President Obama launches his re-election effort today. He's kicking it off with no official governing business today; instead he's spending the day at campaign and fundraising events. Five of them, to be exact.
He's already spent $345,000 of campaign dough on a propaganda film about his life and "achievements" in office. He's already attended more fundraisers at this point in his term than any other president. He's already got a tech office set up in Silicon Valley to carpet-bomb social media with campaign messages and organizing. In fact, Politico reports today that he's got high-tech operations already watching you on the web. He's already been alighting on college campuses to get the kids riled up. And he's been egging on the Far-Left as they orchestrate bogus "movements" like Occupy Wall Street and the "war on women."
So while he's officially launching his campaign today, he actually hasn't stopped campaigning since 2004, when he kicked off his national presence at the Democrat National Convention. Campaigning is what he does, and he's really good at it. The GOP is still mired in a protracted primary race, which means that Obama is enjoying a really long lead time.
The problem for Obama is that unlike in 2008, he actually has a record this time, and it ain't pretty. He's going to have a much tougher time now that "hope and change" has turned to sludge. But the Republicans had better be aware of all of the weapons Obama already has working in his political arsenal, and start now---even absent a nominee---to line up our own. Running against Obama is serious business. Time to get serious.

The Republican nominiee needs to stay focused on the economy. Romney, IMHO, is the best prospect to do just that.
Posted by: DJ | March 16, 2012 at 08:57 AM
///And he's been egging on the Far-Left as they orchestrate bogus "movements" like Occupy Wall Street and the "war on women."////
Egging them on? Sweetheart, would that include the trolling psychopaths from Progistan who cyberstalk your website 24/7, even with violent disgusting obscenities as were seen here very recently, and even shrieking like inmates in the asylum, that you want them here for their "free speech rights"? Would it? And with good timing for the 2012 Election season.
Do you want such troll trash at your website?
Why won't you tell us, like a Conservative Warrior Princess, what you want here and what you don't want here? We'd rather hear it from you, the hostess, than from these obnoxious degenerates and parasites.
Much rather.
Posted by: gringoman | March 16, 2012 at 09:02 AM
Ummah,
Do you know of any other website in the vast blogosphere that tolerates the osbscene troll invasion that Monicamemo puts up with? Can even these arrogant psychopaths name one? Have you ever heard these parasites name even one?
Now a special question, Ummah.....
Is it just a coincidence that this travesty is happening at a GOP-oriented website? And does this tell you anything about the Republicans in the coming Election?
Posted by: gringoman | March 16, 2012 at 09:12 AM
The Republican nominiee needs to stay focused on the economy. Romney, IMHO, is the best prospect to do just that.
Posted by: DJ | March 16, 2012 at 08:57 AM
Dream on, DJ. While Willard recites what's written for him by his pricey handlers, the billion dollar Class War Marxelrods and their media maids will stay focused on plutocrat turkey.
Anybody can see the shape of the coming Election by the blatant and extremely aggressive hijacking of "conservative" Monicamemo. (Well, the few who've been here should know, anyway.)
Where have you been, DJ? I used to think that was you here---not a greater Detroit doppelganger.
Posted by: gringoman | March 16, 2012 at 09:24 AM
Gringoman,
Basically it comes down to a choice between Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney. Compare those three and ask yourself which has been more consistent and coherent on the central theme of what this election is all about; that being economic issues! Then ask yourself which of the three is the best qualified to solve the budget crisis along with the larger economic problems -- which,BTW, are global in scope and scale. It's obvious to any objective observer the answer becomes quite obvious: Romney, BY FAR, has the best skill set for the job.
Posted by: DJ | March 16, 2012 at 09:40 AM
Another thing I can say for Romney is he has identified Obama's real vulnerability: his failed economic policies. That's why Romney's campaign will be narrowly focused on that vulnerability. He's not allowing himself to be distracted by peripheral issues such as contraception or NASA etc. etc. He is staying focused on fixing the economy and balancing the budget. But moreover. he's highlighting Obama's failed accomplishments in those particular areas. That's how Obama can be beat and Romney knows it!
