« The Bill of Rights Hangs By a Thread | Main | Mr. Bipartisanship »

June 29, 2010

Comments

WowZER

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE MENTAL DISORDER, "LIBERALISM", AT WORK RATIONALIZING CIVILIZATIONAL SUICIDE:

"The Obama administration said Monday that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/US-US-NKorea-Ship/2010/06/28/id/363315


gringoman

The problem is the anti-white ideology we have been laboring under ever since the end of WWII,especially the anti white-male ideology (blame it on Hitler?). The anti-white ideology reached its zenith during the culture wars in the 1960s. The USA has been on a steady decline both culturally and socially ever since. Make no mistake about it, there is a concerted effort by industry, government, and leftist acedemic elites to race replace the native white population with non-whites. I haven't pin pointed the reason why they are doing this, but many have come up with some pretty good conclusions - but they get into anti-Semitism

Posted by: anon | June 28, 2010 at 09:47 AM

The reason for today's Liberal Racism must be pretty obvious. Non-elite whites are targeted because they are seen as the chief obstacle in the struggle to conquer and dominate America. The anti-semites who call this a struggle of "the Jews" are essentially the kind of idiots whose place is in a Nazi beer hall, where they can demonstrate what Nietzsche referred to as "too much German beer on the brain." Socialist Jews, of course, may be Liberal Racists, but so are most socialists and lefties of any color or persuasion. Republicans? How was Richard Nixon, who gave us race-based Affirmative Action, not a de facto Liberal Racist---tell us about it, Monica. (Jews may be more inclined to liberal racism since the one major dictator who was not a Liberal Racist---Hitler---happened to be a rabid anti-Semite, who very likely believed he had a Jewish grandfather), As for the so-called "Jewish plot" beloved of the mindless, the muslims today can give even the most socialistic "subversive" Jew a lesson in chutzpah. Can you imagine Jews calling for a huge synagogue to be built at Ground Zero after Jewish radicals brag to this day of taking down the Twin Towers in their Holy War against the infidels? If you can, we have nothing more to discuss.

And of course the "corporate" Republicans are as helpless, even phony, against the cunning Liberal Racists as anyone else. Socialist Sammy and Jihadi Abdullah (not to mention their black hacks) learned a long time ago how to shake down Corporate Charley and control speech via PC guidelines. Note: the latest from the "can do" Corporate Charleys, according to CNBC's Larry Kudlow (who knows them well) These boardroom paragons of the "competent" are now disillusioned with the Obama they helped to put in the White House. Yes. Now they even think he may be an "enemy," of the free enterprise system! Why, they're beginning to suspect Obama of doing all in his power to cripple the American system! Can you believe it? Yes. Really. After months, years of massive evidence of Obama's Marxist, socialist and Koranic ties, Corporate Charley is beginning to revise his previous view of the Obama he helped put in to the White House! Who knew? Corporate Charley is catching up with the commenters at Monicamemo! Lenin said these capitalists would sell you the rope to hang them. They even made Obamanationcare possible! They did. Corporate Charley wanted to schluff off the costs of socialist health care to the taxpayers. Would it eventually put the nation's neck into the bureaucrat's socialist noose? But what did Corporate Charley, or his hired Republicans and Democrats care? Botton line, Baby, bottom line.

And what a row to hoe, Monica's got, as she defends these corporateers who collaborate with Socialist Sammy and his Liberal Racists, and the Republicans who "understand" them!

It's got to be tough, sometimes, for a Republican cheerleader with a dream. Yes, elections do have consequences. If you don't vote for the Republican corporate socialist, you could wind up with the Democrat socialistic corporatist.


www.gringoman.com
Escaping Politically Correct

Truther

How many supply-siders does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The darkness will cause the light bulb to change by itself.


This is the very principle being used to generate jobs.
(that are not apparently coming back)

Truther

How many BP Engineers does it take to change a light bulb?

Just one to make the change, and the entire staff to figure out how to turn it off.

