« Let Me Make This Perfectly Clear | Main | The Mondale Card »

November 02, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452132569e200e54f8bd1b88834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Illegal to be Illegal:

Comments

FK

Great article, Monica. You base your assertions on a t-shirt worn by one man, and on your ignorance and bigotry, without any attempt to understand why people come to this land of opportunity, and what may have induced them to come here, even if illegally. It's easy to condemn them all when you simply look upon them all as criminals. But it doesn't move us toward a solution.

J. Pierpont Finch

Hay FREDK,

If a an armed killer threatenned to break into your home, take all of your possessions and your home, and kill you and your family, and, he followed up his threat by breaking down the door of your home; you're the kind of person that would great him with open arms and pity and ask the killer (1) Why are you doing this - I need to know what induced you to come to take everything I own and kill me and my family? (2) How can we move toward a solution? And then you would label anyone who questionned such odd behavior as an ignorant bigot who utters "hate speech".

Your thought process is f*cked up because you have SH*T FOR BRAINS, SIR. Seek help!

J. Pierpont Finch

Hay FREDK,

The framers of the U.S. Constitution intended that our country be A NATION OF LAWS.

If people and judges selectively choose which laws to follow and which not to follow, what do you suppose happens to the country and its' people?

There's a legal process to follow if one seeks to emigrate to the USA. Foreigners who break into this country illegally for whatever reason are breaking the law by not following the required legal process. Such lawbreakers need to be rounded up and deported, or otherwise encouraged to return to their home country, PERIOD! As a taxpayer, I'm sick of having to pay for their education, healthcare, and incarceration when they commit crimes in this country! You should be too if you had half a brain.

Also, the leaders of that racist Mexican group, LaRasa, have openly stated their intention to retake the entire Southwest U.S. for Mexaco by infiltrating it with illegal aliens. Does that give you pause, or, are you O.K. with that, or are you just totally clueless?

Also, Al Qaeda terrorists are coming through Latin America, changing their sir names, and breaking into the U.S. Doesn't that concern you, or do you think these 7th century throwbacks who behead people who refuse to convert to Islam are nice people with good intentions?

charlie

Monica,

With due respect, its easier to make laws; than it is to uphold them.

Immigration laws are already in place but, for one reason or another, they are seldom or hardly ever enforced.
A wag once said: "Putting off something simple makes it difficult; and putting off something difficult makes it impossible."

I would venture to say that most of these illegals are good people, in search of a better economic life for themselves and their relatives.
But, as in such cases, really bad elements always get mixed in--criminals, diseased, terrorists, etc.

The situation has now reached this alarming level, because the powers that be, chose sentiment over sense; and fantasy over reality.

To be honest, I see no solution. Unless the borders are properly protected, and draconian measures adopted, then we might as well be just voices in the wilderness.

FK

Yes, you are right, Charlie/Finch. People who come into this country without filling out the proper forms are just like psycho killers. The comparison is obvious. Thanks for correcting me. Guess I'm just not as smart as you are.

J. Pierpont Finch


'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'

- Theodore Roosevelt in 1907 (on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN)

FK

OK, so based on what TR said, we should help these aliens become Americans. So do you recommend amnesty, Charlie/Finch?

J. Pierpont Finch

11/2/07: Former CIA official warns that terror groups, Iran may exploit permeable US border with Mexico to infiltrate terrorists into US

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3466854,00.html

The US is concerned that Hamas and Hezbullah agents may penetrate the porous US-Mexican border in order to carry out terrorist attacks, according to Robert Grenier, the former head of the US Central Intelligence Agency's counterterrorism center.

His comments were featured in a report published by the Mexican press on Thursday.

Prospect of ‘Iraq alumni’ terror attacks worldwide could undermine US victory in Iraq

Speaking at an event in Mexico, Grenier—who now runs his own international security firm called Kroll—said that reports indicate the United States is fearful that Iran, Hamas, and/or Hizbullah may seek to set up operations in Mexico in order to carry out terrorist attacks in the US.

