« Musings from Michael Dukakis ?!? | Main | Fred Does Jimmy »

August 24, 2007

Comments

Tom TB

I'd love to see a debate between Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Michelle Obama, then between William Clinton, and Barak Obama!

Chuck in Albany

Dear Monica,

Please call me at the number provided on the email. I'd like to discuss the real facts surrounding Jack's abuse of this blog for the past few years. His aliases are legion as can be verified by IP analysis in cooperation with the webmaster, and does show that he has systematically attempted to undermine this website by a variety of techniques. All of them however are based on Lies and among the most unwholesome of Left Wing motivations. His postings as a whole are anything but legitimate. They attempt to discredit conservatives, feign support for unpopular liberal policies that he personally agrees with, and clog this wonderful website with so much garbage that most normal people would avoid it, thereby frustrating your purpose in having a blog. If your purpose in hosting a site is education on a higher scale, then you will certainly need to prohibit participation by the likes of one Jack Flynn. His fanatical objectives are intended to obstruct any decent American from a fair hearing of the Conservative Message that you would endorse.

I will provide you with all the research that you need to prove Jack is the source of the problem. Many of us have attempted to speak out against his obvious unworthy gamesmanship but so far have not received the appropriate recognition and attention from your office. We would appreciate your due consideration ASAP. The success of the website now hangs by a skinny thread because of this unsavory character. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, Chuck.

Chuck in Albany

To TomTB and All Conservative bloggers,

Please witness this incredible piece of tortured logic which was penned by the hand of Jack Flynn just yesterday:


There has never been a working model of Communism in the world to this point. Unfortunately, they never got beyond the Dictatorship of the proletariat.
But who could disagree with,
a decentralized democracy,
and
"To each, according to his need.
From each according to his abilities."

Posted by: Jack Flynn | August 24, 2007 at 05:39 PM

http://monicamemo.typepad.com/weblog/2007/08/a-sudden-change.html

It is clear that Jack is a well-known supporter of Hillary Clinton. It is also obvious that Jack or Jol, or whomever he is posting as lately, represents the lunatic fringe of the political world. With no understanding of economics or any practical grasp of the incentive motivation of individuals, Jack and his liberal friends appear to celebrate a complete vacuum in factual assimilation. I ask you how on earth do we educate such a confounding mental disaster that is represented by Jack and his kind? In the same breath, he discounts the workability of Communism and then endorses one of Marxism's Central Tenets.

I am at a loss for words. Please, please can one of you conservatives out there offer me some reassurance. Tell me he is not serious. Tell me I am wrong about him. Tell me, please, that nobody can be this stupid. Tell me its not possible. --- The only conclusion a person could reach by such a non-sequitur, would be that in the past, Communistic models have just not been applied properly -- but that we just need to keep trying. He is holding out the possibility that if we just did it better, it might still all work out like Marx had hoped.

Please God help us. Surely, this is some kind of bad joke. Nobody is this dumb. How, God, can anybody have lived through the last 40 or 50 years of Earth history and still subscribe to Communist rhetoric? How could anybody have knowledge of the murderous result of Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Min, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong-il, the failure of European Socialism, the fall of the USSR and its satellites, the financial hocus-pocus foisted on the US under FDR, the massive inflation of the 1970s, the rejection of Hillary Health Care, and the utter disaster of Central Planning by socialist philosophy Central Banking Institutions, and STILL think some form of Collectivism or Marxist application can work?

I am stunned, bewildered, disenchanted and disgusted. I cry out to my Lord for an answer to this Paradox which exists in ignorance of all common sense and reason. Can you help me, my fellow conservatives? Will you offer me one olive branch or fig leaf of hope, a few words of sane, moral discourse?.. For it is the Sabbath and I wish to go forward with a newly inspired heart.

Jack Flynn

Monica,
"Chuck in Albany" is your spammer.
Good luck in dealing with him.
I suggest you do call that fool and you will see just what kind of unstable mind you are dealing with, but I don't think he likes free speech, so be careful.
On second thought, for your own protection, you should have someone else make that call. When cornered, like any rat, he could be dangerous.

gringoman

HITTING SPAMMERS WHERE THEY'RE VULNERABLE:

Between July 1 and the end of the year, spam jumped to nearly 60 percent of all e-mail traffic monitored by Symantec, and many administrators say it makes up an even greater percentage of e-mail now.

Spam filtering is not the answer, said Garth Bruen, who runs a volunteer project focused on taking down the Web sites run by spammers. Bruen tracks down the ISPs and domain name registrars used by spammers and arranges to have their sites shut down.

"This problem is not going to go away if you ignore it. Blocking and filtering is just a jacked-up technological form of ignoring," he said. "What you want to do is report it and make it difficult for these people to exist on the Net and do their transactions."

