakistan-backed terror attack on India. Why? Because the Pakistanis know that, no matter how brutal the deeds of their terrorist auxiliaries, we'll step in to "mediate" and prevent the Indians from retaliating.

Want a truly fresh strategy that would work? End all support of any kind to Pakistan. Close our embassy. Do what makes military sense and reduce our forces in Afghanistan to a level that can be supplied by air. And concentrate on destroying al Qaeda, not on "owning" village X. (Obama's approach just stinks of Vietnam.)

Imagine how different the situation would be if we weren't Pakistan's strategic prisoner and didn't stand between Islamabad and Delhi. What if the Pakistanis had to behave responsibly and stop sponsoring terror attacks against India -- or face India's wrath? Nuclear war? Pakistan would vanish, India would lick its wounds. And the Pakistanis know it.

And how about asking ourselves the fundamental question: "Why is India a success story and Pakistan a complete failure?" Any chance that backward Islam might have something to do with it? We can't bribe people to succeed.

Our president identified al Qaeda as Pakistan's No. 1 enemy. That's wishful thinking. Pakistan's leading enemy has always been corruption. No. 2 is its home-grown Islamist insurgency. Al Qaeda's way down the list.

Our pathetically naive president articulated one sound goal -- defeating al Qaeda -- then told us how he wasn't going to do it. Like LBJ, all he can think of is more troops and more aid. Can't we ask ourselves why the Taliban's thriving? After the military beatings we've given them? How many of our troops must die for an empty policy?

Ho . . . ho . . . BHO. . . Why don't your supporters go?


Super-Regulator Geithner Wants New Powers to Shutdown Businesses with "Systemic Risk"



Ron Paul 3.27.09 C4L pt 1




You raise the issue which the Republicans won't: The Birth.

As mentioned, it's not just about where the former Barry Soetoro was born (that's used by the Obamascam to mock the "birthers.")A huge issue is fact that, no matter where Bammy was born, he was born with dual citizenship---clearly a no-no for POTUS as settled by the Founding Fathers. This is a basic issue which the Obots must go all out to obfuscate, while the Republicans sleep. The craftier Obots do a quick admission of the fact, then sweep it under the rug as if it doesn't matter, since it won't to the average ignoramus. But real legal minds (as opposed to a Slimebert Smearington)know that it does matter.

Here's clarification via the indefatigable East European lady, ORLY TAITZ/ Who clearly has got what it takes.



DickMorrisReports 3/27/09



Our pathetically naive president articulated one sound goal -- defeating al Qaeda -- then told us how he wasn't going to do it. Like LBJ, all he can think of is more troops and more aid. Can't we ask ourselves why the Taliban's thriving? After the military beatings we've given them? How many of our troops must die for an empty policy?

Ho . . . ho . . . BHO. . . Why don't your supporters go?

Posted by: mjfell | March 28, 2009 at 10:29 PM

I saw this movie before. In fact I was in it.

What we're seeing now is a re-make, with different names and places etc. Sequels are rarely as good as the originals, but I'll reserve judgement for this one. Maybe somebody can come up with something new?

The big climactic scene in the original was known as The Story of the Decade, or The Fall of Saigon. That was when the entire blue-ribbon CBS staff fled in the panic and DCR, with Brit night man, stepped in for them and got the story.

More later on the script.


YouTube star summoned to White House?


The man who created two phenomenally successful "We The People" YouTube videos urging Americans to stand up against Congress and reclaim their republic now – or perhaps lose it forever – reportedly has been summoned to the White House by President Obama to discuss the subject matter of the short films.

Bob Basso, who posts videos under the name funbobbasso on YouTube, has created videos in which he portrays Thomas Paine, author of the "Common Sense" pamphlet that made the case for independence during the American Revolution.

Basso, whose website offers his services as a motivational speaker, uses the YouTube presentations to condemn "non-representing representatives" and warns, "Only when they feel the almighty wrath of 'We The People' marching in the streets from California to New York shouting 'We're mad as hell and we want our country back' will they get the message they work for you."

He was scheduled this week to appear on the "Jerry Doyle Show" when he told the radio host that Obama had personally invited him to meet in the White House "to discuss the disturbing nature of the videos."


Here's the song from South Pacific. It wasn't quite what I had in mind.




Do not be ignored!!



But speaking of Bernard


I didn't hear the song that Ron Mwangaguhunga was referring to but could Monica has a segment with a rapper, so maybe that is the song.

If it is, I would welcome the debate. I can certainly find many Rap and hip-hop songs with offensive lyrics.


Obama Betrays Supporters



Former Mobster Compares Obama's Thugs and Soros to the Mafia



Poor People Will Pay Obama's Ego Tax



Why Team Obama Hates Poor People


We heard a lot about those who were unable to "make it in America" during the 2008 campaign. Despite the clear record of opportunity that America has delivered for more people across every race and from every nation in the history of this earth, we were reminded again and again from then candidate Obama that poor people existed.