According to the US counterterrorism expert, American officials are concerned that terrorists will tap into illegal immigrant and/or drug trafficking networks in order to use them to bring people and equipment into the US.

The former CIA official added that the American government is also fearful that Hamas and Hizbullah sleeper cells are already operational in Mexico; and, that Hizbullah is funneling money from Mexico into to Lebanon to fund the organization's operations there.

Until now, the US has not given Hezbullah operations in Mexico much thought. However, in wake of the recent escalation of rhetoric between the US and Iran regarding the latter's nuclear program, American officials have become concerned that Iran will use Hezbullah to carry out terror attacks on US targets around the world, Grenier explained

According to this scenario, Iran could also use Hezbullah networks to hit the US on its own soil.

The terrorism expert noted that it was hard to say for certain that sleeper cells already exist in Mexico. However, according to Grenier, The Lebanese Shia community in Mexico supports Iran and Hizbullah and there is speculation that members of the community could be recruited to carry out acts of terrorism.

charlie

Comrade Jacko/Freddo,

At first I was joking aruond with you, but you've now convinced me that you're nothing but a petty-minded, churlish lout. You're a bottom-of-the-barrel lib.

You imply that I regard all illegal aliens as 'psyco killers', purposefully omitting the preceding sentence which stated, 'most of these illegals are good people'.

It is now clear why the spammer persecuted you. You deserved every bit of it. I wish he was back to batter you some more.

FK

Sounds like I've gotten under your skin. Good.

And time for you to admit that you are the spammer, you closed-minded bastard.

J. Pierpont Finch

Understanding the Wahhabist Infiltration of America
By Frank Salvato Saturday, November 3, 2007

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/485

Part of the reason many Americans don’t appreciate the significance of Osama bin Laden’s declarations of war against the United States and the West is because they are completely oblivious to the in-roads radical Islam has made within the United States. Radical Islamists (i.e., Islamofascists, Wahhabis) understand that the conflict must take place on multiple fronts: militarily, economically, diplomatically and ideologically. Because they understand the complexity of the confrontation and the ability of the West to adapt to challenges--albeit lethargically--they employ multiple tactics in their aggressive pursuit of victory. The West’s addiction to sensationalism, epitomized by our limited attention to detail, unless it plays in the superficial 24-hour news cycle, facilitates the successful infiltration of radical ideology into Western society.

Much to the chagrin of the multicultural and the proponents of diversity, those who promote radical Islamist ideology thrive on the fact that the politically correct culture of the West--and the United States in particular--deems it inappropriate to question religious practices or teachings. With this politically correct “wall of separation” in place little if any scrutiny is given to the information disseminated within any given religious institution. This directly facilitates the ideological advancement of Wahhabism, the most radical and puritanical form of Islam, within the mosques of the United States.

To accurately understand the depth of infiltration of the Wahhabist ideology on American soil we need to examine the ideology and how it is advanced within the United States.

Part of the reason many Americans don’t appreciate the significance of Osama bin Laden’s declarations of war against the United States and the West is because they are completely oblivious to the in-roads radical Islam has made within the United States. Radical Islamists (i.e., Islamofascists, Wahhabis) understand that the conflict must take place on multiple fronts: militarily, economically, diplomatically and ideologically. Because they understand the complexity of the confrontation and the ability of the West to adapt to challenges – albeit lethargically – they employ multiple tactics in their aggressive pursuit of victory. The West’s addiction to sensationalism, epitomized by our limited attention to detail, unless it plays in the superficial 24-hour news cycle, facilitates the successful infiltration of radical ideology into Western society.

Much to the chagrin of the multicultural and the proponents of diversity, those who promote radical Islamist ideology thrive on the fact that the politically correct culture of the West – and the United States in particular – deems it inappropriate to question religious practices or teachings. With this politically correct “wall of separation” in place little if any scrutiny is given to the information disseminated within any given religious institution. This directly facilitates the ideological advancement of Wahhabism, the most radical and puritanical form of Islam, within the mosques of the United States.