DJ

"Non-elite whites are targeted because they are seen as the chief obstacle in the struggle to conquer and dominate America." ( --Gringoman)


Well if that is true, and all the evidence indicates it is, then the socialists' and liberal racists' conquest of America will be complete in a few short years. The fact is whites will be a minority in America within 20 years. Not 40 years as the government census predicts. At present, fully half of all newborns are non-white. This will exponentially increase as massive non-white immigration continues unabated. Couple that with amnesty and the chain migration that will ensue and even the brainwashed Obots can see all the talk about returning to what the Founding Fathers envisioned is folly - Tea Party protests notwithstanding. Demographic change is the driving force and their voting patterns is the transformational weapon. Or do you think all the brainwashed whites and blacks and third-world immigrants will suddenly rebuke the nanny state and become devotees of Aristotle, Jefferson, Voltaire, Burke, Adam Smith etc.? I wouldn't bet on it.

gringoman

I mentioned getting mixed signals on whether General McChrystal was responsible for the Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan. These ROE, reportedly, in an effort to wage a "kinder, gentler" war, are getting American soldiers killed. The following signal, from liberal Spencer Ackerman, looks pretty straightforward and not mixed at all.......


"In his opening statement in his Senate confirmation hearing, Petraeus vowed to “look very hard” at the directives Gen. Stanley McChrystal put in place to cut down on civilian casualties. McChrystal was following counterinsurgency principles that Petraeus, in large part, pioneered and championed within the U.S. military, principles that led McChrystal to say that the attitudes of the Afghan people will be “strategically decisive” in the war.

"And Petraeus, as you’d expect, publicly supports that mission to the hilt. “In counterinsurgency operations, the human terrain is the decisive terrain,” he said, using a jargony term to mean the Afghan people. “I will continue the emphasis on reducing the loss of innocent civilian life to an absolute minimum in the course of military operations.” But that doesn’t mean he’ll continue McChrystal’s rules as written.

"In Afghanistan, McChrystal went further in restricting troops’ ability to use force than Petraeus did in Iraq. McChrystal cut way back on the use of air cover for U.S. troops in firefights, instructed them to give Afghans the right of way on highways, and urged them to cut off battles when insurgents retreat to populated areas. The biggest overlooked aspect of Michael Hastings’ Rolling Stone piece that ended McChrystal’s career was the frustration troops in Afghanistan felt under the rules of engagement — fairly or unfairly.

"So, to send a new signal to those troops, Petraeus called it a “moral imperative” to allow troops “all the support they need when they are in a tough situation.” He said discussed it with the Afghan leadership over the last few days and indicated that he secured their “full agreement” for that principle. While Petraeus didn’t specifically promise a change in the rules or their application, that’s a pretty strong indication that a change is in the works when Petraeus gets to Kabul — something Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the committee, indicated he wanted to see the Senate ensure happens before the July 4 holiday."

Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/06/petraeus-ill-change-the-rules-of-war-in-afghanistan/#ixzz0sH1SIqDw

gringoman

I mentioned getting mixed signals on whether General McChrystal was responsible for the Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan. These ROE, reportedly, in an effort to wage a "kinder, gentler" war, are getting American soldiers killed. The following signal, from liberal Spencer Ackerman, looks pretty straightforward and not mixed at all.......


"In his opening statement in his Senate confirmation hearing, Petraeus vowed to “look very hard” at the directives Gen. Stanley McChrystal put in place to cut down on civilian casualties. McChrystal was following counterinsurgency principles that Petraeus, in large part, pioneered and championed within the U.S. military, principles that led McChrystal to say that the attitudes of the Afghan people will be “strategically decisive” in the war.

"And Petraeus, as you’d expect, publicly supports that mission to the hilt. “In counterinsurgency operations, the human terrain is the decisive terrain,” he said, using a jargony term to mean the Afghan people. “I will continue the emphasis on reducing the loss of innocent civilian life to an absolute minimum in the course of military operations.” But that doesn’t mean he’ll continue McChrystal’s rules as written.

