Double Cross
Barack Obama cannot be serious.
CNN is reporting today that there are ongoing talks between the Clinton camp (read: Bill) and the Obama camp (read: Michelle) about getting Hillary on the ticket. There is, no doubt, a lot of Clintonian extortion happening: promises of riots at the Convention, telling women not to support Obama if he doesn't bend to their demands, horses' heads in their beds.
The talks are described by someone involved as "difficult." Horses' heads do have a tendency to make negotiations "difficult."
Obama, apparently, is thinking about it. Which leads me to believe he's either A) easily intimidated; B) stupid; or C) very, very careful.
He cannot be seen to be blowing her off. Even if he has no intention of putting her on the ticket, he's got to be seen as considerate to her and her army of delegates. But the last thing he wants is Bill Clinton shadowing him for 4 years and Hillary planning the palace coup on Day One.
So, these "talks" may involve a facesaving way for her to get out: that he offers it to her, she declines, the party is unified, and end of story.
But. What if they make that deal, but when he offers it to her, she takes it? That would be a double cross of Clintonian caliber: dirty, underhanded, and genius.
If I were Obama, I'd get it in writing.

Monica is totally wrong.
As I've said before on this blog, an Obama/Clinton ticket is the best hope the Democrats have to win. Putting Clinton on the tickets ensures that Clinton supporters will vote Democratic rather than being tempted by McCain, who many Clinton supporters prefer to Obama.
A V.P. only has as much power as a President allows. Bill Clinton will be available for advice but he doesn't exactly have a free pass into another President's office.
Remember: Johnson hated Kennedy and thought he was a smart-a** kid, and that he (Johnson) was entitled to the presidency. But he got on the ticket because you can't accomplish anything unless you win first.
People forget that the Bush people and Reagan people were adversaries. Reagan and Bush were not exactly lovers. But they joined together and won.
So Monica might want to reconsider her analysis -- which is totally and utterly incorrect.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM
From GRINGOBRO to MONICA
Yo Monca,
That Frek say you wrong, so you probly right.
Now my man gringoman look in his crystal gringoBall, but I let him, not me, tell you what he see. Okay?
Me, I don't min' Hillry takin' back seat to Barra. Obama-Clinton? Hey, that be mo' fun than inteh-racial drag queen soap opera. Know what I sayin'?
Worry 'bout Billry dirty trix? Chil', don'tchoo know Michelle gonna stand by her candy man? Somebody try to mess with Barra in da Oval Office? You know what kind a whippin' an' a whoppin' she gonna give 'em? They be lucky to run out the Rose Garden an' hightail it over the White House gate. Dint I tell you what a baaaaaaaad mama that Michelle be? That ain't no vanilla cream puff.
An' he ain't just got Michelle. You evah see them black muslim guards in Chicago? You think Billry gonna mess with the Fruit of Farrakhan?
Sure, maybe Big Bubba gonna try to hit on MIchelle when Barra go talk with Amabad in Tayran, but so what, if they shut the door tight? Who care? Not me, honey, not me.
Even in the White House, folks got to lighten up at times, relax, let they hair down.
Obama/Clinton. You mean that ain't gonna be some fun?
Know what I sayin'?
www.gringoman.com
Escaping Politically Correct
Posted by: gringoman | May 23, 2008 at 12:25 PM
From GRINGOBRO to MONICA
Yo Monca,
That Frek say you wrong, so you probly right.
Now my man gringoman look in his crystal gringoBall, but I let him, not me, tell you what he see. Okay?
Me, I don't min' Hillry takin' back seat to Barra. Obama-Clinton? Hey, that be mo' fun than inteh-racial drag queen soap opera. Know what I sayin'?
Worry 'bout Billry dirty trix? Chil', don'tchoo know Michelle gonna stand by her candy man? Somebody try to mess with Barra in da Oval Office? You know what kind a whippin' an' a whoppin' she gonna give 'em? They be lucky to run out the Rose Garden an' hightail it over the White House gate. Dint I tell you what a baaaaaaaad mama that Michelle be? That ain't no vanilla cream puff.
