« A Really Inconvenient Truth | Main | Spitzer spits on us »

October 23, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452132569e200e54f10ddd28834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Lesson of Bill:

Comments

FK

Perhaps you could explain why you think it would be such a terrible thing if Hillary Clinton was the candidate.

charlie

Monica,

I wouldn't underestimate Hillary. Even though her performance and achievements as a senator have been dismal, she has a trump card. She is a woman!!

Logic almost always takes a back seat to emotion. If the guys begin throwing power punches at her, it will give the impression that they're abusers beating up on a weak, helpless woman. Remember Lazio?
On the other hand, she cannot be given a free pass.
A huge chunk of wisdom and diplomacy is going to be needed to pull this one off.

Why don't you or Laura enter the race? Then no one will complain when the fur starts flying.

FK

Since when has being a woman been an advantage? If it is an advantage, that would explain why the last 43 presidents have been women. Oh, wait . . . they haven't!

charlie

Comrade Freddo,

Can't blame you for not getting my point.

You try to pass yourself off as logical and objective, but you libs are all the same. Your one-track minds can only operate in the way you've been programmmed.

FK

And you are being a typical conservative . . . calling me a "liberal" as if you've found a witch without backing up your position. Somehow just using the word "liberal" is supposed to win the argument.

charlie

Comrade Freddo (A/K/A Jacko),

You are a self-admitted liberal. Because of your loss of cells, I wouldn't expect you to remember.

I must congratulate the spammer for sabotaging your mind. You are now totally paronoid and non compos mentis.

FK

I don't deny being a liberal. What I am saying to you is that calling me a liberal with a derisive tone does not win the argument for you. You have to do more than that, like actually support your arguments.

Now, just to be clear, because you made the same accusation before the new system was implemented in the blog: I am not Jack; I am a different peson.

Also note: I am not paranoid. This blog is not the center of my life. If it gets too annoying, I'll blow it off.

charlie

Comrade Freddo/Jacko,

So you admit being a LIBERAL, but you do not like it to sound derisive. You would rather we sugarcoat it with words like 'sweetheart' and 'honeybunch'.

BTW, are you a woman? If you are, then pardon me for being rough on you. Except for the harpy, I don't believe in lambasteing females--even though they are rabid libs.

FK

You clearly use the word "liberal" as a derisive term, Charlie/Pierpont. It's your use of it, not my interpretation of it, that makes it derisive. And you compound it by referring to me as "Comrade" and, for some reason, "Jacko", as if I am Jack's alter ego (though, as I recall, you are the one who takes on his identity occasionally).

The problem here is that you are an a##hole.

J. Pierpont Finch

Only a TOTAL FOOL would believe that CHARLIE and PIERPONT are not two separate unique individuals with unique points of view.

FK

OK, Charlie/Pierpont. If there are two of you, then each of you is an a##-half, making one complete a##hole.

FK

OK, Charlie/Pierpont. If there are two of you, then each of you is an a##-half, making one complete a##hole.

charlie

There goes the classy gent with his profanity again.

Can't hide your true colors, can you? Once a lowlife, always a lowlife.

The comments to this entry are closed.