To accurately understand the depth of infiltration of the Wahhabist ideology on American soil we need to examine the ideology and how it is advanced within the United States.

Wahhabism is a fiercely fundamentalist form of orthodox Sunni Islam. After a brief examination of its tenets it is clear that it is one of division, domination and hate.

Wahhabism originated circa 1703 and is the dominant form of Islam in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabists believe that any and all evolution of the Islamic faith after the 3rd century of the Muslim era – after 950 A.D. – was specious and must be expunged. Consequently, Wahhabism is the form of Islam that Osama bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahri practice.

This radically fundamentalist dogma is fanatically bigoted, xenophobic and lends itself to serve as the catalyst for much of the Islamofascist aggression being perpetrated around the world. It is a wrathful doctrine that rejects the legitimacy of all religious philosophy but its own. Wahhabism condemns Christians, Jews and all other non-Muslims, as well as non-Wahhabi Muslims. Wahhabists believe it is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews.

It stresses a worldview in which there exist two opposing realms that can never be reconciled -- Dar al-Islam, or House of Islam, and Dar al-Har, or House of War, also referred to as Dar al-Kufr, House of the Infidel. When Muslims are in the Dar al-Har, they must behave as if they were operatives in a conflict who have been tasked with going behind enemy lines. The Wahhabist ideology permits Muslims to exist “behind enemy lines” for only a few reasons: to acquire knowledge, to make money to be later employed in the jihad against the infidels, or to proselytize the infidels in an effort to convert them to Islam.

Wahhabist doctrine specifically warns Muslims not to imitate, befriend or help “infidels” in any way. It instills hatred for United States because we are ruled by legislated constitutional law rather than by tyrannical Sharia law. Wahhabists are instructed by edict to, above all, work for the creation of an Islamic state where ever they may dwell.

It is because of the Wahhabist ideology’s cruel and unyielding fanaticism that we in the United States should be concerned with its prevalence within the mosques of our nation.

After the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979 – an unprecedented action by the fundamentalists of the Shi’ite sect, the Saudi Arabian government responded by coming to terms with the fundamentalist Wahhabist movement of the Sunni sect. The Saudis, in return for a declaration of non-aggression, began to finance the construction of mosques in countries around the world. An estimated $45 billion has been spent by the Saudis to finance the building and operational costs of mosques and Islamic schools in foreign countries, including in North America.

Through the funding of mosques, Islamic Centers and their operations, Saudi Arabia is exporting the Wahhabist ideology. It is not unusual to find that the presiding cleric in any given mosque within the United States is a Wahhabist and that his teachings have been sanctioned and financed by the Saudi government and vetted by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Two of the more predominant mosques in the United States that have received funding from the Saudi government, and that adhere to the Wahhabist ideology, are the al Farooq mosque in Brooklyn, New York, and the King Fahd mosque in Los Angeles, California. Both mosques welcomed a number of the hijackers who piloted the planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11th, 2001.

In 2005, Freedom House, a 501(c)(3) organization concerned with the mounting threats to peace and democracy, released a report titled, Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Invade American Mosques. This examination of a comprehensive sampling of mosques and Islamic Centers across America shows that literature available in an overwhelming number of them indicates deference for the Wahhabist ideology.

Among some of the edicts – or fatwas – issued through this literature:

▪ “[I]t is basic Islam to believe that everyone who does not embrace Islam is an unbeliever, and must be called an unbeliever, and that they are enemies to Allah, his Prophet and believers.”

▪ “[O]ur doctrine states that if you accept any religion other than Islam, like Judaism or Christianity, which are not acceptable, you become an unbeliever. If you do not repent, you are an apostate and you should be killed because you have denied the Koran.”

▪ “Be dissociated from the infidels, hate them for their religion, leave them, never rely on them for support, do not admire them, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law.”