Earlier this month, researchers at the University of California, San Diego, endorsed Bruen's position, saying that anti-spam fighters could really hurt the spammers' bottom lines by targeting their Web sites.

This seems plausible to me.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/08/24/Spam-fighters-hit-criminals-weak-spot_1.html

Chuck in Albany

Monica is too smart to fall for Jack's unbridled manipulation. She's well
aware of how Liberals will stoop to any lying manuever to achieve political
dominance. Its nice to know where Monica's loyalties reside and its surely
not with Jack and his paranoid fantasies.

Here is the only spammer on this blog and his name is Jack Flynn. When
the lights go on, just watch how this cockeroach scrambles for the exit:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmTnHSq4Eds


gringoman

Hey Monica,

That Fred Train is now pickin' up steam and chuggin' away. Can you hear it, Monica, comin' 'round the bend? It's comin'. Give a listen. Chug-a-chug-a-chug-a-chug-chug-chug. Hear it? Won't be long now. Early September. It's comin', Monica. If you can't hear it yet, just keep those ears perked up.

Now, would you care to give some sort of time frame for when you believe that train's coal fire will go out and be removed from the tracks, making way for your smooth, clean-cut Manager Man's Bullet Train?

Chuck in Albany

By the way, I notice how Gringoman posted his "spam article"
right after Jack's garbage post. I wonder if Jack can take a hint?
Just because a conservative doesn't fight with him, does not
mean he is ignorant of Jack's ploys. Its nice to know the ranks
of those who are tiring of his internet games is growing.

Thanks for weighing in, Gringoman.

Jack Flynn

He's looking for a job, Monica

Chuck in Albany

Jack the Spammer Propagandist said:

Hey Chuck, Hillary isn't Satan. I am.
BOO!

Posted by: Jack Flynn | August 25, 2007 at 04:26 PM

Hey Chuck, now that you know who I am, why don't you stop messing up this blog and come onto my website and we'll have it out. Just comment on any post and we'll take it from there—as down and dirty as you want pal. Only stop your s##t on this blog. Monica doesn't deserve it. Nor does anyone else here.

Posted by: Jack Flynn | August 25, 2007 at 04:35 PM
-----

This is really funny, Jack. You are concerned with this blog. That's hilarious. You go out of your way to destroy what Monica has created here but now you want to blame your work on others. That's really rich.

Let me ask you something. Why would I want to go to your blog? Why would anyone want to go to your blog? Your blog is the Air America of the internet and even less. I bet nobody goes to your blog. I haven't been there and wouldn't know how to get there, but I bet nobody ever posts anything on your blog except you. Nobody reads it and nobody cares what you have to say. This is why you come here. You are pissed that nobody gives a flying crap what you think. And you try to force your views on the rest of us, as if we have some obligation to listen to your half-baked malarkey. When nobody here will agree with you, you invent characters to offer support for your BS views and pretend they are real folks, "legitimate posters" as you like to call them. But its all you. You and your WACKED OUT Point of View. Now you are mad at poor Chuck for discovering your angry little propaganda game. Oh, woe is me!

Hey, we don't have to listen to it. Too bad you're mad. Thats tough bananas, Jack. But don't try to lay your guilt trips on me. I don't owe you a thing, not even
my spit. But you know I do agree with one thing you said: You ARE Satan. At least it seems you've taken him into your spirit, which is a shame. Its a waste because you might have been a contributor here, if you were not such a Raving Lunatic.

Chuck in Albany

Maybe Hillary has a job for poor old Jack, since his blog isn't working out so well. I hear they need some more boot lickers down there. Or maybe he could apply for butt kisser.

Niel

Hey Chuck, there is a message for you over at "Musings from Michael Dukakis"

Jack Flynn

"He's a real nowhere man
Sitting in his nowhere land
Making all his nowhere plans for nobody"

The Beetles


Until you realize that you are nothing
the possibility does not exist for you to become
something.

My good Mom used to say, "Make something out of your self." So I created myself in my own image.
Satan loves me, says I am a vast valley of
temptation. God loves me as well, says I am on the right track to heaven.


On and on the battle raged, into the night, the dawn, the day, the evening and into the night again the bombs rained down. We covered our children's eyes and ears and prayed over and over for it to stop.

Do we want to live that way?

Why do we make Iraqi and Afghan children live that way?

While there is still light in our children's eyes, we must end the death and destruction. Otherwise they may live, but they will live in permanent fear and darkness of spirit.

As a generation, do we want to leave that legacy?

Jack Flynn

LET ME MAKE IT PERFECTLY CLEAR:

WE ARE HURTING IN IRAQ, NOT HELPING.

Fred Klein

Jack, I can no longer cover for you anymore. You need a doctor. Please get help.

Even your love muffin, Hillary Clinton says things are going better in Iraq.