Posted by: DJ | March 16, 2012 at 09:51 AM
Beware of President Obama's circus antics that will ingratiate himself to the voters.
He will pull a huge rabbit out of his hat. This huge rabbit will make the President endearing to many voters. Don't fall for the trick.
If gasoline stays high I hope the voters treat the Democrats like they treated the Republicans in 2008.
Posted by: Brian | March 16, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Which GOP-er is Progistan's best bet for putting America in the hospital? With Obamaneycare, Alas, this isn't a trick question. Does anybody need a second guess?
Okay, DJ, you can have an extra guess, especially since you seem determined to think that Romney's "focusing" on the economy will save his phoney butt from complicity in what many economists say will devastate the US economy in years to come---in addition to neutralizing what should be one of the biggest clubs to beat the Obots over the head with---how they rammed this insane 2000-page health care bill down America's throat in the dead of night, making dirty deal after dirty deal, behind closed doors. And now the incredible Goopers are getting set to anoint the bloody Godfather of Obamacare!
And you think only the libniks are nuts?
Posted by: gringoman | March 16, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Is it just a coincidence that this travesty is happening at a GOP-oriented website? And does this tell you anything about the Republicans in the coming Election?
POSTED BY: GRINGOMAN | MARCH 16, 2012 AT 09:12 AM
--
I take your question as a rhetorical one, o Gringoman since I am well aware that you know what my answer will be:
It tells us an awful lot. More than we want to know. We shall have to ensure that the Goopers don't snatch defeat from the steady jaws of victory.
In other words: It tells us that the Goopers are a bunch of.. rhymes with wussies who are just going through the motions.
They're not nearly as serious about winning as the other side is.
ONLY the American People are standing up and - since that is the only alternative to this atrocious Obaminable Regime at the time - will vote Republican.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 10:21 AM
Romney said he the first thing he'd do as pres would be to issue an Executive order repealing Obamacare. Then it's up to the Congress to do the rest of the job rooting out Obamacare's ill effects. We not only need Mitt as pres, but a majority in both houses.
Posted by: DJ | March 16, 2012 at 10:22 AM
.
In fact, Politico reports today that he[Obama}'s got high-tech operations already watching you on the web.
--
No sh*t, sherlock!
And what are you going to DO about it, Ms. Crowley?
chirp.. chirp.. chirp?
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM
If Romney is the saviour of the economy, what
-exactly- is his plan? I have heard him repeat over and over (ad nauseum) that he will repeal Obamacare, lower corporate taxes, build a bigger military, and "put people back to work"...
I fail to grasp anything else.
Posted by: LongRifle | March 16, 2012 at 11:44 AM
College campus reporting in!
Most where I'm at are either excited about Ron Paul or Obama. This time around it seems like more people are enthusiastic about Ron than Obama; Barack seems to have lost a lot of his mojo with people need the center.
I also think that when Romney is the candidate my peers who are supporting Ron probably wouldn't vote for him or possibly even cast for Obama. I've heard rumors that Ron and Mitt have been in talks (or possibly Rand Paul), which I think is a good strategic move even if false. It would be smart of Mitt to take a swing at the college vote, and in my opinion getting the enthusiasm of the Ron Paul base could be the rabbit in the hat he needs to win.
Posted by: Hox | March 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM
A little off-topic, but...I love America and the Free market, which can solve any problem to make a buck.
In 1994, Kalifornia passed a ban on so-called Assault Rifles with a laundry list of prohibited features (when assembled together).
COLT -in its Market oriented wisdom- has found a way to circumvent (LEGALLY, of course) the state's draconian laws and is once again producing a "CA Compliant" version of its M16 and M4.
Complete with bayonet lug, flash hider, and other "evil" features, the guns are now once again available to Free Men (and women) in all 50 states...
Gotta love it.
Posted by: LongRifle | March 16, 2012 at 11:55 AM
Feel that longrifle. Regulation in general is in such excess here. This why international investors prefer to put their money into china's economy over ours. We need to let the market decide what works and what does not thats what creates wealth.