▪ “Never greet the Christian or Jew first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never befriend an infidel unless it is to convert him. Never imitate the infidel. Never work for an infidel. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel.”

▪ “Those who reside in the land of unbelief out of their own choice and desire to be with the people of that land, accepting the way they are regarding their faith, or giving compliments to them, or pleasing them by pointing out something wrong with the Muslims, they become unbelievers and enemies to Allah and his messenger.”

▪ “To be true Muslims, we must prepare and be ready for jihad in Allah’s way. It is the duty of the citizen and the government. The military education is glued to faith and its meaning, and the duty to follow it.”

With this ideology being taught in mosques across America, there is little reason for speculating as to why hatred exists for American principles, culture and ideology not only within the Islamic community, but among the societally disenfranchised and ideologically vulnerable in the United States who are being indoctrinated into this radical form of Islam.

This brings to the forefront a bothersome question. Why aren’t those of the American Fifth Column, who are predisposed to seeking out the haters among us, calling out the Wahhabist bigots who preach their hate in American mosques?

We in the West – and especially in the United States – must immediately seek out a greater understanding of not only the basic elements of the threat of radical Islam, but the extent to which it has already infiltrated our society. If we continue to remain ignorant of the facts surrounding this very real war against our way of life, we will lose our nation with nary a shot being fired.

__________
Frank Salvato is the vice president and executive director of Basics Project a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(C)(3) research and education initiative. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, Basics Project, partnered in producing the first ever national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism with events taking place in Washington DC, Las Vegas, NV, Dearborn, MI and scheduled to take place in additional locations across the country. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel and is the host of the NMJ Radio show broadcast global on NetTalkWorld global talk radio and broadcast live on BlogTalk Radio. His opinion-editorials are syndicated nationally and he is occasionally quoted in The Federalist.

FK

THIS IS THE POST I WAS RESPONDING TO ABOVE:

"Hay FREDK,

If a an armed killer threatenned to break into your home, take all of your possessions and your home, and kill you and your family, and, he followed up his threat by breaking down the door of your home; you're the kind of person that would great him with open arms and pity and ask the killer (1) Why are you doing this - I need to know what induced you to come to take everything I own and kill me and my family? (2) How can we move toward a solution? And then you would label anyone who questionned such odd behavior as an ignorant bigot who utters "hate speech".

Your thought process is f*cked up because you have SH*T FOR BRAINS, SIR. Seek help!"

FK

Why is it that conservatives are so angry and have so little compassion for others? What drives a person to have so little regard for others that he becomes a conservative, or, worst of all, an actual George W. Bush supporter? You have to be evil or retarded, right? So which of those categories do Charlie and Finch (if they are different people) fit in?

J. Pierpont Finch

FREDK's Nov 4 8:52PM POST:

Notice LIBERAL 'PROGRESSIVE" FREDK's obsession with FEELings, rather than issues (ie. anger, comPASSION...his eMOTIONal response to what he disagrees with is to claim the poster is "evil".."retarded"). HE NEVER DOES DENY BEING THE KIND OF GUY DESCRIBED in FREDK's Nov 4 12:10PM POST.

Then he puts himelf on a pedistal as if he is somehow suPERIOR by asking "what drives a (implied "inferior") person to have such "little regard" for others (as if all knowing FREDK knows from his position of superiority) that he becomes a conSERVATIVE, or worst of all a "GW Bush supporter (here FREDX assumes everyone agrees with HIS lofty opinion he can see that I am one of those leppers in his perverse mind who support GWB - like he really knows whatr I think!). THEN he tars and feathers ALL CONSERVATIVES with his FEELings about an individual he perceives as being a conservative.

THERE HE GOES AGAIN with his F*CKED UP THOUGHT PROCESS!

FK

I'm smiling. You are such a trip. You think I feel superior to you? You are absolutely right. I'm not 'implying' that you are inferior; I'm just plain saying it straight out.

Not that I think I'm on a "pedistal" or even a pedestal, if you want to actually check a dictionary before you make submissions, whether you are a "lepper" or even a leper.