Bottom Line

"When one lie doesn't work, try three!"

-- Jack Flynn

Bottom Line

"My good Mom used to say, "Make something out of your self." So I created
myself in my own image. Satan loves me.."

-- Jack Flynn


THAT JUST ABOUT SAYS IT ALL

Bottom Line

"Until you realize that you are nothing
the possibility does not exist for you to become
something."

-- Jack Flynn


WELL, AT LEAST HE ACHIEVED THE FIRST PART. VERY CONVINCING.
WE LOVE BEING CONDESCENDED TO BY A MORON.

BUT THIS ONE FITS ..........

"Well on his way, his head in a cloud,
The man of a thousand names, talking perfectly loud.
But nobody ever hears him,
Or the sound he appears to make.
And he never seems to notice .....

And nobody seems to like him,
They can tell what he wants to do."

-- Adapted from The Beatles


Jack Flynn

"wink" I just heard a lovely song over the radio. The tuning was scratchy but I think I caught most of it:

Monica Lisa, Monica Lisa, men have named you
You’re so like the lady with the mystic smile
Is it only cause you’re lonely they have blamed you?
For that Monica Lisa strangeness in your smile?

Do you smile to tempt a lover, Monica Lisa?
Or is this your way to hide a broken heart?
Many dreams have been brought to your doorstep
They just lie there and they die there
Are you warm, are you real, Monica Lisa?
Or just a cold and lonely lovely work of art.

Jack Flynn

Is there no tenderness on this blog?

Is there no humor on this blog?

Are there any humans on this blog?

or is it all dusky opinion and argument.

Have you ever tasted peace, or peace of mind?

Yes, Al Quaeda is out there,
But why do you compound the threat
by inviting its dark spirit into your hearts?


Jack Flynn

A "wolf in sheep's clothing Spammer?
Or simply one man's version of moonlight,
equal to your own?

You are constitutionally incapable of agreeing with that aren't you spammer?
That would put you on an equal plane with other humans wouldn't it, and that
you are too superior to abide, aren't you?

You are in your own eyes "the catcher in the rye",
The only American left—the lone voice and bulwark against infiltration by leftist troublemakers communists and infidels.

Aren't you spammer?


Jack Flynn

Yes, I will admit, I am in love with Monica Crowley,
in an archetypal sort of way.
Monica happens to have one of those beautiful faces that men project upon.
Each man creates his own film on that face, his own story about being with
her—serving her, dominating her, lying, discussing and laughing with her, dancing slowly with her, smelling her hair and kissing her lovely lips, riding a bicycle with her, picnicking, swimming, smashing bumper cars, tossing a softball with her, going to a renaissance fair—an infinite supply of scenarios. It is what attracted Hepburn to Tracy. With all his defects, he offered her the comfort of his arms and unconditional love.

With some men it is sexual, with others, idealistic, and with some, both.
She may not even be aware that she has this quality or hindrance in her, but none-the-less the party goes on around her. It is a love-fest people have with one woman, like
Monica. . . or Hillary.

Monica possesses some of Hillary’s better qualities, such as her personableness and her basically friendly persona. Monica has more sex appeal, though even Hillary has a modicum of it, particularly to the older generation, which, (to toss in a non sequitor)”,
will be the key to the next election.
(Remember, Monica, I said it here.)

Hillary looks people directly in the eyes and grasps their hands like she means it.
I don’t know if Monica does that.
Both are relaxed and likable in interviews.
They know what to say and ask. They are very precise about that, and rarely make public mistakes.
Monica is more hypercritical and takes more chances.
Both have contempt for their lower half, (not their husbands), their bellies, navels, hips , legs, ankles feet and toes.
Maybe they got stuck with peasant ankles. That can happen to the best of us.
It might only be their navel and/or toes, but they both throw the baby out with the bath on that one.
Hillary has a rather definitive rump.
Monica’s, I’ve never seen, but I’m sure it is more artistically designed.

Hillary is less passive when around important people she respects or disrespects.

Monica hates to ask the difficult questions to people she likes and Hillary does that with relative ease.

Both are excellent debaters, but Monica is far ahead in enunciation.

Monica punches a lot of words to emphasize her various points, while Hillary works in longer phrases before she punches.

Both are very forceful individuals and excellent at getting their points across.

A debate between them would be astounding and scintillating.

I think that Monica should challenge Hillary to a debate at a neutral university.
And keep challenging her in the media until she will look weak if she refuses.
She should not pull punches. Challenge her outright with TV Ads. Force her to respond, but only if she knows she can win.

I repeat. I am in love with Monica Crowley,
in an archetypal sort of way,

but I am voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yahoo

Somebody should call the authorities about this guy above. What does he call himself, Jack Flynn? - if that really is his name.