Posted by: Hox | March 16, 2012 at 12:33 PM
If Romney is the saviour of the economy, what
-exactly- is his plan? I have heard him repeat over and over (ad nauseum) that he will repeal Obamacare, lower corporate taxes, build a bigger military, and "put people back to work"...
I fail to grasp anything else.
POSTED BY: LONGRIFLE | MARCH 16, 2012 AT 11:44 AM
--
Of course Mittens fails to tell us HOW he will do all these things.
Meaning he really has no intentions of doing any of it.
If he were serious he'd say 'America, I need you to give me a Republican Congress and a Republican Senate so that we can UNDO THE DAMAGE that four years of the wonderchild's unchecked liberalism have wrought upon the Nation.'
At this moment I am still waiting to hear something to that effect from any of the Candidates.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 01:05 PM
The former governor's wife of my state just died. She was known for having said "My husband would not have gotten anywhere without me."
Reminds me a little of Mrs Bush. There is something about a woman backing up her man. She can get in places unobserved, she can apply charm to obtain agreement in a nonthreatening way, and she can remember that little thing that makes a difference.
So why can't men do the same for a woman candidate? The Clintons clearly display the asymmetry. As for the Obamas, some thought Michelle is the real president, with Barry actually backing her up. After all, who sat down next to George Clooney?
Posted by: Chief Joe | March 16, 2012 at 01:51 PM
"Time to get serious." - Monica Crowley
And with that, here ya go, Princess. The only lies about the man the GOP has left:
1. He's a serial axe murderer. Yep, sneaks out in the middle of the night and kills babies. Hacks their heads off. Mostly Jewish, but every now and then, a white baby. Preferably with conservative parents. Not even a drop of blood is left behind, and the reason for that comes later.
2. He takes the bodies home to the White House and Michelle cooks them up for State dinners. Pot pie, they call it, because one of the other main ingredients is marijuana.
3. The reason Obama cares so much about women's bodies and issues is because he's really genetically a woman. It's true, Michelle is also a man and Obama is the one who got pregnant and bore their daughters. True. Breitbart had a film that proved it, and that's why he was murdered.
4. Both Obama and Michelle and the kids are not only the opposite sex masquerading as the opposite sex, they are really Reptilian aliens wearing the skins of dead human beings. There are MANY youtube videos that prove this beyond all shadow of any doubt.
5. Obama really is the Antichrist. No, it's true, all the prophecies about the Antichrist being universally loved and hailed as the ultimate man of faith were lies, all "true" "christians" know on sight that the hatred they feel for him is not racism, but the fact that he is the Antichrist in the flesh.
6. Obama has the SS number of a dead man because he, himself, is the walking dead, the antichrist possessed by Satan himself. The SS number proves it. No, it's true, he survived a fatal assassination attempt head wound right after he was elected during a parade and the entire thing was hushed up by rounding up all the witnesses who were gassed, burned, and the ashes dumped into the Atlantic. True. Photos and videos of the scars are all over the internet.
7. Obama's end game is to get the entire United States nuked by China and Russia and punished by god for not protecting the holy state of Israel and immediately nuking every last living person, slave, farm animal, and pet in Iran when they said "Snap, niggah!".
8. Obama is really a secret Republican mole.
There. In SatanUG's words, "I FIXED IT FOR YA."
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:05 PM
Oh, my apologies. In number 7, I translated, which is not kosher when using quotes.
The actual phrase used by Israel and SatanUG ordering Obama to immediately nuke every last living person, slave, farm animal, and pet in Iran was
"Snap, Schvartze!"
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:21 PM
"In fact, Politico reports today that he's [Obama] got high-tech operations already watching you on the web." - Monica Crowley
Mr. President. Call me. I need another assignment. At your convenience.
Yes, the cell is preferable.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:24 PM
"And what are you going to DO about it, Ms. Crowley?" - SatanUG
I vote for switching sides, publicly.