Nice use of capital letters. Is that how you show that you have the better argument?

You apparently have something other than FEELings, which are better than FEELings? What exactly are those?

BTW -- I'm going to the polls tomorrow. I'll be voting the Democratic party line. My gift to George W. Bush and all you Republican morons.

J. Pierpont Finch

Oh gosh, what a surprise, FREDX. A guy with Terminal Bush Derangement Syhdrome is going to vote the Democrat party line. That's hilarious!

FK

What exactly is Bush Derangement Syndrome? Being able to tell that Bush is incompetent, and has always been so, and that the Republicans must be punished for imposing this idiot on us?

I hope Clinton wins the presidency if only to watch all you Republicans suffer as we have suffered through this Bush debacle.

J. Pierpont Finch

I hate to burst your bubble, FREDX.

Both parties - Democrat and Republican - seem to be in competition as to which can display more incompetance!

- At a time when the financial sector of the economy is reeling, Democrats want to put through the largest tax hike in American History.

- At a time when our War on Islamo-fascism ally, nuke armed Pakistan, teaters on an Islamic radical takeover, Secretary of State Rice seeks to withhold billions in U.S. aid as punishment for their leader's declaration of emergency powers intended to prevent such a takeover (HOW DUMB IS THAT?), and, your favorite President calls for elections in Pakistan (WHAT ME WORRY).

These are but only two of many examples of insane incompetance!


FK

From the New Yorker:

"If she [Hillary Clinton] had been prepared for the driver’s-license question, as she should have been, she might have pointed out that seven states now issue licenses regardless of immigration status, that doing so actually improves security with respect to terrorism (because applicants must produce a passport or other proof of identity as well as proof of residence in the state), and that the New York proposal has been amended to allow the undocumented to obtain a driver’s certificate that cannot be used for federal identification purposes, as in boarding airplanes. Instead, she waffled. She was right to argue that the states have been left to cope with the detritus of President Bush’s failed immigration reform. But driver’s licenses for the undocumented is a perilous issue for Democrats, tailor-made for nativist demagoguery."

charlie

My dear Freddo/Jacko,

What makes you think that a chigger like you can get under my skin? I don't walk around barefeet.

I now see why you hang around here 24/7. Like the parasite you are, you're waiting to attach yourself to an unwary host.
You've got a very long wait, comrade chigger.

Cheerio! Happy waiting!

FK

That's funny, Charlie. Seems to me you post as much if not more than I do, and your posts are way longer.

charlie

Freddo, my dear,

Facts can be irritants, but they tell the truth!

Cheerio, Mr. 24/7.

FK

Typical Republican tactics. You suggest that I am Mr. 24/7, implying that I have nothing better to do than post here, yet you responded to my last post within 8 minutes.

At least you are calling me "Freddo" now, not Freddo/Jacko -- you starting to realize that I really am someone other than your friend Jack?

IBISK1812

As usual you libs all miss the point. Obviously most (but not all) illegals are good people looking for a better life. It is irrelevant.

Although the story of immigrants in America was (and is) wonderful, lets not romanticize about it. The question is: What is in the best interests of America? In the 19th century, it was to invite in as many immigrants as possble to populate the continent. That is no longer the need. And even in the 19th century it was a controlled process with a few ports of entry from which many were turned back.

If we cannot control the borders and enforce the law, then we cannot have any immigration policy. All we have is chaos. We are open to criminals, deseases and loads on social services we cannot support.

You libs need to get the tears out of your eyes and start using your brains.

FK

The driver's license issue is not about securing our borders. Obviously we should. I'm not suggesting that the borders should be opened up to a free-for-all.

The driver's license issue is about whether there should be documentation for the ones that are already here.

But the reasons that people come here are not irrelevant. They provide us with an understanding of why the issue is here. Better to look at the problem deeply than just simply call the illegal immigrants criminals and suggest that instead of being granted driver's licenses, they should be making license plates (as one of our rightwing posters suggested recently).