We were told a lot of things about them as well.

We were told that they were inept in their efforts to help themselves. We were told they were too dumb to make clear choices. And we were told constantly that the only way they would be helped is to grow government, shrink economic opportunity, and make them the modern enslaved demographic, to a government who couldn't care less what happened to them.

Democrats, and the progressive left in particular, exploit the poor, they use the poor, they write speeches about them, and manipulate their "unrepresented voices" in debates. But one thing is increasingly clear from the Obama administration and the popular left in America, they don't have any interest in helping them.

It is easy to explain how this can be true from a macro-worldview position looking at the President's policies. The bailout, the stimulus, the omnibus, and the proposed budget all do nothing to assist a poor person in finding independence and they all aim to create an enslavement to entitlements that dehumanize the individual, create embarrassment for their family, and ultimately rob that person of one of the most cherished gifts God grants us--the satisfaction of personal achievement.

But moving beyond Obama's budget policies, take a look at how the administration has teamed up to hurt the poor families of America with the program of "Cap and Trade." Essentially "Cap and Trade" is a punitive tax that in language would be levied against the largest production companies in our nation. But since no company in the history of mankind has ever absorbed a tax, the real persons being punished for their production means are the consumers of the goods that company produces. The company, by simply passing on the cost of the tax to the consumer, is eventually hurt by the increased prices and perhaps slower consumption but they don't pay the taxes. Companies NEVER pay taxes.

Customers who are in desperate need of what that company creates are the ones who have no choice, and are helpless in doing anything about it. The poor are impacted to a greater degree because of their own lack of capital to be able to fund entrepreneurial options to avoid such companies.

The administration especially hates the working poor. People who are trying to get themselves out of tough circumstances have been targeted by this administration to be forced into even worse circumstances--especially if they disagree. This would be largely accomplished by "card-check" legislation that President Obama promised union bosses he would see passed personally.

In making such a promise what President Obama has pledged is to take away the rights of the working poor who otherwise would be given the constitutional right of a secret ballot. Obama's policy direction on this matter would open up the working poor to direct harassment, threats, and even violence for the simple crime of not agreeing with the union boss. Disagreement that would not even be discovered if the secret ballot was left in place.

And it's not just the administration, but also many of the President's supporters that demonstrate this contempt for the poor... ...like prominent Obama supporter Melissa Etheridge.

Etheridge has joined a growing group of militants who engage in homosexual behavior who are now threatening to withhold their taxes from the administration or state governments until the ingredients of what constitutes a legal marriage can be redefined so as to apply to an entire cadre of sexual unions.

Since the left constantly tell us how generous they think this nation should be, by allocating the tax dollars that you and I put towards poverty relief, one would think that the personal paying of taxes would be a solid priority to the left.

And yet, at the first sign of someone not getting an entitlement they believe the entire History of Western Civilization owes them, they refuse to fund the things they say they believe in.

What liberals REALLY mean is that they would prefer law abiding people to fund government programs, but they really feel no personal compulsion to do so.

And this point brings us to the core of this premise...

President Obama lied to the American people in his silly analogy of a bus driver being limited as to the amount of money he could donate to charity in his prime time press conference last week. It was factually inaccurate and he portrayed himself, a wealthy American, as a "victim" in being able to personally donate to those in need. He did all of this to somehow justify his administration's latest attack against the poor in attempting to limit the taxable deductions of tax-payers towards the ministries and programs that have done the most good in helping the poor in America.

Taxing citizens more prevents them from being able to give to charity more. Taxing citizens more, and also punishing tax-payers for contributing more than a certain percentage of their income is the equivalent of declaring all out war on charitable organizations.

Any way you slice it, some say every way you do, Obama and his ilk show contemptible disdain for the poor.

They do so while using them, manipulating them, and exploiting them for their own political intentions.

And if Jesus were on this earth, he might just make a whip, beat them, and call them vipers.

What are we willing to do?



NY is going to repeal Rockefeller drug laws in an attempt to save money. I’ve been reading that other states are considering of doing the same because of the economy.


A caller on a radio show asked why we can’t use prisoners to do the jobs that illegals do. The radio host said that prisoners stopped being used during a time when jobs became scarce because they created competition for the regular labor force. Of course, the ACLU got involved and jacked up the costs.

I don’t see why we can’t reform the system so that prisoners have to earn their keep. This way we can reduce taxes and we don’t have to rely on illegals.



And how about asking ourselves the fundamental question: "Why is India a success story and Pakistan a complete failure?" Any chance that backward Islam might have something to do with it? We can't bribe people to succeed.

--The answer is obvious: Pretty much the same ethnicity. Pak is almost 100% moslem after all the ethnic/religious really cleansing they performed on all non-moslems there.