ASAP.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:28 PM
And I second! Vould be goot to see Frau Crowley reveal her inner liberal at last, vould it not?
Austin Powers IV. Coming soon to a theater near you 2013.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 16, 2012 at 02:31 PM
And I have to say, I LOVE Jesus man's makeover.
Posted by: Frau Farbissina | March 16, 2012 at 02:32 PM
"We need to let the market decide what works and what does not thats what creates wealth." - Hox
And what will finally get all American workers, sans unions, down to third world slave wages with their kids in the factories too.
The market ALREADY decides what creates wealth.... for the wealthy:
Slave labor for everybody else.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:39 PM
"If Romney is the saviour of the economy, what
-exactly- is his plan? I have heard him repeat over and over (ad nauseum) that he will repeal Obamacare, lower corporate taxes, build a bigger military, and "put people back to work"...
I fail to grasp anything else." - longrifle
Because he never finishes the sentence with the full truth:
"put people back to work..." AT THIRD WORLD SLAVE WAGES DETERMINED BY THE FREE MARKET.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:42 PM
"I LOVE Jesus man's makeover." - Frau Farbissina
Thank you, Frau, and for all your hard work behind the scenes raising my worldwide profile.
XOXOXOXXOXOXOXXOXOXOXOXOXXOXOX
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:43 PM
I LOVE Jesus man's makeover." - Frau Farbissina
Thank you, Frau, and for all your hard work behind the scenes raising my worldwide profile.
XOXOXOXXOXOXOXXOXOXOXOXOXXOXOX
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:43 PM
You do know you are talking to yourself, right?
Posted by: LongRifle | March 16, 2012 at 03:20 PM
.
LOL
Nice pas-de-sox there.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 03:24 PM
XOXOXOXXOXOXOXXOXOXOXOXOXXOXOX
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:43 PM
You do know you are talking to yourself, right?
POSTED BY: LONGRIFLE | MARCH 16, 2012 AT 03:20 PM
--
The X-lax aka LESLIE BELL is bringing back an old sock puppet there.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 03:56 PM
Grasping at Energy Straws
In February 2012 New York Democratic Senator Charles Schumer called upon Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to request Saudi Arabia increase their oil production to make up for potential disruptions in the world’s oil supply resulting from Iranian saber-rattling. Schumer’s unhidden rationale was that such a pledge from the Saudis would drive down gasoline prices in America
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/216057-schumer-saudi-arabis-plan-to-increae-oil-output-will-lower-gas-prices
This ill-advised strategy was clearly politically driven. While the idea of higher gasoline prices, and the accompanying increase in the price of gas dependent goods and services is consistently rejected by average Americans, this is a blatantly partisan call for a short-term fix. This temporary, non-solution, suggested in order to perpetuate the false narrative that America’s economy is improving thanks to "progressive" policy decisions does absolutely nothing to reduce America’s dependency on foreign oil. Quite to the contrary, it exacerbates it.
On March 15, 2012 Reuters reported that during British Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent trip to the U.S. the current White House occupant proposed releasing emergency oil reserves as a way to reduce world oil prices.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/03/15/uk-obama-energy-spr-idUKBRE82E00U20120315
Were the White House to make such a decision, it would be yet another desperate attempt to lower gas prices by whatever means possible. Tapping into the emergency oil reserves is a bad idea. Those reserves are there for use during a pressing national emergency. Tapping in to them every time there’s an increase in the price of a barrel of oil is both gross mismanagement and a misguided misapplication of the stockpile. Not only will the reserves need to be replenished with what might well turn out to be more expensive oil, tapping into them now does nothing to address the long-term problem.
"progressives" continue to grasp at short-term straws frantically trying to make themselves look good in the eyes of low information, sound bite voters. They’re willing to do whatever it takes to win the 2012 election, even if decisions made to make themselves look good in the short term are not sound long term solutions. As radical "progressive" political strategist and leftist hero Saul Alinsky dictated: the ends justify the means.