An' he ain't just got Michelle. You evah see them black muslim guards in Chicago? You think Billry gonna mess with the Fruit of Farrakhan?
Sure, maybe Big Bubba gonna try to hit on MIchelle when Barra go talk with Amabad in Tayran, but so what, if they shut the door tight? Who care? Not me, honey, not me.
Even in the White House, folks got to lighten up at times, relax, let they hair down.
Obama/Clinton. You mean that ain't gonna be some fun?
Know what I sayin'?
www.gringoman.com
Escaping Politically Correct
Posted by: gringoman | May 23, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Sorry, Gringoman, you are wrong, too. Obama/Clinton is the ticket.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM
For the Dhimmicrats to take the White House that would indeed be the ticket.
The only good thing about it from our POV would be the constant sniping and in-fighting.
In the meantime I am not looking forward to higher taxes, mandated health care and socialized major industries.. did any of you catch the dhimwitted Maxine Waters on socializing the oil industry.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 23, 2008 at 03:22 PM
The only thing you are interested in is the mass murder of Muslims, Ummah. Right?
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 23, 2008 at 03:26 PM
What is different is Barry's lack of experience. One could compare him to Franklin Pierce. No doubt Hillary has more influence today than Barry in political circles, and unless he fights this trend, he will be following along, rather than leading.
He could do a Bush I thing, and choose someone like Dan Quayle for VP. Who would that be in the Democratic party? Maybe he could choose himself. Can a man be his own VP? How about Michelle for VP? That would one better Clinton!
Barry could consult the playbook and tell everyone, "With me, you get Michelle also."
Posted by: Truther | May 23, 2008 at 03:37 PM
I would speculate that Ms. Clinton reminded Obama about the fate of Vince Foster and President Kennedy during the negotiations to get Hillary on the ticket. If I were in Obama's shoes, I'd pass and pick a heavy weight who is more qualified to be President and fill in for Obama's weaknesses.
Posted by: J. Pierpont Finch | May 23, 2008 at 04:17 PM
I would speculate that Ms. Clinton reminded Obama about the fate of Vince Foster and President Kennedy during the negotiations to get Hillary on the ticket. If I were in Obama's shoes, I'd pass and pick a heavy weight who is more qualified to be President and fill in for Obama's weaknesses.
Posted by: J. Pierpont Finch | May 23, 2008 at 04:18 PM
I have heard that in the Congressional hallways, that people are already bracing themselves for an inevitable plebiscite that brings Barry into the Oval Office. When asked why they are doing that, the response was : " Well maybe we have our reasons."
Posted by: Truther | May 23, 2008 at 04:19 PM
The horse's head in Barry boudoir, is beginning to look like his own! Spooky.
Posted by: Truther | May 23, 2008 at 05:23 PM
Yeah, maybe not such a great idea to put her on his ticket if he wants to survive even a single term..
He may be better advised to keep HRC at as much arm's length as he can muster.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 23, 2008 at 05:44 PM
I believe Obama doesn't want Hillary on the ticket under any circumstances. How can he run as the change candidate with Bill and Hillary tagging along. And why would you want an ego maniac on the ticket with you. And God only knows what Bill is capable of between now and the election (another loose canon like Rev. Jeremiah Wright to hang around his neck).
And I don't think Hillary wants to play second fiddle to anyone. I can't see her stooping to the VP slot. She wants to be QueenBee or nothing. So I think there is no chance whatsoever that there will ever be an Obama/Clinton ticket.
Posted by: SteveOk | May 23, 2008 at 06:25 PM
Hey, liEb-Fred: When u say things like
The only thing you are interested in is the mass murder of Muslims, Ummah. Right?
Posted by: FredK2929
You should be able to back it up with facts.
This is Missouri here. SHOW ME.
You're nothing but a run-of-the-mill liEEEEberal mudslinger.
You learned from the best. His name starts with a "G". This sort of ad hominem is so second nature for you libs that u don't even notice anymore.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 23, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Hey, maybe they can have a COMMUNE at the White House. They can all move in together..