Ibisk's post is the typical kind posted by conservatives here. Instead of addressing our arguments, he/she simply calls us "libs" and says we don't use our brains. That is not a useful contribution to political discourse.

IBISK1812

Fredk,
It is you who labeled Monica with 'ignorance and bigotry' because she (and many of us) don't agree with you.

Why the illegals come here is obvious - and irrelevant. They are desperate for work and opportunity.

Granting driver's licenses to illegals is de-facto amnesty, which can only encourage more illegals and more chaos.

With the borders under control, normalization of the existing illegals' status may be feasible and more palatable. But we cannot put the cart before the horse. And that is what Spitzer is trying to do.

Again, I reiterate my point. We cannot have ANY kind of policy on this without CONTROL of it.

FK

It's not amnesty if the card can't be used for federal identification purposes.

Who is the "we" that must have control over the policy?

FK

And I do believe that Monica Crowley is ignorant. She simply calls the illegal immigrants criminals and points out that one man in some picture is wearing a shirt that says "Kiss My" with an arrow. She is not an effective writer and, despite her degrees and radio shows, has no understanding of the issues.

charlie

Senor 24/7,

Would you mind giving us the definition of IGNORANT, and CRIMINAL?

FK

I'll fulfill your requests, Charlie, when you try to communicate without being obnoxious, i.e., calling me "Senior 24/7" (when you are on here as much as I am, if not more).

Account Deleted

Sarah has to be aware that this would derail her high volume support from Conservatives throughout the Southwest,

where border security and illegal immigration are the #1 problem issues that has got them to feel that something must be done about it.

But even more important to them is to stop politicians like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and George Bush who in 2007 tried to push the

left leaning, liberal, and anti-American Kennedy-McCain Immigration Reform/Amnesty Bill.

Because this guys political views and the policies that he promotes are like screws loose for the people of the Southern border state of Arizona, and the US in general!

The fact that he's been able to win 5 times
tells you that he's got some really big $$$ and political connections.

But look at what just happened in Massachusetts for there to be some hope!

The left leaning, liberal, and anti-American Kennedy-McCain Immigration Reform/Amnesty Bill was drafted in 2007.

The bill was defeated in the US Congress in that same year, but will always be pushed as long as McCain is in the US Senate.

The bill in 2007 had a very costly projected $$$ 3-5 trillion $$$ ( could have been more like $$$ 7-10 trillion $$$ ) cost for US taxpayers over 20 years.

That would have given at least the estimated
11,000,000 illegal/aliens/immigrants in the US at the time, Amnesty and the fast track to US Citizenship.

Plus any amount more of them on top of the 11,000,000 estimated amount, that actually were in the US at the time that the bill was drafted.

For example, after passing the bill if there were actually 20,000,000 illegal alien/immigrants who came out of the woodwork in the US,

to sign up for the Kennedy-McCain Amnesty/fast track to US Citizenship program, and not just the
estimated 11,000,000 at that time,they would have all according to the bill that they drafted and pushed hard for,

been eligible for
the Amnesty and fast track to US Citizenship program too, and the cost of the bills program would have then been more like $$$ 7-10 trillion $$$ over 20 years!

They would have also been able to bring 1,000,000's more of their relatives to the US as their legal US guest residents!

But you have to be careful how you word your attacks on that and all of his loony left wing policies,

because the first thing they'll do in response is try to label you as a racsist, bigot, or something like that,

and also give you the whole left wing liberal Democrat, fake phony fraud RINO-CINO George Bush, John McCaine, and Lindsey Graham type;

"not politically correct accusation treatment".

So you have to plan what you're going to
say and then how you'll respond to their multiple choice of pre-planned

comebacks and difficult to get out of politically correct accusations,

with something very good that they don't
expect, that also gets the majority of the Independents, Republicans, and Conservatives in Arizona and the US,

to see through their politically correct rhetoric, and start believing in and supporting your side of the issues, and your Conservative candidacy.