In the interest of national security and job creation, the United States should put Americans back to work delivering American energy to Americans. This is the best way for America to become energy independent while boosting the economy. Trying to force "green energy" on America’s economy overnight will only contribute to the collapse of that economy. Evidence: Spain’s troubled financial situation and extremely high unemployment.
America doesn’t need a broken economy. America doesn’t need short-term price fixes driven by partisan political decisions. America needs and deserves sound, long term solutions that will result in energy independence.
Drill here. Drill now.
http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/grasping-at-energy-straws/
Posted by: mjfell | March 16, 2012 at 04:43 PM
More obamacare Lies
“obamacare” was sold on a lie and passed against the wishes of the majority of Americans.
To make matters worse, in an unprecedented move, the man who administers Medicare and Medicaid was appointed in a clearly obvious move to bypass the Constitutional provision for Legislative oversight.
You won’t be keeping your healthcare and your doctor if you like them. There’s going to be a single payer system complete with rationing. It was sold as ”a robust public option” because that sounds so much better than death panel. However, if you listen to the words of the head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, you’ll see exactly where he stands on the subject.
Consider this bit of news reported by Investor's Business Daily:
The strategy of hide and delay may have collapsed with a new Congressional Budget Office report that reveals that the current 10-year cost of ObamaCare is an astounding $1.76 trillion. That's nearly double the $900 billion President Obama told a special session of Congress on Sept. 9, 2009, that ObamaCare would cost. He also claimed the "plan will not add to our deficit."
The new projection is from 2013 to 2022, and when 2014 arrives and costs and taxes are in sync, the 10-year cost of ObamaCare is expected to be well in excess of $2 trillion. Fact is the administration has no clue and never had one concerning how much ObamaCare and its consequences would drive up costs, a fact grudgingly admitted to by Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, under questioning by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.
Johnson noted that we were promised family premiums would drop by $2,500 once ObamaCare and its insurance exchanges were up and running. But the Kaiser Family Foundation has released a study saying that in anticipation of ObamaCare's arrival, family premiums are up $2,200.
http://news.investors.com/article/604400/201203141851/cbo-obamacare-cost-double-obama-vow.htm
Healthcare is not a "human right". It’s a commodity. It doesn’t matter if the government redistributes wealth to pay for the healthcare needs of the collective or if you pay for it yourself, it’s still bought and paid for. It’s still a commodity. Healthcare is NOT a right.
BTW, you’re born with rights that are God given. Government does not give your rights to you. As John F. Kennedy so eloquently stated in his 1960 inaugural address "The rights of man come not from the generosity of the State, but from the hand of God".
"progressives" MUST be voted out of office in November 2012.
http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/more-evidence-obamacare-was-sold-on-a-lie/
Posted by: mjfell | March 16, 2012 at 04:46 PM
"You do know you are talking to yourself, right?" - longrifle
Really?
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 04:48 PM
"progressives" MUST be voted out of office in November 2012." - MJFellSpam
And when they are not, and by a landslide, can we take that as your promise to leave?
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 04:49 PM
"Drill here. Drill now." - MJFellSpam
Fantastic! Nurse!! Patient is fully sedated?
Mayfield head clamp!
Nurse! My drill!
Brzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 04:53 PM
Doctor Bombay, do you really think you'll find sanity in MJFellSpam's cranial cavity?
Of course not, why do you think they call it a cavity?
We're drilling for OIL!
AH... and here it comes!! Peanut, I think!
Nurse! My plastic jug please!
My nurse always has the nicest jugs, don't you think?
Muah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.
(Yes, I used to work for Screen Gems.)
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 04:57 PM
"Really?" - xbjllb
Really.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 04:59 PM
"Beware of President Obama's circus antics that will ingratiate himself to the voters.
He will pull a huge rabbit out of his hat. This huge rabbit will make the President endearing to many voters. Don't fall for the trick." - Brian
The rabbit will lay chocolate eggs that will, when put into your gas tanks, turn into full tanks of free gas.
What's not to like?
OBAMA/CLINTON 2012
Oh, wait a minute, HILLARY'S an even bigger rabbit.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 05:08 PM
I will say this thread went south quick.. also skiped a bunch.