Who knows.. Bill may have some leftover cigars laying around..
And once a week Oprah can broadcast from the Oval Office..
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 23, 2008 at 06:50 PM
PERECT ASSIGNMENT FOR HRC in an Obama Administration:
Ambassador to Myanmar (Formerly Burma)!
Posted by: J. Pierpont Finch | May 23, 2008 at 08:32 PM
UG --
One only has to look at your past blog entries to conclude that you are interested only in the mass murder of Muslims. Do you deny it? Do you have any other interests?
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 24, 2008 at 12:28 PM
This is one of Monica's best shows. EVERYONE should listen to it as soon as she can post it. Monica interviewed 2 great authors, so check out their books this weekend.
Herbert London
http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Secular-Challenge-National-Religion/dp/1594032270/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211657827&sr=8-1
James Rosen
http://www.amazon.com/Strong-Man-Mitchell-Secrets-Watergate/dp/B0015DTVCE/ref=kinw_dp_ke?ie=UTF8&qid=1211655565&sr=8-1
Patrick Buchanan has a new book out too.
http://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Hitler-Unnecessary-War-Britain/dp/030740515X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211658011&sr=1-2
Posted by: M/M | May 24, 2008 at 04:02 PM
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is using strong-arm tactics against anti-illegal-immigration Democrats in an effort to kill the SAVE Act (H.R. 4088) for the year.
Although many Dems have co-sponsored the bill, she is intimidating them away from signing the discharge petition.
Question: Why doesn't someone ask Nancy what she thinks she is doing? This act requires companies to check the immigration status of applicants for jobs, and requires them to hire only legal aliens with the appropriate Visas.
Posted by: Truther | May 24, 2008 at 05:20 PM
UG --
One only has to look at your past blog entries to conclude that you are interested only in the mass murder of Muslims. Do you deny it? Do you have any other interests?
Posted by: FredK2929
--
Fred G-oebbels.. you just keep repeating your lies. And I do not answer to your inquisitional tone. Why don't you tell US what you are interested in.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 25, 2008 at 04:50 PM
So Monica might want to reconsider her analysis -- which is totally and utterly POLITICALLY incorrect.
POSTED BY: FREDK2929
--
I take it that's what u really mean to say, K-Geo. But then u liEEEEberals fail to make any distinction between correct and POLITICALLY correct.
That fact has been DULY NOTED by us.
In fact it colors everything Fred spews forth on this and other blogs..
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 25, 2008 at 07:23 PM
UG --
I'm interested in history, literature, and film. What are you interested in other than seeing Muslims mass murdered? I'm not lying; just looking at what I've seen you posting here and coming to an obvious conclusion. After all, UG -- you are a great representative of the LUNATIC FRINGE.
You are wrong by what I meant. I literally meant that Monica is incorrect. She is no expert on politics. No more than the other idiots who post here. The Obama/Clinton ticket would be a great idea; the best chance for the Democrats. "PC" has nothing to do with what I said.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 26, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Fred u just showed your utter stupidity. You completely missed my point and I am not about to do the work for you.
It's simply not worth it.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 27, 2008 at 03:02 PM
LiEberalism is a mental disorder and there is no cure.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 27, 2008 at 03:03 PM
As we celebrate this Memorial Day I passed by Jifhadwatch came across another poster's musings on Citizenship and the fact that - for their various reasons - moslems, liberals and international businessmen have such low regard for Citizenship.
The post is too long to repost in its entirety but I will paste the part concerning the leftist's view of citizenship.