India still has millions of moslems who remain a vastly disruptive influence on Society there and one can only wonder what India might be today were it not for the centuries of moslem incursion into that far too peaceful and ethically advanced nation.

Now Europe is lowring her defenses and the effects are alreay quite clear.

I doubt that Europe will be able to withstand centuries of islam the way India has endured and strangely persevered.

What could this world be like and how wonderful indeed would it be witghout the scourge of islam!




Gringoman, all I am saying is that if one were to sleuth out such a thing as Mr. Obama's place of birth and the certificate is not forthcoming one could investigate the hospital he is said to have been born in or the church that baptized him and so on.

Surely there must be photographs and official records of these events.




Another cherry from the VAST ORCHARD of islam:


Extreme and disgusting violence warning. Be warned: THIS IS WHAT THEY DO!

They're instructing their young for the purpose too.



The LIEberals are outdoing themselves in the final days before the 20th Congressional District elections. If you listen to them, you would think that Obama, Schumer and Hillary VOTED AGAINST the original TARP bailout.


Disgusting illegals



Obama Citizenship - Lightfoot / Keyes v. Bowen 2/3



RNC's Michael Steele On President "I'm Done"





"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the United States. Empowered with the sovereign authority of the people by the framers and the consent of the legislatures of the states, it is the source of all government powers, and also provides important limitations on the government that protect the fundamental rights of United States citizens.


Teacher Unions vs. Poor Kids


The "education president" remained silent when his congressional Democrats essentially killed the Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) in the city where he now lives and works.

Of the 1,700 students, starting in kindergarten, in this private-school voucher program, 90 percent are black and 9 percent are Hispanic.

First the House and then the Senate inserted into the $410-billion omnibus spending bill language to eliminate the $7,500 annual scholarships for these poor children after the next school year.


Barack Obama and Alinsky's Rules for Psychopaths


A psychopath is a person without conscience; someone who constantly breaks the moral rules of the community. Saul Alinsky was a "community organizer" who found a career that fit that personality disorder. In the Orwellian upside-down world of the Left, community organizers disorganize communities. That is the meaning of revolution, to overturn whatever exists today in the raw pursuit of one's own power.

Alinsky boasted about his close alliance with Frank Nitti, Al Capone's second in command in the Chicago Mob during the 1930s. Al Capone's Mob were domestic terrorists, and not for any noble cause either. They poisoned the Chicago politics of their era. Alinsky's close alliance with Frank Nitti tells us something crucially important today. Alinsky was also a lifelong ally of the Stalin-controlled Communist Party, at a time when Stalin was known to have murdered tens of millions of people. He was proud of building a bridge between organized crime and the power hungry Left. That tacit alliance may continue today.

Alinsky's personality fits the definition of a psychopath -- someone who has no guilt or shame toward others. But Alinsky also discovered how to teach psychopathic behavior to college students. That is the key to his success: To persuade hundreds of thousands of ignorant young people that it is much more moral to be immoral. Or, as Bill Ayers famously said, "Bring the Revolution home; kill your parents."

Bill Ayers is now a highly influential professor of education. That is not an accident; it reflects a deliberate program of radical agitation and propaganda through the school systems. If you want to know who brought down American education, Bill Ayers is part of the answer.

A lot of the Boomer Left is marked by psychopathic behavior, in politics and in the rest of life. That is why the actions of the Left are so shocking to many of us.



I mentioned something similar to my husband, what's wrong with the sheriff joe arpaio approach to recidivism:) I would like to see violent criminals incarcerated instead of them making Billionaires. According to James Webb about 25 billion dollars a year in illegal drug profits off of U.S. citizens. Hillary blames Americans, well what else would we expect? They Our Leaders and Lawmakers, can't take responsibility for any of their neglect of our Country...as in Failing to secure our Borders and Ports...almost 8 years after 9/11. Instead Hillary blames Americans...I've got an FYI for Madame Secretary all Americans are not hooked on Mexican Drugs...of course considering how the last November election turned out, she probably thinks we are all imbibing something:)


Who will raise kids: Mom, Dad or state?
67 legislators in D.C. press Congress to add parents' rights to Constitution


Smith pointed to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, an internation treaty approved by the Clinton administration but stalled by opposition in the Senate, as one example of governmental attempts to infringe on parental rights.

"It's possible that in the near future, the United States may significantly weaken the rights of parents to raise their children," Smith wrote. "Crucial decisions that parents are accustomed to making, such as what our children read, who they associate with, what kind of discipline is used, whether we take them to church, or whether we homeschool, all become decisions for the state if the United States ratifies the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child."

He continued, "By allowing the government to define and determine what is in the 'best interests of the child,' outside the context of abuse and neglect cases, the UNCRC in effect diminishes the parental role, replacing it with government supervision."

The comments to this entry are closed.