ATM drinking 1.75 gin and tonics, happy Pattys day MONICA
At a bar near campus, thanks to me they now have fox news on.. except the 5 is being drained out by horrible music.
Posted by: Hox | March 16, 2012 at 05:11 PM
Then of course, there's always the ultimate rabbit trick, or rather, the rabbit test... a younger brother for Malia and Sasha, perhaps?
Go ahead, conservatives. Kick a pregnant woman out of her White House.
Dagnamit, Mr. President, where's MY paycheck for such machiavellian genius?
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 05:13 PM
"except the 5 is being drained out by horrible music." - HOX
Horrible television and trash propaganda covered by horrible music.
Sounds apt to me.
Smart bar you're crawling in.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 05:15 PM
IF (and it's still a very big IF) Obama were to pick Hillary as a running mate, with the women that would come running the GOP could run god (THEIR god) on the ticket and lose with all the women (even their own) they've lost over the 1600 Church takeover on contraception.
And if the First Lady announced a pregnancy?
Pack it in. ALL over.
And with conservatives fleeing the country, think how many jobs and country club and CEO slots that will free up for the rest of us.
(Yes. He really did it. He did the John Lennon "Obama more popular than god" thing.
Of course, when he said it, he meant the god of the conservatives, which has been Satan FROM DAY ONE.)
In fact, that's the EXACT problem of the Conservatives: they already ARE, in effect, running THEIR god of intolerance, hate, enforced cannon-fodder making, and eternal religious war, on THEIR ticket.
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 05:24 PM
My, won't THIS be fantastic reading with St. Paddie's Day hangovers...
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 05:25 PM
OBAMA/CLINTON 2012
xbjfrauleslie
D-E-L-U-S-I-O-N-A-L
Posted by: LongRifle | March 16, 2012 at 05:41 PM
I'll contend I'm at a seedy bar.
But the five is quality programming. If I wasn't so deep in the bag id try to have a intelligent conversation but it's not happening. I'm in minx assassin mode right now bro... these ladies are more interesting
Posted by: Hox | March 16, 2012 at 06:07 PM
Oh, wait a minute, HILLARY'S an even bigger rabbit.
POSTED BY: XBJLLB | MARCH 16, 2012 AT 05:08 PM
--
I wouldn't call her a rabbit. A heifer in a pants suits is much more descriptive IMHO.
.
Posted by: Ummahgummah | March 16, 2012 at 06:51 PM
"I will say this thread went south quick.. also skiped a bunch." --Hox
You'll soon find out EVERY thread here goes south. Thanks to troll trash such as Jay and XBJLLB.
Posted by: Lurker | March 16, 2012 at 08:08 PM
Conservatives always claim that it's Liberals who the racist ones.
But, there is a hude demand for T-shirts and Bumperstickers with messages such as this one:
The bumper sticker reads, "Don't Re-Nig in 2012." And in smaller print below, "Stop repeat offenders. Don't' reelect Obama!" The sticker also features an image of the Obama campaign logo crossed out.
Posted by: jay | March 16, 2012 at 09:06 PM
Is it just a coincidence that this travesty is happening at a GOP-oriented website? And does this tell you anything about the Republicans in the coming Election?
Posted by: gringoman | March 16, 2012 at 09:12 AM
Noticed Conservative trolls on Liberal sites.
Posted by: jay | March 16, 2012 at 09:08 PM
Posted by: xbjllb | March 16, 2012 at 02:43 PM
You do know you are talking to yourself, right?
Posted by: LongRifle | March 16, 2012 at 03:20 PM
By you posting your comment.
SHOWED THAT YOU LISTENED!
can't comment on what you didn't noticed!
Posted by: jay | March 16, 2012 at 09:14 PM
Noticed that MJFELL posted his usual spiel.
Monica could comment about chickens on the farm. And, MJ will still post his,"this has nothing to do with the thread. But, ask me if I care"
Posted by: jay | March 16, 2012 at 09:18 PM