Citizenship means nothing to the leftist, cosmospolitan bureaucrats of government, who know by Marxist theory that global socialism with centralized planning should rightfully control the entire planet. Leftists know that our immigration laws and our national borders, as just yet more manifestations of obsolete Christian-based laws and societal organization, have no validity, since only global, secular law is to be respected. Leftists know that immigration laws and national borders are just impediments to the spread of socialism to be cleverly circumvented by lying, by word games, by intimidation (legal and otherwise), by threats of punishment, or by real punishment, as part of their everyday progressive duty. Leftists know that their loyalty is owed to the global cosmopolitan Community of Man alone, and not to any traditional entity--such as to any nation state, or to a governing Constitution--save outwardly for deceptive purposes, until their numbers are large enough and they are strong enough to pull off the mask and then force their will on the rest of us. As they deconstruct our civilization from within, leftists know they are right to do this because they are the Supreme Ones, having the special knowledge and wisdom that only they possess, and that the unsavory, benighted people they seek to dominate are too mean-spirited, dumb, and ingnorant to know what is good for them.
With special thanks to Stendec on Jihadwatch
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 27, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Galileo was once "lunatic fringe", Fred. And Churchill was a "war monger".
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 27, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Thank you for your decision that responding to me is "not worth it" . . . but you somehow continued to respond in multiple posts. If I "missed your point", it's because I don't think your posts have any points worth any serious attention.
Ummah -- to paraphrase Senator Lloyd Bentsen -- you are no Galileo. And, in addition, you are no Churchill.
You are just a member of the lunatic fringe, and your goofy opinions are not respected outside of this absurd blog.
Keep having fun on Jihadwatch. You might want to check out the KKK web site, too; I'm sure you'll like it.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 27, 2008 at 03:18 PM
And what exactly does Jihadwatch have in common with the KKK. Fred?
What Jihadwatch does is to report what the MSM refuse to. They give detailed accounts of jihadist activity world-wide because they see it as a global issue deserving of being reported.
For some reason it doesn't sit well with the libs when reports are made of moslems killing and otherise mistreating others.
These others are not only Jews and Christians but also Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, Atheists, Zoroastrians and a few more I am certain.
Fact is that Jihadwatch reports are always fact-chechable which is why I have to reply to your slander in trying to tie them to the KKK.
And I want people to see that Fred's line of "reason" is what permeates the MSM and a lot of academia and politics today.
They surreptitiously label whatever they do not consider PC as "far-right" or as "racist" or as "ultra-conservative" as a means of discrediting dissenting thought.
And I will call KKK-Fred the lib on it each and every time he does it.
The way they do these things with such utter self-righteous normalcy merely shows how deep the problem has become..
so once again, I ask Fred please show us the similarities between Jihadwatch and the KKK. I am sure the many Jewish contributors and readers at Jihadwatch would be curious to hear that one!
PS. And what ticket did Lloyd Benson run on? hehe
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 27, 2008 at 04:21 PM
Mr. Ummah --
I am calling YOU a racist. Let's not go overboard with what I am labelling. I am talking about YOU and YOU alone.
I took one look at Jihadwatch. It was disgusting, and I don't intend to go there again. It was loaded with contributors like you, who have closed your mind to the possibility that maybe there are decent Muslims out there who are not trying to kill you.
And that's how I see Jihadwatch as similar to the KKK -- which cannot accept for a second that anyone different from them may be decent.
Lloyd Bentsen (not Benson) was a DEMOCRAT, and he was up against Dan Quayle, someone who was considered an idiot at the time, but who may be a genius compared to our current president.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 27, 2008 at 04:40 PM
So when they refuse to drink Koolaid and sing Kumbaya they're a bunch of "racists". Typical liEEEberal claptrap!
It's you idiots on the left who wil get us all killed with your naiveté.
I repeat: Jihadwatch reports stories of jihad and other islamis activity and discusses the strategies and methods employed by said groups, countries and individuals.
Something our liEEEEberal Media refuse to do as part of their job description:
R E P O R T E R. They're supposed to REPORT!
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 28, 2008 at 02:51 AM
K Fred I KNOW he was a Dhimmikrat. You libs always see yourselves so far above everyone else.. those of us who cling to our guns and our religion.. LOL.. the angry white people..
God u liEEberals are so full of stereotyoes and you show it openly and without shame.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah | May 28, 2008 at 02:58 AM
I don't know about everyone, but I certainly believe that I'm better than you. I don't think I've ever denied that.
Posted by: FredK2929 | May 28, 2008 at 08:34 AM