What is this thing he wrote? A suicide note or a love letter? Or maybe its a preamble to a Celebrity Stalking conviction. In any case the man needs help. It just goes to show you kids out there, why you should always go easy on the alcohol in those critical developmental years.

One day he hates Monica, next day he loves her. And then he throws Hillary in the Veggematic for these erotic comparisons to Monica? Imagine sticking your nose in Hillary's hair - You want me to lose my lunch?

Oh wait, I know .... this is some kind of Marketing scheme for Hillary. He's using Pavlovian conditioning by pairing Hillary (the dog) with Monica (his stimulant). Pair them enough times, and then every time you see Hillary, you feel like Monica just walked in. What a great idea. But the thing he forgot is the Extinction phenomenon. After a great number of pairings, the association fades. So then all you are left with is Hillary and no matter how many times you stick your nose in that mop of hers, its never going to be Monica. How unfortunate.

Someone should get this guy in a private conversation with Bill Clinton. Have him ask Bill why he steps out on Hillary if she's such a sexpot? Reality is so much more cruel than fantasy, is it not? Very cruel, indeed.

Well, isn't this just like Life? Often the image does not match the goods. What a buzz killer. Its probably at this point the love letter morphs into the suicide note. Dreams are great .. right up until you wake and find yourself in bed with Hillary Clinton. Better keep the gun close to the night stand, pal.


Jack Flynn

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.
Do I bow to genius or an idiot savant?
Where do I begin? The swelling prose? The clarity of the images? The analogies bathed in perfection? The cynical bite of humor?
The best prose I have seen on here.
KUDOS pal.

Oh, about what you say.

That's bulls##t

Jack Flynn

I did not post the inane gibberish above at 1:45 PM. It was the Spammer who goes by the name Inka Dinka Doo.

Jack Flynn

UGH! I would be privileged to share bed, body and breakfast with Hillary Clinton. It would be like Lady Contessa and the APE man. UGH! UGH! UGH!
Thump! thump! thump!
Darn. Now I have given away that well kept democratic secret about Dean's Yiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.
He had been pulled out of a Hillary fantasy to speak at the podium.

They'll probably kick me out of the party for this.


Jack Flynn

"I did not post the inane gibberish above at 1:45 PM. It was the Spammer who goes by the name Inka Dinka Doo."


YES I DID, yes indeed, Inkblot. Yes indeed.

J. Garcia Flynn

DARK STAR (the Monica Crowley version)

"Dark star crashes, pouring its light into ashes.
Reason tatters, the forces tear Jack loose from the axis.
Searchlight casting for faults in the clouds of delusion.
Shall we go, Monica and I while we can
Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds?

Mirror shatters in formless reflections of matter.
Glass hand dissolving to ice petal flowers revolving.
Lady in velvet recedes in the nights of good-bye.
Shall we go, Jack and I while we can
Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds?"


J. Garcia Flynn

Who said there is no tenderness on this blog? Who said there is no humanity?


This is not the definitive version but see if you like it ....

http://mikesware.com:8081/mp3/Grateful%20Dead/Fillmore%20East%202-11-69/12%20-%20Dark%20Star.mp3

Jack Flynn

It is definitive enough for me. Great! Like Tibetan bells, wash the mind clean. Takes anger away.
Thanks
J

PETE

FOR ALL OF THE POSTERS (and their various Moniker incarnations) who support the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES.

8/24/07: Tax Cuts Could Be Hurting Rich

http://www.newsmax.com/inside_cover/Rich_Tax_Cuts/2007/08/24/27182.html

Contrary to the commonly held belief that the Bush tax cuts slashed the tax burden on the richest Americans, they have actually had the reverse effect.

The richest 1 percent, 5 percent and 10 percent of U.S. taxpayers are accounting for a larger percentage of the federal income tax burden than tax estimators say they would have if the 2003 tax cuts had not been implemented, according to an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 35.7 of federal income taxes in 2004, while they would have paid 30.5 percent without the tax cuts.

The richest 5 percent paid 56.2 percent in 2004, compared to 50.2 percent without the cuts.

Preliminary data from 2005 tells a similar story – Americans earning more than $1 million paid $236 billion in income taxes, up from $132 billion in 2003, the year of the cuts. That was a 78 percent increase in taxes paid by millionaire households

yada yada yada!

THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EFFECTS WILL LIKELY WORK IN REVERSE (ie the rich will benefit) IF THE ECONOMIC ILLITERATE DEMOCRATS NOW PROPOSING TO HIKE TAXES HAVE THEIR WAY after the 2008 election.

Pete is JACK FLYNN

THIS CONTINUOUS BLOG ABUSE BY THE SCURRILOUS DEFAMER AND
HOMOSEXUALITY PROMOTOR WHO GOES BY THE NAME "JACK FLYNN"
MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED!

The comments to this entry are closed.