I will be a guest on The O'Reilly Factor TONIGHT (Tuesday, December 18) at 8pm and 11pm ET on the Fox News Channel.
« The Other Mayor Of New York | Main | Two Presidents: A Study In Contrasts »
December 18, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452132569e200e54fbc985b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference O'Reilly Factor:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Categories
- 2006 Midterm Elections
- 2008 Presidential Race
- CIA Leak Investigation
- Culture
- Fairness Doctrine
- Hillary
- Illegal Immigration
- Imus
- Iraq
- Jimmy Carter
- McCain
- North Korea
- Nuclear North Korea
- Obama
- Palin
- Podcast
- Presidential History
- Sarah Palin
- September 11th
- Show Information
- Television
- The Democrats
- War on Terror
- Website Information
Recent Posts
May 2013
Go girl! Go girl! Go girl!
Posted by: SteveOk | December 18, 2007 at 04:07 PM
Have some guts. Go on Air America sometime.
Posted by: FK | December 18, 2007 at 04:25 PM
Excellent discussion on O'Reilly about Hillary's negatives. I think if she gets the nomination what her negatives will mean is that the Republican base will vote in record numbers unlike any election in history. The Republican turn out will not be an issue in that election, it will be massive. The religious right sees her as a stooge of the devil so they will turn out in massive numbers whether Huckabee or Guiliani or Romney gets the nomination.
Posted by: SteveOk | December 18, 2007 at 09:22 PM
Squeezed in, sort of.
Talk about kneecaps, whoa ... look at Edwards now.
What greater gift of a woman for a woman?
Posted by: Truther | December 19, 2007 at 12:18 PM
Loved the black dress with the dash of Christmas from the red pin. It was sort of opposite from the McLaughlin Group when you wore a red dress with the black boots. Sort of an inversion, I'm surprised Truther didn't pick up on the symmetry.
Posted by: SteveOk | December 19, 2007 at 01:55 PM
I think your argument that there is a double standard with women candidates is generally true but in Hillary's case I don't think it is the ambition that people are turned off by, it is the dishonesty, the paranoia, not to mention her socialist views. When you look at her and ask why does she want to be President the answer I see is to obtain power, period. The perfect example is her statement that she wants to "take" the profits of the oil companys and give them to a government agency (that she will appoint) and redistribute the money as she sees fit. That is the essence of what she is about. That is her agenda, to gather power and then redistribute the patronage to maintain her power base. That is how it was done in Arkansas where she learned politics. That is how Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro does it and that is how she will govern.
Posted by: SteveOk | December 19, 2007 at 02:06 PM
I was thinking of being cutoff at the kneecaps by Hillary, as Monica had mentioned.
Sorry if I was unclear. Edwards may be suffering a reveral of fortune because of a haircut and a dalliance.
Posted by: Truther | December 19, 2007 at 03:04 PM