"In Afghanistan, McChrystal went further in restricting troops’ ability to use force than Petraeus did in Iraq. McChrystal cut way back on the use of air cover for U.S. troops in firefights, instructed them to give Afghans the right of way on highways, and urged them to cut off battles when insurgents retreat to populated areas. The biggest overlooked aspect of Michael Hastings’ Rolling Stone piece that ended McChrystal’s career was the frustration troops in Afghanistan felt under the rules of engagement — fairly or unfairly.

"So, to send a new signal to those troops, Petraeus called it a “moral imperative” to allow troops “all the support they need when they are in a tough situation.” He said discussed it with the Afghan leadership over the last few days and indicated that he secured their “full agreement” for that principle. While Petraeus didn’t specifically promise a change in the rules or their application, that’s a pretty strong indication that a change is in the works when Petraeus gets to Kabul — something Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the committee, indicated he wanted to see the Senate ensure happens before the July 4 holiday."

Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/06/petraeus-ill-change-the-rules-of-war-in-afghanistan/#ixzz0sH1SIqDw

gringoman

Or do you think all the brainwashed whites and blacks and third-world immigrants will suddenly rebuke the nanny state and become devotees of Aristotle, Jefferson, Voltaire, Burke, Adam Smith etc.? I wouldn't bet on it.

Posted by: DJ | June 29, 2010 at 02:36 PM

Many economists say the debt crisis in the US is far more serious than the Eurozone. California virtually a basket case, closely followed by NY, ILL and many others. Americans can still turn away instead of looking reality in the eye, since Washington can still camouflage the Big Government debt bomb by printing dollars. Think Greece multiplied by 100. Think the pension schemes that will run into trillion dollar--that's with a't'--- deficits. Think Social Security bankrupt and facing 30-50 million new "beneficiaries." And not all the king's men will be able to put these Humpty Dumpty "benefits" together again that the union bosses and "people friendly politicians" were so good at wresting from businesses and the tax payer.

Why would people have to become a Voltaire or Jefferson to "rebuke the nanny state"? When there's nothing but an imploded shell of Socialist Sammy's Big Nanny, what's left to rebuke?

The more leading question: Will these dependents on Government largesse hold off the post-Nanny marauders, or join them?

Truther

There will be a sudden cessation of more extreme elements as the Nanny bubble bursts in the near future. This will occur globally, but also here in the US, leaving a percentage of dependent people unsupported. For them, migration is no escape since the same conditions will prevail elsewhere.

There might be adjustments in the income of publically supported jobs as compensation in the system, although this is in doubt. At one state university they just acquired a junior VP from the state, who was a gubernatorial aid. His salary is 245K. Besides this being a conflict of interest, there must be a senior VP who draws a salary, and then all their aids and secretaries also. It adds up.

Ummah Gummah

.

The nanny state in say, Germany Sweden and England is still attracting the worst of the worst from outside these countries.

Local politicians prefer to tax their own people to accommodate the Great Unwashed spilling in from abroad rather than just saying no and simply changing policies than don't work.

Thus the balance between producers and passive consumers is being irrevocably skewed and the social systems that were built on the premise of taking care of one's own people and not the entire world, will logically experience a giant crash.

I predict wars between native and non-native populations in Europe withing the next 20 years.

Something is wrong with the institution of Democracy since this is being repeated in all the better-off Western countries.

Good intelligent logical people have long quit the field of eligible candidates for political office of any kind.

We are being ruled by ignorant cynical morons who - for whatever reason - continue to ignore the freight train that's about to hit us all.

.

wholesale

There will be a sudden cessation of more extreme elements as the Nanny bubble bursts in the near future. This will occur globally, but also here in the US, leaving a percentage of dependent people unsupported. For them, migration is no escape since the same conditions will prevail elsewhere. 2945abc45 0212

The comments to this entry are closed.