Stick to the issues and don't dishonor
him with personal attacks and you'll have gotten past one of the main traps,

that his campaign will probably have set, and is counting on for you to fall into!

How ironic that a Republican Senator who has too many times shown himself to be a left leaning liberal moderate Republican RINO-CINO,

who was teamed up with ultra liberal Teddy Kennedy to pass such a left leaning, liberal, and anti-American illegal alien/immigrant/immigration bill.

Would be endorsed by a widely accepted so called Conservative Republican spokesperson/leader right after the amazing and highly needed victory in Massachusetts, by a Conservative Republican, who then soon thereafter, also is duped into supporting John McCain!!!

I saw that she would end up being a George Bush $$$ type RINO-CINO and US sellout not too long ago. She's going for the big corporate $$$ type RINO-CINO GOP support and endorsements.

Along with the always present huge personal profits $$$ when you sell out the US and its people to the big corporations, like George Rino-Cino Bush did during his 2 terms as US President.

Scott Brown is probably just misguided and falling for the the 2 phonies Palin and McCain.

He probably feels that McCain is a war hero so of course I'll endorse him.

Or the big corporations $$$ got to him already and have tricked him into this!

I say tricked because I have never even read about him yet, and I am giving him the benefit of the doubt at this time.

I promise you He will be getting a copy of all of my commemnts about the left leaning, liberal, and anti-American Kennedy-McCain illegal alien/immigrant/immigration/Amnesty reform bill.

But Scott Brown was saying that he was all against that kind of anti-American, left wing, liberal, Democratic, and bad economic immigration policies!

What's up with that

???

Here is a list of some of the unbelievable damaging, Anti-American, USA destroying, unsecure borders/illegal alien/immigrants/immigration give it all away US politicians legislation;

that has been done to our country when Bill Clinton was president and John McCain was the border state of AZ US Senator and a leading outspoken US Senator!

1. Section 245(i) The Amnesty of 1994 – a temporary rolling amnesty for 578,000 illegal aliens.

2. Section 245(i) The Extension Amnesty of 1997 – an extension of the rolling amnesty created in 1994.

3. Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NA­SCARA) Amnesty of 1997 – An amnesty for close to one million illegal aliens from Central America.

4. Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA) of 1998 -- An amnesty for 125,000 illegal aliens from Haiti.

5. Late Amnesty of 2000 – An amnesty for illegal aliens who claim they should have been amnestied under the 1986 IRCA amnesty, an estimated 400,000 illegal aliens.

6. Life Amnesty of 2000 – A reinstatement of the rolling Section 245(i) amnesty that legalized an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens.

Thats Amnesty people!!!

That was given to 3,000,000 illegal alien/immigrant criminal invaders through US legislation!

All of the children born to these 3,000,000 illegal alien/immigrant criminal invaders,

and all of the children born to the 15-30,000,000 undocumented illegal alien/immigrant criminal invaders

while they were allowed to stay here for so long by our wonderful, masterful, highly ethical, reliable, and responsible politicians,

who are always watching out for the US-American peoples best interest,

were given automatic citizenship on the spot, thanks to our wonderful, masterful, highly ethical, reliable,

and responsible politicians who are always watching out for the US-American peoples best interest !!!

Right???

Savage says that he should leave us all alone with his unappreciated liberal wandering ways, and to go and open up a Buick dealership, so that we can all be happy!

John McCain, We all like and care about you because of your heroic bravery when you fought for this country.

But really, can you do us all a big favor and let one of the Conservative Republicans from Arizona fight for your states right to be a normal American state,

and not a Mexican-Central-South-American-foreign national enclave/stronghold/invasion platform from within our own once great country!

Marcos

Monica, that's how you compared all illegal immigrants based on a t-shirt worn by a person? So based on your process of analysis, I should believe every white person is closed-bigoted like you. Thanks God, I am not like you, and judge a person individually and not where is from.

Afraid of stop living in your little white world?

The comments to this entry are closed.